Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T18:45:23.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Onset of Glaciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas J. Crowley
Affiliation:
Applied Research Corporation, 305 Arguello Drive, College Station, TX 77840, U.S.A.
Gerald R. North
Affiliation:
Climate System Research Program, Department of Meteorology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that climate has varied between ice-free and glaciated states, with transitions often marked by abrupt steps. We summarize some modeling studies that have attempted to explain elements of the long-term trend and discuss a particular model for abrupt transitions that involves instabilities due to albedo discontinuities at the snow/ice edge.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1990
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The deep-sea 18O record for the last 100 million years (Ma). The long-term trend is thought to reflect cooling in high latitudes. Note that abrupt steps mark the long-term trend. 18O record after Douglas ard Woodruff (1981).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Postulated Paleozoic apparent polar wander paths of the South Pole with respect to Gondwanaland. Dashed line indicates alternate path based on different data sources. Numbers in parentheses are ages in Ma. (From Crowley and others, 1987; adapted from Morel and Irving, 1978.)

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Modeled summer temperature at the South Pole for different positions of an idealized supercontinent (see inset), based on seasonal two-dimensional energy balance model calculations. Heavy line represents temperatures for the present orbital configuration. Variations around this value represent changes in forcing compatible with the maximum changes in orbital configurations for the Pleistocene (highest points, “hot summer” orbit; lowest points, “cool summer” orbit). Diagonal striping marks the postulated region of parameter space affected by glaciation if ice-albedo feedback were included. (From Crowley and others, 1987.)

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Schematic graph of equilibrium solutions of an energy balance model with ice-albedo feedback. The dependent variable is the ice-cap radius and the independent variable is the solar constant (or carbon dioxide) increasing to the right. (From North and Crowley, 1985.)

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Example of the length scale effect as modeled in both EBMs and the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory general circulation model (GFDL-GCM). For both experiments a “point sink” of heat — northern hemisphere ice sheet — was inserted as a lower boundary condition. Note the limited area affected by the perturbation, and that the far-field response is similar in both the EBM and GCM. GCM results from Broccoli and Manabe (1987); figure from Hyde and others (1989).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Seasonal snow-line distribution vs time of year, as calculated with nonlinear energy balance model with idealized geography. Shaded area denotes land. Q/Q0 refers to proportional changes in effective solar forcing. Note that changes in forcing of 0.0001 can result in seasonally ice-free states and that there is a tendency for “clustering” of instabilities over a relatively small range of parameter space (see text). (From Lin and North, 1989.)