Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T12:20:08.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Holocene paleohydrology from alpine lake sediment, Emerald Lake, Wasatch Plateau of central Utah, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2022

Lesleigh Anderson*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
Gary Skipp
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
Laura Strickland
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
Jeff Honke
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
Jeremy Havens
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
D. Paco VanSistine
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver CO
*
*Corresponding author email address: <land@usgs.gov>
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Holocene sediments at Emerald Lake in central Utah (3090 m asl) document the paleohydroclimatic history of the western Upper Colorado River headwater region. Multi-proxy analyses of sediment composition, mineralogy, and stable isotopes of carbonate (δ18O and δ13C) show changes in effective moisture for the past ca. 10,000 years at millennial to decadal timescales. Emerald Lake originated as a shallow, closed-basin cirque pond during the Early Holocene. By ca. 7000 cal yr BP, higher lake levels and carbonate δ18O values indicate rising effective moisture and higher proportions of summer precipitation continued at least until ca. 5500 cal yr BP when a landslide entered the lake margin. Between ca. 4500 and 2400 cal yr BP dry conditions at Emerald Lake envelop the timing of the ‘Late Holocene Dry Period’ identified at lower elevations. For the past ca. 2500 years, Emerald Lake δ18O values were relatively low, indicating wetter conditions and higher snow input (compared to rain), except for dry periods at ca. 2000 cal yr BP and during the Medieval Climate Anomaly at ca. 1000 and ca. 500 cal yr BP. Results provide a long-term perspective on precipitation extremes that influence regional water supplies from a snow-dominated catchment typical of the predominant source region for the Upper Colorado River.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2022
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the Emerald Lake study area (red box) within the Muddy Creek watershed in the southern Wasatch Plateau, central Utah, on a colored digital elevation model. The inset shows the area's location in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCB) in relation to the White River Plateau in northwest Colorado, Garden Basin Fen (GBF) and Torrey soils, discussed in the text. North-south normal faults (black lines) were mapped by Witkind et al. (2006) and are shown for the area only within the U.S. Geological Survey Manti 30′x 60′quadrangle.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Expanded view of study area from Figure 1 of the Emerald Lake watershed with topography and surface water, ice-extent (Larson, 1996), faults and geologic units (Witkind et al., 2006), landslides (orange), and rockfall (purple) (McDonald and Giraud, 2015).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Emerald Lake imagery. (A) Oblique view (Digital Globe), (B) overhead (aerial photography), and (C) ground view and core locations A/C and D (photo credit, Lesleigh Anderson). The modern shoreline in (A) is outlined in dark blue. The landslide into the lake is outlined in (A) and (B) with yellow, and the inferred pre-landslide extent of the shallow marl bench is outlined in light blue. The location of the ground view is shown by a green star in (A) and (B). The transect A-A’ refers to the schematic block diagram in Figure 9.

Figure 3

Table 1. Emerald Lake, Utah, radiocarbon data.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Emerald Lake water column measurements (A) and (B) lake water isotope ratios shown with nearby Utah plateau lakes that form a local evaporation line (LEL) with a lower slope than the global and local meteoric water lines (GMWL, LMWL). The LMWL is by Friedman et al. (2002b). DO = dissolved oxygen; Spc = specific conductivity.

Figure 5

Table 2. Aqueous and isotopic geochemistry of Emerald Lake, Utah.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Core D lithologic units, bulk magnetic susceptibility (black) and dry bulk density (brown), percent inorganic carbon (%CaCO3, red) and organic matter (%OM, blue), and the age-depth model. Age control points are shown in black with 1σ error bars. Omitted ages are shown in gray. Red outlines denote the 95% confidence limits of the age model.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Core D carbonate δ18O and δ13C (dolomite-normalized, note reversed δ13C axis) shown with abundances of calcite, dolomite (purple), and quartz (orange) plotted against age (cal yr BP). Percentages of dolomite indicate detrital influence on calcite abundance and are used to normalize the carbonate isotope values. Mineral abundances are normalized by percent carbonate using coulometric values of Total Inorganic Carbon (TIC).

Figure 8

Figure 7. Sediment associations for (A) organic matter and carbonate abundances, core D in solid black, core A/C in open red. (B) Core D percent carbonate and carbonate δ18O (dolomite normalized), and (C) carbonate δ18O and δ13C (dolomite normalized) grouped by detrital mineral abundance (higher in open orange) and inferred lake level.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Stratigraphic variations in sediment composition for core A/C (left, 8 m water depth) and core D (middle, 1.3 m water depth) with chronological lake level interpretations (right). All units are in percent for carbonate (red, CaCO3), organic matter (black, OM), and, for core D, detrital dolomite (purple), and quartz (orange).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the Emerald Lake basin across A-A' (Fig. 3C) showing the lake and watershed processes affected by the landslide at the core A/C and D locations. During a wet period with rising lake levels (ca. 5500 cal yr BP), a landslide moved down the unstable cirque hillslope and entered the lake, moving towards the core D location and reducing the lake's volume. Stratification of the lake's water column led to higher sedimentary carbonate abundances above the thermocline, producing marl benches (light blue water color) rich in Chara (green algae). Less carbonate accumulated below the thermocline (dark blue) because carbonate dissolved while settling through the water column. Lake stratification strengthened with higher lake levels and weakened with lower lake levels.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Regional record comparison between latitude 37° and 40°N from low-elevation western sites (left, 114.5°W, eastern Nevada) to high-elevation eastern sites (right, 107°W, western Colorado). Inferred wet and dry periods at Stonehouse Meadow (1910 m elevation; Mensing et al., 2013); δ18O anomalies at Lower Pahranagat Lake (975 m elevation; Theissen et al., 2019). Emerald Lake (red, this study) in central Utah (3090 m elevation) with periods of low lake levels indicated by orange shaded boxes to the right of the vertical Holocene average and high lake levels in green to the left, and Yellow and Bison lakes (3140 m and 3255 m elevation, respectively; Anderson, 2011, 2012; Anderson et al., 2016a, 2016b), which indicate a precipitation transition from summer monsoon to winter ENSO/PDO regimes. LIA = Little Ice Age, MCA = Medieval Climate Anomaly.

Supplementary material: File

Anderson et al. supplementary material

Table S1 and Figures S1-S4

Download Anderson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.6 MB