Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T12:11:31.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does the Options Market Underreact to Firms’ Left-Tail Risk?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2024

Bei Chen
Affiliation:
Shanghai International Studies University School of Business and Management beichen.finance@shisu.edu.cn
Quan Gan*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney Business School
Aurelio Vasquez
Affiliation:
ITAM Business School aurelio.vasquez@itam.mx
*
quan.gan@sydney.edu.au (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We show that firms’ left-tail risk positively predicts future returns of crash insurance. We proxy crash insurance with bear spreads, an option trading strategy that profits when extreme negative returns occur. Crash insurance for high (low) left-tail risk firms earns positive (negative) returns, suggesting that the downside protection it provides is not adequately priced. Our results are mainly explained by two types of underreaction: volatility underreaction in high left-tail risk portfolios and underreaction to the persistence of left-tail risk. Disagreement partially explains our results, but a risk-based approach does not.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material
Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 264 KB