Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T14:23:13.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current eating disorder healthcare services – the perspectives and experiences of individuals with eating disorders, their families and health professionals: systematic review and thematic synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2019

Gemma Johns*
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, School of Medicine, Swansea University, UK
Bridget Taylor
Affiliation:
Retired Psychiatric Nurse and currently a Lay Representative, Department of Medicine, Swansea University, UK
Ann John
Affiliation:
Professor in Public Health and Psychiatry, Population Psychiatry, Suicide and Informatics, Swansea University Medical School, UK
Jacinta Tan
Affiliation:
Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Swansea University, UK
*
Correspondence: Gemma Johns, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK. Email: gemma.johns@swansea.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of mental disorders and a high incidence of morbidity, but if diagnosed and treated promptly individuals can benefit from full recovery. However, there are numerous problems at the healthcare interface (i.e. primary and secondary care) for eating disorders. It is important to examine these to facilitate appropriate, seamless treatment and improve access to specialist care.

Aims

To examine the current literature on the experiences and perspectives of those across healthcare interfaces for eating disorders, to include individuals with eating disorders, people close to or caring for those with eating disorders such as family and friends, and health professionals.

Method

To identify relevant papers, a systematic search of electronic databases was conducted. Other methods, including hand-searching, scanning reference lists and internet resources were also used. Papers that met inclusion criteria were analysed using a systematic methodology and synthesised using an interpretative thematic approach.

Results

Sixty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was relatively good. The included papers were of both qualitative (n = 44) and quantitative studies (n = 24) and were from ten different countries. By synthesising the literature of these papers, three dominant themes were identified, with additional subthemes. These included: ‘the help-seeking process at primary care’; ‘expectations of care and appropriate referrals’ and ‘opposition and collaboration in the treatment of and recovery from eating disorders’.

Conclusions

This review identifies both facilitators and barriers in eating disorder healthcare, from the perspectives of those experiencing the interface first hand. The review provides recommendations for future research and practice.

Declaration of interest

None.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019
Figure 0

Table 1 Quality assessment score

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of selection of papers.

RQs, (a) What are the current facilitators and barriers across primary and secondary eating disorder healthcare services? (b) What conclusions can be drawn from the international literature to improve the healthcare services for eating disorders?
Figure 2

Fig. 2 Summary of themes.

Figure 3

(a)

Figure 4

(a)

Figure 5

(a)

Figure 6

(a)

Supplementary material: File

Johns et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Johns et al. supplementary material(File)
File 36.5 KB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.