Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T14:31:18.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why they shared: recovering early arguments for sharing social scientific data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Emily Hauptmann*
Affiliation:
Western Michigan University E-mail: emily.hauptmann@wmich.edu

Argument

Most social scientists today think of data sharing as an ethical imperative essential to making social science more transparent, verifiable, and replicable. But what moved the architects of some of the U.S.’s first university-based social scientific research institutions, the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research (ISR), and its spin-off, the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), to share their data? Relying primarily on archived records, unpublished personal papers, and oral histories, I show that Angus Campbell, Warren Miller, Philip Converse, and others understood sharing data not as an ethical imperative intrinsic to social science but as a useful means to the diverse ends of financial stability, scholarly and institutional autonomy, and epistemological reproduction. I conclude that data sharing must be evaluated not only on the basis of the scientific ideals its supporters affirm, but also on the professional objectives it serves.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable