Dizziness is a common presenting complaint to the emergency room (ER)Reference Kerber, Meurer, West and Fendrick 1 . Vertigo is one form of dizziness and can be divided, based on the timing of the symptoms, into episodic, acute constant, and chronic forms. Diagnosis and management of these patients in the ER is often inadequateReference Newman-Toker, Hsieh and Camargo 2 . For example, specific guidelines exist for the use of the Dix-Hallpike maneuver followed by a particle repositioning (Epley) maneuver in the diagnosis and treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)Reference Bhattacharyya, Baugh and Orvidas 3 . A recent population-based study has shown that these manoeuvres are underutilized in the ERReference Kerber, Burke and Skolarus 4 .
The acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is a form of acute, constant vertigo that can be benign or due to life threatening causes such as posterior fossa strokeReference Kattah, Talkad, Wang, Hsieh and Newman-Toker 5 . The head impulse test (HIT) is an evidenced based clinical tool that is used to differentiate between patients with benign and serious causes of the AVSReference Halmagyi and Curthoys 6 - Reference Weber, Aw and Todd 8 . A positive test occurs when a subject makes a voluntary corrective saccade to maintain fixation after passive head turning performed by the examiner. Guidelines have been published regarding its useReference Tarnutzer, Berkowitz and Robinson 9 . To our knowledge, there have been no studies investigating the utilization of the HIT in the ER.
We retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients who received a final diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo. Our goal was to identify the utilization rate of the head-impulse test. Secondary goals were to assess the use of the Dix-Hallpike Maneuver, the use of imaging, and stroke risk in these patients.
Methods
Study Population
We analyzed ER visits between January 1st 2011 and December 31st 2011 at the Jewish General Hospital, in Montreal QC Canada. The Jewish General Hospital is a 637 bed tertiary-care centre in Montreal affiliated with McGill University. There are approximately 67,000 ER visits annually. There are no neuro-otologists affiliated with the hospital, nor is there a referral bias for stroke, dizziness or vertigo patients that we are aware of. All ER visits with a final diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo based upon the International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9) coding system (780.4 and 386), were identified and included. Patients were excluded if a non-neurovestibular diagnosis (for example, syncope) was established immediately after the initial ER assessment. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Jewish General Hospital.
Data Collection
A Microsoft Access ® database of ER visits for dizziness or vertigo was created. Data abstraction was performed by one of the authors (TM) who was not blinded. The patients were grouped based on symptom duration into episodic, acute constant, or chronic categories based upon the initial treating physician’s assessment in the ER. “Episodic” was defined as recurrent episodes of vertigo each lasting less than one hour. “Acute constant” was arbitrarily defined as a sudden onset of constant vertigo lasting for less than two weeks prior to presentation to the ER. “Chronic” was defined as constant vertigo lasting for more than two weeks.
The following information was abstracted independently from the ER physician and neurologist notes: presence of documented vascular risk factors, results of general neurology examination, eye movement examination, head impulse test, Dix-Hallpike maneuver, and tests of skew. The use and results of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was recorded. Imaging results were classified as “normal”, “abnormal but no change from previous”, “incidental findings”, “findings suggestive of posterior circulation ischemia or hemorrhage”, or “other relevant”. The final diagnosis was abstracted from the neurologist’s note, or the ER note when no neurological consultation was performed. If repeat ER visits occurred related to the same symptoms then the final diagnosis was used. Vestibular neuritis, vestibular neuropathy, labyrinthitis, and viral vestibulopathy were all grouped together as vestibular neuritis. BPPV, benign positional vertigo, and positional vertigo were grouped together as BPPV.
Results
We identified 1196 patients with a final diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo (Figure). From the latter, 10 charts were excluded due to illegibility of the notes. Of the remaining 1186, 544 did not have a vestibular diagnosis. Six hundred and forty-two patients with vertigo remained. This cohort was 60.3% female, with an average age of 63. Two hundred and forty-five patients were classified as episodic vertigo, 260 as acute constant vertigo, and 87 as chronic. For 50 patients, information regarding timing was unavailable.
Results of chart review of all emergency room visits in 2011 with a final diagnosis of vertigo.
Utilization of head impulse test (HIT)
The HIT was performed a total of 34 times in 31 of the 642 patients (5%) with vertigo. It was performed 24 times by neurologists (out of a total of 105 neurology consults done on the 642 total patients) and 10 times by ER physicians. It was performed in 8 of 245 (3%) episodic vertigo patients, in 19 of 260 (7%) acute constant vertigo patients, and in 4 of 87 (5%) chronic vertigo patients. The Table provides a breakdown of positive and negative HIT results by group and provides the final diagnoses.
The HIT is most appropriately used in the setting of acute constant vertigoReference Halmagyi and Curthoys 6 , Reference Weber, Aw and Todd 8 . For these patients, the HIT was negative in all 6 patients in whom it was performed who were diagnosed with stroke. It was positive in 6 of the 13 remaining cases in which it was performed. All 13 of these non-stroke, acute constant vertigo cases received a final diagnosis of peripheral vertigo (Table). The HIT results in stroke versus non-stroke acute constant vertigo cases did not reach statistical significance (Fisher exact test p=0.06).
Final diagnosis of 31 patients who had Head Impulse Testing (HIT) in the Emergency Room and received a discharge diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo. Patients are divided by subgroup of vertigo and result of HIT.
HIT=Head impulse test
BPPV=Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
Utilization of other bedside testing
In the episodic vertigo cases, the Dix-Hallpike maneuver was performed in 77 (31.4%) patients. The Epley maneuver was performed in 15.3% of patients diagnosed with BPPV.
Utilization of Imaging
A CT scan was performed in 76 of 245 (31.0%) episodic vertigo patients. None were found to have significant lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in three of these patients and none were found to have significant lesions. In the acute constant subgroup, 132 of 260 (50.8%) patients had CT scans with 5 (3.8%) having significant lesions, all ischemic stroke. Twenty-five (9%) patients had an MR imaging brain with 12 (48.0%) showing significant lesions. Fifty three of 87 chronic vertigo patients had a CT, with the only abnormality being an incidental orbital lesion on one CT.
Performing a CT scan extended the average time in ER from 4:25 to 9:16 hours (excluding the admitted stroke patients).
Risk of Stroke
The overall risk of stroke was 3.3% (21/642), with all strokes occurring in the acute constant subgroup (21/260, 8.1%). As noted, the HIT was negative in all six stroke patients in whom it was performed. A CT scan was positive in 5 of the 21 (2.4%) stroke patients. Magnetic resonance imaging was positive in 10 of the 15 stroke patients in whom it was performed.
Independent review of all 308 stroke admissions to the hospital in 2011 only identified a single additional patient who had presented with chronic vertigo but was not identified in our series of ER visits. (This case is not included among our 642 cases).
Discussion
Careful attention to both the history and the use of validated bedside tests can lead to appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients presenting to the ER with dizziness and vertigo. None of the patients with episodic or chronic vertigo in our study were diagnosed with stroke or other serious intracranial cause. Of the 21 patients presenting with acute constant vertigo who were diagnosed with stroke, the HIT was negative in each of the 6 patients in whom it was done while it was positive in 6 of 13 non-stroke cases. These findings agree with previous studiesReference Newman-Toker, Kattah, Alvernia and Wang 7 , Reference Tarnutzer, Berkowitz and Robinson 9 , Reference Chen, Lew, Chambers and Dewey 10 that patients presenting with acute, constant vertigo and a negative HIT have a much higher chance of stroke as a cause of their symptoms compared to other vertigo patients.
Unfortunately, this study clearly demonstrates that the head-impulse test (HIT) was under-utilized by both ER physicians and neurologists when evaluating patients presenting with acute constant vertigo in the emergency room. It was utilized in only 19 of 260 such cases. To our knowledge the utilization of the HIT has not been reported previously. We also found that the Dix-Hallpike maneuver was underutilized, being performed in only 31% of patients with episodic vertigo. This agrees with a previous US study in the United States (US), in which only 21.8% of patients diagnosed with BPPV underwent the Dix-Hallpike maneuverReference Kerber, Burke and Skolarus 4 . There are probably multiple reasons for the under-utilization of bedside tests such as the HIT. Physicians may be unaware of the test, lack confidence in performing it, or they may consider it to be too subjective and prefer to rely on their history. As the HIT is a simple and rapid test to administer it is unlikely that time was a factor.
The implication of more appropriate use of history and bedside testing are obvious. Computed tomography scanning was performed in 76 episodic vertigo and 53 chronic vertigo patients, with none showing a significant abnormality except for a single incidental orbital lesion. The low yield of CT scanning in this patient population agrees with previous studiesReference Kerber, Schweigler and West 11 , Reference Lawhn-Heath, Buckle, Christoforidis and Straus 12 . Avoiding imaging in these cases would have a direct cost savings and in our study would have reduced the average time spent in the ER by half. The utilization of CT head imaging was higher in our study (31% and 50% in the episodic and acute constant subgroups, respectively) compared to a US population study (25%)Reference Kerber, Meurer, West and Fendrick 1 . This was unexpected as ER CT use in Canada is typically lower than in the USReference Berdahl, Vermeulen, Larson and Schull 13 . One explanation may be that our cohort comprises patients with a final diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo rather than a presenting complaint of dizziness or vertigo.
This study has several limitations. It was retrospective and non-blinded. Our analysis was based on written documentation, although there is some published evidence that this correlates well with the medical encounterReference Stange, Zyzanski and Smith 14 . The small number of patients who underwent HIT makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions about its usefulness, but this was not the primary objective of the study and has been previously reportedReference Newman-Toker, Kattah, Alvernia and Wang 7 , Reference Tarnutzer, Berkowitz and Robinson 9 . We do not know how many physicians were aware of the HIT and chose not to use it, as opposed to being unaware of it. There is no definitive gold standard test for many of the final diagnoses made in dizzy patients and, to our knowledge, the majority of our subjects with a final diagnosis of peripheral vertigo did not have follow-up imaging (CT or MRI) in the days following their ER visit to assure that the diagnosis of peripheral disease was not incorrect.
Recent publications have described the use of the video head impulse test (vHIT)Reference MacDougall, Weber and McGarvie 15 - Reference Matino-Soler, Esteller-More and Martin-Sanchez 17 . This uses a head-mounted camera to measure eye movements during the head turn. It has the advantage of being able to detect “covert saccades” that the examiner would miss by visual inspection aloneReference Weber, Aw and Todd 8 . The vHIT can reliably distinguish vestibular neuritis and stroke and a clinical trial regarding its use is underwayReference Mantokoudis, Saber Tehrani and Wozniak 18 . We would certainly encourage the use of the vHIT where available. However, the results of our study with bedside (non-video) HIT are still relevant for two reasons. If physicians so dramatically under-utilize a simple bedside clinical test like the HIT it seems unlikely they would be more likely to utilize an updated version requiring digital equipment and analysis. More importantly, this technology is unlikely to be available in every ER. We suggest the following approach to patients presenting to the ER with an acute vestibular syndrome: A careful history regarding symptom timing and duration to identify those with acute, constant vertigo; a bedside HIT; and, where available, a video HIT.
Disclosure Information
Fraser Moore and Timothy McDowell do not have anything to disclose
