Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T05:26:50.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometrical lattice engineering of complex oxide heterostructures: a designer approach to emergent quantum states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

Xiaoran Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA
S. Middey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA
Yanwei Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA
M. Kareev
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA
J. Chakhalian*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
*
Address all correspondence to J. Chakhalian at jchakhal@uark.edu

Abstract

Epitaxial heterostructures composed of complex oxides have fascinated researchers for over a decade as they offer multiple degrees of freedom to unveil emergent many-body phenomena often unattainable in bulk. Recently, apart from stabilizing such artificial structures along the conventional [001]-direction, tuning the growth direction along unconventional crystallographic axes has been highlighted as a promising route to realize novel quantum many-body phases. Here we illustrate this rapidly developing field of geometrical lattice engineering with the emphasis on a few prototypical examples of the recent experimental efforts to design complex oxide heterostructures along the (111) orientation for quantum phase discovery and potential applications.

Information

Type
Functional Oxides Prospective Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the idea about geometrical lattice engineering, which has three control parameters named as orientation, stacking, and superlattice throughout its entire process.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The conventional unit cell of a normal spinel structure. The corresponding (111) ionic planes are marked in the figures. Note, the A ionic planes only form the triangle planes, while the B ionic planes form both the triangle planes and also the kagome planes.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (111)-oriented CoCr2O4/Al2O3 (CCO/AlO) heterostructures. (a) Epitaxial relationship between CCO and AlO. The hexagonal close packing of AlO oxygen sublattice is labeled as AB in black, while the CCP of CCO oxygen sublattice is labeled as ABC in brown. (b)–(d) RHEED images during the growth of each component. The half-order reflections (marked by pink solid circles) observed on CCO layer is due to the double expansion of the in-plane unit cell. Reproduced from Ref. 24, with the permission of AIP Publishing.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) X-ray reflectivity and (b) x-ray diffraction curves of 2CCO/nAlO (n = 1 and 2) superlattices. Both the thickness fringes and the superlattice satellite peaks are clearly seen from the graphs. (c, d) x-ray absorption spectra of the CCO/AlO superlattices on the L2,3 edges of Co and Cr, respectively. The spectra of CCO powders with normal spinel structure are plotted as references [Figs4(a) and 4(b) adapted with permission of AIP Publishing from Ref. 46].

Figure 4

Figure 5. Buckled honeycomb lattice and Dice lattice geometry can be generated by epitaxial growth of perovskite system along the [111] direction. A sites are not shown for Dice lattice due to visual clarity.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Schematics (assuming pure ionic picture) to demonstrate the presence (absence) of polar jump for RENiO3 on SrTiO3 (LaAlO3) (111) substrate[61]. (b) XAS of 5 uc LNO films on LAO and STO (111) have been compared with bulk Ni2+O, and LaNi3+O3. RHEED pattern of these films, recorded along pc [1−1 0]. For details, see Ref. 63. (c) Experimental arrangement for measuring XLD of (111)-oriented superlattice (upper panel) and XA spectra recorded for a [2NdNiO3/4LaAlO3]×3 SL grown on LAO (111) using vertically (V) and horizontally (H) polarized x-ray and their difference are plotted in lower panel. Due to strong overlap of Ni L3 edge with La M4 edge (from the substrate and spacer layer LAO), only Ni L2 edge is shown. Panel(c) adapted with permission from Ref. 25. Copyrighted by the American Physics Society.

Figure 6

Figure 7. B-site ordered double perovskites viewed along the conventional (001) and the unconventional (111) direction, respectively. The (001) rock-salt arrangement of the B and B′ sites is equivalent to (111) BO6 and B′O6 superlattice.

Figure 7

Figure 8. XAS and XMCD spectra on the L edge of (a) Fe and (b) Cr of the (111)-oriented 1LaFeO3/1LaCrO3 superlattice. Both spectra were measured at 10 K with an external magnetic field ~5 T applied parallel to the film surface. Data were collected in the total electron yield mode. Adapted from Ref. 86, with the permission of AIP Publishing.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Summary and outlook on GLE. The upper panel displays other possible routines to topological phase and frustrated magnetism by applying pure GLE. The bottom panel presents the combination of GLE with IE or SE to establish new systems with intriguing physics such as quasi-particle excitation and emergent phenomena.