Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T19:14:02.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Randomized Controlled Trial of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Education for the Recognition of Tension Pneumothorax by Paramedics in Prehospital Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2020

Paul A. Khalil*
Affiliation:
Denver Health/University of Colorado, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver, Colorado USA
Andrew Merelman
Affiliation:
Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, MS-3, Parker, Colorado USA
John Riccio
Affiliation:
South Metro Fire Rescue Authority, Centennial, Colorado USA
Jodi Peterson
Affiliation:
South Metro Fire Rescue Authority, Centennial, Colorado USA
Ryan Shelton
Affiliation:
South Metro Fire Rescue Authority, Centennial, Colorado USA
Jeff Meyers
Affiliation:
South Metro Fire Rescue Authority, Centennial, Colorado USA
Tim Ketchmark
Affiliation:
South Metro Fire Rescue Authority, Centennial, Colorado USA
Emily Garneau
Affiliation:
SonoSim, Denver, Colorado USA
Stephanie Khalil
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher
Genie Roosevelt
Affiliation:
Denver Health/University of Colorado, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver, Colorado USA
Amanda Toney
Affiliation:
Denver Health/University of Colorado, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver, Colorado USA Denver Health/University of Colorado, Pediatric Ultrasound Fellowship Director, Denver, Colorado USA
*
Correspondence: Paul A. Khalil, MD, 7006 Breakwater Pl, Louisville, Kentucky 40059 USA, E-mail: pkhalil3@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

The primary goal of this study was to determine if ultrasound (US) use after brief point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training on cardiac and lung exams would result in more paramedics correctly identifying a tension pneumothorax (TPTX) during a simulation scenario.

Methods:

A randomized controlled, simulation-based trial of POCUS lung exam education investigating the ability of paramedics to correctly diagnose TPTX was performed. The US intervention group received a 30-minute cardiac and lung POCUS lecture followed by hands-on US training. The control group did not receive any POCUS training. Both groups participated in two scenarios: right unilateral TPTX and undifferentiated shock (no TPTX). In both scenarios, the patient continued to be hypoxemic after verified intubation with pulse oximetry of 86%-88% and hypotensive with a blood pressure of 70/50. Sirens were played at 65 decibels to mimic prehospital transport conditions. A simulation educator stated aloud the time diagnoses were made and procedures performed, which were recorded by the study investigator. Paramedics completed a pre-survey and post-survey.

Results:

Thirty paramedics were randomized to the control group; 30 paramedics were randomized to the US intervention group. Most paramedics had not received prior US training, had not previously performed a POCUS exam, and were uncomfortable with POCUS. Point-of-care US use was significantly higher in the US intervention group for both simulation cases (P <.001). A higher percentage of paramedics in the US intervention group arrived at the correct diagnosis (77%) for the TPTX case as compared to the control group (57%), although this difference was not significantly different (P = 0.1). There was no difference in the correct diagnosis between the control and US intervention groups for the undifferentiated shock case. On the post-survey, more paramedics in the US intervention group were comfortable with POCUS for evaluation of the lung and comfortable decompressing TPTX using POCUS (P <.001). Paramedics reported POCUS was within their scope of practice.

Conclusions:

Despite being novice POCUS users, the paramedics were more likely to correctly diagnose TPTX during simulation after a brief POCUS educational intervention. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Paramedics were comfortable using POCUS and felt its use improved their TPTX diagnostic skills.

Information

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable