Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T01:21:27.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stalagmite evidence for Early Holocene multidecadal hydroclimate variability in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2022

Asfawossen Asrat*
Affiliation:
Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana School of Earth Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Andy Baker
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Wuhui Duan
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044, China
Melanie J. Leng
Affiliation:
National Environmental Isotope Facility, British Geological Survey, Keyworth NG12 5GG, UK School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
Ian Boomer
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Rabeya Akter
Affiliation:
Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Gregoire Mariethoz
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Lewis Adler
Affiliation:
Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Catherine N. Jex
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Meklit Yadeta
Affiliation:
Roy M. Huffington Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 75206, USA Department of Geology, Selale University, Fiche, Ethiopia
Lisheng Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Innovation Academy for Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
*
*Corresponding author at: Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana. E-mail address: kassayea@biust.ac.bw (A. Asrat).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multiproxy oxygen and carbon isotope (δ13C and δ18O), growth rate, and trace element stalagmite paleoenvironmental record is presented for the Early Holocene from Ethiopia. The annually laminated stalagmite grew from 10.6 to 10.4 ka and from 9.7 to 9.0 ka with a short hiatus at ~9.25 ka. Statistically significant and coherent spectral frequencies in δ13C and δ18O are observed at 15–25 and 19–23 years, respectively. The observed ~1‰ amplitude variability in stalagmite δ18O is likely forced by nonequilibrium deposition, due to kinetic effects during the progressive degassing of CO2 from the water film during stalagmite formation. These frequencies are similar to the periodicity reported for other Holocene stalagmite records from Ethiopia, suggesting that multidecadal variability in stalagmite δ18O is typical. Several processes can lead to this multidecadal variability and operate in different directions. A hydroclimate forcing is likely the primary control on the extent of the partial evaporation of soil and shallow epikarst water and associated isotopic fractionation. The resulting oxygen isotope composition of percolation water is subsequently modulated by karst hydrology. Further isotopic fractionation is possible in-cave during nonequilibrium stalagmite deposition. Combined with possible recharge biases in drip-water δ18O, these processes can generate multidecadal δ18O variability.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2022
Figure 0

Figure 1. (A) Regional structural setting of Ethiopia showing the location of the Mechara caves. The epicenters of the major earthquakes in the Main Ethiopian Rift and the adjoining highlands are marked (note that earthquake epicenters in the northern Afar depression are not represented). Insets show the mean position of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) in July (summer) and January (winter) over Africa; and the mean monthly rainfall (RF in mm) and mean monthly temperature of the Mechara region, at the Bedesa Meteorological Station (1994–2014 data from the Ethiopian Meteorological Agency). Location of B is marked by a solid rectangle around the location of Mechara; (B) The topography, geology, structure, and drainage system of the Mechara karst area and locations of the entrances to the caves (including Achere–Aynage and Bero). (C) Achere–Aynage cave survey showing the location of stalagmite Ach-3 and a previously published stalagmite, Ach-1. A and B modified from Asrat et al. (2008, 2018, respectively); C modified from Brown et al. (1998).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Ach-3 hand-section in both scanned image (left) and sketch (right), showing the four growth phases; locations of the major and minor growth hiatuses; and sampling for isotopes, trace elements, U-Th analyses, and U-Th ages. The central inset is a sample of a high-resolution scan (not to scale) along the central growth axis showing the annual laminae of Ach-3.

Figure 2

Figure 3. An age–depth model for Ach-3. Depth measured as distance (mm) from the top of the speleothem. Locations of ages and hiatuses are marked.

Figure 3

Table 1. 230Th dating of stalagmite Ach-3 (2σ error).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Scatter plots of δ18O vs. δ13C for: (A) each growth phase (numbers shown are slopes of best-fit lines) and (B) Hendy tests along growth laminae in stalagmite Ach-3. Note that similar nonequilibrium deposition was observed in Ach-1 and Bero-1 (Asrat et al., 2007; Baker et al., 2010).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Time series of the first three principal components (PC1–PC3).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Time series of growth rate and geochemical proxies in Ach-3: (A) annual growth rate, (B) δ13C, (C) δ18O, (D) Sr/Ca, (E) Mg/Ca, and (F) P/Ca.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Autocorrelation functions for δ18O and δ13C.

Figure 8

Table 2. (A) variogram analysis for stalagmite Ach-3 for the three growth phases (phase 1: oldest; phase 3: youngest): range (r), information content (IC), and flickering (f); and (B) summary of geostatistical properties for Ach-3, Bero-1, and Ach-1: univariate spectral analysis, showing the dominant and statistically significant (from red noise) periodicities in the oxygen isotope, carbon isotope, and growth rate time series.a

Figure 9

Figure 8. Conceptual model for the deposition of stalagmite Ach-3: (A) growth phase 1: initiation and flushing from soil dominating the flow; (B) growth phase 2: wet and continuous growth from full storage, with multidecadal variability due to within-cave processes (such as drip rate or water saturation); (C) growth phase 3a: similar flow conditions to those of phase 2 but with less water storage; and (D) major tectonic process leading to the redirecting of flow regimes and relocation of drip sources resulting in rapid shutoff and growth cessation. Cartoons modified from Asrat et al. (2007, 2018).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Isotopic composition conceptual diagram. The changes in oxygen isotope composition are based on observed Addis Ababa IAEA monthly δ18O precipitation (process A); observed global range of epikarst and soil evaporative fractionation (open arrow) and range for ratio of precipitation to potential evapotranspiration (P/PET) = 0.9 (filled arrow) (Baker et al., 2019) (process B); well-mixed drip-water δ18O (process C); observed global range of recharge bias (open arrow) and range for P/PET = 0.9 (filled arrow) (Baker et al., 2019) (process D); and modeled nonequilibrium fractionation factors (Scholz et al., 2009) (process E). WRT, with respect to.

Supplementary material: File

Asrat et al. supplementary material

Asrat et al. supplementary material

Download Asrat et al. supplementary material(File)
File 761.3 KB