Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T11:25:09.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy, Public Support, and Measurement Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

YUEHONG ‘CASSANDRA’ TAI Open the ORCID record for YUEHONG ‘CASSANDRA’ TAI [Opens in a new window] ,
YUE HU Open the ORCID record for YUE HU [Opens in a new window]  and
FREDERICK SOLT Open the ORCID record for FREDERICK SOLT [Opens in a new window]
YUEHONG ‘CASSANDRA’ TAI*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, United States
YUE HU*
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, China
FREDERICK SOLT*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, United States
*
Yuehong ‘Cassandra’ Tai, PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, United States, yuehong-tai@uiowa.edu.
Yue Hu, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Tsinghua University, China, yuehu@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Frederick Solt, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, United States, frederick-solt@uiowa.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do democratic regimes depend on public support to avoid backsliding? Does public support, in turn, respond thermostatically to changes in democracy? Two prominent recent studies (Claassen 2020a; 2020b) reinvigorated the classic hypothesis on the positive relationship between public support for democracy and regime survival—and challenged its reciprocal counterpart—by using a latent variable approach to measure mass democratic support from cross-national survey data. However, both studies used only the point estimates of democratic support. We show that incorporating the concomitant measurement uncertainty into these analyses reveals that there is no support for either study’s conclusion. Efforts to minimize the uncertainty by incorporating additional survey data still fail to yield evidence in support of either hypothesis. These results underscore the need for both more nuanced analyses of the relationships between public support and democracy and taking measurement uncertainty into account when working with latent variables.

Information

Type
Letter
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 118 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 512 - 518
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bound, John, Brown, Charles, and Mathiowetz, Nancy. 2001. “Measurement Error in Survey Data.” In Handbook of Econometrics, eds. Heckman, James J. and Leamer, Edward, 3705–3843. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, O’Grady, Tom, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2019. “Policy Ideology in European Mass Publics, 1981–2016.” American Political Science Review 113 (3): 674–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2018. “Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014.” American Political Science Review 112 (2): 249–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Christopher. 2019. “Estimating Smooth Country–Year Panels of Public Opinion.” Political Analysis 27 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Christopher. 2020a. “Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?” American Journal of Political Science 64 (1): 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Christopher. 2020b. “In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion.” American Political Science Review 114 (1): 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Christopher, and McLaren, Lauren. 2021. “Does Immigration Produce a Public Backlash or Public Acceptance? Time-Series, Cross-Sectional Evidence from Thirty European Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000260.Google Scholar
Crabtree, Charles D., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2015. “Uncovering Patterns among Latent Variables: Human Rights and de Facto Judicial Independence.” Research & Politics 2 (3): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fails, Matthew D., and Pierce, Heather Nicole. 2010. “Changing Mass Attitudes and Democratic Deepening.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Mounk, Yascha. 2017. “The Signs of Deconsolidation.” Journal of Democracy 28 (1): 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Sumner, Jane Lawrence. 2020. “Measuring the Consolidation of Power in Nondemocracies.” Journal of Politics 82 (4): 1545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Matthew H., and Svolik, Milan W.. 2020. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 2021. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P., Lax, Jeffrey R., Malecki, Michael, and Phillips, Justin H.. 2015. “Polarizing the Electoral Connection: Partisan Representation in Supreme Court Confirmation Politics.” Journal of Politics 77 (3): 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Helen, and Welzel, Christian. 2019. “Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy around the Globe.” Social Forces 98 (1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieckhaus, Jonathan, Son, Byunghwan, Bellinger, Nisha Mukherjee, and Wells, Jason M.. 2014. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Support.” The Journal of Politics 76 (1): 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C. 2014. “Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2021. “Voters against Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 100 (3): 174–78.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., and Whitehead, Lawrence. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Qi, Lingling, and Shin, Doh Chull. 2011. “How Mass Political Attitudes Affect Democratization: Exploring the Facilitating Role Critical Democrats Play in the Process.” International Political Science Review 32 (3): 245–62.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, and Sarsfield, Rodolfo. 2007. “Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (5): 637–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonovits, Gabor, McCoy, Jennifer, and Littvay, Levente. 2022. “Democratic Hypocrisy and Out-Group Threat: Explaining Citizen Support for Democratic Erosion.” The Journal of Politics https://doi.org/10.1086/719009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solis, Jonathan A., and Waggoner, Philip D.. 2021. “Measuring Media Freedom: An Item Response Theory Analysis of Existing Indicators.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1685–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Frederick. 2020. “Modeling Dynamic Comparative Public Opinion.” SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/d5n9p.Google Scholar
Tai, Yuehong ‘Cassandra,’ Hu, Yue, and Solt, Frederick. 2022. “Replication Data for: Democracy, Public Support, and Measurement Uncertainty.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XAUF3H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Martin Abba. 1993. Tools for Statistical Inference: Methods for the Exploration of Posterior Distributions and Likelihood Functions, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treier, Shawn, and Jackman, Simon. 2008. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Kruse, Stefan. 2017. “Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization: Testing the Emancipatory Theory of Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 463–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, Byung-Deuk, Allemang, Lindsey, and Solt, Frederick. 2022. “Public Gender Egalitarianism: A Dataset of Dynamic Comparative Public Opinion toward Egalitarian Gender Roles in the Public Sphere.” SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/37dq9.Google Scholar
Wuttke, Alexander, Gavras, Konstantin, and Schoen, Harald. 2020. “Leader of the Free World or Pioneer in Democracy’s Decline? Examining the Democratic Deconsolidation Hypothesis on the Mass Level in East and West Germany.” Research & Politics 7 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuttke, Alexander, Gavras, Konstantin, and Schoen, Harald. 2022. “Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

‘Cassandra’ Tai et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XAUF3H
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

‘Cassandra’ Tai et al. supplementary material

‘Cassandra’ Tai et al. supplementary material

Download ‘Cassandra’ Tai et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 116 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.