Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:26:04.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alzheimer’s Disease and COVID-19 Pathogenic Overlap: Implications for Drug Repurposing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2023

Mahdieh Golzari-Sorkheh
Affiliation:
Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Imindu Liyanage
Affiliation:
Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Mark A. Reed
Affiliation:
Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Donald F. Weaver*
Affiliation:
Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Donald F. Weaver, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, 60 Leonard Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5T 0S8. Email: dweaver@uhnres.utoronto.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

As COVID-19 continues, a safe, cost-effective treatment strategy demands continued inquiry. Chronic neuroinflammatory disorders may appear to be of little relevance in this regard; often indolent and progressive disorders characterized by neuroinflammation (such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD)) are fundamentally dissimilar in etiology and symptomology to COVID-19’s rapid infectivity and pathology. However, the two disorders share extensive pathognomonic features, including at membrane, cytoplasmic, and extracellular levels, culminating in analogous immunogenic destruction of their respective organ parenchyma. We hypothesize that these mechanistic similarities may extent to therapeutic targets, namely that it is conceivable an agent against AD’s immunopathy may have efficacy against COVID-19 and vice versa. It is notable that while extensively investigated, no agent has yet demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy against AD’s cognitive and memory declines. Yet this very failure has driven the development of numerous agents with strong mechanistic potential and clinical characteristics. Having already approved for clinical trials, these agents may be an expedient starting point in the urgent search for an effective COVID-19 therapy. Herein, we review the overlapping Alzheimer’s/ COVID-19 targets and theorize several initial platforms.

Résumé :

RÉSUMÉ :

La maladie d’Alzheimer et le chevauchement pathogène de la COVID-19 : implications pour le repositionnement des médicaments employés. Alors que la pandémie de COVID-19 se poursuit, une stratégie de traitement sécuritaire et efficace par rapport au coût exige des efforts continus en recherche. À cet égard, les troubles neuro-inflammatoires chroniques peuvent sembler peu pertinents. Souvent indolents et progressifs, les troubles caractérisés par une neuro-inflammation, par exemple la maladie d’Alzheimer, sont fondamentalement différents, dans leur étiologie et leur symptomatologie, de l’infectiosité rapide et de la pathologie de la COVID-19. Cependant, ces deux maladies partagent des caractéristiques pathognomoniques étendues, y compris aux niveaux membranaire, cytoplasmique et extracellulaire, qui aboutissent à une destruction immunogène analogue du parenchyme de leurs organes respectifs. Nous émettons donc l’hypothèse que ces similitudes mécanistiques peuvent s’étendre à des cibles thérapeutiques, à savoir qu’il est concevable qu’un agent contre l’immunopathie de la maladie d’Alzheimer puisse être efficace contre une infection à la COVID-19 et vice-versa. Malgré des recherches approfondies en la matière, il est à noter qu’aucun agent n’a encore fait preuve d’une efficacité thérapeutique notable contre le déclin des fonctions cognitives et de la mémoire dans le cas de la maladie d’Alzheimer. C’est pourtant cet échec qui a conduit au développement de nombreux agents dotés d’un fort potentiel mécanistique et de caractéristiques cliniques. Ayant déjà été approuvés pour des essais cliniques, ces agents peuvent constituer un point de départ avantageux dans la recherche urgente d’une thérapie efficace contre les infections à la COVID-19. En somme, nous voulons ici passer en revue les cibles de la maladie d’Alzheimer et de la COVID-19 qui se recoupent et théoriser, pour ce faire, plusieurs avenues initiales de recherche.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation
Figure 0

Figure 1: Alzheimer’s immunopathy. Multiple concurrent immunopathies are described in AD. These include complement activation via factor C1q, a pro-inflammatory cytokine cascade (involving IL-1R1, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IFN-γ, ICAM-1, MIP-1α/MIP-1β, S100β, and SDF-1); microglial dysregulation – mediated by TLR4 and CD14 stimulation causing additional pro-inflammatory cytokine release (TNF-α and IL-1β); mTOR/GSK3β/CDK5 pathway activation. These reciprocally interact with Aβ and tau proteopathies, likely in synergism, and contribute to neurotoxicity and cell death.

Figure 1

Figure 2: COVID-19 immunopathy. Upon adhesion and infection of cells, COVID-19 induces cytological damage, culminating in the release of PAMPs. These signals, in turn with immunogenic reactions to the virion itself, lead to activation of complement, concomitant with a pro-inflammatory cytokine storm (involving IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, GCSF, MCSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1 α, HGF, IFN-γ, and TNF-α). Cumulatively, these promote macrophage activation and dysregulation via the TLR3/TLR7 receptors, mediating additional cytokine release. This can be accompanied by mTOR signaling with modulates the humoral response against the infection.

Figure 2

Figure 3: Overlapping therapeutic targets between AD and COVID-19. Similarities in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and COVID-19 suggest the possibility of repurposing existing AD research and therapeutics against COVID-19. These include elevated inflammation via macrophage/microglial dysregulation – possibly mediated via TREM2/ DAP12 pathways; membrane and lipid dysregulation; mitochondrial dysregulation – mediated via the TPSO pathway in AD, and the MAVS pathway in COVID-19, converging on the VDAC1 channel; and endoplasmic reticular dysfunction – targeting stress or ER-phagy.

Figure 3

Figure 4: Molecular structures of inositol isomers. Inositol (A) is a collection of nine different stereoisomers of a hexa-substituted cyclohexane polyol. The most common isomer is myo-inositol (B), which is cis-1,2,3,5-trans-4,6-cyclohexanehexol. Scyllo-inositol (C) has undergone trials as an amyloid anti-aggregant in AD.

Figure 4

Figure 5: Molecular structures of heparan sulfate, heparin sulfate, eprodisate. Heparan sulfate (A) (HS) is a linear polysaccharide that occurs as a proteoglycan (HSPG) in which two or three HS chains are attached in close proximity to cell surface or extracellular matrix proteins. Heparin (B) is a smaller glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide polymer, structurally related to heparan, and consists of a variably sulfated repeating disaccharide unit; the most common disaccharide unit is composed of a 2-O-sulfated iduronic acid and 6-O-sulfated, N-sulfated glucosamine, IdoA(2S)-GlcNS(6S). Eprodisate (C) (1,3-propanedisulfonate) is a negatively charged, sulfonated small molecule that has structural similarities to heparin and heparan sulfate; it is a glycosaminoglycan mimetic with sulfate group positioned geometrically to mimic those in heparin and heparan.