Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T19:22:09.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Glyphosate with Residual Herbicides in No-Till Soybean (Glycine max) Production1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lawrence A. Vanlieshout  and
Mark M. Loux
Lawrence A. Vanlieshout*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Mark M. Loux
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
*
Corresponding author's address and E-mail: 955 Elm Street, Wilmington, OH 45177; lvanlieshout@in-touch.net.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate is often mixed with residual herbicides to control emerged weeds in no-till crop production systems. Field studies were conducted in Ohio from 1992 to 1994 to evaluate the weed control provided by residual herbicides and reduced rates of glyphosate in full-season, no-till soybean. Herbicide treatments were applied at two timings to examine the effect of weed size. At 4 wk after treatment, greater than 85% Pennsylvania smartweed control was obtained with metribuzin plus chlorimuron and linuron plus chlorimuron applied with 280 g ai/ha glyphosate and with imazethapyr and imazaquin applied with 560 g/ha glyphosate. All residual herbicides provided at least 85% common lambsquarters control when applied with 560 g/ha glyphosate. In 1992, the early application of residual herbicides provided this level of common lambsquarters control without glyphosate due to the small weed size at the time of application. Residual herbicides applied with 280 g/ha glyphosate controlled giant foxtail 85% or greater. Higher glyphosate rates were needed to control barnyardgrass. The performance of reduced glyphosate rates was dependent on weed species and weed size.

Keywords

Chlorimuronglyphosateimazaquinimazethapyrlinuronmetribuzinbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCGcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAPennsylvania smartweed, Polygonum pensylvanicum L. # POLPYsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrTank mixturesCHEALECHCGPOLPYSETFAWATweeks after treatment

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 480 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1990. 1989 National Survey of Conservation Tillage Practices. West Lafayette, IN: Conservation Technology Information Center. 83 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. 1998 National Survey of Conservation Tillage Practices. West Lafayette, IN: Conservation Technology Information Center. 98 p.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, M. 1978. Antagonistic effects of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. D., Upchurch, R. P., Homesley, W. B., and Franz, J. E. 1971. Introduction of a new broad-spectrum postemergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26: 64–68.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. and Witt, W. W. 1987. Alternative pest management practices. In Helsel, Z. R., ed. Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control. New York: Elsevier Science. pp. 197–234.Google Scholar
Bruff, S. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Tank-mix combination for weed control in stale seedbed soybean. Weed Technol. 6: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybean. Weed Sci. 37: 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3: 596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-ethyl (Classic): a new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybean. Weed Technol. 1: 114–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter): a new soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1: 186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutchfield, D. A., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1985. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch on weed control. Weed Sci. 34: 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1995. Non-selective and selective herbicide combinations in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanie, A. J., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., and Vidrine, P. R. 1993. Influence of residual herbicides on rate of paraquat and glyphosate in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7: 960–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. M., Stachler, J. M., and Harrison, S. K. 1998. Weed Control Guide for Ohio Field Crops. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Bull. 789. 142 p.Google Scholar
Moseley, C. M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1990. Reducing herbicide inputs when establishing no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4: 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, C. M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1991. Decreasing rates of nonselective herbicides in double-crop no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1992. 2,4-D and salt combinations affect glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol. 6: 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32: 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980a. Influence of various herbicides and Tween 20 on the effectiveness of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60: 939–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980b. Interaction between glyphosate and various herbicides for broadleaf weed control. Weed Res. 20: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hamman, W. M. 1981. Influence of non-ionic surfactants, ammonium sulfate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. A., Dest, W. M., and Triolo, A. C. 1974. Preliminary report on the effect of mixing liquid fertilizers and residual herbicides with paraquat and glyphosate. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 28: 35–40.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Inhibition of glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 27: 575–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46: 652–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 155–181.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Sci. 21: 574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwunnamer, V. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulfate and other additives. Weed Res. 16: 13–19.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5: 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1978. Weed control for double-crop soybean planted with the no-tillage method following small grain harvest. Agron. J. 70: 577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. J. and Loader, M.P.C. 1980. Effects of ammonium sulphate and other additives upon the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 20: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar