Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T02:53:33.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochemical and microtextural properties of pyritized foraminiferal tests: results from ODP hole 763A, Southeastern Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2025

Rina Rani Palei
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Anil Kumar Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Prasanta Sanyal
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata, Mohanpur, India
Manoj Kumar Jaiswal
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata, Mohanpur, India
*
Corresponding author: Anil Kumar Gupta; Emails: anil_k_gupta1960@yahoo.co.in, anilg@gg.iitkgp.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pyritization of microfossils serves as a key indicator of paleoenvironmental conditions, yet the controlling factors on pyrite morphology and composition remain poorly constrained. This study encountered different pyrite morphology (framboids and patches) from the foraminiferal tests retrieved from the marine sediment samples of Ocean Drilling Program Hole 763A, southeastern Indian Ocean, during different geological time slices. We hypothesize that distinct microenvironments and controlling factors might have influenced the morphology. Detailed investigations of the morphology, mineralogy and geochemistry of Fe-S coatings within and on foraminiferal tests suggest the dynamics of paleoredox conditions during the Middle Pleistocene and Upper Miocene. The comprehensive geochemical overview and the presence of Ni and Ba associated with Fe-S coatings and sediments suggest deoxygenation of deep-sea sediments driven by climatic shifts rather than hydrothermal activities. The stable anoxic deep ocean setting during the Middle Pleistocene, evidenced by increased organic matter flux and ocean stratification, contributed to low bottom-water oxygen levels. The geochemical evidence from the Upper Miocene samples indicates predominantly oxidising conditions, as shown by the altered reddish-yellow foraminiferal tests, which are mainly composed of calcite. However, localized reducing conditions are evidenced by patches of pyrite associated with foraminiferal shells, suggesting the presence of transitional redox conditions within the oxidising sediments during the Upper Miocene.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. The bathymetry and topography map of the studied region is created by using the GMT 6.0 software. The red star denotes the location of ODP Hole 763A. The wind path, source area and estimated dust deposition region are illustrated here based on the findings of Karp et al. (2020).

Figure 1

Table 1. Age datums are based on chron and subchron paleomagnetic boundaries established by Haq & von Rad (1990) and further updated to Raffi et al. (2020)

Figure 2

Table 2. Interpolated ages of analyzed samples from ODP Hole 763A

Figure 3

Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs of altered foraminifera. (A–C) Microscopic features observed from the Middle Pleistocene samples. (A) Foraminiferal shells appearing black due to internal infilling with Fe–S deposits; (B) Pyrite grows outward through the aperture after replacing the inside biological shells; (C) Broken chamber of a planktic foraminifera filled with framboidal pyrite. (D–G) Microscopic features observed from the Upper Miocene samples. (D) Black Fe–S coatings (patchy pyrite) on planktic foraminiferal tests; (E) Localized black Fe–S coatings on the internal side of broken shells, while within one chamber, while adjacent chambers remain unaltered within the broken fragments of the foraminifera; (F) Planktic foraminiferal shells completely altered (oxidized) to a reddish yellow colour; (G) Fe–S deposits surrounded by foraminifera and get altered through the point contact from the deposits. Photomicrographs are taken using an upright microscope (DMLM6000M) operating under visible light at IIT Kharagpur.

Figure 4

Figure 3. The following BSE images highlight the presence of framboidal pyrite in the Middle Pleistocene samples: (A–C) Trilobatus quadrilobatus exhibiting framboidal pyrite filling in its chambers; (D–F) Globorotalia hirsuta with framboidal pyrite in both the aperture and chambers; (G–I) Bulimina striata with irregular aggregates of pyrite crystals on its surface; (J, K) Framboidal pyrite found in the broken chambers of planktic foraminiferal shells; (L) Dense concentration of framboidal pyrites within foraminiferal tests, embedded in sediments; (M) Within the scattered sediment matrix, growth of framboids within foraminifera.

Figure 5

Figure 4. The following BSE images illustrate various foraminiferal species from the Upper Miocene samples: (A–C) Neogloboquadrina humerosa, highlighting a patchy distribution of pyrite; (D–F) Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina, displaying patchy pyrite appearing to be coated on the test surface; (G–I) coexistence of pyrite patches and baryte on the surface of Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina; (J–L) Dentoglobigerina altispira, exhibiting irregular aggregates of pyrite infilling the pores within its chambers. (M–O) Representative image for the sediment sample at ∼6.58 Ma showcasing the tests and test fragments embedded within sediments; (N) cross-section of Globorotalia menardii filled with pyrite framboids; and (O) deformed and irregular aggregates of pyrite growth on a broken shell.

Figure 6

Figure 5. The Raman spectrum of the coatings observed on foraminiferal tests displays prominent peaks at ∼375 and 340 cm–1, indicating the presence of the pyrite phase (after Lara et al.2015). The spectrum is illustrated in two forms: (A) Raman spectra for framboidal pyrite and (B) Raman spectra for the patchy pyrite.

Figure 7

Figure 6. (A, G, M) Representative BSE images of foraminiferal tests from the Middle Pleistocene samples. (B–F) Chemical maps of Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Si corresponding to ‘A’; (H–L) Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Si for ‘G’; (N–R) Chemical maps of Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Si for ‘M’. In these maps, colour intensity represents the concentration of each element at the pixel level, with black areas indicating elemental absence. (i, ii, iii) Corresponding semiquantitative atomic percentages obtained through point analysis (supplementary Table 3).

Figure 8

Figure 7. (A) Representative BSE image and (B–G) corresponding elemental distribution maps of Ca, Fe, S, Si, K and Al; (H) Representative BSE image and (I–L) corresponding elemental maps of Ca, Fe, S and Si illustrating sediment composition and Fe–S mineral deposits in the Middle Pleistocene sample at ∼0.898 Ma.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Chemical composition distribution maps. (A, G, M) Representative BSE images of foraminiferal tests from the Upper Miocene samples. (B–F) Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Si corresponding to ‘A’; (H–L) Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Ba for ‘G’; (N–R) Ca, Fe, S, Mg and Si for ‘M’. Colour intensity in each elemental map reflects the relative concentration of the element at the pixel level, with black regions indicating the absence of the respective element. (i, ii, iii) The corresponding semiquantitative atomic percentages of elements, obtained through point analysis (supplementary Table 3).

Figure 10

Figure 9. (A) Representative BSE image and (B–F) distribution of Ca, Fe, S, Si and Al corresponding to ‘A’; (G) representative BSE image and (H–L) maps of Ca, Fe, S, Si and Al for ‘G’, showing the sediment’s composition along with pyrite for the sample at ∼6.58 Ma. (M, N) The presence of baryte within the sediment matrix.

Figure 11

Figure 10. The XRD patterns illustrate the mineralogical composition of bulk sediment samples. (A) Represents the mineral assemblage of the sample at ∼0.898 Ma; (B) shows the composition of the sample at ∼1.07 Ma; and (C) shows the mineral composition of the sample at ∼6.58 Ma.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Histogram representation of carbon isotope ratios and XRF data for both the Middle Pleistocene and Upper Miocene events. (A and B) Display the δ¹3C values with the error bars (such as standard deviation) obtained from benthic and planktic foraminifera, respectively; (C and D) Present P (%) values and Fe/Mn ratios, respectively, derived from XRF analysis of bulk sediments.

Supplementary material: File

Palei et al. supplementary material 1

Palei et al. supplementary material
Download Palei et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Palei et al. supplementary material 2

Palei et al. supplementary material
Download Palei et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 35.1 KB