Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T23:48:07.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence and the Administrative Process: Lobbying the U.S. President's Office of Management and Budget

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2015

SIMON F. HAEDER  and
SUSAN WEBB YACKEE
SIMON F. HAEDER*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
SUSAN WEBB YACKEE*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
*
Simon F. Haeder is Doctoral Student, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 110 North Hall, 1050 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706, 559.908.2704 (haeder@wisc.edu).
Susan Webb Yackee is Professor, Department of Political Science & the La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, 608.265.6017 (yackee@wisc.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All administrative processes contain points of entry for politics, and the U.S. president's use of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review government regulations is no exception. Specifically, OMB review can open up a pathway for interest groups to lobby for policy change. We theorize that interest group lobbying can be influential during OMB review, especially when there is consensus across groups. We use a selection model to test our argument with more than 1,500 regulations written by federal agencies that were subjected to OMB review. We find that lobbying is associated with change during OMB review. We also demonstrate that, when only business groups lobby, we are more likely to see rule change; however, the same is not true for public interest groups. We supplement these results with illustrative examples suggesting that interest groups can, at times, use OMB review to influence the content of legally binding government regulations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 507 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bagley, Nicolas, and Revesz, Richard L.. 2006. “Centralized Oversight of the Regulatory State.” Columbia Law Review 106: 1260–329.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven J., Deets, Jennifer M., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2011. “Outside Communications and OIRA Review of Agency Regulations.” Administrative Law Review 63 (Special Edition): 149–77.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Patrick T., and Schneider, Christina J.. 2007. “So the Reviewer Told You to Use a Selection Model? Selection Models and the Study of International Relations.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bressman, Lisa Schultz, and Vandenbergh, Michael P.. 2006. “Inside the Administrative State: A Critical Look at the Practice of Presidential Control.” Michigan Law Review 105 (1): 47–99.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan, and Stephenson, Matthew C.. 2007. “Regulatory Quality under Imperfect Oversight.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 605–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata. Revised ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and Lewis, David E.. 2008. “Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences.” Political Analysis 16 (1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, Cary. 2006. “Citizen Participation in Rulemaking: Past, Present, and Future.” Duke Law Journal 55: 943–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2012. “Interest Groups and Presidential Approval.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 431–54.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and West, William. 1988. “Presidential Power and Republican Government: The Theory and Practice of OMB Review.” Journal of Politics 50 (4): 864–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Curtis W. 2009. Federal Rulemaking: The Role of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. 1998. “Theories of Regulation: Incorporating the Administrative Process.” Columbia Law Review 98: 1–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Steven. 2003. “White House Review of Agency Rulemaking: An Empirical Investigation.” University of Chicago Law Review 70 (3): 821–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMuth, Christopher C., and Ginsburg, Douglas H.. 1986. “White House Review of Agency Rulemaking.” Havard Law Review 99: 1075–88.Google Scholar
Dudley, Susan E. 2011. “Observations on OIRA's Thirtieth Anniversary.” Administrative Law Review 63 (Special Edition): 113–29.Google Scholar
Duffy, Robert J. 1997. “Regulatory Oversight in the Clinton Administration.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 27: 71–90.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald. 1994. “TMQ-Ing OMB: Or Why Regulatory Review under Executive Order 12,291 Works Poorly and What President Clinton Should Do about It.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57 (2): 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, Scott R. 1998. “Political Influence on the Bureaucracy: The Bureaucracy Speaks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 8 (1): 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Accounting Office. 2003. Rulemaking: OMB's Role in Reviews of Agencies’ Draft Rules and the Transparency of Those Reviews. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
Glance, Natalie S., and Huberman, Bernardo A.. 1994. “The Dynamics of Social Dilemmas.” Scientific American 270 (3): 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Marissa Martino. 1998. “Interest Groups in the Rule-making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government Accountability Office. 2009. Federal Rulemaking: Improvements Needed to Monitoring and Evaluation of Rules Development as Well as to the Transparency of OMB Regulatory Reviews. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, and Stewart, Brandon M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2004. “By Invitation Only: Interest Group Access to the Oval Office.” American Review of Politics 25 (Fall): 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Elena. 2001. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114: 2245–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M. 2007. The Management of Regulation Development: Out of the Shadows. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M., and Furlong, Scott R.. 2011. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M., Furlong, Scott R., and West, William. 2010. “Interest Groups, Rulemaking, and American Bureaucracy.” In Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, ed. Durant, R. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 590–611.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 2010. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Update Edition, with an Epilogue on Health Care. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2009. “Revisiting the Administrative Presidency: Policy, Patronage, and Agency Competence.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (1): 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbers, Jeffrey S. 2006. A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking. Washington, DC: ABA Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Kenneth R. 2001. With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarity, Thomas. 1991. Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Amy Melissa, and Yackee, Susan Webb. 2007. “Interest Group Competition on Federal Agency Rules.” American Politics Research 35 (3): 336–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, eds. Chubb, J. E. and Peterson, P. E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 235–272.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Wilson, Scott A.. 1994. “Presidents and the Politics of Structure.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Richard P. 1983. The Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Naughton, Keith, Schmid, Celeste, Yackee, Susan Webb, and Zhan, Xueyong. 2009. “Understanding Commenter Influence during Agency Rule Development.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28 (2): 258–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, Stephanie P., and Rosenbloom, David H.. 2007. “Critical Reflections on Hamiltonian Perspectives on Rule-making and Legislative Proposal Initiatives by the Chief Executive.” Public Administration Review 67 (6): 1049–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. 1992. “The Presidency and Organized Interests: White House Patterns of Interest Group Liaison.” American Political Science Review 86: 612–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pika, Joseph A. 1983. “Interest Groups and the Executive: Presidential Intervention.” In Interest Group Politics, eds. Cigler, A. J. and Loomis, B.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 298–323.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 1995. “Reinventing the Regulatory State.” University of Chicago Law Review 62: 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhani, Patrick. 2000. “The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique.” Journal of Economic Surveys 14 (1): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2003. Administrative Law for Public Managers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2011. “Federalist No. 10: How Do Factions Affect the President as Administrator-in-chief?” Public Administration Review 71 (1): 522–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2005. The New Imperial Presidency: Renewing Presidential Power after Watergate, Vol. 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2009. “The Administrative Presidency and Bureaucratic Control: Implementing a Research Agenda.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 1: 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart. 2005. “Unequal Partners: Cost Benefit Analysis and Executive Review of Regulations.” Environmental Law Reporter 35: 10433–44.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart. 2011. “OIRA inside and Out.” Administrative Law Review 63 (Special Edition): 135–47.Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena, Patoka, Michael, and Goodwin, James. 2011. Behind Closed Doors at the White House: How Politics Trumps Protection of Public Health, Worker Safety, and the Environment. Washington, DC: Center for Progressive Reform.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2013. “The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: Myths and Realities.” Harvard Law Review 126: 1838–78.Google Scholar
Tozzi, Jim. 2011. “OIRA's Formative Years: The Historical Record of Centralized Regulatory Review Preceding OIRA's Founding.” Administrative Law Review 63 (Special Edition): 37–69.Google Scholar
Vella, Francis. 1998. “Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey.” Journal of Human Resources 33: 127–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Wendy E. 2010. “Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture.” Duke Law Journal 59: 1321–432.Google Scholar
Warren, Kenneth F. 2004. Administrative Law in the Political System. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
West, William F. 2004. “Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis.” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William F. 2005. “The Institutionalization of Regulatory Review: Organizational Stability and Responsive Competence at OIRA.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (1): 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William F. 2006. “Presidential Leadership and Administrative Coordination: Examining the Theory of a Unified Executive.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William F., and Barrett, Andrew W.. 1996. “Administrative Clearance under Clinton.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 26 (2): 523–38.Google Scholar
West, William F., and Raso, Connor. 2013. “Who Shapes the Rulemaking Agenda? Implications for Bureaucratic Responsiveness and Bureaucratic Control.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (3): 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Alan E. 2009. “Delegation and Positive-Sum Bureaucracies.” Journal of Politics 71: 998–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “A Bias towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Yackee, Susan Webb. 2009. “Is the Bush Bureaucracy Any Different? A Macro-empirical Examination of Notice and Comment Rulemaking under ‘43.’” In President George W. Bush's Influence over Bureaucracy and Policy: Extraordinary Times, Extraordinary Powers, eds. Provost, C. and Teske, P.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 41–59.Google Scholar
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “Sweet-talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 16 (1): 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2012. “The Politics of Ex Parte Lobbying: Pre-Proposal Agenda Building and Blocking during Agency Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22: 373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.