Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-wvcvf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T20:43:21.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inulin and oligofructose as prebiotics in the prevention of intestinal infections and diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2006

D. Bosscher*
Affiliation:
ORAFTI Group, Aandorenstraat 1, B-3300 Tienen, Belgium
J. Van Loo
Affiliation:
ORAFTI Group, Aandorenstraat 1, B-3300 Tienen, Belgium
A. Franck
Affiliation:
ORAFTI Group, Aandorenstraat 1, B-3300 Tienen, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author: Dr D. Bosscher, fax +32 16 801 359, email douwina.bosscher@orafti.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Health and wellbeing are challenged constantly by pathogens. A number of defence mechanisms exist to protect the body from pathogen colonisation and invasion, with an important role to play for the natural intestinal bacterial flora (mainly by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli). The present paper reviews the evidence on the effects of inulin and oligofructose on colonisation and translocation of pathogens and the prevention of intestinal diseases. In vitro experiments have shown that lactic acid-producing bacteria have antagonistic (antibacterial) activity against pathogens partly because of the production of organic acids which are the endproducts of inulin and oligofructose fermentation. In addition, studies with epithelial layers have shown that inulin and oligofructose inhibit pathogen colonisation and that endproducts of their fermentation have the ability to support barrier function. Furthermore, studies in various animal models have shown that inulin and oligofructose accelerate the recovery of beneficial bacteria, slow down pathogen growth, decreasing pathogen colonisation and systemic translocation. Finally, data from human intervention trials either in patients with intestinal disorders or disease, or prone to critical illness, found that inulin and oligofructose restore the balance when the gut microbial community is altered, inhibit the progression of disease or prevent it from relapsing and/or developing. To conclude, the dietary use of inulin and oligofructose offers a promising approach to restore microbial communities and to support barrier function of the epithelia by their prebiotic action. This may offer the host protection against invasion and translocation of pathogens (endogenous and/or exogenous) and in the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2006
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Antimicrobial effect of bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium infantis) measured by the clear areas on agar plates (inhibition zone) inoculated with the test bacteria and surrounding discs containing methanol–acetone extracts of B. infantis. Values are means of triplicate determinations, with their standard errors represented by horizontal bars (Gibson & Wang, 1994b).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Changes in the numbers of the pathogens Escherichia coli, Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella enteritidis (colony-forming units (cfu)/ml) in co-culture experiments with Lactobacillus plantarum with the addition of oligofructose () or starch () after 24 h incubation. Values are means of three determinations, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. There was a significant change in pathogen numbers from the baseline (start of the fermentation): * P < 0·01, ** P < 0·001 (Fooks & Gibson, 2002).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Numbers of Escherichia coli (log10 colony-forming units(cfu)/g wet weight) in the jejunal tissue from pigs fed a diet with or without (control) inulin (4 %) after 1 h incubation (n 20 organ cultures). * Mean value was significantly different from that in the control pigs (P < 0·05) (adapted from Naughton et al.2001).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Influence of oligofructose (3 %; ■) on the bacterial composition (Clostridium perfringens, C. paraputrificum and C. difficile; log10 colony-forming units(cfu)/g) in the caecum of gnotobiotic quails after inoculation with a faeces from preterm infants suffering from necrotising enterocolitis. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * There was a significant change in pathogen numbers compared with the control diet (□) (P < 0·05) (adapted from Butel et al.2001.)

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Bacterial densities (log10 colony-forming units(cfu)/g wet weight) at different intestinal sites from the oligofructose-supplemented pigs (5 g/100 ml; ■) v. non-supplemented pigs (□). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * There was a significant change in bacterial numbers compared with the control diet (P < 0·05) (Oli et al.1998).