Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T18:40:24.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychosocial markers of age at onset in bipolar disorder: a machine learning approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2022

Sorcha Bolton*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK
Dan W. Joyce
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, UK
Katherine Gordon-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Worcester, UK
Lisa Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Worcester, UK
Ian Jones
Affiliation:
National Centre for Mental Health, Cardiff University, UK
John Geddes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, UK
Kate E. A. Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, UK
*
Correspondence: Sorcha Bolton. Email: sorcha.bolton@psych.ox.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Bipolar disorder is a chronic and severe mental health disorder. Early stratification of individuals into subgroups based on age at onset (AAO) has the potential to inform diagnosis and early intervention. Yet, the psychosocial predictors associated with AAO are unknown.

Aims

We aim to identify psychosocial factors associated with bipolar disorder AAO.

Method

Using data from the Bipolar Disorder Research Network UK, we employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to identify psychosocial factors associated with bipolar disorder AAO. Twenty-eight factors were entered into our model, with AAO as our outcome measure.

Results

We included 1022 participants with bipolar disorder (μ = 23.0, s.d. ± 9.86) in our model. Six variables predicted an earlier AAO: childhood abuse (β = −0.2855), regular cannabis use in the year before onset (β = −0.2765), death of a close family friend or relative in the 6 months before onset (β = −0.2435), family history of suicide (β = −0.1385), schizotypal personality traits (β = −0.1055) and irritable temperament (β = −0.0685). Five predicted a later AAO: the average number of alcohol units consumed per week in the year before onset (β = 0.1385); birth of a child in the 6 months before onset (β = 0.2755); death of parent, partner, child or sibling in the 6 months before onset (β = 0.3125); seeking work without success for 1 month or more in the 6 months before onset (β = 0.3505) and a major financial crisis in the 6 months before onset (β = 0.4575).

Conclusions

The identified predictor variables have the potential to help stratify high-risk individuals into likely AAO groups, to inform treatment provision and early intervention.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Density plots for the 11 predictors selected by cross-validated LASSO regression model on >90% of the 1000 resampling runs. Negative beta coefficients indicate an association with an earlier AAO, whereas positive coefficients represent an association with a later AAO. AAO, age at onset; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.

Figure 1

Table 1 Non-exponentiated modal coefficients for each of the 11 predictors selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model on >90% of resampling runs

Figure 2

Table 2 Means, s.d. and ranges for continuous measures in the total sample (n = 1022)

Figure 3

Table 3 Absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies for categorical variables in the total sample (n = 1022)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Calibration curve showing the agreement between observed outcomes and predictions, using the test set data. The dotted line represents ‘perfect model calibration’; the blue line is the calibration curve generated by our model with a locally weighted scatterplot smoother and 95% confidence intervals (grey); the blue scatter points are the observed data. Observed and predicted age at onset is shown on a natural logarithm scale. MAE, mean absolute error.

Supplementary material: File

Bolton et al. supplementary material

Bolton et al. supplementary material

Download Bolton et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.3 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.