Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:46:00.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy and the Blood-Brain Barrier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2024

Mark A. Maclean*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Patrick S. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Jamil H. Muradov
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Gwynedd E. Pickett
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Alon Friedman
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Adrienne Weeks
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Ryan Greene
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
David Volders
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Mark A. Maclean; Email: mark.maclean@dal.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Background:

Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is an adverse event associated with diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. Decades of animal and human research support a mechanistic role for pathological blood-brain barrier dysfunction (BBBd). Here, we describe an institutional case series and review the literature supporting a mechanistic role for BBBd in CIE.

Methods:

A literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases from inception to January 31, 2022. We searched our institutional neurovascular database for cases of CIE following endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular disease during a 6-month period. Informed consent was obtained in all cases.

Results:

Review of the literature revealed risk factors for BBBd and CIE, including microvascular disease, pathological neuroinflammation, severe procedural hypertension, iodinated contrast load and altered cerebral blood flow dynamics. In our institutional series, 6 of 52 (11.5%) of patients undergoing therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures developed CIE during the study period. Four patients were treated for ischemic stroke and two patients for recurrent cerebral aneurysms. Mechanical stenting or thrombectomy were utilized in all cases.

Conclusion:

In this institutional case series and literature review of animal and human data, we identified numerous shared risk factors for CIE and BBBd, including microvascular disease, increased procedure length, large contrast volumes, severe intraoperative hypertension and use of mechanical devices that may induce iatrogenic endothelial injury.

Résumé :

RÉSUMÉ :

L’encéphalopathie provoquée par les produits de contraste et la barrière hémato-encéphalique

Contexte :

L’encéphalopathie induite par les produits de contraste (EIPC) est un événement indésirable associé aux procédures endovasculaires diagnostiques et thérapeutiques. À cet égard, des décennies de recherche animale et humaine soutiennent qu’il existe un rôle mécaniste en lien avec le dysfonctionnement pathologique de la barrière hémato-encéphalique (BHE). Nous voulons décrire ici une série de cas survenus dans des établissements de santé et passer en revue la littérature qui soutient le rôle mécaniste de la BHE en ce qui regarde l’EIPC.

Méthodes :

Une analyse de la littérature a été effectuée en consultant les bases de données MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL et Cochrane depuis le début de cette étude jusqu’au 31 janvier 2022. Nous avons aussi effectué une recherche dans une base de données neurovasculaires intra-établissement pour identifier les cas d’EIPC survenus à la suite d’un traitement endovasculaire d’une maladie cérébrovasculaire, et ce, au cours d’une période de six mois. À noter que le consentement éclairé a été obtenu dans tous les cas.

Résultats :

L’examen de la littérature a révélé des facteurs de risque à la fois pour la BHE et l’EIPC, notamment la maladie microvasculaire, la neuro-inflammation pathologique, l’hypertension procédurale sévère, la charge de contraste iodée et l’altération de la dynamique du flux sanguin cérébral. Dans notre échantillon intra-établissement de patients, 6 des 52 (11,5 %) patients ayant subi des procédures thérapeutiques neuro-endovasculaires ont développé une EIPC au cours de la période d’étude. De plus, 4 patients ont été traités pour un AVC ischémique et deux d’entre eux pour des anévrismes cérébraux récurrents. Précisons qu’une endoprothèse mécanique ou une thrombectomie ont été utilisées dans tous les cas.

Conclusion :

Dans notre échantillon intra-établissement de patients et dans notre analyse documentaire de données animales et humaines, nous avons ainsi identifié de nombreux facteurs de risque communs pour l’EIPC et la BHE, y compris la maladie microvasculaire, la durée accrue de l’intervention, les volumes de contraste importants, l’hypertension intra-opératoire sévère et l’utilisation de dispositifs mécaniques qui peuvent induire des lésions endothéliales iatrogènes.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation
Figure 0

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics

Figure 1

Table 2. Perioperative diagnostic and procedural data for patients undergoing endovascular therapy for cerebrovascular disease

Figure 2

Table 3. Postoperative clinical, treatment and radiological data for patients with contrast-induced encephalopathy following endovascular therapy for cerebrovascular disease

Figure 3

Figure 1. Case 1. (A) Unenhanced axial computed tomography (CT) demonstrates blood filling predominantly the anterior basal cisterns and bilateral sylvian fissures. (B) Oblique view cerebral angiogram, left internal carotid artery (ICA) injection demonstrating blister aneurysm of the supraclinoid segment (red arrow). (C) CT angiography (CTA) reconstructions demonstrate post-treatment blister aneurysm recurrence. (D) Unenhanced CT head following treatment of the aneurysm recurrence shows left hemispheric effacement of the cortical sulci and contrast staining. (E) Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) re-demonstrates the contrast extravasation, focused on the hand knob region of the primary motor cortex. Diffusion-weighted imaging demonstrated embolism related infarction in the same region (not shown). (F) Follow-up MRI at 55 hours post-treatment demonstrates near resolution of contrast extravasation and sulcal effacement.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Case 6. (A) CTA 3-dimensional reconstruction demonstrates occlusion of the left MCA (white arrow). (B) CT perfusion demonstrated increased TTP in the left MCA territory. Anterior view of the left ICA injection digital subtraction angiogram pre- (C) and post- (D) EVT, demonstrating TICI 3 result. (E) Unenhanced CT head demonstrates contrast extravasation over the left temporal, parietal and occipital regions with effaced cortical sulci and parenchymal edema. (F) Repeat CT Head 18 hours later demonstrates resolution. CT = computed tomography; CTA = CT angiography; EVT = endovascular thrombectomy; ICA = internal carotid artery; MCA = middle cerebral artery; TICI = Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; TTP = time to peak.

Supplementary material: File

Maclean et al. supplementary material 1

Maclean et al. supplementary material
Download Maclean et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 8.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maclean et al. supplementary material 2

Maclean et al. supplementary material
Download Maclean et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 2.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maclean et al. supplementary material 3

Maclean et al. supplementary material
Download Maclean et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 2.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maclean et al. supplementary material 4

Maclean et al. supplementary material
Download Maclean et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 2.5 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maclean et al. supplementary material 5

Maclean et al. supplementary material
Download Maclean et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 2.7 MB