Introduction

The 1993–95 surge of Bering Glacier and Bagley Ice Valley (formerly Bagley Icefield), Alaska, U.S.A. (Fig. 1), which occurred soon after the 1991 launch of the First European Remote-sensing Satellite (ERS-1), provided a unique opportunity to employ space-borne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery for observation and analysis of this major surge, which affected virtually the entire 180 km length of the largest glacier in continental North America (Reference Molnia and PostMolnia and Post, 1995; Reference FatlandFatland, 1998; Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 1998,Reference Fatland and Lingle2002; Reference Roush, Lingle, Guritz and FatlandRoush and others, 2003). SAR enabled observation of Bagley Ice Valley during the winter months when extended darkness, cold, and heavy snow effectively precluded data acquisition by other means. In particular, the winter “ice phases” of ERS-1, with 3 day exact-repeat orbit cycles, enabled detailed measurement of the surface motions of Bagley Ice Valley using SAR interferometry during mid-winter 1993/94, while the surge was in full progress (Reference FatlandFatland, 1998; Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 1998,Reference Fatland and Lingle2002). These mid-winter observations, combined with earlier work by others on glacier hydrology and surge mechanics (e.g. Reference KambKamb and others, 1985; Reference Clarke, Schmok, Ommanney and CollinsClarke and others, 1986; Reference KambKamb, 1987; Reference RaymondRaymond, 1987; Reference Fountain and WalderFountain and Walder, 1998), suggest a hypothesis that appears capable of shedding light on several aspects of glacier surging. Fundamental to this hypothesis are the observations first published by Reference StenborgStenborg (1970), Reference BjörnssonBjörnsson (1972) and Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others (1975), which led to the conclusion that temperate glaciers store water. This conclusion has been substantiated by more recent observations (e.g. Reference CollinsCollins, 1982; Reference Willis, Sharp and RichardsWillis and others, 1993; Reference Murray, Stuart, Fry, Gamble and CrabtreeMurray and others, 2000).

Fig. 1.

The box shows the location of Bering Glacier and Bagley Ice Valley. Upper Seward Glacier (Fig. 4a and b) is located near the east (right) border of the box.

Englacial Water Storage

Reference StenborgStenborg (1970), who carried out hydrological and other related measurements on Mikkaglaciaren, northern Sweden, from 1June to 1 September 1957, found that the runoff excess during mid-summer was greater than the runoff deficit during early summer by about a factor of two (see table on p. 24 of Reference StenborgStenborg, 1970). He concluded that the glacier had stored water during early summer and subsequently released this stored water during mid-summer. His data suggest that additional storage probably occurred during the preceding spring and, possibly, autumn and winter. Reference BjörnssonBjörnsson (1972) found evidence of delayed runoff due to water storage by Bægisárjökull in northern Iceland.

Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others (1975) estimated the mass balance of South Cascade Glacier, in Washington, U.S.A., by three different methods including the hydrological method. Their observations extended from 1May to 30 September 1965–70. They found that the water volumes released during summer as runoff greatly exceeded the volumes that could be attributed to ablation plus rainfall; the difference was so large it could not be attributed to measurement errors. They concluded that from 1 May to 19 June, water went into storage. From 20 June to 30 September, a volume of water about seven times greater than the volume that apparently went into storage was drained from storage and discharged as runoff. This large difference suggests that additional water went into storage prior to 1 May.

Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others (1975) concluded that during long periods with little or no ablation (late fall to early spring), the glacier’s internal and subglacial drainage system becomes constricted. Thewater resulting from the relatively small amounts of ablation and rain occurring during these periods is thus forced into storage. When ablation increases in the spring, the rapidly increasing hydraulic head forces additional water into storage while the summer drainage system is gradually melting open. Much of the runoff observed during summer was thus stored during the preceding spring and fall.

Reference FountainFountain (1989) showed that the firn on South Cascade Glacier also accounts for significant water storage, with about 12% of the total spring storage being within the firn layer.

More recent studies (e.g. Reference CollinsCollins, 1982; Reference Willis, Sharp and RichardsWillis and others, 1993) have substantiated seasonal water storage by temperate glaciers, with maximum filling and release occurring during varying time periods. Reference Willis, Sharp and RichardsWillis and others (1993), for instance, found that filling of Midtdalsbreen, Norway, continued until late July; this was followed by a period of balance, then another period of filling during August, such that maximum water storage occurred in late August.

Reference Fountain and WalderFountain and Walder (1998) suggest that the likely storage capacity of subglacial cavities beneath small, temperate alpine glaciers (e.g. South Cascade Glacier) is insufficient to account for the estimated volumes of stored water. This implies that most water storage maybe englacial. Considering this problem in greater detail, these authors concluded, by process of elimination, that “a substantial fraction of both short- and longterm water storage is probably englacial”.

Reference Murray, Stuart, Fry, Gamble and CrabtreeMurray and others (2000) found, from measurements of radar propagation velocity vs depth, that the englacial water content of Falljokull, Iceland, (in the ablation area, near the terminus) was equivalent to a layer of water at least 1.8 m thick per square meter of basal area, and that this water was stored within veins and cavities significantly smaller than the resolution of the radar, which was of the order of a few tens of centimeters.

A Storage Mechanism, Winterwater, and Basal Motion

A comparative study of the hydrology of surge-type Black Rapids Glacier and nearby steady-flow Fels Glacier, in the Alaska Range, was carried out by Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others (1995). The period of observation was about mid-May through mid-August 1986–89. The authors concluded that the drainage systems of these glaciers could be viewed as consisting of slow systems, which carried about 80–90% of the water, and superimposed fast systems which carried the remaining 10–20%. The fast systems were restricted to the lowermost 30–40% of the glacier length (within the ablation areas), and consisted of discharge routes (surface streams, moulins and subglacial conduits) that transported water quickly and responded to diurnal variations in water input caused, for example, by surface temperature changes and rainfall. The slow systems, which did not respond to diurnal variations in water input, were described by these authors as consisting of “heterogeneous small passageways throughout the ice and distributed at the bed, which maintained relatively uniform discharge from day to day”.

Black Rapids and Fels Glaciers were found by Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others (1995) to be “hydrologically normal” relative to other temperate glaciers (e.g. Reference Rothlisberger, Lang, Gurnell and ClarkRothlisberger and Lang, 1987). That is, the surge-type character of Black Rapids Glacier could not be distinguished from the steady-flow character of Fels Glacier based on the hydrological measurements.The hydrology of Black Rapids Glacier is not necessarily typical of all surge-type glaciers in Alaska and Yukon; Trapridge Glacier, for example, may have characteristics more typical of surge-type glaciers on the inland side of the Saint Elias Mountains, Yukon Territory, Canada (see Reference Clarke, Collins and ThompsonClarke and others, 1984; Reference Flowers and ClarkeFlowers and Clarke, 1999; Reference FlowersFlowers, 2000; see also Reference BjörnssonBjörnsson, 1998, for an unusual example of subglacial hydrology during an Icelandic surge). The finding that Black Rapids and Fels Glaciers could not be distinguished on the basis of their hydrological characteristics, however, is significant.

The slow drainage systems that existed throughout Black Rapids and Fels Glaciers, in particular throughout the upper 60–70% of their lengths, which contained an estimated 80– 90% of the water at any given time during summer, may act as water-storage elements in late summer and early autumn. That is, at the end of the summer melt season, constriction of the relatively narrow passage ways of the slow systems, due to reduced water flux, may effectively trap large quantities of water within these glaciers. The relatively small amounts of additional water resulting from occasional ablation and rain during this time period (as suggested by Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others, 1975) would then add to the amount of stored water. In addition, water stored within the firn layer at the end of summer very likely drains into the glacier during the subsequent winter, thus adding to englacial storage and, ultimately, to the amount of water reaching the bed (Reference FountainFountain, 1989). Simultaneously, the relatively small amounts of water (about 10–20% of the total) remaining within the fast system may drain out to the terminus and be lost as runoff during late summer and early fall, since there is evidently nothing to prevent this.

In April 1996, seven holes were drilled to depths of about 600 m in Black Rapids Glacier by W.D. Harrison, M. Truffer, K. A. Echelmeyer and others (personal communication, 1997), in preparation for the work described by Reference Truffer, Motyka, Harrison, Echelmeyer, Fisk and TulaczykTruffer and others (1999). The early-spring time period of this project was within hydrological winter, so surface melting had not yet begun. A large volume of water was pumped from one hole to determine whether it had connected with the subglacial water system, using a high-capacity pump. The pump was incapable of lowering the water level, which was close enough to the surface to indicate subglacial water pressure within about 90% of the ice overburden pressure. All of the water was then pumped back into the hole, again with no effect on the water level. The implied subglacial water pressure was within the range found by Reference KambKamb and others (1985) to underlie Variegated Glacier, Alaska, while it was in full surge but Black Rapids Glacier was not surging. This result implies that at least localized high subglacial water pressures are typical of Black Rapids Glacier (and, by implication, other temperate glaciers) during late winter and early spring, and hence that high subglacial water pressures are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for rapid surge motion.

Reference Humphrey and RaymondHumphrey and Raymond (1994) carried out hydraulic measurements on Variegated Glacier before, during and after the surge of 1982–83. They concluded that water storage during the surge was equivalent to a layer about 1m thick per unit area of bed, and that much of it was stored englacially. They went on to say: “This implies a strong relationship between sliding and water storage. Furthermore, the volume of storage implies that the relationship between sliding and the basal hydrologic system is between sliding and volume of water, not necessarily between sliding and basal water pressure.” In addition, they concluded that: “The volume of water stored above the surge front was the major hydraulic control on the surge.” These findings suggest that if the subglacial water pressure is high but the amount of water at the bed is small, fast basal motion may not occur, necessarily, because the ice may be restrained by bed irregularities, while if the amount of water at the bed is large, fast basal motion is likely to occur because the ice is effectively separated from, and therefore not restrained by, the bed irregularities. ( In the latter case, the subglacial water pressure would presumably be high as well.) These findings also suggest that englacially stored water was acting as the source which maintained adequate water volume at the bed.

The conclusions of Reference Humphrey and RaymondHumphrey and Raymond (1994) are consistent with the April 1996 observations of W. D. Harrison, M. Truffer, K.A. Echelmeyer and others (personal communication, 1997) on Black Rapids Glacier, in which high subglacial water pressures per se were not accompanied by fast basal motion.

Bering Glacier Surge: Evidence of Midwinter Subglacial Hydraulic Activity

Reference Roush, Lingle, Guritz and FatlandRoush and others (2003) identified the earliest evidence that the 1993–95 surge of Bering Glacier was in progress in an ERS-1 SAR image acquired on 26 March 1993. From its apparent area of initiation, roughly 50–60km up-glacier from the calving front, the surge propagated both down-glacier to the terminus (Reference RoushRoush, 1996) and up-glacier into Bagley IceValley (Reference FatlandFatland,1998). The acceleration of Bagley Ice Valley was “smooth” enough to yield coherence between SAR images obtained along a 3 day exact-repeat orbit. This enabled use of SAR interferometry to make high-resolution measurements of horizontal velocity prior to the surge, during winter 1992, and velocity, acceleration and vertical motion events while the surge was in full progress, during January–February 1994 (Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 1998,Reference Fatland and Lingle2002).

Circular motion anomalies termed phase bull’s-eyes, typically about 0.5–4 km in diameter, emerged as unexpected and significant features of the interferometric analysis (Fig. 2; see also Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 1998, fig. 17). The distribution of phase bull’s-eyes observed along Bagley Ice Valley during January–February 1994 is shown in Figure 3. (These were not all observed simultaneously.) These anomalies have been described and discussed in detail by Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle (1998,Reference Fatland and Lingle2002).

Fig. 2.

A winter phase bull’s-eye (lower of the two near top center) observed on Tana Glacier (Fig. 3), which is a Bering Glacier distributary that did not participate in the 1993–95 surge of Bering Glacier and Bagley IceValley. Negative phase curvature indicates downward displacement of the surface. Note that concurrent upward displacement of the surface is indicated by positive phase curvature of the bull’s-eye at top center, suggesting simultaneous drainage and emplacement of subglacial water beneath this up- and down-glacier phase bull’s-eyes couplet.

Fig. 3.

Distribution of phase bull’s-eyes observed on Bagley Ice Valley during January–February 1994, while it was in surge. Note that a lesser number of phase bull’s-eyes were also observed during this time period on nearby non-surging glaciers. The scale at bottom shows the ERS-1 time periods during which the orbit geometry was suitable for interferometric SAR observations. (Adapted from Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 2002.)

The simplest and most straightforward interpretation of the phase bull’s-eyes, given their roughly circular, spatially localized and transient nature, is that they represented vertical motions of the glacier surface caused by subglacial hydraulic phenomena. The vertical motions indicated by the fringes were about 3–30cm during the 3 day observation intervals. Phase bull’s-eyes with positive and negative phase curvature were observed with about equal frequency on Bagley Ice Valley; the distribution shown in Figure 3 represents roughly equal numbers of upward and downward motion events during January–February1994 (Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 2002).

Figure 2 shows a prominent phase bull’s-eye on Tana Glacier (a Bering distributary that flows north (see Fig. 3)), having negative phase curvature indicating downward displacement. Tana is not a surge-type glacier, so this shows that mid-winter phase bull’s-eyes were not observed only on the surging main trunk of Bagley Ice Valley and on the post-surge main trunk of Bering Glacier (Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle, 2002). Figure 3 shows that phase bull’s-eyes were also observed on other glaciers that were not in a state of surge, although there were far fewer of them. Reference FatlandFatland (1998) also observed a prominent mid-winter phase bull’s-eye on Black Rapids Glacier, which persisted long enough to show evidence of down-glacier flow. The implication is that the midwinter subglacial hydraulic activity represented by transient phase bull’s-eyes is common to many temperate glaciers, but is much more vigorous when a glacier is in surge.

The phase bull’s-eyes observed on Bagley Ice Valley during mid-winter 1993/94 while it was in full surge could not have resulted from direct drainage of surface water to the bed. The bull’s-eyes thus imply transient delivery of englacially stored water to the bed at discrete locations. If this water originated at the surface up-glacier from a given bull’s-eye during the previous late summer or autumn, this would provide the necessary hydraulic head for lifting (in effect, hydraulic jacking) of the glacier at the location of the bull’s-eye. Lifting of glacier surfaces due to downward movement of surface meltwater after the onset of spring ablation has been observed on many glaciers (e.g. Reference Iken, Rothlisberger, Flotron and HaeberliIken and others, 1983; for a recent description see Reference Mair, Nienow, Willis and SharpMair and others, 2001). Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle (1998, Reference Fatland and Lingle2002) show that this phenomenon also occurs during mid-winter.

A Surge Hypothesis

We propose that englacial storage of water is the fundamental driver of temperate-glacier surges, and suggest that the surge cycle can be described as follows. We begin by supposing that a surge of a glacier such as Bering Glacier–Bagley Ice Valley has run to completion, and the quiescent phase has begun.

1. (1) During each subsequent year the upper glacier thickens, while ablation reduces the thickness of the lower glacier, particularly near the terminus. Simultaneously, the surge-advanced terminus retreats.

2. (2) During late summer/ early autumn of each year, after the end of the main summer melt season, the relatively small amounts of additional water generated by occasional ablation and rainfall are forced into storage, as described by Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others (1975), along with water from the firn reservoir (Reference FountainFountain,1989). This water is added to the large volumes of water already trapped within the glacier’s “slow” drainage system (Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others, 1995) by constriction of the passageways, due to the combination of glaciostatic pressure and reduced water flux.

3. (3) Simultaneously the basal motion, and hence the surface velocity, decreases significantly. We speculate that this may occur because the amount of water at the bed and the subglacial water pressure are both reduced during autumn due to most of the water within the “fast” drainage system (Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others, 1995) running out to the terminus and being lost as runoff.

4. (4) As winter progresses, the large reservoir of englacially stored water moves downward toward the bed. This occurs for the simple reason that water is denser than ice. See, for instance, Reference WeertmanWeertman (1973) and Reference Fountain and WalderFountain and Walder (1998). Reference Raymond and HarrisonRaymond and Harrison (1986) refer to this downward water movement as “pumping”.

5. (5) The heterogeneous nature of the slow englacial drainage system (or what remains of it, after winter constriction of the passageways) causes water to reach the bed at discrete locations, causing subtle upward bulging of the surface on the order of several to a few tens of centimeters. Hydraulic head sufficient for lifting of the glacier may result from water reaching the bed that has originated farther up-glacier, at a higher elevation. An observer acquiring repeat-pass SAR images of the glacier at this time would see this phenomenon as a phase bull’s-eye with upward phase curvature. (Single-pass SAR interferometry does not permit discrimination of the subtle horizontal motion anomalies that may also be associated with uplift.)

6. (6) In addition, basal water may migrate horizontally, conceivably, through what remains of the constricted winter subglacial drainage system. Transient pooling of this water due to blockage at a particular location could also cause subtle upward bulging of the surface, conceivably−given adequate hydraulic head−which would be observed as a phase bull’s-eye with upward phase curvature. Alternatively, drainage of a transient pool due to continued horizontal migration, after overcoming the local blockage, might be observed in an interferogram as a bull’s-eye with negative phase curvature.

7. (7) Meanwhile, the surface velocity gradually increases as winter progresses. This phenomenon, which has been observed on Black Rapids Glacier (personal communication from W. D. Harrison, M. Truffer, and K. A. Echelmeyer, 1997), as well as on other glaciers, implies that basal motion is gradually increasing. The most straightforward explanation for this, we suggest, is that the amount of water at the bed gradually increases during winter due to continued downward movement of the water within the englacial storage reservoir. Figure 4a and b, consisting of interferograms synthesized from SAR images acquired on 21–22 October 1995 (Fig. 4a) and 28–29 March 1996 (Fig.4b), illustrate this phenomenon on upper Seward Glacier in the Saint Elias Mountains. (This area is east (right) of the eastern (right) margin of Figure 3.) The fringes in Figure 4a, at lower right, indicate that the main-trunk Seward Glacier was flowing at about 0.4 m d^{− 1} relative to the adjacent low rock ridge in late October 1995. The increased number of fringes at lower right in Figure 4b indicates that the main-trunk Seward Glacier was flowing at about1.1md⁻¹inthe same area during late March 1996. The flow of upper Seward Glacier thus clearly accelerated during the course of the winter. Simultaneously (in the case of Black Rapids and other glaciers, possibly including Seward Glacier), the subglacial water pressures become high and steady during late winter and early spring due to slow but steady water input to the bed, combined with absence of a free and easy means for this water to drain to the terminus.

8. (8) The glacier, however, does not surge. This is, we suggest, because the slowly increasing volume of water at the bed is able to leak down-glacier without destabilizing the constricted subglacial drainage system of winter. The movements of this water during and after reaching the bed are expressed as relatively infrequent phase bull’seyes in SAR interferograms, as noted above (Fig. 2).

9. (9) In the spring, the rapidly rising hydraulic head caused by the onset of surface melting, while the winter drainage system is still constricted, causes additional water to be forced into storage (Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others, 1975). This process can continue into early summer (Reference StenborgStenborg, 1970) while the efficient summer drainage system, including the fast components, is gradually melting open. Finally, englacially stored water is added to the runoff from surface ablation and rainfall, causing a substantial addition to the mid-summer runoff. All of the englacially stored water probably does not run off during summer, however, and indeed only a small fraction of it may run off. Retention of much of the stored water is, we suggest, likely to be caused by the existence of the slow drainage system which continues to hold about 80–90% of the glacier’s total water (in the case of Black Rapids Glacier (Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others, 1995)), and which forms a slowly moving reservoir that will be augmented, once again, by water storage during the subsequent late summer and early autumn.

10. (10) Each year this cycle repeats itself. The average time required for a given glacier to return to its pre-surge thickness distribution is, we suggest, determined by the surface mass balance, with glaciers in high-precipitation regimes having, on average, shorter surge periods. As the glacier thickens toward its pre-surge geometry, its water-storage capacity increases, because for a given porosity a thicker glacier can store more water. If the surface meteorological conditions resulting in englacial water storage were the same each year, this would result in progressively more water descending to the bed each winter and “leaking off”. The glacier would surge, presumably, in a year when the rate of water reaching the bed became large enough (due to the annually increasing reservoir of englacially stored water) to finally overwhelm the constricted winter subglacial drainage system, thus forcing pervasive failure of the subglacial till (see Reference ClarkeClarke, 1987; Reference Truffer, Harrison and EchelmeyerTruffer and others, 2000) or, alternatively, wide spread and rapid basal sliding (see Reference KambKamb, 1987; Reference RaymondRaymond, 1987).

11. (11) However, the surface meteorological conditions that are favorable for englacial water storage are far from constant. Indeed, these conditions vary stochastically from year to year. A surge-type glacier thus attains, potentially, sufficient water-storage capacity for its next surge by thickening to its pre-surge geometry, but this is only one of at least two requirements. A second requirement that is, we suggest, more important is for the glacier to actually store enough water englacially for the gradual downward migration of this water during winter to finally overwhelm the constricted basal drainage system. This is, we propose, the cause of surge onset in a particular year, given that the glacier has otherwise attained its pre-surge thickness distribution. It is this large storage-capacity requirement, we suggest, that accounts for the statistical finding of Reference Clarke, Schmok, Ommanney and CollinsClarke and others (1986) that “long” glaciers are more likely to be surge-type than “short” glaciers. The connection is that long glaciers are, on average, likely to have lower surface slopes, and thus to be thicker and hence capable of storing more water than short glaciers.

Fig. 4.

(a) An interferogram of upper Seward Glacier, synthesized from SAR images acquired 21–22 October 1995. This area is located east (right) of the eastern (right) margin of Figure 3. The fringes at lower right (southeast) indicate that the main-trunk glacier was flowing at about 0.4 m d–1 relative to an adjacent low rock ridge. (b) An interferogram of the same area of upper Seward Glacier, synthesized from SAR images acquired 28–29 March 1996. The increased number of fringes at lower right (southeast) show that the main trunk glacier was flowing at about 1.1m d–1 at this time relative to the adjacent low rock ridge. The ×2.86 increase of the surface velocity between October 1995 and March 1996 suggests increased basal motion due to downward movement of englacially stored water during the winter.

The problem of whether sufficiently large englacial water storage can occur in 1 year as a result of favorable surface meteorological conditions (mass balance), or whether the surface meteorological conditions must be favorable over a multi-year time period, is open to question. Here we propose that the specific result must be englacial storage of a sufficiently large quantity of water, and that the interannual variability of weather and mass balance results, at some point, in this required storage actually occurring. After the 1957–60 major surge of Bering Glacier–Bagley Ice Valley, for example, a second major surge occurred in 1965–67, after only 5 years of quiescence (Reference PostPost, 1972). The next major surge did not occur until 1993–95, after 26 years of quiescence. In between, however, a false start (a partial surge) occurred in 1981 (personal communication from A. Post, 1993), after 14 years of quiescence. The variability of the timing of surge onset is thus so large that the surge period must be viewed as having a large stochastic component. We propose that the stochastic timing of surge onset for a particular glacier, such as Bering Glacier–Bagley Ice Valley, is caused by the uncertainty of the meteorological conditions that must be satisfied for sufficiently large storage of englacial water to occur.

The two-phase nature of some surges demonstrates that the total englacially stored water volume involved in initiation and sustaining of these surges can be very large. That is, after cessation of the first phase, as in the cases of Variegated Glacier in 1982 (Reference KambKamb and others, 1985) and Bering Glacier in 1993–94 (Reference Roush, Lingle, Guritz and FatlandRoush and others, 2003), sufficient englacially stored water remained to initiate and sustain a second phase, even though both of these glaciers had been drawn down from their pre-surge configurations. In the case of Bering Glacier, the fast motion of the first phase ended with a large outburst of sediment-laden water that began 27 July 1994 and lasted at least 2 weeks (personal communication from B. F. Molnia, 1994). Renewed terminus advance was observed in April 1995, which appeared to cease in July 1995 (personal communication from S. Ranney, 1995). An outburst flood of sediment-laden water occurred in mid-September 1995, which lasted approximately 10 or 11 days (Reference RoushRoush, 1996; Reference Roush, Lingle, Guritz and FatlandRoush and others, 2003). This, we suggest, illustrates the critical role of englacially stored water above and beyond the glacier having a particular pre-surge thickness distribution. We also suggest that the partial Bering Glacier surge of 1981 (personal communication from A. Post, 1993) may have been a result of surface meteorological conditions causing sufficient englacial water storage to initiate a surge, but not enough to sustain it. We note also, as pointed out by M. J. Sharp (personal communication, 2002), that intensive surface and englacial fracturing of a glacier during the first phase of a surge may cause an increase in englacial water storage sufficient to initiate a second phase, due to an increase in the amount of surface area available for melting and a large increase in the number of conduits (i.e. crevasses) whereby water can flow downward into englacial storage.

Summary

A surge hypothesis is presented that builds on the work of Reference StenborgStenborg (1970), Reference BjörnssonBjörnsson (1972), Reference Tangborn, Krimmel and MeierTangborn and others (1975), and more recent studies (e.g. Reference CollinsCollins, 1982; Reference Willis, Sharp and RichardsWillis and others, 1993; Reference Murray, Stuart, Fry, Gamble and CrabtreeMurray and others, 2000) which have shown that temperate glaciers seasonally store water englacially, and the surge observations and hypotheses of Reference KambKamb and others (1985), Reference Raymond and HarrisonRaymond and Harrison (1986), Reference KambKamb (1987) and Reference RaymondRaymond (1987). Our hypothesis also builds on (i) the hydraulic study of Reference Humphrey and RaymondHumphrey and Raymond (1994), which showed that basal motion is a function of the amount of water at the bed, not just the subglacial water pressure; (ii) the work of Reference Raymond, Benedict, Harrison, Echelmeyer and SturmRaymond and others (1995), which showed that glacier drainage can be represented as consisting of superimposed fast and slow drainage systems; (iii) the deep-drilling observations of W. D. Harrison, M. Truffer, K. A. Echelmeyer and others (personal communication, 1997), which showed that Black Rapids Glacier is characterized by high and steady subglacial water pressures during late winter; and (iv) the space-borne interferometric SAR observations of Reference FatlandFatland (1998) and Reference Fatland and LingleFatland and Lingle (1998, Reference Fatland and Lingle2002), which revealed evidence of vigorous subglacial hydraulic activity beneath Bagley IceValley during mid-winter 1993/94, a time when it was in full surge and when this water could not have resulted from direct drainage from the surface.

Englacial storage of a sufficiently large volume of water, after surge-type glaciers have thickened sufficiently to store this water, is proposed as the cause of temperate-glacier surges. The average time required to return a given glacier to its pre-surge geometry appears to be a function of its mass balance, i.e. the regional climate, with glaciers in high-precipitation regimes surging more frequently, on average, than glaciers in low-precipitation regimes. Downward movement of stored water to the bed during winter, at a rate sufficient to finally overwhelm the constricted subglacial drainage system, is proposed as the process that results in surge initiation, consisting of pervasive failure of the subglacial till or, alternatively, the onset of widespread and rapid basal sliding. It follows that “long”glaciers are more likely to be surge-type than “short” glaciers, as determined by Reference Clarke, Schmok, Ommanney and CollinsClarke and others (1986), because long glaciers are likely to be thicker and hence capable of storing more water than short glaciers. It also follows that glaciers do not surge that have sufficient subglacial drainage capacity during winter to allow englacially stored water to “leak off” down-glacier as it descends to the bed, without overwhelming the basal drainage system. In addition, it follows that a surge-type glacier will not actually surge, given that it is otherwise primed by having attained its pre-surge thickness distribution, until the surface meteorological conditions occur that result in englacial storage of a sufficiently large volume of water. We propose that the uncertainty of these meteorological conditions accounts for the stochastic timing of surge onset for a given surge-type glacier.