1 Introduction
The performance of high-power fiber lasers is affected by thermal effects of different kinds, such as transverse mode instability or cladding/coating thermal damage. The thermal management of high-power fiber lasers is thus an important part of their design, especially in cases with large quantum defects such as in thulium-doped fiber lasers (TDFLs)[ Reference Wang, Huang, Song, Wei, Pei and Ruan1– Reference Ren, Li, Wang, Guo, Wu and Zhou3] operating around 2 μm and pumped at 790 nm. Since the heat load and thus temperature have their maximum usually near a fiber end where the pump power is delivered, this location is critical in terms of thermal management.
The heat load maximum appears due to the highest pump absorption, which is proportional to active ion concentration. Therefore, one possibility to reduce the heat load maximum is to decrease the concentration and increase the fiber length proportionally to keep their product constant. Such a method has its limitations in thulium-doped fibers (TDFs) because a low concentration of Tm
${}^{3+}$
ions leads to a less efficient two-for-one process that is known to enhance slope efficiency. Spatially dependent concentration in a fiber cross-section can reduce the heat load while maintaining high efficiency, but there is yet another degree of freedom, not investigated so far, that can be utilized to modify heat load distribution along the active fiber. It is demonstrated here that the longitudinally inhomogeneous profile of concentration can serve to decrease extremes of heat load and temperature.
Several approaches were studied for the thermal management of solid-state and fiber lasers. Primarily, efficient cooling methods were sought that can extract generated heat out of the active fiber to the fiber surroundings. For example, cooling efficiency in different geometries has been analyzed[ Reference Lapointe, Chatigny, Piché, Cain-Skaff and Maran4, Reference Fan, He, Zheng, Dai, Zhao, Wei and Lou5]. Different materials of cladding and coating, including metal clad[ Reference Daniel, Simakov, Hemming, Clarkson and Haub6], were proposed for thermal management of active fibers at the kW level. The general conclusion of these studies is that the cooling medium is to be placed as close to the fiber core as possible, avoiding any intermediate materials with low thermal conductivity. The performance of this practical strategy is limited by an outer fiber diameter that is often large (400 μm) in high-power double-clad fibers.
An all-optical approach to thermal management based on radiation cooling by anti-Stokes fluorescence was proposed for solid-state lasers[
Reference Bowman7]. The method, which was also studied in the context of Yb-doped fiber lasers[
Reference Nemova and Kashyap8–
Reference Yu, Ballato, Digonnet and Dragic12], can in principle achieve nearly zero heat generation by ensuring radiation-balanced lasing when the time-averaged absorbed power density equals the radiated power density due to stimulated and spontaneous emission. This approach can have a great potential in cases where its application conditions are met, that is, for low-quantum defects and
${\nu}_\mathrm{s}<{\nu}_\mathrm{p}<{\nu}_\mathrm{f}$
, where
${\nu}_\mathrm{s}$
,
${\nu}_\mathrm{p}$
,
${\nu}_\mathrm{f}$
are the lasing, pump, and average spontaneous emission (fluorescence) frequencies.
The spatially dependent rare-earth dopant concentration was found to be fruitful in high-power solid-state (crystal) lasers. A multi-slab trivalent ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Yb
${}^{3+}$
:YAG) laser with different concentration in each slab was proposed[
Reference Mason, Ertel, Banerjee, Phillips, Hernandez-Gomez and Collier13,
Reference Banerjee, Ertel, Mason, Phillips, Siebold, Loeser, Hernandez-Gomez and Collier14] as a way to ensure a uniform heat load in each slab. The concept was studied numerically by a three-dimensional ray-tracing code[
Reference Sawicka, Divoky, Novak, Lucianetti, Rus and Mocek15] and by solving propagation equations[
Reference Li, Zhang, Yan, Cui, Wang, Xiao, Jiang, Zheng, Wang and Li16]. It was optimized in the record-breaking solid-state laser Bivoj[
Reference Divoký, Pilař, Hanuš, Navrátil, Denk, Severová, Mason, Butcher, Banerjee, De Vido, Edwards, Collier, Smrž and Mocek17]. Segmented Ho
${}^{3+}$
:YAG crystal lasers have been studied experimentally as well[
Reference Goth, Rupp, Griesbeck, Eitner, Eichhorn and Kieleck18]. Gradient-doped crystals were investigated to increase pumping efficiency[
Reference Stroganova, Galutskiy, Tkachev, Nalbantov, Tsema and Yakovenko19] and demonstrated to limit the temperature extreme[
Reference Wei, Cheng, Dou, Zhang and Jiang20].
The concept of spatially dependent dopant concentration in active optical fibers has been investigated so far only in the context of fiber cross-section inhomogeneity, whether intended or parasitic. Various methods have been proposed to measure concentration distribution in the fiber cross-section[ Reference Yablon21– Reference Vivona, Kim and Zervas23]. Functional active fibers adopting modified chemical vapor deposition (MCVD) and other doping techniques to tailor the transverse doping profile, for example, confined-doped fibers, can exhibit benefits such as higher overlap of the mode field with the active area improving the beam quality[ Reference Chen, Yao, Huang, An, Wu, Pan and Zhou24]. Ring-shaped doping profiles have been shown to reduce the gain of amplified spontaneous emission and to shift the gain peak to the shorter wavelengths, for example, a nested ring Tm-doped fiber provided lasing at 1907 nm with reduced thermal load and without parasitic lasing at longer wavelengths[ Reference Barber, Shardlow, Barua, Sahu and Clarkson25].
To the best of our knowledge, the concept of active fibers with longitudinally inhomogeneous concentration has not been investigated so far. In the next section the simplest model is applied to show how the heat load maximum is reduced when a suitable concentration profile is considered.
2 Search for the maximally flat heat load
Let us consider the simplified model of pump power absorption with a constant pump absorption coefficient
${\alpha}_\mathrm{p}\ [\mathrm{m}^{-1}]$
. From the following propagation equation for pump power
${P}_\mathrm{p}$
:
$$\begin{align}\frac{\mathrm{d}P_\mathrm{p}(z)}{\mathrm{d}z}=-{P}_\mathrm{p}(z){\alpha}_\mathrm{p},\end{align}$$
it follows that pump power decreases along the fiber (
$z$
coordinate) as
${P}_\mathrm{p}(z)={P}_\mathrm{p}(0)\exp \left(-{\alpha}_\mathrm{p}z\right)$
. The pump absorption is proportional to concentration
${N}_\mathrm{t}$
as
${\alpha}_\mathrm{p}={\sigma}_\mathrm{pa}{\overline{N}}_0{N}_\mathrm{t}{\varGamma}_\mathrm{p}$
, where
${\sigma}_\mathrm{pa}$
is the absorption cross-section at the pump wavelength,
${\overline{N}}_0={N}_0/{N}_\mathrm{t}$
is the relative ground level population and
${\varGamma}_\mathrm{p}$
is the pump field overlap with the doped area. If a constant power conversion efficiency between the signal power
${P}_\mathrm{s}$
and the pump power is assumed to be
$\eta ={\mathrm{d}P}_\mathrm{s}/{\mathrm{d}P}_\mathrm{p}$
and assuming that all pump power not converted to a signal is converted to heat, the heat load per unit length is
$$\begin{align}Q(z)&=\left(1-\eta \right)\left(-{\mathrm{d}P}_\mathrm{p}/\mathrm{d}z\right) \end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}&=\left(1-\eta \right){P}_\mathrm{p}(0){\alpha}_\mathrm{p}\exp \left(-{\alpha}_\mathrm{p}z\right)\end{align}$$
and reaches its maximum at
$z=0$
.
Our task is to find the concentration profile
${N}_\mathrm{t}(z)$
that leads to a maximally flat heat load profile along the fiber of a length
$L$
. This is achieved by assuming pump dependence in the form
${P}_\mathrm{p}(z)={P}_\mathrm{p}(0)\left(1-z/L\right)$
. Its derivative
${\mathrm{d}P}_\mathrm{p}/\mathrm{d}z=-{P}_\mathrm{p}(0)/L$
is also equal to the right-hand side of Equation (1) where the absorption coefficient
${\alpha}_\mathrm{p}(z)$
is now considered to be a function of
$z$
. Therefore
$$\begin{align}{\alpha}_\mathrm{p}(z)=\frac{P_\mathrm{p}(0)}{P_\mathrm{p}(z)L}=\frac{1}{L-z}\end{align}$$
and the concentration is
${N}_\mathrm{t}(z)={\alpha}_\mathrm{p}(z)/\left({\overline{N}}_0{\sigma}_\mathrm{pa}{\varGamma}_\mathrm{p}\right)$
. The heat load with this concentration profile is
$z$
-independent, that is,
${Q}_\mathrm{l}(z)=\left(1-\eta \right){P}_\mathrm{p}(0)/L$
. Note that
${\alpha}_\mathrm{p}(0)=1/L$
and
${\alpha}_\mathrm{p}(L)$
diverges in Equation (4). The situation is shown in the example in Figure 1, where power and heat load profiles are compared for constant concentration and for concentration profile using Equation (4). The heat load maximum
$Q\left(z=0\right)=0.38$
W/m is reduced to
$Q(z)=0.1$
W/m if the inhomogeneous profile is applied.
Power and heat load profiles along the active fiber in an oscillator configuration with constant concentration (solid lines) and with an inhomogeneous concentration profile
${N}_\mathrm{t}(z)$
for a maximally flat heat load (dashed lines). Parameters:
$L=4$
m,
$\eta =0.6$
,
${\sigma}_\mathrm{pa}=8\times {10}^{-25}$
m
${}^2$
,
${N}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
,
${\Gamma}_\mathrm{p}=0.005$
,
${N}_0\sim 1$
.
While the above example demonstrates the concept, the theoretical profile (Equation (4)) cannot be realized even in principle because of its divergence at
$z=L$
. Furthermore, the simplified model is not adequate to describe all of the important fiber laser features. Therefore more realistic concentration profiles will be analyzed using a comprehensive numerical model[
Reference Grábner, Švejkarová, Aubrecht, Pokorný, Honzátko and Peterka26].
3 Numerical simulation
3.1 Numerical model
The comprehensive numerical model is based on the solution of laser rate equations together with wavelength-resolved propagation equations for power spectral density[ Reference Grábner, Švejkarová, Aubrecht, Pokorný, Honzátko and Peterka26]. It takes into account a great deal of physically relevant effects that are important for realistic modeling of high-power fiber lasers, such as amplified spontaneous emission, fiber temperature changes due to self-heating[ Reference Grábner, Švejkarová, Aubrecht, Pokorný, Honzátko and Peterka26] based on the analytic model for a temperature radial profile in the fiber[ Reference Grábner, Peterka and Honzátko27], temperature-dependent absorption and emission cross-section spectra[ Reference Jiříčková, Grábner, Jauregui, Aubrecht, Schreiber and Peterka28, Reference Jiříčková, Švejkar, Grábner, Jauregui, Aubrecht, Schreiber and Peterka29], intrinsic fiber attenuation and cross-relaxation dependence on concentration.
3.2 Model parameters
High-power TDFL parameters applied in the numerical model are essentially the same as those reported in Ref. [Reference Grábner, Švejkarová, Aubrecht, Pokorný, Honzátko and Peterka26]. While a majority of the parameters, including, for example, spectroscopic parameters of Tm
${}^{3+}$
ions in silica, are known with sufficient accuracy, the parameters determining the exact relationship between fiber temperature and heat load depend on fiber cooling efficiency provided by a cooling system and thus they are problem-specific. In order to demonstrate the concept, the analytical model[
Reference Grábner, Peterka and Honzátko27] for temperature radial distribution in a layered medium is used with the following set of parameters: doped core with a radius
${a}_1=10$
μm, silica cladding
${a}_2=200$
μm, polymer coating
${a}_3=300$
μm, thermally conducting paste
${a}_4=500$
μm, aluminum heat sink
${a}_5= 501$
μm. Thermal conductivity values in different layers are
${k}_1={k}_2=1.38$
W m
${}^{-1}$
K
${}^{-1}$
,
${k}_3=0.18$
W m
${}^{-1}$
K
${}^{-1}$
,
${k}_4=0.15$
W m
${}^{-1}$
K
${}^{-1}$
,
${k}_5=238$
W m
${}^{-1}$
K
${}^{-1}$
. The background temperature is set to 23°C. Note that the analytical model uses cylindrical layers; in Section 4.2 we show, for comparison, the temperature distribution for real geometry calculated by a numerical model; see the inset in Figure 9.
3.3 Concentration profiles
Several concentration longitudinal profiles were selected to be analyzed and compared with a constant concentration case. The linear profile is defined as follows:
$$\begin{align}{N}_\mathrm{t}\left(\zeta \right)={\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}\left( a\zeta +b\right),\kern1em a=2\left(1-b\right), \end{align}$$
where
$\zeta =z/L$
is the relative longitudinal coordinate,
$a$
,
$b$
are mutually dependent parameters and
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}$
is the average concentration along the fiber,
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=\left(1/L\right){\int}_0^L{N}_\mathrm{t}(z)\mathrm{d}z$
. The step profile is defined as follows:
$$\begin{align}{N}_\mathrm{t}\left(\zeta \right)={\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}{a}_i,\kern1em {\zeta}_i\le \zeta <{\zeta}_{i+1},\kern1em i=1,2,\dots,\end{align}$$
where
${a}_i$
is the relative concentration in the
$i$
th section and
${\zeta}_i$
is the relative coordinate of the
$i$
th section beginning. The Gaussian profile is defined as follows:
$$\begin{align}{N}_\mathrm{t}\left(\zeta \right)={\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}C\exp \left(-\frac{{\left(\zeta -\mu \right)}^2}{2{\sigma}^2}\right),\end{align}$$
where
$\mu$
and
$\sigma$
are the mean value and standard deviation of the Gaussian profile, respectively, and
$C$
is a normalization constant. The tanh profile is defined as follows:
$$\begin{align}{N}_\mathrm{t}\left(\zeta \right)={\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}\left(a+\left(b-a\right)\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tanh \left(\sigma \left(\zeta -\mu \right)\right)\right)\right),\end{align}$$
where
$a$
and
$b$
are the minimum and maximum relative concentration and
$\mu$
,
$\sigma$
are shifting and scaling parameters, respectively. The inverse distance profile is defined as a modification of (Equation (4)) as follows:
$$\begin{align}{N}_\mathrm{t}\left(\zeta \right)=\frac{1}{\sigma_\mathrm{pa}{\varGamma}_\mathrm{p}}\frac{1}{L^{\prime }-{L}^{\prime }{\zeta}^{\prime }},\end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}{\zeta}^{\prime}=\frac{\zeta }{{\left(1+{\left|\zeta \right|}^p\right)}^{1/p}},\end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}p=\frac{-\ln 2}{\ln \left(1-1/\left({N}_\mathrm{tm}{\sigma}_\mathrm{pa}{\Gamma}_\mathrm{p}{L}^{\prime}\right)\right)},\end{align}$$
where
${L}^{\prime}= cL$
, such that
$c\le 1$
is a shorter-than-fiber-length distance, and
${N}_\mathrm{tm}$
is a maximal concentration parameter.
3.4 Temperature versus concentration profiles
In order to demonstrate the influence of the longitudinally inhomogeneous concentration on power and temperature distribution along the active fiber, the cladding-pumped TDFL example is analyzed.
In the analyzed example, the following parameters are assumed: fiber length
$L=7$
m, core diameter
${d}_\mathrm{c}=20$
μm, cladding diameter
${d}_\mathrm{cl}=400$
μm, coating diameter
${d}_\mathrm{ct}= 600$
μm (note that
${d}_\mathrm{c}=2{a}_1$
,
${d}_\mathrm{cl}=2{a}_2$
,
${d}_\mathrm{ct}=2{a}_3$
), numerical aperture (NA) = 0.3, average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
, pump wavelength
${\lambda}_\mathrm{p}=790$
nm, signal wavelength
${\lambda}_\mathrm{s}=2000$
nm, reflectivities
${R}_1=0.99$
,
${R}_2=0.036$
and signal and pump overlap factors
${\varGamma}_\mathrm{s}=0.90$
,
${\varGamma}_\mathrm{p}=0.0025$
. The temperature-dependent cross-section spectra (the Cryo variant[
Reference Jiříčková, Švejkar, Grábner, Jauregui, Aubrecht, Schreiber and Peterka29]) are applied.
Figure 2 compares six longitudinal profiles of concentration
${N}_\mathrm{t}(z)$
with the same average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
. The constant concentration profile (Figure 2(a)) leads to the maximum core temperature of 127.7°C, which is located near the beginning of a fiber. The maximum of the forward propagating signal power
${P}_\mathrm{f}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{s}\right)$
is 592.1 W. Assuming the linear profile of concentration according to Equation (5) with
$b=0.7$
(see Figure 2(b)), the maximum core temperature decreased to 105.8°C and its position shifted inside the fiber. The maximal signal power also decreased to 554.9 W. Assuming a step-wise concentration profile according to Equation (6) with parameters
${\zeta}_1=0$
,
${\zeta}_2=0.33$
,
${\zeta}_3=0.66$
,
${a}_1=0.7$
,
${a}_2=1$
,
${a}_3=1.3$
(see Figure 2(c)), the maximal temperature drops to 114.6°C but the discontinuities of temperature appear at the positions of abrupt changes in the concentration profile. Assuming the Gaussian profile according to Equation (7) with parameters
$\mu =0.7$
,
$\sigma =0.4$
(see Figure 2(d)), the maximal temperature is 114°C with a maximal signal power of 561 W. Assuming the tanh profile according to Equation (8) with parameters
$a=0.25$
,
$b=1.3$
,
$\mu =0.3$
,
$\sigma =6$
(Figure 2(e)), the maximal core temperature is 121.1°C with a maximal signal power of 562.9 W. The inverse distance profile according to Equation (11) with parameters
$c=0.55$
,
${N}_\mathrm{tm}=5\times {10}^{26}$
(see Figure 2(f)), exhibits the greatest drop of maximum temperature to 98.9°C but clearly at the expense of the output power since maximal signal power is
${P}_\mathrm{f}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{s}\right)=516.4$
W. Note that laser output power is
${P}_\mathrm{sout}={P}_\mathrm{f}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{s},z=L\right)\left(1-{R}_2\right)$
.
Power and temperature distribution along the TDFL (pump power
${P}_\mathrm{p}=1000$
W): (a) constant concentration, (b) linear profile, (c) step profile, (d) Gaussian profile, (e) tanh profile and (f) inverse distance profile. All profiles are with the same average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
(
$\sim$
10,900 mol ppm). Notes: numerical values of heat load
$Q$
[W/m] are on the temperature axis;
${P}_\mathrm{f}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{p}\right)$
is the forward propagating pump power,
${P}_\mathrm{f}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{s}\right)$
is the forward propagating signal power and
${P}_{\mathrm{b}}\left({\lambda}_\mathrm{s}\right)$
is the backward propagating signal power.
The relation between the laser output signal power and maximum core temperature along the fiber is depicted in Figure 3 where the profiles with the same average concentration are compared. The output signal power values were achieved by applying pump power from 200 to 2000 W in 100 W steps (see the dots). Clearly, the maximal fiber temperature limits the achievable output power, or in other words, the particular output power leads to different fiber temperatures with different concentration profiles. Note that the temperature differences are less pronounced in the case of coating temperature.
Maximal core temperature versus laser output signal power (for pump power
${P}_\mathrm{p}$
= (200:100:2000) W for different concentration profiles with the same average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
(
$\sim$
10,900 mol ppm) (circles) and for inverse distance and constant profiles with
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.9\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
(
$\sim$
13,100 mol ppm) (squares).
It is evident from the presented examples and Figure 3 that reducing maximal temperature is achieved only at the expense of efficiency (i.e., the ratio of output power to pump power). However, one can achieve the same output power with the same pumping power and still significantly reduce a temperature by using a higher average concentration. The inverse distance profile with parameters
$c=0.4$
,
${N}_\mathrm{tm}=5\times {10}^{26}$
and average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.9\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
is analyzed in Figure 4. The same maximal signal power is achieved as in the case of constant concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.4\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
, but here the maximal core temperature is reduced to 106.4°C, which is more than 20°C less than in the case of constant concentration (with the same output signal power). This inverse distance profile with higher average concentration is also shown in Figure 3 (see the square dots), to achieve a significant reduction of temperature with the same or slightly better efficiency in comparison with the case of a constant profile.
Power and temperature distribution along the TDFL (pump power
${P}_\mathrm{p}=1000$
W); inverse distance profile with the average concentration
${\overline{N}}_\mathrm{t}=2.9\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
(
$\sim$
13,100 mol ppm).
Note that a constant concentration profile with an increased average concentration would provide even higher output power but also significantly higher maximal heat load and temperature. Therefore, using a suitable inhomogeneous profile, one can set a better trade-off between power and temperature, or in other words, a higher output power can be achieved under the requirement that the prescribed maximum temperature limit is not to be exceeded.
For example, let us assume that the coating temperature
${t}_\mathrm{ct}$
has to be kept lower than 81°C. Taking this limit into account, the maximum signal power 574.4 W can be achieved with maximum core temperature
${t}_\mathrm{c}=106.9$
°C, maximum coating temperature
${t}_\mathrm{ct}=80.9$
°C for lower constant concentration
${N}_\mathrm{t}=2.05\times {10}^{26}$
m
${}^{-3}$
and increased fiber length
$L=12$
m. Note that the output signal power is lower than in Figure 4 where the same temperature limits are fulfilled by using an inverse distance profile on a 7 m long fiber.
The numerical model of the fiber laser respects nonuniform pump absorption due to nonuniform population inversion along the fiber but assumes a homogeneous overlap factor of the pump field with the doped area. However, simulations of electromagnetic field propagation[ Reference Grábner, Nithyanandan, Peterka, Koška, Jasim and Honzátko30] in double-clad active fibers show that the overlap and resulting pump absorption profile are also dependent on the spatial distribution of the excitation field and on the cladding geometry.
4 Experimental details
A practical demonstration of longitudinally inhomogeneous concentration in the TDFL was performed by multi-segmented active fibers with varying configurations.
4.1 Methodology
An in-house prepared double-clad fiber (SG1647) with inhomogeneous thulium concentration was used for the experiments. That allowed the selection of various sections with different concentrations with a minimal variation in the refractive index profile, thus reducing the splice losses between different parts of the fiber. However, it is essential to clarify that this inhomogeneity was not localized in the short fiber segments. The fiber was processed to a quasi-octagonal shape with core, pedestal and cladding (flat to flat) dimensions of 12, 31 and 132 μm, respectively. During the experiment, the fiber was placed on the aluminum plate and fixed using Kapton tape at several spots. This arrangement allowed for optimal conditions to observe heat distribution.
In the initial stage, the individual segments with Tm
${}^{3+}$
concentrations of 6900 (A), 11,800 (B), 13,700 (C) and 16,000 (D) molar ppm were measured separately. The concentration was calculated based on the measured cladding absorption and the cladding/core radius ratio. In a 100%–4% setup, shown in Figure 5, the resonator was formed by a high-reflectivity (HR) fiber Bragg grating (FBG), centered around 1940 nm (AFR/TeraXion), along with a perpendicularly cleaved end. The pump was provided by a laser diode (LD) operating at 792 nm (Aerodiode/BWT) protected from 2 μm radiation by fiber with high OH concentration (Hi OH, Thorlabs FG105UCA). Individual segments were measured up to a pump power of 30 W. A passive fiber (Nufern SM-GDF 10/130 μm) was utilized to minimize mode-field diameter mismatch between the active fiber and the various FBGs. The unabsorbed pump power was separated by a silicon filter or dichroic mirror. Using cut-back measurement, the maximal slope efficiency with respect to pump power was determined.
Experimental setup of the TDFL.
In the next step, two two-segmented lasers were prepared to compare segmented and uniformly doped active fibers in the resonator. Both had the same fiber length and similar average concentration and they contained a splice in between to minimize their influence. These splices were created using an optimized program on the splicer (Fitel S185) providing loss estimation based on image analysis as well. In addition, we tested three- and four-segmented lasers to demonstrate the character of the step-profile laser. All TDFLs were tested using the same setup as for the individual segments. During the characterization, the spectra were measured with an optical spectrum analyzer (Yokogawa AQ6375), and the surface temperature was monitored using a thermal camera (Micro-epsilon TIM40).
4.2 Results
Table 1 summarizes the slope efficiencies for individual segments. According to these results, segmented TDFLs were formed by splicing together individual segments. The particular compositions of the segmented TDFLs are listed in Table 2.
Slope efficiency for individual segments pumped up to 30 W.
Composition of formed segmented TDFLs; all units are in meters.
Figure 6 shows the performance of two-segmented TDFLs. The segmented laser’s slope efficiency was 65.3%, consistent with the uniformly doped one. However the two-segmented uniform TDFL did not last out the pump power above 40 W. The thermal camera image in Figure 7 illustrates well the fundamental principles of multi-segment laser operation. The temperature label indicates the highest value in the marked area. At the same pump power, the heat distribution along the segmented fiber was more even, allowing the fiber to handle higher pump powers.
Laser performance comparison of two-segmented and uniformly doped fiber. Both TDFLs have similar average Tm concentration and fiber length.
Thermal image of the (a) two-segmented TDFL and (b) two-segmented uniform TDFL under the same pump powers. The temperature of 110°C was reached just before the splice failure.
Additional segments were added to the laser configuration for further experiments. The three-segmented laser demonstrated performance reaching a slope efficiency of 62%, as shown in Figure 8(a). The thermal camera image in Figure 8(b) indicates a notably improved heat distribution. The image also shows that the splice between the first and second segments (S1-S2) was warmer than the splice where the pump power enters the first segment of the active fiber (FBG-S1). This observation suggests that the lengths and concentrations of the individual active fibers can be designed more effectively.
(a) Performance of the three-segmented TDFL. (b) Thermal camera image at a pump power of 28 W.
The temperature at the outer coating along the fiber determined from the thermal camera image is compared with the simulated fiber temperature in Figure 9. The temperature was calculated from the heat load
$Q$
using the analytical model[
Reference Grábner, Peterka and Honzátko27] calibrated by Comsol heat transfer simulations of an active fiber placed on the cooled plate; see the inset of Figure 9. The temperature peaks were modeled by introducing ‘splice losses’
${L}_\mathrm{s}=$
0.02, 0.025 and 0.012 dB/cm at locations
$z=$
0, 55 and 162 cm along the fiber, respectively, based on the experimental observations. It is evident that in the first 50 cm of the fiber where
$Q(z)\sim 4$
W/m, the temperature was significantly lower compared with the case of uniform fiber with the same average concentration (see dashed lines).
Measured (crosses) and simulated (lines) fiber temperature of the three-segmented TDFL at a pump power of 28 W versus uniform fiber with the same average concentration (dashed lines). Inset: simulated temperature distribution of active fiber laying on a cooling desk under core heat load
$Q=20$
W/m.
Based on these findings, an attempt was made to further improve laser performance by integrating a fourth segment. In particular, segment B was placed at the second position to achieve a more gradual increase of Tm ion concentration while maintaining approximately the same resonator length and same total averaged concentration. It reduced the temperature of the splice S1-S2 (compare Figures 8 and 10) and segment C could be shortened, as the last splice was not at higher risk of heat damage. The laser exhibited a stable output power of 54 W and even greater improvements in slope efficiency exceeding 64% with the pump power up to 30 W and 62% for the high power test, shown in Figure 10. Furthermore, the threshold was lowered compared to individual segments with higher concentrations. See Figure 11 for a summary of the slope efficiency and threshold power.
(a) Performance of the four-segmented fiber laser. (b) Thermal camera image at a pump power of 33 W.
Summary of the measurements at pump power of up to 30 W.
5 Conclusion
Segmented active fibers were utilized to distribute the heat load along the fiber more effectively during laser operation. A comparison between the two-segmented fiber and the uniformly doped fiber with the same length and average concentration demonstrated that the segmented design allows for better heat distribution, enabling it to withstand higher pump powers and maintain good efficiency at the same time.
The output power of 30 and 54 W was achieved for the three-segmented and four-segmented TDFLs, respectively. Both lasers exceed the slope efficiency of 62%, comparable with individual segments, although they contain splices between the active fibers. This could be improved by using a single fiber with a concentration gradient, which is challenging to achieve with the current state of technology.
Fiber lasers with longitudinally segmented fibers provide promising solutions for integrating highly doped TDFs with an efficient two-for-one process into the laser while minimizing thermally induced damage, leading to efficient high-power lasers.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, project No. 23-05701S, and co-funded by the European Union and the state budget of the Czech Republic under project LasApp CZ.02.01.01/00/22 008/0004573.
Open access
