The prevalence of hypertension, a main contributor to stroke, CHD and early mortality(Reference Lewington, Clarke and Qizilbash1), has increased in many countries worldwide, including China. A report from the International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterASIA, 2000–2001)(Reference Gu, Reynolds and Wu2) showed that the prevalence of hypertension has increased 42 % in Chinese men compared with results from the 1991 Chinese National Hypertension Survey(Reference Wu, Duan and Gu3). Changes in lifestyle, including diet, and an increase in life expectancy resulting from the recent economic development of China may, in part, explain the rapid increase in the prevalence and absolute number of hypertension cases in China(Reference Chen4).
Many cross-sectional and prospective epidemiological studies have demonstrated that alcohol consumption is one of the most important modifiable risk factors for hypertension among populations from various geographic regions, including North America, Europe and Asia(Reference He and Bazzano5–Reference Beilin and Puddey7). Smoking has been shown to have an acute effect on raising blood pressure (BP) by vasoconstriction and accelerating the heart rate(Reference Benowitz, Kuyt and Jacob8–Reference Cryer, Haymond and Santiago11). The chronic effects of habitual smoking on BP have not been adequately examined in epidemiological studies. A recent meta-analysis of twenty-four case–control studies conducted in China from 1989 to 2001 has suggested that alcohol consumption, smoking, high intake of salt, family history of hypertension, quickness to temper and overweight were the important risk factors for hypertension in China(Reference Luo, Luan and Yuan12).
The role of dietary factors in the modulation of BP among hypertensive and normotensive adults has been investigated in intervention(Reference Svetkey, Simons-Morton and Vollmer13, Reference Appel, Moore and Obarzanek14) and observational studies(Reference Miura, Greenland and Stamler15–Reference Centritto, Lacoviello and di Giusepe19). International comparisons and results from studies of migrants and religious groups have suggested that differences in diet may be important determinants of variability in BP(Reference Ascherio, Stampfer and Colditz16). While intervention studies have shown relatively consistent results on dietary intake and BP, the interventions often focused on pre-specified diet and often involved short-term exposure. Dietary pattern analysis has the ability to integrate the complex and subtle interactive effects of many dietary exposures and more closely approximates the biological activity of interdependent nutrients in vivo (Reference Appel, Moore and Obarzanek14, Reference Hu20). However, both factor analysis and cluster analysis, the two most common approaches used to investigate dietary patterns, are considered a posteriori approaches, which generate dietary patterns based on available, empirical data without an a priori hypothesis(Reference Hu20).
We report here on the associations of dietary patterns, selected lifestyle factors, such as cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, and their interactions with BP among middle-aged and elderly Chinese men in Shanghai who are participants of a large, population-based cohort study and who had reported no history of physician-diagnosed hypertension.
Subjects and methods
Study population
This is a cross-sectional analysis of data collected in the baseline survey of the Shanghai Men's Health Study. The Shanghai Men's Health Study is an ongoing, population-based cohort study conducted in eight typical communities of Shanghai, China(Reference Cai, Zheng and Xiang21). All male residents who were 40–74 years of age and had no prior history of cancer were eligible for the study. Trained interviewers visited the homes of 83 058 eligible men identified through the Shanghai Resident Registry who lived in the study communities during the time the baseline survey was conducted; 61 504 men were recruited men into the study between 2002 and 2006. The participation rate was 74·0 %. Reasons for non-participation were refusals (21·1 %), absence during the study period (3·1 %), and other miscellaneous reasons including poor health or hearing problems (1·8 %). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of each participating institution, and all participants provided written, informed consent.
The baseline survey was completed by in-person interview using a structured questionnaire designed to collect information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, including dietary intake, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, medical history and use of medications, including antihypertensives and hormones. The prevalence of hypertension was assessed by the question, ‘Have you ever been diagnosed with hypertension by a physician?’
Blood pressure measurement
At the baseline survey, BP was measured for 98·2 % of participants (n 60 401). After the participants sat quietly for more than 5 min, systolic and diastolic BP were taken using an aneroid sphygmomanometer according to a standard protocol(Reference Perloff, Grim and Flack22). Based on the recommendations of the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (the Joint National Committee 7 full report, accessed on 28 August 2007)(23), we defined pre-hypertension as systolic BP ≥ 120 to < 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 80 to < 90 mmHg and hypertension as systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90.
Assessment of dietary intake
Dietary information was collected via an in-person interview using a validated FFQ(Reference Villegas, Yang and Liu24). The FFQ included eighty-one food items, which covered 88·8 % of the commonly consumed foods in urban Shanghai. For each food item or food group, participants were asked how frequently (daily, weekly, monthly, annually or never) they consumed the food or food group, followed by a question on the amount of consumption in liang (1 liang = 50 g) per unit of time over the past 12 months. For seasonal food consumption (mainly fruits and vegetables), an additional question about months of food consumption per year was asked. Our prior investigation of this FFQ found favourable dietary intake estimation characteristics when compared to dietary intake estimated by multiple 24 h dietary recalls(Reference Hu20). For example, correlation coefficients between the FFQ and averages from 24 h dietary recalls ranged between 0·59 and 0·66 for macronutrients, 0·41 and 0·59 for most micronutrients, and 0·41 and 0·66 for major food groups.
Dietary pattern derivation
Dietary patterns were derived using factor analysis(Reference Cai, Zheng and Xiang21, Reference Kleinbaum, Kupper and Muller25), with eighty-one individual foods or food groups entered into the analysis as the absolute amount of intake in grams per day. The PROC FACTOR procedure in Statistical Analysis Systems (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was applied to perform the analysis. This procedure uses factor analysis and orthogonal rotation (Quartimax option in Statistical Analysis Systems) to derive non-correlated factors and to render the results more easily interpretable. To determine which number of factors to retain, we examined both the scree plots and the factors themselves to see which set of factors most meaningfully described the distinct food consumption patterns after adjustment for total energy intake. Three major dietary patterns that account for about 41·4 % of the variation of dietary intake were derived(Reference Cai, Zheng and Xiang21). Factors were thereby interpreted as dietary patterns and named after the food groups with the highest loading. These loadings can be considered as correlation coefficients between food groups and dietary patterns and take values between − 1 and +1. A factor score was then calculated for each participant for each of the factors, in which the standardised intakes of each of the eighty-one foods or food groups were weighted by their factor loadings and summed. The sums were then standardised again ((score − mean score)/sd of score).
From these analyses, three factors were extracted and factor-loading matrices for the three dietary patterns are listed in Appendix 1. The higher the factor loading of a given food item, the greater the contribution of that food item to the specific factor. Dietary pattern I was heavily loaded with vegetables, such as legumes and leafy vegetables and named the ‘vegetable’ pattern. Pattern II was heavily loaded with fruits and milk and named the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern. Pattern III was heavily loaded with meat, poultry and organ meat (heart, brain, tongue, intestine, etc.) and named the ‘meat’ pattern.
Statistical analysis
For the present study, we excluded men who reported a history of hypertension (n 18 359), diabetes (n 3864), CHD (n 3154) or stroke (n 536), or who took antihypertensive medication (n 14 160; not mutually exclusive). These exclusions were made because of concerns that dietary practice and BP could be substantially influenced by disease diagnosis and use of medications. In addition, we excluded men with missing BP data (n 1103) or with extreme total energy intake ( < 2092 and >16 736 kJ ( < 500 or >4000 kcal)/d; n 91). After these exclusions, 39 252 men remained for the current analysis.
Study participants were categorised into quintiles of dietary factor scores for each dietary pattern, and participants in the lowest quintile were chosen as the reference group. Mean BP differences associated with each category of dietary factor scores were compared with the reference group, and their 95 % CI were estimated using a multiple regression model. Covariates adjusted for included age, BMI, education, income, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, weight gain since age 20 and total dietary energy intake. A linear trend test was performed by treating ordinal score variables as continuous variables in the model. We also tested linearity using continuous dietary factor scores. We conducted analyses stratified by cigarette smoking (never, light ( < 20 cigarettes/d) and heavy ( ≥ 20 cigarettes/d)) and alcohol consumption (never, light ( < 7 times/week) and heavy ( ≥ 7 times/week)) status to evaluate the potential interactive effect of these variables on dietary patterns with quintile categories. Tests for interaction were performed by introducing a multiplicative interaction term into the main effect models. We also applied a polychotomous logistic regression model to evaluate associations between each dietary pattern and prevalence of pre-hypertension or hypertension. All tests of statistical significance were based on two-sided probability. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of Statistical Analysis Systems software (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Table 1 presents selected characteristics of study participants according to the three derived dietary patterns. The mean age of the study population was 52·5 (sd 8·9) years. Approximately, 22 % of the study participants had attained college or higher education, 65·8 % reported ever smoking and 31·0 % reported regular alcohol consumption (at least 3 times/week for at least 6 months). About 30 % of study participants engaged in regular exercise (once a week at least for 3 months continuously during the 5 years preceding the interview). The mean values of systolic and diastolic BP were 121·9 (sd 15·4) and 79·9 (sd 9·4) mmHg, respectively. The prevalence of pre-hypertension and hypertension were 47·6 and 25·1 %, respectively. Men with a higher score for the ‘vegetable’ pattern were more likely to drink alcohol compared with men with a lower score. Men with a higher score for the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern were older, had higher educational attainment and higher income, and tended to exercise regularly, but were less likely to smoke cigarettes or drink alcohol than men with a lower score. Men with a higher score for the ‘meat’ pattern were younger and were more likely to smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol compared to men with a lower score (Table 1). Men with higher scores for either the ‘vegetable’ or the ‘meat’ pattern also had higher intakes of Na, K, Ca and Mg.
(Mean values and standard deviations or percentages)
LTPA, leisure time physical activity.
* Alcohol consumption was defined as ‘at least 3 times/week for more than 6 months continuously’.
† Derived from foods, table salt or cooking salt.
The associations of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption with BP are presented in Table 2. Alcohol consumption was positively associated with both systolic and diastolic BP, while cigarette smoking was only associated with systolic BP. The adjusted mean systolic BP was 3·2 mmHg higher (95 % CI 2·9, 3·5) and diastolic BP was 2·0 mmHg higher (95 % CI 1·8, 2·2) for current drinkers compared with never drinkers. The positive association between cigarette smoking or alcohol consumption and BP was statistically stronger among heavy smokers (P < 0·001, for diastolic BP) and drinkers (P < 0·001, both BP).
(Mean values, standard deviations, OR and 95 % CI)
* Mean difference in BP with each category of each group from the factor analysis compared with the reference level, estimated by the multiple regression models after adjustment for age, BMI, education, income, weight gain since age 20 years and total dietary energy intake.
† BP of men who never smoked or drank alcohol.
After adjustment for confounding factors, the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern was inversely associated with both systolic and diastolic BP. The adjusted mean systolic BP was 2·9 mmHg lower (95 % CI − 3·4, − 2·4) and diastolic BP was 1·7 mmHg lower (95 % CI − 2·0, − 1·4) for men with a score in the highest quintile of the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern compared with men with a score in the lowest quintile. On the other hand, the ‘vegetable’ pattern was not associated with either systolic or diastolic BP. The ‘meat’ pattern was unrelated to systolic BP, but was positively and marginally significantly related to diastolic BP (Table 3). The results for all dietary patterns did not change materially when analyses were confined to participants who reported no major changes in their diet during the preceding 5-year period (n 27 436).
(Mean values, standard deviations, OR and 95 % CI)
* Mean difference in BP with each category of each group from the factor analysis compared with the reference level, estimated by the multiple regression models after adjustment for age, BMI, education, income, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, weight gain since age 20 years and total dietary energy intake.
† Test for linearity.
‡ BP of men in lowest quintile for each dietary pattern.
The effect of each dietary pattern on BP was further evaluated by stratifying by alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking status. The inverse association between the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern and BP was more pronounced among current smokers, particularly among heavy smokers. The interaction test, however, was not statistically significant (Table 4). Among heavy drinkers, on the other hand, the highest quintile of scores for the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern was associated with 4·1 mmHg lower systolic BP (95 % CI − 5·2, − 3·1) and 2·0 mmHg lower diastolic BP (95 % CI − 2·7, − 1·3) compared with the lowest quintile of scores, while the corresponding reductions in systolic and diastolic BP among non-drinkers were 2·0 mmHg (95 % CI − 2·6, − 1·5) and 1·3 mmHg (95 % CI − 1·6, − 0·9), respectively (Table 4). Tests for multiplicative interaction were significant for both systolic (P = 0·003) and diastolic (P = 0·011) BP. The associations of the ‘vegetable’ and the ‘meat’ patterns with BP were not modified by smoking or alcohol consumption status (data not shown).
(OR and 95 % CI)
Ref., reference.
* Mean difference in BP with each category of each group from the factor analysis compared with the reference level, estimated by the multiple regression models after adjustment for age, BMI, education, income, weight gain since age 20 years, total dietary energy intake, and total intake of Na and Ca.
† Former smokers included men who had ever smoked at least 1 cigarette/d for more than 6 months but were not smoking at the time of the interview. < 20 (cigarettes/d) v. ≥ 20 (cigarettes/d): smoked < 20 cigarettes/d v. >20 cigarettes/d.
‡ P for interaction between smoking or alcohol consumption (never and ever smoker/drinker) and five categories of the fruit and milk diet.
§ P for interaction between smoking or alcohol consumption (no currently, light and heavy smoker/drinker) and five categories of fruit and milk diet.
∥ Alcohol consumption was defined as ‘at least 3 times/week for more than 6 months continuously’.
¶ Former drinkers included men who had ever drunk alcohol at least 3 times/week for more than 6 months continuously, but were not drinking at the time of the interview. < 7 (times/week) v. ≥ 7 (times/week): drunk < 7 times/week v. >7 times/week.
Table 5 presents associations of each dietary pattern with prevalence of pre-hypertension and hypertension based on polychotomous logistic regression analysis stratified by alcohol consumption status. Similar to the results for BP, higher scores for the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern were associated with a lower prevalence of both pre-hypertension and hypertension, and the associations appeared to be stronger among current drinkers. Although the ‘vegetable’ and the ‘meat’ patterns were positively associated with the prevalence of pre-hypertension and hypertension among all participants, the associations were most evident for former alcohol drinkers (Table 5).
(OR and 95 % CI)
* OR adjusted for age, BMI, education, income, cigarette smoking, weight gain since age 20 years and total dietary energy intake compared to subjects with normal blood pressure.
Discussion
The prevalence of self-reported physician diagnosis of hypertension (47·9 % for men 40–75 years of age) in our entire study population is higher than that in the recent InterASIA report (2000–1) on a Chinese population of men (38·7 % for men 45–75 years of age)(Reference Gu, Reynolds and Wu2). Considering the high prevalence of undiagnosed and untreated hypertension in China(Reference Hou26), the prevalence could be higher. After we excluded men who had a history of physician-diagnosed hypertension and men who had ever used antihypertensive drugs or had a history of diabetes, CHD or stroke at the baseline survey, the prevalence rate of hypertension was still 25 %, suggesting a substantial underdiagnosis of hypertension in the present study population. In addition, 47·5 % men had pre-hypertension. In the present study, we found that a dietary pattern with high consumption of fruit and milk was significantly and inversely associated with both lower systolic and diastolic BP in men. Its effect was more evident among current alcohol drinkers, particularly heavy drinkers, and was independent of other socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. On the other hand, neither a dietary pattern with high consumption of vegetables nor a pattern with high consumption of meat was related to higher systolic or diastolic BP, and no interaction with alcohol consumption was observed.
One aspect of dietary patterns, which is presumably related to BP level, is the co-contributions of micronutrients such as K, Ca, Na, Mg, fibre, etc(Reference Hermansen27). An alternative explanation points to compounds abundant in fruits and vegetables, such as antioxidants, which help to prevent oxidative stress. For example, it has been shown that 100 g of fresh apples may have antioxidant activity equivalent to 1500 mg of ascorbic acid(Reference Eberhardt, Lee and Liu28). Vascular oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension, resulting in impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation(Reference McIntyre, Bohr and Dominiczak29), although the Supplementation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants-randomised trial could not demonstrate any beneficial effect of low-dose antioxidant supplementation on 6·5 year risk of hypertension(Reference Czernichow, Bertrais and Blacher30).
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension intervention study(Reference Appel, Moore and Obarzanek14) and the Oxford Fruit and Vegetable Study(Reference John, Ziebland and Yudkin31) have both shown that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products, and low in saturated fats can substantially lower both systolic and diastolic BP. The present finding that a ‘fruit and milk’ pattern was associated with lower BP is consistent with these reports. However, in the present study, neither the ‘vegetable’ nor the ‘meat’ patterns were related to BP. The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study reported an inverse association of BP with consumption of a plant-based diet (e.g. whole grains, fruits and nuts) and a positive association with red and processed meat(Reference Steffen, Kroenke and Yu32). McNaughton et al. (Reference McNaughton, Mishra and Stephen18) reported that a mixed pattern, including fruit, vegetables and dairy products, as well as a meat, potatoes and sweet foods pattern was inversely associated with BP. A higher score for an ‘olive oil and vegetables’ dietary pattern was associated with lower BP in Italian men(Reference Centritto, Lacoviello and di Giusepe19). A vegetarian diet has been associated with some degree of protection against hypertension compared with a non-vegetarian diet in a Western population(Reference Armstrong, van Merwyk and Coates33). On the other hand, a null association between vegetable consumption and BP or hypertension was reported in several other clinical interventions(Reference Czernichow, Bertrais and Blacher30) and observational(Reference Sanakane, Teutsumi and Gotoh17, Reference Steffen, Kroenke and Yu32, Reference Chen, Factor-Lovak and Howe34) studies. It is noteworthy that the definition of the ‘vegetable’ pattern in the present study is different from that used in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study and other studies. In addition, because many lifestyle factors are associated with dietary patterns and there is overlap between dietary patterns, it is difficult to truly distinguish one dietary pattern from another.
There are several possible explanations for the different associations observed for the ‘vegetable’ and the ‘fruit and milk’ patterns in the present study. First, a high score for the ‘vegetable’ or the ‘meat’ pattern was related to a high intake of Na, while a high score for the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern was not related to a dietary Na intake. Intake of total Na was positively associated with both systolic and diastolic BP in the present study population, consistent with results from other populations(Reference Hermansen27, Reference Chen, Factor-Lovak and Howe34). However, additional adjustment for Na and Ca intakes did not change the associations of dietary patterns with BP. In contrast to the eating habits of Western populations, which often consume vegetables that are raw and fresh, Chinese populations tend to eat vegetables that have been cooked with salt or that have been pickled. Second, mineral absorption in the intestine is affected by compounds that are consumed at the same time and interact with other minerals. For instance, phytate and oxalate, both abundant in vegetables, can impair the bioavailability of Ca, Fe and Zn, and phytate content depends to some extent on food processing and cooking methods(Reference Ma, Jin and Piao35). On the other hand, the citric and ascorbic acids, abundant in fruit, have been reported to have a synergistic effect on the mineral absorption and bioavailability of Ca and P in the body(Reference Lacour, Tardivel and Drueke36). Third, in view of the effect of antioxidants on BP, cooking vegetables before they are eaten may result in the loss of some antioxidant content (e.g. vitamin C). Finally, because the association of the ‘vegetable’ pattern with BP was no longer present when the analysis was restricted to participants who reported no major changes in recent diet, reverse causality, i.e. diet modification as a means to prevent high BP among men with high BP, could not be excluded.
The positive association between alcohol consumption and BP is widely recognised. Consistent with the present results, many epidemiological studies have reported a positive association between alcohol consumption and BP(Reference Klatsky, Friedman and Siegelaub37–Reference Marmot, Elliott and Shipley39). A prospective cohort study in Japan(Reference Yoshita, Miura and Morikawa40) observed that the average annual increase in systolic BP was greater among alcohol drinkers who consumed ≥ 300 g/week than among non-drinkers, suggesting a hypertensive effect of long-term alcohol consumption. Smoking causes an acute increase in BP and heart rate and possibly malignant hypertension(Reference Tuomilehto, Elo and Nissinen41), which could be explained by nicotine acting as an adrenergic agonist, mediating local and systemic catecholamine release of vasopressin(Reference Cryer, Haymond and Santiago11). A study in England showed a small independent effect of smoking on BP(Reference Primatesta, Falaschetti and Gupta42), similar to results from the present study. However, a cross-sectional study in Japan found lower BP in cigarette smokers(Reference Okubo, Miyamoto and Suwazono43). It is noteworthy that in the present study, the association of the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern with BP was modified by alcohol consumption status; the association between the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern and BP was stronger among current and heavy alcohol drinkers. To our knowledge, no study has reported a combined effect of dietary patterns and alcohol consumption on BP, although Criqui et al. (Reference Criqui, Langer and Reed44) reported that intakes of Ca and K were significantly and inversely related to BP in non-drinkers and light drinkers compared with heavy drinkers. The present study appears to suggest that the nutrients, including antioxidants and certain minerals abundant in the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern, may counteract the negative effects of alcohol consumption that cause vascular damage. More studies are needed to confirm the present findings.
It is noteworthy that given the cross-sectional nature of the present study, no causal association of dietary patterns with BP can be established. Although careful adjustment for multiple confounders did not appreciably change the results, we could not completely exclude the possibility of residual confounding due to unmeasured or inaccurately measured covariates, such as information on family history of hypertension and BP-related diseases including hypercholesterolaemia. It is possible that men with a known family history of hypertension or with hypercholesterolaemia were more likely to pursue healthier lifestyles and dietary practices than those without such a family history or condition. BMI and weight gain are related to BP and dietary patterns, and thus may act as confounders. It is also possible they are in the causal pathway. In the present study, the association of the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern with BP changed little with or without adjustment for BMI and weight gain (data not shown). The ‘vegetable’ pattern, on the other hand, was inversely associated with BP without adjustment for BMI and weight gain, indicating possible overadjustment (data not shown). However, we also found that the ‘vegetable’ pattern was positively associated with BMI and weight gain, suggesting possible reverse causation (data not shown). Studies with a prospective design are needed to disentangle the nature of the relationship between dietary patterns and BP. Because there are many potential differences in nutrients between dietary patterns, this approach cannot determine the specific nutrients responsible for BP differences. Dietary patterns are likely to vary according to sex, socioeconomic status, ethnic group and culture, and the meaning of a dietary pattern could change over time because of changes in food preferences and food availability(Reference Hu20). Although the distribution of age, sex, education level and occupation in the eight participant communities is similar to the general population of urban Shanghai, it is unclear whether the present findings can be generalised to residents of sub-urban Shanghai or to other cities in China. Thus, it is necessary to replicate these results in diverse populations. Nevertheless, the present study has several strengths. The population-based study design and high response rate minimised selection bias. BP was measured in participants' homes by trained medical professionals. The comprehensive information on lifestyle and dietary factors allowed for adjustment of a broad range of potential confounding variables.
In summary, we found that the ‘fruit and milk’ pattern was inversely associated with BP, and the effect was more pronounced in current and heavy alcohol drinkers. The present results suggest that modifying dietary practice may be an effective means of combating high BP.
Acknowledgements
S.-A. L. drafted the manuscript and analysed the data. X. O. S. and W. Z. designed and obtained the funding for the overall study. X. O. S., G. Y., Y.-B. X., H. L., W.-H. X. and Y.-T. G. directed and supervised the field operation and data cleaning. X. O. S., G. Y. and W. Z. provided critical advice in data analysis and manuscript preparation. H. C. contributed to the statistical analysis. All co-authors have reviewed and approved the paper. The present study was supported by US PHS grant number R01 CA82729 from the National Cancer Institute. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Appendix 1
* Factor loadings are multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest integer.
