Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T09:31:24.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and metabolism of isothiocyanates formed from broccoli glucosinolates: effects of BMI and daily consumption in a randomised clinical trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2018

Craig S. Charron*
Affiliation:
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
Bryan T. Vinyard
Affiliation:
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Statistics Group, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
Sharon A. Ross
Affiliation:
Division of Cancer Protection, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
Harold E. Seifried
Affiliation:
Division of Cancer Protection, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
Elizabeth H. Jeffery
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Janet A. Novotny
Affiliation:
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
*
*Corresponding author: C. S. Charron, fax +1 301 504 9098, email craig.charron@ars.usda.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulphoraphane originates from glucoraphanin in broccoli and is associated with anti-cancer effects. A preclinical study suggested that daily consumption of broccoli may increase the production of sulphoraphane and sulphoraphane metabolites available for absorption. The objective of this study was to determine whether daily broccoli consumption alters the absorption and metabolism of isothiocyanates derived from broccoli glucosinolates. We conducted a randomised cross-over human study (n 18) balanced for BMI and glutathione S-transferase μ 1 (GSTM1) genotype in which subjects consumed a control diet with no broccoli (NB) for 16 d or the same diet with 200 g of cooked broccoli and 20 g of raw daikon radish daily for 15 d (daily broccoli, DB) and 100 g of broccoli and 10 g of daikon radish on day 16. On day 17, all subjects consumed a meal of 200 g of broccoli and 20 g of daikon radish. Plasma and urine were collected for 24 h and analysed for sulphoraphane and metabolites of sulphoraphane and erucin by triple quadrupole tandem MS. For subjects with BMI >26 kg/m2 (median), plasma AUC and urinary excretion rates of total metabolites were higher on the NB diet than on the DB diet, whereas for subjects with BMI <26 kg/m2, plasma AUC and urinary excretion rates were higher on the DB diet than on the NB diet. Daily consumption of broccoli interacted with BMI but not GSTM1 genotype to affect plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of glucosinolate-derived compounds believed to confer protection against cancer. This trial was registered as NCT02346812.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Myrosinase-mediated catabolism of glucoraphanin and glucoerucin to sulphoraphane and erucin, respectively, and subsequent mercapturic acid pathway conjugations and interconversion of sulforaphane and erucin.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Recruitment and enrollment of subjects. DB, daily broccoli; NB, no broccoli.

Figure 2

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants* (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 2 Macronutrients, fibre, glucoraphanin and glucoerucin provided by base diet and broccoli

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Plasma AUC (over 24 h) and urinary accumulation (over 24 h) of metabolites of glucoraphanin and glucoerucin expressed as the percentage of total AUC and total urinary accumulation, respectively, of subjects who had consumed the diet with no broccoli. Values are least squares means and 95 % CI. SF, sulphoraphane; SF-GSH, sulphoraphane-glutathione; SF-CG, sulphoraphane-cysteineglycine; SF-C, sulphoraphane-cysteine; SF-NAC, sulphoraphane-N-acetylcysteine; ER-GSH, erucin-glutathione; ER-CG, erucin-cysteineglycine; ER, erucin-cysteine; ER-NAC, erucin-N-acetylcysteine. □ , Percentage plasma AUC; , percentage urinary accumulation.

Figure 5

Table 3 Pharmacokinetic data over 24 h and lactulose:mannitol ratio following consumption of a meal of 200 g of broccoli with 20 g of raw daikon radish that had been preceded by either 16 d of a control diet with no broccoli or the same control diet with daily consumption of 200 g of broccoli and 20 g of daikon radish (Least squares means and 95 % confidence intervals; n 9 for each BMI group)

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Plasma mass (concentration/plasma volume) of total metabolites (sulphoraphane, sulphoraphane-glutathione, sulphoraphane-cysteineglycine, sulphoraphane-cysteine, sulphoraphane-N-acetylcysteine, erucin-glutathione, erucin-cysteineglycine, erucin-cysteine and erucin-N-acetylcysteine) with time for subjects with (a) BMI <26 kg/m2 and (b) BMI >26 kg/m2. Values are least squares means with upper 95 % confidence limits shown above largest mean at a given time and lower 95 % confidence limits shown below smallest mean at a given time. Treatment×BMI was statistically significant (P=0·0464) as determined by ANOVA model linear contrasts. , Daily broccoli diet; , no broccoli diet.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 Urinary excretion rate of total metabolites (sulphoraphane, sulphoraphane-glutathione, sulphoraphane-cysteineglycine, sulphoraphane-cysteine, sulphoraphane-N-acetylcysteine, erucin-glutathione, erucin-cysteineglycine, erucin-cysteine and erucin-N-acetylcysteine) during collection time periods for subjects with (a) BMI <26 kg/m2 and (b) BMI >26 kg/m2. Values are least squares means and 95 % CI. Treatment×BMI was significant (P=0·0154) as determined by ANOVA. , Daily broccoli diet; □ , no broccoli diet.

Supplementary material: PDF

Charron et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Charron et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 72.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Charron et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Charron et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 71.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Charron et al. supplementary material

Figure S3

Download Charron et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 97.6 KB