Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T21:07:38.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of impurities on the ice microstructure of Monte Perdido Glacier, Central Pyrenees, NE Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2023

Nicolás González-Santacruz*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Leioa, Spain
Patricia Muñoz-Marzagon
Affiliation:
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Leioa, Spain
Miguel Bartolomé
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, National Museum of Natural Sciences (CSIC), Madrid, Spain Swiss Institute for Speleology and Karst Studies (SISKA), La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland Department of Earth Sciences, Geological Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
Ana Moreno
Affiliation:
Department of Geoenvironmental Processes and Global Change, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain
Jennifer Huidobro
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
Sérgio Henrique Faria
Affiliation:
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Leioa, Spain IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Nicolás González-Santacruz; Email: nagonzalez002@ikasle.ehu.eus
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Monte Perdido Glacier, located in the central Pyrenees, is one of the southernmost glaciers in Europe. Due to climate change, this glacier is suffering an accelerated mass loss, especially in the last decades. If the current trends persist, this glacier is expected to disappear in the next 50 years. As part of the efforts of the scientific community to increase the knowledge about this glacier, this research presents the first microstructural characterization of the Monte Perdido Glacier, focused on a high-impurity concentration segment that belongs to an ice core drilled in 2017. The results reveal the ice has a layering defined by air bubbles and non-soluble impurities. The bubble-defined layering exhibits features of both a primary (sedimentary) and a secondary (strain-induced) origin. We found a clear inverse correspondence between the particle concentration and the grains' size and roundness index. A preliminary micro-Raman characterization of the particles shows the occurrence of atacamite, anatase (likely related to ancient mining activities in the vicinity of the glacier) and quartz. The latter could be an indicator of mineral dust, probably suggesting the arrival of dust-laden air masses from the north of the African continent.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Glaciological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. The red dot indicates the location of the Monte Perdido Glacier. (a) Geographical situation of Monte Perdido Glacier in the Pyrenees. (b) Main peaks in the Marboré Cirque. The yellow box indicates the MP1 ice core extraction site. (c) Zoom into the yellow box of Figure 1b. Brownish areas on the top-right and centre-left parts of the figure are the result of mineral dust deposition events. The rocky outcrop on the right is composed of Paleocene limestones. (d) Detail of the MP1 borehole after extraction.

Figure 1

Figure 2. MP1–6 segment. (a) MP1–6 lower (S1) and upper (S2) sections. (b) Zones (Z) with different bubble number densities delimited by dashed lines. In the lower section, the impurity layer (I.L.) is visible. (c) Position of M1 and M2 samples.

Figure 2

Figure 3. M1 ice microstructure. To improve the visualization of grain size and shape, the grain boundary (GB) outline is depicted below each scanned band, including also the parts of bubbles exposed to the surface (in black). (a) and (b) Micrographs representing the sample's general appearance. (c) Nucleation of tiny grains along a GB. (d) Cluster of tiny grains, possibly an example of particle-stimulated nucleation (PSN) process. (e) Detail of M1 under crossed polarizers.

Figure 3

Figure 4. M2 ice microstructure. The dashed black/yellow lines represent the upper limit of the impurity layer. (a) and (b) Microstructure of the upper part of the sample, where the impurity concentration is low. (c) and (d) Microstructure within the impurity layer. (e) Detail of M2 under crossed polarizers.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Microstructure outlines of the M1 (Right) and M2 (left) micrographs. Grain boundaries (GB, black lines), sub-grain boundaries (sGB, red lines) and bubbles (black areas). Grey rectangles represent regions where the sample microstructure is damaged by fractures. The stepped black line represents the upper limit of the impurity layer in M2. Below it, there is a decrease in grain size and roundness index.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Domains (D) with different values of bubble number density (ρbn), sizes and shape, delimited by the yellow dashed lines. (a) M1 sample. (b) M2 sample. Arrows indicate zones with high ρbn values.

Figure 6

Table 1. Air bubble morphological characteristics in the ice samples M1 and M2

Figure 7

Table 2. Grain size and roundness in the ice samples M1 and M2

Figure 8

Figure 7. Micro-Raman analyses of the M2 impurity layer. Quartz (SiO2 polymorph; blue line), atacamite ([Cu2Cl (OH)3]; red line) and anatase (TiO2; grey line).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Detailed positions of the microstructure outlines in M1 (a) and M2 (b) depicted in Figure 5.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Micrographs of M1 and M2. (a) The image shows an ice grain delimited by its boundaries (GB; 1), which appear as black or dark grey lines. Inside, several sub-grain boundaries (sGB; e.g. 2 and 3) with a lighter appearance, reveal heterogeneous stresses within the grain. With time, sGB will evolve into GB, therefore multiple grains (A, B, C, D) will differentiate from the original grain (rotation recrystallization; RXX). Additionally, nucleation of a small grain at a GB triple junction (SIBM-N; 4) and dislocation walls (5) which will eventually merge and form an sGB, can be observed. (b) Throughout the grain surface, encompassing most of the micrograph, slip bands (SB; faint and parallel lines) also indicate shear stresses acting on the grain. Besides, examples of different types of sGB: n (6), p (7) and z (8) can be identified. (c) Points 9 and 5, the latter from Figure 9a, exemplify the pinning effect of micro-bubbles (9) or particles (5). Two irregular and opaque particles composing the impurity layer (10 and 11) are also visible. (d) Grain boundaries with sinusoidal shape (12 and 13) and bubbles (14) at the M2 impurity level.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Regions where dynamic recrystallization dominates. Evidence of this process is the bulged grain boundaries, indicating the presence of SIBM-O (1, 3 and 4) or the nucleation of new grains SIBM-N (5 and 6). Additionally, point 2 is a clear example of the pinning process, in this case, caused by a micro-bubble.