Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T11:20:50.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A plot-scale study of firn stratigraphy at Lomonosovfonna, Svalbard, using ice cores, borehole video and GPR surveys in 2012–14

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

SERGEY MARCHENKO*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Department of Geophysics, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
VEIJO A. POHJOLA
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
RICKARD PETTERSSON
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
WARD J. J. VAN PELT
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
CARMEN P. VEGA
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
HORST MACHGUTH
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
CARL E. BØGGILD
Affiliation:
Centre for Arctic Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
ELISABETH ISAKSSON
Affiliation:
Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway
*
Correspondence: Sergey Marchenko <sergey.marchenko@geo.uu.se>
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spatial heterogeneity of snow and firn properties on glaciers introduces uncertainty in interpretation of point and profile observations and complicates modelling of meltwater percolation and runoff. Here we present a study of the temporal and spatial dynamics of firn density and stratigraphy at the plot-scale (≈10 m × 10 m × 10 m) repeated annually during 2012–14 at the Lomonosovfonna icefield, Svalbard. Results from cores, video inspections in boreholes and radar grid surveys are compared. Ice layers 0.1–50 cm thick comprised ≈8% of the borehole length. Most of them are 1–3 cm thick and could not be traced between boreholes separated by 3 m. Large lateral variability of firn structure affects representativeness of observations in single holes and calls for repeated studies in multiple points to derive a representative stratigraphy signal. Radar reflections are poorly correlated with ice layers in individual boreholes. However, the match between the high amplitude peaks in the grid-averaged radar signal and horizons of preferential ice layer formation revealed by averaging the video surveys over multiple boreholes is higher. These horizons are interpreted as buried firn layers previously exposed to melt-freeze or wind-driven densification and several of them are consistently recovered throughout three field campaigns.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) location of the study site at the Lomonosovfonna ice field with a map of Svalbard shown in the lower right corner. Also shown is the location of the Soviet expedition in 1965 Zinger1966; (b) the grid of boreholes and GPR profiles used in the study site. Note: the distances between boreholes 2 and 2a, 4 and 4a, 6 and 6a, 8 and 8a are not to the main scale.

Figure 1

Table 1. Details on stratigraphy data collected using firn cores, video and GPR surveys

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Analysis of GPR data. The blue curve is a radar trace from processed and migrated dataset. The green curve shows the corresponding instantaneous amplitudes derived using the Hilbert filter. Similar series were used in Figures 5–7. The violet line shows the threshold defined as the mean plus two standard deviations of all instantaneous amplitudes in traces measured in one field campaign. It was used to decipher reflectors in individual radar traces, which are shown as grey-shaded two-way travel time intervals.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Snow and firn temperature measured during 2012 and 2013.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Stratigraphy distribution observed in firn cores drilled in 2012 (a), 2013 (b) and 2014 (c). Different shades of the blue colour mark the depth intervals where snow (light), firn and ice (dark) were observed. Density distribution measured in cores in 2012–2014 (d).

Figure 5

Table 2. Number and thickness of ice layers/reflectors in individual boreholes/GPR traces

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Firn stratigraphy observed in 2012 using video surveys. Ice layers found in different boreholes are shown as horizontal black lines. The blue curve to the right illustrates the number of boreholes that indicated an ice layer at a specific depth.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Vertical profiles of firn stratigraphy derived in 2012 using different methods: firn core stratigraphy (c); ice layers recovered by video surveys in boreholes 2 (a), 5 (d) and 8 (f); reflectors and average instantaneous amplitude calculated for 3 radar traces sounded above boreholes 2 (b), 5 (e) and 8 (g).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Spatially averaged signals from the video and GPR data collected in 2012 (a), 2013 (b) and 2014 (c). Also shown are the summer surfaces 2011–2007 (coloured labels) interpreted from a 500 MHz GPR profile Pelt2014 and corrected for surface accumulation and gravitational firn compaction after April 2012.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Instantaneous amplitudes of the GPR data collected in April 2012. (a) radar profile crossing locations of boreholes 2, 5 and 8 (shown white, see Fig. 1b); (b) GPR data averaged in across-profile direction, also shown are the summer surfaces 2011–2007 (coloured labels) interpreted from a 500 MHz GPR profile Pelt2014.