1 Butler, Charles, The Book of the Roman-Catholic Church: in a Series of Letters addressed to Robt. Southey Esq. (London, 1825), p. 340.Google Scholar

2 Belsham, Thomas, The Sufferings of Unitarians in former Times (London, 1813)Google Scholar; Gordon, Alexander, Heads of English Unitarian History (London, 1895), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

3 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘Dissent and Toleration: Lord Stanhope’s Bill of 1789’, J.E.H., 29, (1978), pp. 57–59.Google Scholar

4 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration in late eighteenth-century British Politics: the Unitarian Petition of 1792’, J.E.H., vol. 42 (1991), pp. 39–67 Google Scholar; A.A.W. Bishop Douglass diary, 14 May 1805.

5 For the background to this development, see Ditchfield, G. M., Theophilus Lindsey: From Anglican to Unitarian (Dr. Williams’s Trust, London, 1998).Google Scholar

6 See Webb, R. K., ‘The Emergence of Rational Dissent’, in Haakonssen, K., (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion. Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 12–41.Google Scholar

7 See Robbins, Caroline, The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman. Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies (New York, 1968), chapter 9Google Scholar; Haydon, Colin, Anti-Catholicism in Eighteenth-century England. A Political and Social Study (Manchester and New York, 1993), chapter 5.Google Scholar

8 Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1688–1832. Ideology, Social Structure and Political Practice during the Ancien Régime (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 307–315 Google Scholar; Ditchfield, G. M., ‘Ecclesiastical Policy under Lord North’, in Walsh, John, Haydon, Colin and Taylor, Stephen (eds.), The Church of England c.1689-c.1833 (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 228–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 J.R.U.L.M. Lindsey Letters, Lindsey to William Tayleur, 10 June 1780.

10 Fitzpatrick, Martin, ‘Joseph Priestley and the Cause of Universal Toleration’, Price-Priestley Newsletter, No. I (1977) p. 21 Google Scholar. There is much material on the Priestley riots in the Archdiocese of Birmingham Archives: see especially C1059, C1081–1095, C1111–1119 and Cl165–1182.

11 Ditchfield, ‘Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration’, pp. 54–5; Ditchfield, G. M., ‘A Unitarian View of English Dissent in 1807’, T.U.H.S., vol. 18, No. 2 (April 1984), 1–16.Google Scholar

12 Wellbeloved, Charles, The Principles of Roman Catholics and Unitarians Contrasted (York, 1800), p. 29 Google Scholar; Milner, John, Letters to a Prebendary: being an Answer to reflections on Popery by the Rev. John Sturges, LL.D (2nd ed., London, 1801), Letter IV, p. 149 Google Scholar, and The End of Religious Controversy, in a Friendly Conversation between a religious Society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic Divine (London, 1818), Letter XLIX, pp. 212–3.

13 See Toulmin, Joshua, The Practical Efficacy of the Unitarian Doctrine considered, in a Series of Letters to … A. Fuller (London, 1796)Google Scholar and The Injustice of Classing Unitarians with Deists and Infidels (London, 1797); Geddes, Alexander, A Modest Apology for the Roman Catholics of Great Britain: addressed to all moderate Protestants; particularly to the Members of both Houses of Parliament (London, 1800), pp. 133–137.Google Scholar

14 Disney, John, A Dialogue between a Clergyman of the Church of England and a Lay-Gentleman (London, 1792), pp. 8 seq. Google Scholar; Alexander Geddes, Modest Apology, pp. 158–9.

15 Linker, R. W., ‘English Catholics in the eighteenth century’, Church History, 35 (1966), 288–310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gooch, Leo, ‘The Religion of a Gentleman: the Northern Catholic Gentry in the Eighteenth Century’, Rec. Hist., 23 (May 1997), pp. 318–40.Google Scholar

16 Duffy, Eamon, ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected: I (1779–1787)’, Rec. Hist., vol. 10, no. 4 (Jan. 1970), p. 196 Google Scholar; Rutt, Priestley, vol. 2, pp. 92–3.

17 For Charles Howard, eleventh Duke of Norfolk, see Namier, Sir Lewis and Brooke, J. (eds.), The History of Parliament. The House of Commons 1754–1790 (3 vols., London, 1964), vol. 2, p. 664 Google Scholar, and J.R.U.L.M., Lindsey Letters, Lindsey to William Tayleur, 22 Jan. 1781; Reynolds, E. E. (ed.), The Mawhood Diary (C.R.S., 1956), pp. 147, 189.Google Scholar

18 British Library, Add MS 7961, seq. 31, 32–3 (Minutes of the Catholic Committee).

19 On Lee, see Namier, and Brooke, , The House of Commons, 1754–1790, vol. 3, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar

20 The seven-page article may be found, above the initial ‘M’, in Rees, Abraham, The Cyclopaedia; or Universal Dictionary of Arts, Sciences and Literature (39 vols., London, 1819), vol. 16 (unpaginated).Google Scholar

21 B.A.A. C931 Geddes to John Kirk, 26 Oct. 1788.

22 Good, John Mason, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Reverend Alexander Geddes (London, 1803), pp. 191–4.Google Scholar

23 B.A.A. Cl130: Geddes to Kirk, n.d. (?1791).

24 Dr Geddes’s General Answer to the Queries, Counsils, and Criticisms that have been communicated to him since the publication of his proposals for printing A New Translation of the Bible (London, 1790), Appendix, pp. 28–32. See also Rutt, Priestley, vol. 2, p. 11.

25 Leeds Mercury, 17 Mar. 1792; Oxford Journal, 17 Mar. 1792.

26 A New Translation of the Book of Psalms, from the Original Hebrew; with various Readings and Notes. By the late Geddes, Alexander LL.D. (London, 1807).Google Scholar

27 J.R.U.L.M. Lindsey Letters: Lindsey to William Tayleur, 16 Oct. 1787.

28 Geddes, Alexander, Letter to the Rev. Dr Priestley; in which the author attempts to prove, by one prescriptive argument, that the Divinity of Jesus Christ was a primitive tenet of Christianity (London, 1787), p. 4.Google Scholar

29 The Works of Nathaniel Lardner, D.D., ed. Kippis, Andrew (11 vols., 1788), list of subscribers (unpaginated) prefaced to vol. 1.Google Scholar

30 See Letter from the Rev. Alexander Geddes, LL.D. to the Right Rev. John Douglass, Bishop of Centuriae and Vicar Apostolic in the London District (London, 1794), pp. 40–42; Duffy, , ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected: I (1779–1787)’, Rec. Hist., vol. 10, no. 4 (Jan. 1970), pp. 196–7Google Scholar; Rowlands, Marie, ‘The Staffordshire Clergy, 1688–1803’, Rec. Hist., vol. 9 (1967–8), pp, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Rutt, Priestley, vol. 2, pp. 482, 498–9; Dr. Williams’s Library, MS 12.80.

32 Alexander Geddes, Letter to the Rev. Dr Priestley, passim.

33 Berington, Joseph, Letters on Materialism and Hartley’s Theory of the Human Mind, addressed to Dr Priestley (London, 1776), p. 225.Google Scholar

34 See Fuller, Reginald C., Alexander Geddes 1737–1802. Pioneer of Biblical Criticism (Sheffield, 1984).Google Scholar

35 Webb, R. K., ‘The Unitarian Background’, in Smith, Barbara (ed.), Truth, Liberty, Religion. Essays celebrating Two Hundred Years of Manchester College (Oxford, 1986), p. 19.Google Scholar

36 Rowlands, ‘Staffordshire Clergy’, p. 228; Duffy, , ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected: III, 1796–1803’, Rec. Hist., vol. 13, no. 2 (Oct. 1975), pp. 143–4Google Scholar; Nockles, Peter B., ‘“The Difficulties of Protestantism”: Bishop Milner, John Fletcher and Catholic Apologetic against the Church of England in the Era from the First Relief Act to Emancipation, 1778–1830’, Rec. Hist., vol. 24, no. 2 (October 1998), pp. 222–3.Google Scholar

37 Nichols, John, Illustrations of the Literary History of the Eighteenth Century (8 vols., London, 1817–58), vol. 7, p. 507 (‘Remarks by Bishop Percy on Lord Petre’s Letter to Bishop Horsley’).Google Scholar

38 Geddes, Modest Apology, p. 14; Berington, , The Rights of Dissenters from the Established Church. In Relation principally to English Catholics (Birmingham, 1789), p. 19.Google Scholar

39 Wellbeloved, Charles, The Principles of Roman Catholics and Unitarians Contrasted. A Sermon, written with reference to the charges brought against those who maintain the Doctrine of the DIVINE UNITY in the strictest sense, by Dr Horsly (York, 1800), p. 15.Google Scholar

40 Wellbeloved, The Principles of Unitarians and Catholics compared, pp. 15–16; Geddes, , Letter to a Member of Parliament, on the Case of the Protestant Dissenters; and the expediency of a General Repeal of all Penal Statutes that regard Religious Opinions (London, 1787), p. 27n.Google Scholar

41 Nightingale, Joseph, A Portraiture of the Roman Catholic Religion; or, an Unprejudiced Sketch of the History, Doctrines, Opinions, Discipline, and present State of Catholicism (London, 1812), p. 12.Google Scholar

42 Rutt, Priestley, vol. 2, p. 10; see also Wellbeloved, The Principles of Roman Catholics and Unitarians Contrasted, pp. 42 seq.

43 M.R., 11 (1816), p. 39.

44 Milner, Letters to a Prebendary, p. 459.

45 Geddes, Letter to a Member of Parliament, p. 22; Milner, Letters to a Prebendary, pp. 511–12.

46 A good example is Randolph, Thomas, A Vindication of the Worship of the Son and the Holy Ghost against the exceptions of Mr Theophilus Lindsey (Oxford, Cambridge and London, 1775), pp. 163–4.Google Scholar

47 Ditchfield, Theophilus Lindsey, p. 6.

48 Geddes, Modest Apology, p. 29.

49 Ibidem., p. 17.

50 Butler, Charles, Historical Memoirs of the English, Irish and Scottish Catholics, since the Reformation (3rd ed., 4 vols., London, 1822), vol. 3, pp. 313 seq.Google Scholar

51 See particularly, Milner Letters to a Prebendary, pp. 447–8, 445 seq., 467–8, 487–8.

52 Berington, The Rights of Dissenters from the established Church, p. 23.

53 Fletcher, John, The Guide to the True Religion: a Series of Sermons on the Marks, and Character, of the Church of Christ (2nd ed., London, 1836), pp. 175–6.Google Scholar

54 See Gordon, Alexander, Addresses Biographical and Historical (London, 1922), pp. 3–41.Google Scholar

55 Nockles, ‘ “The Difficulties of Protestantism” ’, pp. 218 and 233 n. 185.

56 Cobbett, , Pari. Hist., vol. 17, vols. pp. 291–2.Google Scholar

57 See ‘A Lawyer’, ‘The Deeds of Essex Chapel’, T.U.H.S., vol. 1, No. 3 (Dec. 1918), pp. 261, 271–2.

58 See Bellenger, Dominic, ‘The Émigrè Clergy and the English Church, 1789–1815’, J.E.H., vol. 34 (1983), pp. 392–410 Google Scholar, and The French Exiled Clergy in the British Isles after 1789 (Bath, 1986).

59 See Mather, F. C., High Church Prophet. Bishop Samuel Horsley (1733–1806) and the Caroline Tradition in the late Georgian Church (Oxford, 1992), pp. 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 Quoted in Ditchfield, ‘Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration’, p. 65.

61 Jones, David, writing under the pseudonym of ‘The Welsh Freeholder’, The Welsh Freeholder’s Farewell Epistles to the Right Rev. Samuel Lord Bishop … of Rochester (London, 1794), p. viii Google Scholar; Wellbeloved, The Principles of Roman Catholics and Unitarians Contrasted, p. 10.

62 Milner, John, The Funeral Oration of his late Most Christian Majesty Louis XVI. Pronounced at the Funeral Service performed by the French Clergy of the King’s House, Winchester, at St Peter’s Chapel, in the said City, April 22, MDCCXCIII (London, 1793), p. 24.Google Scholar

63 Bellenger, ‘The Émigrè Clergy’, p. 397.

64 For James Martin, M.P., see J.R.U.L.M. Lindsey letters, Lindsey to John Rowe, 3 Feb. 1791, and Thorne, Roland (ed.), The History of Parliament. The House of Commons, 1790–1820, (5 vols., London, 1986), vol. 4, pp. 558–61.Google Scholar

65 Public Record Office, London, T93.8; T93.25.

66 Duffy, , ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected: III, 1796–1803’, Rec. Hist., vol. 13, no. 2 (Oct. 1975), p. 133 Google Scholar; Bellenger, The French Exiled Clergy, pp. 38–43.

67 Duffy, Eamon, Peter and Jack: Roman Catholics and Dissent in eighteenth century England (London: Dr. Williams’s Trust, 1982)Google Scholar; This idea is fully developed in Bossy, John, The English Catholic Community 1570–1850 (London, 1975).Google Scholar

68 Geddes, Modest Apology, p. 75.

69 Plowden, Francis, The Case stated … Occasioned by the Act of Parliament lately passed for the relief of the English Roman Catholics (London, 1791), p. 147.Google Scholar

70 John Milner, Short View of the Chief Arguments against the Catholic Petition, pp. 45–6. Milner was referring to the title of 30 Charles II, St. II. c. 1, ‘An Act for the more effectual preserving the King’s Person and Government by disableing Papists from sitting in either House of Parliament’.

71 Fortescue, Sir John, (ed.), The Correspondence of King George III (6 vols., London, 1927–8), vol. 4, p. 286 Google Scholar; Aspinall, A. (ed.), The Later Correspondence of George III (5 vols., Cambridge, 1966–70), vol. 1, p. 551.Google Scholar

72 Article by ‘J.M.’ in The Protestant Journal; or the True Catholic’s Protest against the Modern Church of Rome, for 1832, p. 103; Ditchfield, G. M., ‘Joseph Mendham: Collector and Controversialist’, in Hingley, S. and Shaw, D., (eds.), Catalogue of the Law Society’s Mendham Collection (London, 1994), pp. xv–lxxiv.Google Scholar

73 Christian Observer, 1844, p. 447.

74 Gentleman’s Magazine, 83, i (1813), p. 104.

75 Duffy, , ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected’: III, 1796–1803’, Rec. Hist., vol. 13, no. 2 (Oct. 1975), p. 144 Google Scholar; M.R., New Series, vol. 3 (1829), p. 278.

76 Fletcher, John, A Comparative View of the Grounds of the Catholic, and Protestant Churches (London, 1826), p. 291.Google Scholar

77 Davis, Richard W., Dissent in Politics. The Political Life of William Smith M.P. (London, 1971), p. 198.Google Scholar

78 Davis, Dissent in Politics, pp. 155–6, chapter 12.

79 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘A Unitarian View of English Dissent in 1807’, T.U.H.S., Vol. 18, No. 2 (April, 1984), p. 11 Google Scholar; A.A.W. Diary of Bishop Douglass, 27 June 1807.

80 Larsen, Timothy, Friends of Religious Equality. Nonconformist Politics in Mid-Victorian England (Woodbridge, 1999), pp. 225–242.Google Scholar

81 Nockles, Peter B., The Oxford Movement in Context. Anglican High Churchmanship 1760–1857 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 164 seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

82 Nockles, ‘ “The Difficulties of Protestantism” ’ pp. 210, 224.

83 Mather, High Church Prophet, pp. 112 seq.

84 Milner, Letters to a Prebendary, p. 411.

85 Fitzpatrick, Martin, ‘Joseph Priestley and the Cause of Universal Toleration’, Price-Priestley Newsletter, No. 1 (1977), pp. 3–30 Google Scholar. For criticisms of the narrowness of the 1787 campaign, see Geddes, Alexander, Letter to a Member of Parliament, on the Case of the Protestant Dissenters (London, 1787), pp. 2, 22, 35Google Scholar; Berington, Joseph, The Rights of Dissenters from the Established Church. In Relation principally to the English Catholics (Birmingham, 1789), p. 57.Google Scholar

86 Geddes, Letter to a Member of Parliament, pp. 2, 34n.

87 A.A.W. Diary of Bishop Douglass, 23 June 1800. Hobhouse’s speech is reported in Cobbett, W., Parliamentary History of England (36 vols., London, 1806–20), vol. 35, cols. 356–9.Google Scholar

88 North Yorkshire R.O. Wyvill of Constable Burton MSS: ZFW 7/2/225/4: Lord Stourton to M. Strickland, 12 Feb. 1811.

89 Gandolphy, Peter, Letters Addressed to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Protestant Clergy of England, on the secret Causes of the Increase of Catholics (London, 1813), p. 73nGoogle Scholar. The charges against Gandolphy were noted by the Monthly Repository, 14 (1819), p. 767.

90 B.A.A. C1892, Joseph Nightingale to Berington, 31 Dec. 1811.

91 B.A.A. C1898, Berington to John Kirk, 12 Feb. 1812.

92 Nightingale, Joseph, A Portraiture of the Roman Catholic Religion; or, an Unprejudiced Sketch of the History, Doctrines, Opinions, Discipline and present State of Catholicism (London, 1812), pp. ix, xviii, 438–9.Google Scholar

93 M.R., vol. 21 (1826), p. 370.

94 R. W. Davis, Dissent in Politics 1780–1830, p. 227. Chapter 12 of this book provides an excellent analysis of the relations between Dissent and Catholicism during the 1820s.

95 Hansard, T. C., The Parliamentary Debates, New Series, commencing with the Accession of George IV, XX, cols. 804, 1109.Google Scholar

96 Christian Observer, vol. 29 (1829), p. 130.

97 M.R., New Series., vol. 3 (1829), pp. 276–7.

98 Tindall, Philip Noble, ‘Roman Catholics and Unitarians: An Account of reciprocal Help and Comfort’, T.U.H.S., vol. 20, No. 3 (April 1993), pp. 177–86.Google Scholar

99 See Short, K. R. M., ‘London’s General Body of Protestant Ministers: Its Disruption in 1836’, J.E.H. vol. 24 (1973), pp. 377–93; Ivimey is quoted on p. 386.Google Scholar

100 Rathbone, Eleanor F., William Rathbone. A Memoir (London, 1905), pp. 48–50 Google Scholar; M.R. New Series, vol. 6 (1832), pp. 479–80; 381–92.

101 See the letters of John Lingard to William Shepherd, Harris Manchester College, Oxford (Shepherd Collection, Vols. 1 and 2); effective use of this correspondence is made by Cattermole, P. H., ‘John Lingard: the Apologist as Historian’ (University of Kent Ph.D dissertation, 1984).Google Scholar

102 Madge, Thomas, Lectures on Certain High-Church Principles commonly designated by the term Puseyism (London, 1844), p. vii.Google Scholar

103 White, Joseph Blanco, Practical and External Evidence against Catholicism, with Occasional Strictures on Mr Butler’s “Book of the Roman Catholic Church” (1825)Google Scholar; The Poor Man’s Preservative against Popery (1825); Murphy, Martin, Blanco White. Self-banished Spaniard (New Haven and London, 1989)Google Scholar, especially chapter 10.

104 Nockles, ‘ “The Difficulties of Protestantism” ’ pp. 209–210.

105 Ibidem, pp. 203, 208; Milner, The End of Religious Controversy, Letter XI, p. 126n, where he attacked John Hey, who indicated that the Church of England was divided from Socinianism ‘only by a few “Unmeaning words’ ” Fletcher, John, Thoughts on the Rights and Prerogatives (1823), pp. 92–3.Google Scholar

106 Milner, Joseph, A Serious Expostulation with the Rev. Joseph Berington, upon his Theological Errors concerning Miracles and other Subjects (London, 1797), pp. 114–118.Google Scholar

107 Henry E. Huntington Library: STO 1075: privately printed pamphlet, ‘A Letter from the Rev. C. O’Conor … to the Reverend J. Berington’ (Dublin, 1813), p. 4.Google Scholar

108 Fletcher, Guide, pp. 171–82.

109 Nockles, ‘ “The Difficulties of Protestantism” ’ p. 207.

110 Nightingale, Portraiture of the Roman Catholic Religion, p. 295n.

111 Milner, The End of the Religious Controversy, Letter XV, p. 21.

112 A.A.W. Diary of Bishop Douglas, 20 May 1808. Stone was author of An Unitarian Christian Minister’s Plea for Adherence to the Church of England (London, 1808).

113 McCalman, I., Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries and Pornographers in London, 1795–1840 (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar

114 Duffy, , ‘Ecclesiastical Democracy Detected’ I (1779–1787), Rec. Hist., vol. 10, no. 4 (Jan. 1970), p. 205.Google Scholar

115 Murville, M. N. L. Couve de, John Milner 1752–1826 (Birmingham, 1986), pp. 28, 33.Google Scholar

116 Ward, W., The Life of John Henry, Cardinal Newman (2 vols., London, 1812), vol. I, pp. 196, 529.Google Scholar

117 Aveling, J. C. H., The Handle and the Axe. The Catholic Recusants in England from Reformation to Emancipation (London and Tiptree, 1976), chapter 15.Google Scholar

118 Webb, R. K., ‘The Unitarian Background’, in Smith, Barbara (ed.), Truth, Liberty, Religion. Essays celebrating Two Hundred Years of Manchester College (Oxford, 1986), p. 18.Google Scholar

119 ‘The Watchman’, in M.R. N.S., 3 (1829), p. 696.

120 Fletcher, Guide, p. 61, and Catholic Manual, p. 5.

121 M.R., N.S. 3 (1829), p. 696.

122 Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, 1968), p. 430 Google Scholar. See also Haydon, Colin, Anti-Catholicism in eighteenth-century England. A Political and Social Study (Manchester, 1993), pp. 264–5.Google Scholar