Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T07:59:34.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow-induced oscillations of a clamped flexible ring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2025

Zepeng Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, PR China Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141 Korea
Yingzheng Liu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Hyung Jin Sung*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141 Korea
*
Corresponding author: Hyung Jin Sung, hjsung@kaist.ac.kr

Abstract

The flow-induced oscillations of a clamped flexible ring in a uniform flow were explored using the penalty immersed boundary method. Both inverted and conventional ring configurations were examined, with systematic analysis focused on the effects of bending rigidity and eccentricity. Four distinct oscillation modes were identified across parameter variations: flapping (F), deflected oscillation (DO), transverse oscillation (TO) and equilibrium (E) modes. Each mode exhibited a 2S wake pattern. The inverted ring sustained the DO mode under low bending rigidity with a deflected shape, transitioning to the TO mode at higher bending rigidity. In the TO mode, a lock-in phenomenon emerged, enabling the inverted ring to achieve a high power coefficient due to a simultaneous rise in both oscillation amplitude and frequency. By contrast, the conventional ring exhibited the F mode at low bending rigidity and transitioned to the E mode as rigidity increased, although its power coefficient remained lower because of reduced critical bending rigidity. For the inverted ring, low eccentricity enhanced oscillation intensity but limited the operational range of the TO mode. In contrast, for the conventional ring, reducing eccentricity led to an increase in oscillation amplitude. Among the investigated configurations, the inverted-clamped ring achieved the highest energy-harvesting efficiency, surpassing those of the conventional clamped ring and a buckled filament.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Two energy harvesters based on flow-induced vibration: (a) a one-edge-clamped flag and (b) a two-edge-clamped flag.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematics of ($a$) inverted and ($b$) conventional clamped flexible rings in a uniform flow.

Figure 2

Table 1. Domain test, including the averaged drag coefficient $\overline{C}_{{D}}$, oscillation amplitude of $A_{y}$, the Strouhal number $St$ and the relative errors $e$ to $32\times 24$ (domain height test in part I) and $64\times 16$ (domain length test in part II) in the conventional configuration ($L/D=3$, $\gamma =0.01$, $Re=100$).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Time evolution of the transverse displacement of the midpoint of the ring ($y_{{m}}$) for different (a) grid sizes and (b) time steps.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Oscillation amplitude for an inverted ring as a function of (a) $\gamma$ and (b) $W/L_{0}$.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Superposition of the instantaneous shapes of the flexible ring for different oscillation modes: (a) F mode at $\gamma =$ 0.01, (b) DO mode at $\gamma =$ 0.02 and (c) TO mode at $\gamma =$ 0.5, with $\epsilon = 0.65$. The white line in each inset represents the experimentally observed mode.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Mode diagram for (a) inverted and (b) conventional initial states depending on $\gamma$ and $\epsilon$; regions DO, TO, F and E correspond to the DO mode, the TO mode, the F mode and the E mode, respectively.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Time histories of the midpoint ($x_{{m}}$, $y_{{m}}$) in the TO mode. (b) The sequential process of the TO mode ($\epsilon = 0.65$, $\gamma =$ 0.5).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Instantaneous contours of (a) $\omega _{z}$ and (b) $p$ for the F mode ($\gamma =0.01$), DO mode ($\gamma =0.02$) and TO mode ($\gamma =0.5$) under $\epsilon = 0.65$.

Figure 9

Figure 9. (a) Time histories of $x_{{m}}$, $y_{{m}}$, $F$ and $E$. Instantaneous contours of (b) $\omega _{z}$ and (c) $p$ at A, B, C and D for $\epsilon = 0.65$ and $\gamma =$ 0.5 under the TO mode.

Figure 10

Figure 10. (a) Oscillation amplitude ($A_{y}$) and (b) oscillation frequency ($f_{{y_{{m}}}}$) as a function of $\gamma$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 11

Figure 11. (a) Instantaneous contours of $\omega _{z}$ and (b) the PSD of $f_{{y_{{m}}}}$ and $f_{v}$ for an inverted-clamped ring under different $\gamma$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 12

Figure 12. Oscillation frequency ($f_{{y_{{m}}}}$), vortex shedding frequency ($f_{v}$) and natural frequency ($f_{n}$) for (a) inverted rings and (b) conventional rings as a function of $\gamma$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 13

Figure 13. (a) Time histories of $x_{{m}}$, $y_{{m}}$, $F_{{f}x}$ and $F_{{f}y}$ of the inverted-clamped ring under different $\gamma$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 14

Figure 14. Average variation of (a) curvature ($\overline{K}^{\prime}$) and (b) elastic energy ($\overline{E}_{s}^{\prime}$) for inverted and conventional rings as a function of $\gamma$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 15

Figure 15. (a) Values of $\langle K\rangle$ and (b) $\langle E_{{s}}\rangle$ for an inverted ring as a function of $s/L$ ($\epsilon = 0.65$).

Figure 16

Figure 16. (a) Values of $\gamma (\overline{K}^{\prime}f_{{y_{m}}})^{2}$ and (b) the average power coefficient ($\overline{c}_{p}$) as a function of $\gamma$ (0.65).

Figure 17

Figure 17. (a) Variation of the average power coefficient ($\overline{c}_{{p}}$) as a function of $\gamma$, and (b) time evolution of the power coefficient ($c_{{p}}$) for the inverted ring and inverted flag.

Figure 18

Figure 18. Superposition of the instantaneous shapes of inverted rings under different $\epsilon$ ($\gamma =$ 0.5).

Figure 19

Figure 19. (a) Values of $A_{y}$ and (b) $f_{{y_{{m}}}}$ for inverted and conventional rings as a function of $\epsilon (\gamma =$ 0.5 for inverted and $\gamma =$ 0.01 for conventional).

Figure 20

Figure 20. (a) Instantaneous contours of $\omega _{z}$ and time histories of (b) the midpoint displacement and (c) fluid force for an inverted ring under $\epsilon = 0.5$, 0.4, 0.2 ($\gamma =$ 0.5).

Figure 21

Figure 21. (a) Average variation of curvature ($\overline{K}^{\prime}$) and (b) elastic energy ($\overline{E}_{s}^{\prime}$) for inverted and conventional rings as a function of $\epsilon$ ($\gamma =$ 0.5 for inverted and $\gamma =$ 0.01 for conventional).

Figure 22

Figure 22. (a) Values of $\langle K\rangle $ and (b) $\langle E_{{s}}\rangle$ as functions of $s/L$ for an inverted ring under different $\epsilon$ ($\gamma =$ 0.5).

Figure 23

Figure 23. (a) Values of $\gamma (\overline{K}^{\prime}f_{{y_{{m}}}})$2 and (b) average power coefficient ($\overline{c}_{{p}}$) for inverted and conventional rings as a function of $\epsilon$ ($\gamma =$ 0.5 for inverted and $\gamma =$ 0.01 for conventional).