Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T23:17:14.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intakes and sources of isoflavones, lignans, enterolignans, coumestrol and soya-containing foods in the Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), from 7 d food diaries, using a newly updated database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Angela A Mulligan ,
Gunter GC Kuhnle ,
Marleen AH Lentjes ,
Veronica van Scheltinga ,
Natasha A Powell ,
Alison McTaggart ,
Amit Bhaniani  and
Kay-Tee Khaw
Angela A Mulligan*
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Gunter GC Kuhnle
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Marleen AH Lentjes
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Veronica van Scheltinga
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Natasha A Powell
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Alison McTaggart
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Amit Bhaniani
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
Kay-Tee Khaw
Affiliation:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK EPIC, Department of Gerontology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email angela.mulligan@phpc.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

A diet rich in phyto-oestrogens has been suggested to protect against a variety of common diseases but UK intake data on phyto-oestrogens or their food sources are sparse. The present study estimates the average intakes of isoflavones, lignans, enterolignans and coumestrol from 7 d food diaries and provides data on total isoflavone, lignan and phyto-oestrogen consumption by food group.

Design

Development of a food composition database for twelve phyto-oestrogens and analysis of soya food and phyto-oestrogen consumption in a population-based study.

Setting

Men and women, aged 40–79 years, from the general population participating in the Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk) between 1993 and 1997, with nutrient and food data from 7 d food diaries.

Subjects

A subset of 20 437 participants.

Results

The median daily phyto-oestrogen intake for all men was 1199 μg (interquartile range 934–1537 μg; mean 1504 μg, sd 1502 μg) and 888 μg for all women (interquartile range 710–1135 μg; mean 1205 μg, sd 1701 μg). In soya consumers, median daily intakes were higher: 2861 μg in men (interquartile range 1304–7269 μg; mean 5051 μg, sd 5031 μg) and 3142 μg in women (interquartile range 1089–7327 μg; mean 5396 μg, sd 6092 μg). In both men and women, bread made the greatest contribution to phyto-oestrogen intake – 40·8 % and 35·6 %, respectively. In soya consumers, vegetable dishes and soya/goat's/sheep's milks were the main contributors – 45·7 % and 21·3 % in men and 38·4 % and 33·7 % in women, respectively.

Conclusions

The ability to estimate phyto-oestrogen intake in Western populations more accurately will aid investigations into their suggested effects on health.

Keywords

Phyto-oestrogensSoyaEPIC-Norfolk

Information

Type
Assessment and methodology
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 16 , Issue 8 , August 2013 , pp. 1454 - 1462
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012 

Phyto-oestrogens are a group of non-steroidal, polyphenolic plant metabolites that induce biological responses and can mimic or modulate the action of endogenous oestrogens, often by binding to oestrogen receptors(1). The bioactivity of phyto-oestrogens is based on their structural similarity to 17β-oestradiol(Reference Setchell and Adlercreutz2) and their ability to bind to the oestrogen receptor(Reference Shutt and Cox3). Due to their bioactivity, these compounds are associated with potentially beneficial effects on a wide range of human conditions, such as cancer(Reference Peeters, Keinan-Boker and van der Schouw4–Reference Ward, Kuhnle and Mulligan6), CVD(Reference Anthony7, Reference Bhupathy, Haines and Leinwand8), osteoporosis(Reference Lagari and Levis9), menopausal symptoms(Reference Krebs, Ensrud and MacDonald10, Reference Tousen, Ezaki and Fujii11), obesity and type 2 diabetes(Reference Bhathena and Velasquez12, Reference Cederroth, Vinciguerra and Gjinovci13). The occurrence of many of these conditions is much lower in traditional Asian societies, where phyto-oestrogen-rich foods form an important component of the diet. Estimates suggest that the average isoflavone intake in Japan ranges from 25 to 100 mg/d(1).

The major phyto-oestrogen classes are isoflavones, found predominantly in legumes and soya foods; lignans, found in cereals, linseed, fruits and vegetables; and coumestans, found in young sprouting legumes, such as clover and alfalfa sprouts. Colonic microflora metabolise plant lignans into enterolignans, enterolactone and enterodiol(Reference Borriello, Setchell and Axelson14). Daidzein, an isoflavone, is metabolised to equol in some individuals(Reference Rowland, Wiseman and Sanders15). Traditional soya foods rich in isoflavones, such as tofu, tempeh and miso, are seldom consumed in the UK; instead soya dairy alternatives, such as soya milk, cheese, yoghurts, and textured vegetable protein (TVP)/tofu burgers are more commonly eaten. However a number of commercial products, such as bread, biscuits and breakfast cereals, contain soya ingredients as food additives and these also contribute to phyto-oestrogen intake(16, 17).

A number of detailed studies have previously been carried out to measure the phyto-oestrogen content of food items in the UK(Reference Liggins, Bluck and Runswick18–Reference Liggins, Mulligan and Runswick20), Finland(Reference Valsta, Kilkkinen and Mazur21), the USA(17, Reference Horn-Ross, Barnes and Lee22), the Netherlands(Reference Milder, Arts and Van De Putte23) and Canada(Reference Thompson, Boucher and Liu24). To date, there are few data available on soya and/or phyto-oestrogen intakes in the UK and most intake data have been mainly on isoflavones.

The present paper investigates the intakes, distributions and sources of phyto-oestrogen-containing foods in a population-based cohort study, the Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), as recorded by a 7 d food diary (7dFD), using a newly in-filled phyto-oestrogen database.

Methods

The EPIC-Norfolk study

EPIC-Norfolk is a prospective cohort study of over 25 000 free-living men and women, aged between 40 and 75 years, studying the effects of nutrition and other lifestyle factors on health(Reference Day, Oakes and Luben25). The study was approved by the Norwich District Health Authority Ethics Committee, and all participants gave signed informed consent. Participants completed a 7dFD between 1993 and 1998, of which 92 % were returned. Of these, 20 437 were entered and available for statistical analysis.

Dietary data

The 7dFD is an A5, 45-page booklet in which the description, preparation and amounts of foods and drinks consumed at main meals, snacks and between meals are recorded over a week(Reference Bingham, Welch and McTaggart26). A trained nurse instructed each participant on how to fill in the diary. As part of this instruction, the nurse asked the participant to recall the previous day's intake and this description was written into the first day.

The diary data were entered using DINER (Data Into Nutrients for Epidemiological Research), a data-entry system specifically created for EPIC-Norfolk(Reference Welch, McTaggart and Mulligan27). The DINER program contains nutrient data derived from the 5th edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods and associated supplements(Reference Holland, Unwin and Buss28–Reference Chan, Brown and Church37). Although there are approximately 4500 food items available from these sources, the nutrient data of only 2704 of these food items are appropriate as DINER only contains foods in an edible state. More than 8000 items, so-called ‘new foods’, have been added to DINER in an attempt to cover the wide range of foods and drinks available in the UK. The nutrient data of these ‘new foods’ is obtained by matching known nutrient composition, e.g. using manufacturers’ data, with between one and four of the aforementioned 2704 items, in order to obtain the best possible match of nutrient analyses. These ‘new foods’ also contain approximately 2300 non-specific (n.s.) items, which are used when the data recorded in a food diary are minimal or missing, e.g. ‘bread n.s.’, ‘milk n.s.’, etc.

Selection of foods for analysis

Primarily single food items, called ‘basic foods’, were chosen for analysis (e.g. banana, rice, flour, peas). Foods to be analysed were selected on the basis of their frequency of consumption, calculated from the entry of more than 14 500 7dFD from EPIC-Norfolk. However, soya-containing foods (e.g. soya mince, soya and linseed bread) were also analysed, in addition to foods previously thought not to contain any phyto-oestrogens (e.g. meat, fish) and foods where there was uncertainty regarding the presence of phyto-oestrogens (e.g. milk, tea, coffee, alcohol). Of the 2704 foods, 349 were analysed for phyto-oestrogen content (13 %); values have been reported for cereals and cereal-based foods(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'aquila and Aspinall38), fruits and vegetables(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall39), beverages, nuts, seeds and oils(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall40) and foods from animal origin(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall41).

Analysis of foods

The phyto-oestrogens analysed included the isoflavones: biochanin A, daidzein, genistein, glycitein and formononetin; the lignans: matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol and shonanin; the enterolignans: enterodiol and enterolactone; and equol and coumestrol. Foods were analysed as described previously(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Low42). In brief, foods were prepared, freeze-dried and extracted with 10 % aqueous methanol by volume. After deconjugation with Helix pomatia juice, samples were prepared by solid-phase extraction and analysed by LC–MS/MS with triply 13C-labelled internal standards. The reproducibility of this method is better than 15 % (relative CV) and the detection limit is 1·5 μg/100 g.

Development of the phyto-oestrogen database

The remaining basic foods were in-filled using one of three methods: copying, calculating using a conversion factor or calculating using a recipe.

Values from similar food items were copied and assigned to 295 basic foods (11 %). Copying of values was carried out: (i) where there were two or more foods of a similar classification, but the analysis for only one of these was available (e.g. analysis of roast chicken breast used for grilled chicken breast without skin, fresh lemon juice used for fresh lime juice); (ii) where commercial products were analysed but similar types were not (e.g. analysis of commercial trifle used for frozen commercial trifle and frozen, boiled petit pois used for canned petit pois); and (iii) where recipe foods needed to be calculated without the availability of a recipe (e.g. values of homemade mayonnaise used for commercial mayonnaise, fresh chocolate éclair used for frozen chocolate éclair).

The foods that were analysed contained the edible part only. Therefore foods that included skin, bone/fat and peel had to be calculated accordingly, as did foods where the phyto-oestrogen content changed due to water uptake during cooking or water loss during drying. Values for 175 basic food items were calculated using a conversion factor in this way (6·5 %). Examples include toasted brown bread and avocado weighed with skin and stone.

Only a limited number of meats were analysed so values for other meats had to be in-filled from these data, many of which were calculated from separately analysed lean and fat samples. For example, ‘beef, topside, roasted, well done, lean and fat’ was calculated using the analysed values of ‘beef, topside, roasted, well done, lean’ (87 %) and ‘beef fat, roasted’ (13 %).

Of the aforementioned 2704 foods, 1056 had their phyto-oestrogen content assigned using the recipe calculation method (39 %), using basic food analyses and recipes mainly available in the 5th edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods and associated supplements(Reference Holland, Unwin and Buss28–Reference Chan, Brown and Church37). Examples of recipe foods include vegetable lasagne, egg custard tart and banana cake.

Remaining foods had different types of missing value assigned. The phyto-oestrogen content was assumed zero (e.g. salt, water); or amount unknown but may be significant (e.g. cocoa/hot chocolate powders, some cheeses, herbs and spices, less commonly consumed fruits and vegetables, some fish, some fats and oils, some meats, chocolate and savoury snacks).

Categorisation of soya foods and consumers

In the DINER system, similar foods are grouped together, such as tea and coffee, fruits, vegetables, breakfast cereals, etc. These food groups have been utilised to study food group sources of total lignans, total isoflavones and total phyto-oestrogens between ‘soya consumers’ (SC) and ‘non-soya consumers’ (NSC). SC were identified as those who had consumed any foods related to ‘soya’, ‘tofu’, ‘TVP’, ‘tempeh’ and/or ‘miso’, of which there were 134 in the DINER program. NSC did not consume any of these foods.

Statistical analyses

The data were analysed using the statistical software packages SAS version 9 and STATA version 10. Mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated to describe the distribution of intakes for two groups: SC and NSC, stratified by sex. Differences in means between these groups were tested using two-sided t tests and further adjusted for energy intake using linear regression analyses.

Results

Absolute phyto-oestrogen intake

Table 1 describes anthropometric data and average daily coumestrol, total enterolignan, isoflavone, lignan, phyto-oestrogen and energy intakes in 9326 NSC men and 354 SC men. The mean daily intakes of total isoflavones (P < 0·0001), lignans (P < 0·001) and phyto-oestrogens (P < 0·0001) were significantly higher in SC men than in NSC men; mean daily total phyto-oestrogen intake was 5051 (sd 5031) μg in SC men but only 1369 (sd 942) μg in NSC men. NSC men were significantly older and heavier and had a significantly greater BMI (all P < 0·05).

Table 1

Average daily intakes of coumestrol, total enterolignans, total isoflavones, total lignans, total phyto-oestrogens and energy in non-soya-consuming (NSC) men (n 9326) and soya-consuming (SC) men (n 354), as measured by a 7 d food diary, and anthropometric data. Men aged 40–79 years, Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

IQR, interquartile range; MD, difference between means.

*NSC men (n 9320).

†NSC men (n 9315).

‡NSC men (n 9311).

Data for 10 274 NSC and 483 SC women are shown in Table 2. The mean daily intakes of total isoflavones, lignans and phyto-oestrogens (all P < 0·0001) were significantly higher in SC women than in NSC women; mean daily total phyto-oestrogen intake was 5396 (sd 6092) μg in SC women but only 1008 (sd 652) μg in NSC women. NSC women consumed significantly less energy than SC women (P < 0·0001). However, the results from the energy-adjusted means did not differ from the unadjusted means. SC women were significantly younger, lighter and taller, and therefore also had a significantly lower BMI (P < 0·0001 for all except height, where P < 0·001).

Table 2

Average daily intakes of coumestrol, total enterolignans, total isoflavones, total lignans, total phyto-oestrogens and energy in non-soya-consuming (NSC) women (n 10 274) and soya-consuming (SC) women (n 483), as measured by a 7 d food diary, and anthropometric data. Women aged 40–79 years, Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

IQR, interquartile range; MD, difference between means.

*NSC women (n 10 256); SC women (n 482).

†NSC women (n 10 255); SC women (n 482).

‡NSC women (n 10 247); SC women (n 482).

The mean daily total phyto-oestrogen intake was higher in SC women than in SC men, 5396 μg v. 5051 μg, but this difference was not significant. However, average daily intakes of total lignans (P < 0·05) and total enterolignans (P < 0·0 0 1) were significantly higher in SC men than in SC women.

The intakes of coumestrol, total enterolignans, isoflavones, lignans and phyto-oestrogens were slightly higher in all men than in all women and these differences were significant (P < 0·0001). The mean total daily phyto-oestrogen intake was 1504 μg in men (sd 1502 μg; median 1199 μg, IQR 934–1537 μg) and 1205 μg in women (sd 1701 μg; median 888 μg, IQR 710–1135 μg; data not shown). Total enterolignan intake was low in both men and women and was significantly related to milk and milk products intake (P < 0·0001).

Table 3 illustrates total mean daily phyto-oestrogen intake, by 10-year age bands, for NSC and SC, stratified by sex. There was a small significant linear decrease (P < 0·0001) in intake for both NSC men and women, as well as for SC men, with increasing age; this linear decrease was not as significant in SC women (P < 0·05). When the data were adjusted for energy, similar trends were observed (Table 3).

Table 3

Unadjusted (U) mean daily intakes (and standard deviation) and energy-adjusted (A) mean daily intakes (and standard error of the mean, sem) of total phyto-oestrogens (μg) in non-soya-consuming (NSC) and soya-consuming (SC) men and women, by age band. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Sources of phyto-oestrogen intake

Data on percentage food group sources of total phyto-oestrogens, total isoflavones and total lignans in men and women are shown in Table 4, but only where food groups contribute 5 % or more to the intake of each phyto-oestrogen group. In all men and women, bread and bread rolls made the greatest contribution to phyto-oestrogen intake – 40·8 % and 35·6 %, respectively. When SC were excluded, the contribution made by bread and bread rolls rose to 45·1 % in men and 42·4 % in women. However, in SC men and women, foods contributing to total phyto-oestrogen intake were very different, with vegetable dishes and soya/goat's/sheep's milk being the main contributors, accounting for a combined total of approximately 67 % of intake in men and 72 % in women.

Table 4

Percentage (%) contribution to total phyto-oestrogens (TOT PE), total isoflavones (TOT ISO) and total lignans (TOT LIG) from food groups, in all men and women, and non-soya-consuming (NSC) and soya-consuming (SC) men and women, ordered by percentage contribution in all men. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

–, % contribution <5·0 %.

*Contain soya/textured vegetable protein/tofu/tempeh foods.

Bread and bread rolls also made the greatest contribution to total isoflavone intake in all men and women – 51·3 % and 45·2 %, respectively. In SC, vegetable dishes and soya/goat's/sheep's milk were the main contributors, accounting for approximately 66 % of intake in men and 72 % in women.

Tea and coffee were the main contributors to total lignan intakes, accounting for 32·8 % of intake in men and 37·3 % in women. These values are very similar to those found in NSC men and women (33·0 % and 37·8 %, respectively). This food group was also the greatest contributor to lignan intake in SC: 26·9 % in men and 29·4 % in women. The consumption of alcohol also contributed to lignan intake: approximately 7 % of intake in all women from wine and 21 % in all men from wine, beer and lager.

Figure 1a illustrates the percentage contribution of food groups to the daily intake of total phyto-oestrogens in NSC. Bread and bread rolls made the greatest contribution (43 %), followed by breakfast cereals (12 %) and tea and coffee (6 %). In SC, vegetable dishes were the highest contributor (41 %), followed by soya/goat's/sheep's milk (25 %) and bread and bread rolls (11 %) (Fig. 1b).

Fig 1

Percentage contribution of food groups to the daily intake of total phyto-oestrogens in (a) non-soya consumers and (b) soya consumers. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Food choices of soya consumers and non-soya consumers

Mean average daily intakes (in grams) of the food groups listed in Table 4 were compared between SC and NSC, stratified by sex, using a two-sample t test. In men, these were all significantly different (P < 0·0001 for all food groups except wine, where P < 0·05). NSC men had significantly higher intakes of vegetables, fruits, nuts and seeds, meat products, wine and beer and lager; intakes of bread and bread rolls, breakfast cereals, tea and coffee, vegetable dishes and soya/goat's/sheep's milk were higher in SC men.

In women, mean average daily intakes of most food groups listed were significantly different between SC and NSC (P < 0·0001 for all food groups, with the exception of wine and soya/goat's/sheep's milk where P < 0·05). NSC women had significantly higher intakes of vegetables, fruits, nuts and seeds, meat products, soya/goat's/sheep's milk and beer and lager; intakes of bread and bread rolls, breakfast cereals, tea and coffee, wine and vegetable dishes were higher in SC women.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the average intake and distribution of soya-containing foods, coumestrol, total isoflavones, lignans, enterolignans and phyto-oestrogens, using a newly in-filled phyto-oestrogen database. This data set of phyto-oestrogen intake data is one of the largest to be investigated to date. The isoflavone intake data are similar to the intake of the vegetarian group (7·4 mg/d) in a recent UK study(Reference Ritchie, Cummings and Morton43). Data from the 1998 UK Total Diet Study estimated average daily intake of 3 mg of the combined isoflavone aglycones (daidzein, genistein and glycitein)(Reference Clarke and Lloyd44). Exposure estimates of total isoflavones for SC and soya-containing foods in UK adults based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (1986–1987) and the Dietary Survey of Vegetarians (1994–1995) were 0·6 and 2·6 mg/person per d respectively(45).

These data on daily isoflavone intake are higher than those from a previous study of EPIC-Norfolk participants(Reference Mulligan, Welch and McTaggart46); 0·84 mg in all men (IQR 0·39–0·82 mg) and 0·77 mg in all women (IQR 0·30–0·64 mg). The differences in intake can mainly be attributed to the inclusion of the phyto-oestrogen analysis of certain foods in the database, foods which had not previously been analysed in the UK, such as tea, coffee, meat, fish, milk and dairy products(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall40, Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall41), as well as changes in the isoflavone content of isoflavone-rich foods, such as soya flour, soya yoghurt, tofu/soyabean curd, tofu burgers and soyabean burgers. These foods were previously taken from published values(Reference Kiely, Faughnan and Wahala47) but recently analysed in the UK(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'aquila and Aspinall38, Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquila and Aspinall41) and a 30–85 % reduction in their isoflavone content was found. Some commonly consumed foods, including brown and wholemeal breads, were also found to contain 20–30 % less isoflavones than previously estimated. The phyto-oestrogen content in plants is variable and depends on genetic, environmental, growth, harvesting and processing factors. A recent investigation into the variability of the phyto-oestrogen content in nine foods from different sources has shown that the phyto-oestrogen content varied on average by a factor of 2·8, with a CV of 39 % for isoflavones and 33 % for lignans(Reference Kuhnle, Dell'Aquilla and Runswick48).

Food group sources of total lignans, total isoflavones and total phyto-oestrogens were analysed separately. The richest food group source of both total isoflavones and phyto-oestrogens was bread and bread rolls. This is due to the soya flour added to bread in large-scale bread manufacture which produces 80 % of the UK's bread. In EPIC-Norfolk, 96–97 % of bread is commercially produced. Data from Italy and Ireland have estimated that over 90 % of total isoflavone intake comes from bread(Reference Van Erp-Baart, Brants and Kiely49).

Recipes from McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th edition and its associated food supplements(Reference Holland, Unwin and Buss28–Reference Chan, Brown and Church37) were used in calculating the phyto-oestrogen content of most food products and dishes. However, some of these foods were analysed in the 1980s (e.g. croissants, jam tarts, scones, apple pies), and soya is not listed as an ingredient. In the DINER system(Reference Welch, McTaggart and Mulligan27), commercial items sometimes receive the same nutrient composition as homemade items in the absence of reliable analyses. Therefore underestimation of phyto-oestrogen content is likely as it has been estimated that 60 % of commercially processed foods contain soya(17).

Regarding food group sources of phyto-oestrogens in SC, vegetable dishes and soya/goat's/sheep's milk were the main contributors. Soya product consumption in ten countries participating in the EPIC study consisting of 35 955 subjects, as measured by a 24 h dietary recall interview, found that soya product consumption is low in Western European countries. Of the seven subgroups of soya products, soya dairy products were consumed in the highest quantities: 1200 mg/d for men and 1900 mg/d for women(Reference Keinan-Boker, Peeters and Mulligan50).

A number of the findings relating to the food group choices made by SC and NSC were somewhat unexpected. In both NSC men and women, intakes of vegetables, fruit, nuts and seeds were significantly higher, whereas intakes of bread and bread rolls, breakfast cereals, tea and coffee and vegetable dishes were significantly higher in SC. However the differences found were small and could have been due to the large sample size. A more detailed food group classification is required to more accurately assess choices made by SC and NSC.

The ability to more accurately estimate phyto-oestrogen and soya intake in Western populations will enable investigations into the suggested beneficial effects of soya on health to be carried out, in the absence of biomarker data.

Acknowledgements

Source of funding: This study was supported by research grants from the Food Standards Agency (T05028), the Medical Research Council (G0500300, G1000143) and Cancer Research UK (C864/A8257). Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Authors’ contribution: A.A.M. oversaw the development of the database, conducted the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. M.A.H.L., K.-T.K. and G.G.C.K. assisted in writing and revising the manuscript. M.A.H.L., V.v.S., N.A.P. and A.M. assisted in the development of the database. A.B. created the programs for the database. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all participants of the EPIC-Norfolk study and the EPIC staff for their help with this work.

References

1.Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (2003) Phytoestrogens and Health. London: Food Standards Agency.Google Scholar
2.Setchell, KDR & Adlercreutz, H (1988) Mammalian lignans and phytoestrogens. In The Role of the Gut Flora in Toxicity and Cancer, pp. 315–346 [IR Rowland, editor]. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Shutt, DA & Cox, RI (1972) Steroid and phyto-oestrogen binding to sheep uterine receptors in vitro. J Endocrinol 52, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Peeters, PHM, Keinan-Boker, L, van der Schouw, YTet al. (2003) Phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Review of the epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 77, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Buck, K, Zaineddin, AK, Vrieling, Aet al. (2010) Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Ward, HA, Kuhnle, GG, Mulligan, AAet al. (2010) Breast, colorectal and prostate cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk in relation to phytoestrogen intake derived from an improved database. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Anthony, MS (2002) Phytoestrogens and cardiovascular disease: where's the meat? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22, 1245–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Bhupathy, P, Haines, CD & Leinwand, LA (2010) Influence of sex hormones and phytoestrogens on heart disease in men and women. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 6, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lagari, VS & Levis, S (2010) Phytoestrogens and bone health. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 17, 546–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Krebs, EE, Ensrud, KE, MacDonald, Ret al. (2004) Phytoestrogens for treatment of menopausal symptoms: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 104, 824–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Tousen, Y, Ezaki, J, Fujii, Yet al. (2011) Natural S-equol decreases bone resorption in postmenopausal, non-equol-producing Japanese women: a pilot randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 18, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bhathena, SJ & Velasquez, MT (2002) Beneficial role of dietary phytoestrogens in obesity and diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Cederroth, CR, Vinciguerra, M, Gjinovci, Aet al. (2008) Dietary phytoestrogens activate AMP-activated protein kinase with improvement in lipid and glucose metabolism. Diabetes 57, 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Borriello, SP, Setchell, KD, Axelson, Met al. (1985) Production and metabolism of lignans by the human faecal flora. J Appl Bacteriol 58, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Rowland, IR, Wiseman, H, Sanders, TABet al. (2000) Interindividual variation in metabolism of soy isoflavones and lignans: influence of habitual diet on equol production by the gut microflora. Nutr Cancer 36, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.US Department of Agriculture (2002) USDA–Iowa State University Database on the Isoflavone Content of Foods. http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/isoflav/isoflav.html (accessed November 2010).Google Scholar
17.the ENDS report (1996) Supermarkets demand segregation of genetically modified soya. ENDS Report issue 258, 26.Google Scholar
18.Liggins, J, Bluck, LJ, Runswick, Set al. (2000) Daidzein and genistein contents of vegetables. Br J Nutr 84, 717–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Liggins, J, Bluck, LJ, Runswick, Set al. (2000) Daidzein and genistein content of fruits and nuts. J Nutr Biochem 11, 326–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Liggins, J, Mulligan, A, Runswick, Set al. (2002) Daidzein and genistein content of cereals. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 961–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Valsta, LM, Kilkkinen, A, Mazur, Wet al. (2003) Phyto-oestrogen database of foods and average intake in Finland. Br J Nutr 89, Suppl. 1, S31–S38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Horn-Ross, PL, Barnes, S, Lee, Met al. (2000) Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies: development of a database (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Milder, IEJ, Arts, ICW, Van De Putte, Bet al. (2005) Lignan contents of Dutch plant foods: a database including lari-ciresinol, pinoresinol, secoisolariciresinol and matairesinol. Br J Nutr 93, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Thompson, LU, Boucher, BA, Liu, Zet al. (2006) Phytoestrogen content of foods consumed in Canada, including isoflavones, lignans and coumestan. Nutr Cancer 54, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Day, N, Oakes, S, Luben, Ret al. (1999) EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. Br J Cancer 80, 95–103.Google Scholar
26.Bingham, SA, Welch, AA, McTaggart, Aet al. (2001) Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk. Public Health Nutr 4, 847–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Welch, AA, McTaggart, A, Mulligan, AAet al. (2001) DINER (Data Into Nutrients for Epidemiological Research) – a new data-entry program for nutritional analysis in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort and the 7-day diary method. Public Health Nutr 4, 1253–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Holland, B, Unwin, ID & Buss, DH (1988) Cereals and Cereal Products. Third Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
29.Holland, B, Unwin, ID & Buss, DH (1989) Milk Products and Eggs. Fourth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
30.Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, IDet al. (1991) McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
31.Holland, B, Unwin, ID & Buss, DH (1991) Vegetables, Herbs and Spices. Fifth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Holland, B, Unwin, ID & Buss, DH (1992) Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1992) Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
34.Holland, B, Brown, JB & Buss, DH (1993) Fish and Fish Products. Third Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Chan, W, Brown, JB & Buss, DH (1994) Miscellaneous Foods. Fourth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Chan, W, Brown, J, Lee, SMet al. (1995) Meat, Poultry and Game. Fifth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Chan, W, Brown, J, Church, SMet al. (1996) Meat Products and Dishes. Sixth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Kuhnle, GGC, Dell'aquila, C, Aspinall, SMet al. (2009) Phytoestrogen content of cereals and cereal-based foods consumed in the UK. Nutr Cancer 61, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Kuhnle, GG, Dell'Aquila, C, Aspinall, SMet al. (2009) Phytoestrogen content of fruits and vegetables commonly consumed in the UK based on LC–MS and 13C-labelled standards. Food Chem 116, 542–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Kuhnle, GGC, Dell'Aquila, C, Aspinall, SMet al. (2008) Phytoestrogen content of beverages, nuts, seeds, and oils. J Agric Food Chem 56, 7311–7315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Kuhnle, GGC, Dell'Aquila, C, Aspinall, SMet al. (2008) Phytoestrogen content of foods of animal origin: dairy products, eggs, meat, fish, and seafood. J Agric Food Chem 56, 10099–10104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Kuhnle, GGC, Dell'Aquila, C, Low, YLet al. (2007) Extraction and quantification of phytoestrogens in foods using automated solid-phase extraction and LC/MS/MS. Anal Chem 79, 9234–9239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Ritchie, MR, Cummings, JH, Morton, MSet al. (2006) A newly constructed and validated isoflavone database for the assessment of total genistein and daidzein intake. Br J Nutr 95, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Clarke, DB & Lloyd, AS (2004) Dietary exposure estimates of isoflavones from the 1998 UK Total Diet Study. Food Addit Contam 21, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (2001) Working Group on Phytoestrogen Paper PEG/2001/24: Amendment to the Isoflavone Intake Assessment. London: Food Standards Agency.Google Scholar
46.Mulligan, AA, Welch, AA, McTaggart, AAet al. (2007) Intakes and sources of soya foods and isoflavones in a UK population cohort study (EPIC-Norfolk). Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Kiely, M, Faughnan, M, Wahala, Ket al. (2003) Phyto-oestrogen levels in foods: the design and construction of the VENUS database. Br J Nutr 89, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Kuhnle, GGC, Dell'Aquilla, C, Runswick, SAet al. (2009) Variability of phytoestrogen content in foods from different sources. Food Chem 113, 1184–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Van Erp-Baart, MAJ, Brants, HAM, Kiely, Met al. (2003) Isoflavone intake in four different European countries: the VENUS approach. Br J Nutr 89, Suppl. 1, S25–S30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Keinan-Boker, L, Peeters, PHM, Mulligan, AAet al. (2002) Soy product consumption in 10 European countries: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr 5, 1217–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Average daily intakes of coumestrol, total enterolignans, total isoflavones, total lignans, total phyto-oestrogens and energy in non-soya-consuming (NSC) men (n 9326) and soya-consuming (SC) men (n 354), as measured by a 7 d food diary, and anthropometric data. Men aged 40–79 years, Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Figure 1

Table 2 Average daily intakes of coumestrol, total enterolignans, total isoflavones, total lignans, total phyto-oestrogens and energy in non-soya-consuming (NSC) women (n 10 274) and soya-consuming (SC) women (n 483), as measured by a 7 d food diary, and anthropometric data. Women aged 40–79 years, Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Figure 2

Table 3 Unadjusted (U) mean daily intakes (and standard deviation) and energy-adjusted (A) mean daily intakes (and standard error of the mean, sem) of total phyto-oestrogens (μg) in non-soya-consuming (NSC) and soya-consuming (SC) men and women, by age band. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Figure 3

Table 4 Percentage (%) contribution to total phyto-oestrogens (TOT PE), total isoflavones (TOT ISO) and total lignans (TOT LIG) from food groups, in all men and women, and non-soya-consuming (NSC) and soya-consuming (SC) men and women, ordered by percentage contribution in all men. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997

Figure 4

Fig 1 Percentage contribution of food groups to the daily intake of total phyto-oestrogens in (a) non-soya consumers and (b) soya consumers. Men and women aged 40–79 years (n 20 437), Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk), 1993–1997