Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T04:09:27.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl and pyroxsulam–resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua) in an annual cropping system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2023

Vijaya Bhaskar Alwarnaidu Vijayarajan*
Affiliation:
Research Officer, Crop Research Centre Oak Park, Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland
Charlotte Morgan
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Nawaporn Onkokesung
Affiliation:
Lab Leader, Weed Resistance Research, Bayer Crop Science, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Sarah K. Cook
Affiliation:
Principal Research Consultant, Weed Biology, ADAS Boxworth, Boxworth, UK
Trevor R. Hodkinson
Affiliation:
Professor, Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Susanne Barth
Affiliation:
Senior Research Officer, Crop Research Centre Oak Park, Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland
Michael Hennessy
Affiliation:
Head of Crops Knowledge Transfer, Crop Research Centre Oak Park, Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland
Patrick D. Forristal
Affiliation:
Principal Research Officer, Crop Research Centre Oak Park, Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Vijaya Bhaskar Alwarnaidu Vijayarajan; Email: Vijaya.Bhaskar@teagasc.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) has become a problem in non-arable land areas. In arable fields, P. annua is frequently of lower priority in weed control program due to the variety of control options available and the relatively modest impact on crop yield compared with other species. In Ireland, postemergence herbicides are not primarily intended for P. annua control, but some herbicides, including the acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl, exhibit P. annua activity. In this study, a suspected P. annua population (POAAN-R) that survived mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl at 0.75 of the field recommended rate was sampled from a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) field in County Dublin, Ireland. Single-dose testing confirmed that the suspected POAAN-R had evolved resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl and, additionally, to pyroxsulam (not registered in Ireland for P. annua control), but was sensitive to clethodim, glyphosate, pendimethalin, and flufenacet. Dose–response experiments indicated that POAAN-R was more resistant (GR50 resistance index) to both mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl (47.8 times) and pyroxsulam (38.0 times) than sensitive POAAN-S, and this was associated with the mutation at Trp-574 in the ALS protein. Malathion (a cytochrome P450 [P450] inhibitor) pretreatment did not reverse POAAN-R resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl or pyroxsulam at the field rate or above. The natural inherent mutation at Ile-1781 in acetyl-CoA carboxylase protein had no effect on both POAAN-R and POAAN-S sensitivity to clethodim. The glyphosate sensitivity of POAAN-R also corresponded with no known mutation in 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase protein. Based on field histories, poor early-season weed control coupled with intensive use of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl (often at reduced rates) has unintentionally selected for ALS inhibitor–resistant POAAN-R. This is the first report to characterize resistance in P. annua to ALS-inhibiting herbicides mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl and pyroxsulam in an arable setting. There is an opportunity to effectively control POAAN-R using herbicides, but this needs a wide-ranging and varied approach, coupled with cultural/nonchemical practices.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Resistance status across different herbicide chemistries for sensitive (POAAN-S) and resistant (POAAN-R) populations of Poa annua.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Dose–response curves of sensitive (POAAN-S) and resistant (POAAN-R) populations of Poa annua treated with a range of recommended field rates (±) of (A) acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl (15 + 5 g ai ha−1) and (B) pyroxsulam (18.8 g ai ha−1). Vertical bars represent the SEs.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Dose–response curves of sensitive (POAAN-S) and resistant (POAAN-R) populations of Poa annua treated with a range of recommended field rates (±) of (A) acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase)-inhibiting herbicide clethodim (120 g ai ha−1) and (B) 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS)-inhibiting herbicide glyphosate (540 g ai ha−1). Vertical bars represent the standard errors.

Figure 3

Table 2. Shoot fresh weight GR50 values (SEs in parentheses) of sensitive (POAAN-S) and resistant (POAAN-R) populations of Poa annua treated with a range of recommended field rates (±) of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl (15 + 5 g ai ha−1) and pyroxsulam (18.8 g ai ha−1).

Figure 4

Table 3. Shoot fresh weight GR50 values (SEs in parentheses) of sensitive (POAAN-S) and resistant (POAAN-R) populations of Poa annua treated with a range of recommended field rates (±) of clethodim (120 g ai ha−1) and glyphosate (540 g ai ha−1).

Supplementary material: File

Alwarnaidu Vijayarajan et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S4

Download Alwarnaidu Vijayarajan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.5 MB