Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T22:18:33.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and testing of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Kerala, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1998

James R Hebert ,
Prakash C Gupta ,
Ramesh B Bhonsle ,
PR Murti ,
Hemali Mehta ,
Florence Verghese ,
Mira Aghi ,
Kamala Krishnaswamy  and
Fali S Mehta
James R Hebert*
Affiliation:
Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
Prakash C Gupta
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
Ramesh B Bhonsle
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
PR Murti
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India Currently affiliated with the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Champa Fleurs, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies
Hemali Mehta
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
Florence Verghese
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
Mira Aghi
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
Kamala Krishnaswamy
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad 500007, India
Fali S Mehta
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400005, India
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail James.Hebert@ummed.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Objective:

To develop and test a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for use in rural areas of Kerala, India.

Design:

Based on food use and market surveys of the study area, a quantitative 81-item interviewer-administered FFQ was developed. A validation study was conducted consisting of 24-h diet recalls (24HR) administered on 8 days randomly selected over an entire year and two administrations of the FFQ, one at the beginning of the l-year period and the other at the end. FFQ and 24HR-derived nutrient scores were compared using correlation and regression analyses and by examining differences in the nutrient scores.

Setting:

Rural villages in Ernakulum district, Kerala, South India.

Subjects:

In each of 30 households, the male head of household and female food preparer were enrolled.

Results:

Pearson (parametric) correlation coefficients (rp) averaged about 0.50 in comparing nutrient scores derived from the 24HR with those from the first FFQ and about 0.55 in comparing the second FFQ. On average, Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) were slightly lower than the rp in comparing the scores derived from the first FFQ, but virtually identical for the second FFQ. Regression analyses indicated better agreement in the comparison of the 24HR-derived scores with the first FFQ than the second FFQ. Difference scores, however, tended to be larger in comparing the first FFQ scores with the 24HR.

Conclusions:

This FFQ produces results broadly comparable to those used in Europe and North America, indicating its suitability for comparing exposures within a study population in reference to health-related endpoints.

Keywords

Human nutritionFood frequency questionnaireIndiaDietary assessment methods

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 123 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 1998

References

1Willett, WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990.Google Scholar
2Hebert, JR, Miller, DR. Methodologic considerations for investigating the diet–cancer link. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988; 47: 1068–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Hebert, JR, Clemow, L, Pbert, L, Ockene, IS, Ockene, JK. Social desirability and approval biases in dietary self-report may profoundly compromise the validity of diet–disease studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995; 24: 389–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1985; 122: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Block, G, Woods, M, Potosky, A, Clifford, C. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1990; 43: 1327–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Chadha, SL. Dietary profile of adults in an urban and a rural community. Indian J. Med. Res. 1995; 101: 258–67.Google Scholar
7Rao, B. Monitoring nutrient intakes in India. Indian J. Pediatr. 1987; 54: 495–501.Google ScholarPubMed
8National Institute of Nutrition (NIN). National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau Report of Repeat Surwys (1988–90). Indian Council of Medical Research. Hyderabad, India: NIN, 1991.Google Scholar
9Hebert, JR, Gupta, PC, Bhonsle, R et al. Determinants of accuracy in estimating the weight and volume of commonly used foods: a cross-cultural comparison. Ecology of Food and Nutrition (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
10Sankaranarayanan, R, Varghese, C, Duffy, SW, Padmakumary, G, Day, NE, Nair, MK. A case-control study of diet and lung cancer in Kerala, south India. Int. J. Cancer 1994; 58: 644–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Nandakumar, A, Thimmasetty, KT, Sreeramareddy, NM, et al. A population-based case–control investigation on cancers of the oral cavity in Bangalore, India. Br. J. Cancer 1990; 62: 847–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Notani, PN. Role of diet and alcohol in tobacco-related cancer at sites in the upper aerodigestive tract in an Indian population. In: Gupta, PC, Hamner, JE, Murti, PR, eds. Control of Tobacco-Related Cancers and Other Diseases: Proceedings of an International Symposium: 15–19 January 1990. Bombay, India: Oxford University Press, 1990; 149–55.Google Scholar
13Gupta, PC, Bhonsle, RB, Murti, PR, Daftary, DK, Mehta, FS, Pindborg, JJ. An epidemiologic assessment of cancer risk in oral precancerous lesions in India with special reference to nodular leukoplakia. Cancer 1989; 63: 2247–52.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14National Institute of Nutrition (NIN). Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. Hyderabad, India: NIN, 1993.Google Scholar
15Messer, E. Intra-household allocation of food and health care: current findings and understandings – introduction. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997; 44: 1675–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Hebert, JR. Relationship of vegetarianism to child growth in South India. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 1985; 42 1246–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Thimmayamma, B. A Handbook of Schedules and Guidelines in Socio-economic and Diet Surveys. Hyderabad, India: National Institute of Nutrition, 1987.Google Scholar
18Gibson, RS. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
19Hebert, JR, Miller, DR, Barone, J, Engle, A. Assessment of Change in Fat Intake in an Intervention Study. American Public Health Association (APHA), 119th Annual MeetingAtlanta, GAAPHA1991.Google Scholar
20Posner, BM, Martin-Munley, SS, Smigelski, C, et al. Comparison of techniques for estimating nutrient intake: the Framingham Study. Epidemiology 1992; 3: 171–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Hebert, JR, Ockene, IS, Hurley, TG, Luippold, R, Well, AD, Harmatz, MG. Development and testing of a seven-day dietary recall. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 925–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Franke, RW, Chasin, BH. Kerala State, India: radical reform as development (Review). Int. J. Health Serv. 1992; 22: 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Neff, D. The social construction of infertility: the case of the matrilineal Nayars in south India. Soc. Sci. Med. 1994; 339: 475–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Rosner, B, Willett, WC. Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1988; 127: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Salvini, S, Hunter, DJ, Sampson, L, et al. Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption. Int. J. Epidemiol 1989; 18: 858–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Hebert, JR, Miller, DR. The inappropriateness of conventional use of the correlation coefficient in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Euro. J. Epidemiol. 1991; 7: 339–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Borrelli, R, Cole, TJ, DiBiase, G, Contaldo, F. Some statistical considerations on dietary assessment methods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989; 43: 453–63.Google ScholarPubMed
28Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Dasgupta, P. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Jobe, JB, Mingay, DJ. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am. J. Publ. Health 1989; 79: 1053–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Dwyer, JT, Gardner, J, Halvorsen, K, Krall, EA, Cohen, A, Valadian I. Memory of food intake in the distant past. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1989; 130: 1033–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Smith, AF. Cognitive psychological issues of relevance to the validity of dietary reports. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993; 47(suppl 2): S6–S18.Google Scholar
33Dwyer, JT, Coleman, KA. Insights into dietary recall from a longitudinal study: accuracy over four decades. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65: 1153S–8S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed