Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T15:50:36.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The near wake of discrete roughness elements on swept wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2023

G. Zoppini*
Affiliation:
Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
T. Michelis
Affiliation:
Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
D. Ragni
Affiliation:
Group of Aeroacoustics, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
M. Kotsonis
Affiliation:
Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
*
Email address for correspondence: g.zoppini@tudelft.nl

Abstract

This work presents the first experimental characterization of the flow field in the vicinity of periodically spaced discrete roughness elements (DRE) in a swept wing boundary layer. The time-averaged velocity fields are acquired in a volumetric domain by high-resolution dual-pulse tomographic particle tracking velocimetry. Investigation of the stationary flow topology indicates that the near-element flow region is dominated by high- and low-speed streaks. The boundary layer spectral content is inferred by spatial fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of the spanwise velocity signal, characterizing the chordwise behaviour of individual disturbance modes. The two signature features of transient growth, namely algebraic growth and exponential decay, are identified in the chordwise evolution of the disturbance energy associated with higher harmonics of the primary stationary mode. A transient decay process is instead identified in the near-wake region just aft of each DRE, similar to the wake relaxation effect previously observed in two-dimensional boundary layer flows. The transient decay regime is found to condition the onset and initial amplitude of modal crossflow instabilities. Within the critical DRE amplitude range (i.e. affecting boundary layer transition without causing flow tripping) the transient disturbances are strongly receptive to the spanwise spacing and diameter of the elements, which drive the modal energy distribution within the spatial spectra. In the super-critical amplitude forcing (i.e. causing flow tripping) the near-element stationary flow topology is dominated by the development of a high-speed and strongly fluctuating region closely aligned with the DRE wake. Therefore, elevated shears and unsteady disturbances affect the near-element flow development. Combined with the harmonic modes transient growth these instabilities initiate a laminar streak structure breakdown and a bypass transition process.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geometrical parameters of the measured forcing configurations computed from numerical BL solutions. Colour map based on $k/\delta ^*$, symbols based on DRE height, legend indicating nominal element height [mm].

Figure 1

Figure 2. (ac) Values of $\bar {u}_d$ and (df) $u^{\prime }$ for forcing case $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _1$, $Re_{{k}}=192$ (for $k_3$) in (a,d) the $xz$ plane at $y=0.55\bar {\delta }^*$; (b,e) the $yz$ plane at $x_1=0.154c$ (vertical dashed line in a,d) and (c,f) at $x_2=0.174c$ (vertical dash-dot line in a,d). Disturbance profiles at (h) $x_1$ and (i) $x_2$ for all three velocity components; element height (solid horizontal black line); LST $\lambda _1$ shape function (dashed grey line) scaled to match $\langle \bar {u} \rangle _z$ maximum; element height (horizontal full line).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Streak amplitude analysis for varying $Re_{{k}}$: (a) $A_{str}$ for high-speed (full line) and low-speed (-.) streaks; (b) $A_{And}$ and amplitude limit for laminar streak breakdown (-., Andersson et al.2001). Element location (shaded grey region).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) The $Q$-criterion iso-surfaces $Q=0.005$ (red) and $Q=-0.01$ (blue) for $Re_{{k}}=192$ case; $\bar {u}_R=0$ iso-surface (green). Streamwise vorticity contours and $Q$-criterion iso-lines in (b) $y_Rz_R$ plane at $x/c=0.16$ and (c) $x_Rz_R$ plane at $y/\bar {\delta }^*=0.55$. Full blue lines $Q>0$ levels (5 between 0.005, 0.01), full black line $Q=0.005$ level, grey dash-dot lines $Q<0$ levels (5 between $-0.001$, $-0.01$).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Spanwise FFT analysis for (a,b) $Re_{{k}}=192$ and (c,d) $Re_{{k}}=90$. (a,c) FFT spectra in the $x\lambda$ plane; (b,d) $\langle \bar {u} \rangle _z$ profiles and $\lambda _{f1}$ FFT shape function at $x_1$ (dashed vertical line in a,c) and $x_2$ (dash-dot vertical line in a,c). The LST $\lambda _1$ shape function (- -) scaled to match $\langle \bar {u} \rangle _z$ maximum; element height (horizontal full line). Here, $V$ stands for ${\rm FFT}_z(\bar {u})/\bar {u}_{\infty }$.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a,c) Values of $A_{int}(\bar {u})$ and (b,d) $E(\bar {{\boldsymbol {u}}})$ for the total disturbance field and for the $\lambda _{{f1}}-\lambda _{{f6}}$ FFT harmonics for forcing cases (a,b) $Re_{{k}}=192$; (c,d) $Re_{{k}}=90$. Element location (grey shaded region); PTV uncertainty (blue shaded region).

Figure 6

Figure 7. The $A_{int}$ and $N_{eff}$ estimations for the experimental FFT $\lambda _{{f1}}$ mode (symbols) and for the LST solution $\lambda _1$ mode (solid lines). $A_0$ shown by filled black markers.

Figure 7

Figure 8. The $E_{\lambda _{fi}}(\bar {{\boldsymbol {u}}})$ trends (symbols, 1 out of 5 shown) and maximum values (red circle) and transient growth modelling functions (black lines, White et al.2005) at various $Re_{{k}}$ for individual FFT modes; (a) $\lambda _{{f1}}$, (b) $\lambda _{{f3}}$, (c) $\lambda _{{f4}}$, (d) $\lambda _{{f5}}$, (e) $\lambda _{{f6}}$.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Variation of (a) $E(\bar {{\boldsymbol {u}}})$, and $E_{\lambda _{fi}}(\bar {{\boldsymbol {u}}})$ computed for FFT modes (b) $\lambda _{{f1}}$, (c) $\lambda _{{f2}}$ and (d) $\lambda _{{f3}}$ modes at varying $Re_{{k}}$. Energy is scaled by $Re_{{k}}^2$; element location (grey shaded region).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Stationary flow topology for forcing case $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{3/2}$, $Re_{{k}}=192$ (i.e. $k_3$): (a,b) $\bar {u}_d$ in the $yz$ plane at (a) $x_1=0.154c$ and (b) at $x_2=0.174c$; (c) $\langle \bar {u} \rangle _z$ profiles and $\lambda _{f1}$ FFT shape functions at $x_1$ and $x_2$; element height (horizontal full line); (d) $A_{And}$ and amplitude limit for laminar streak breakdown (-. line) for various $Re_{{k}}$. (e) Spanwise FFT spectra in the $x\lambda$ plane at $y=0.55\bar {\delta }^*$. Here, $V$ stands for ${\rm FFT}_z(\bar {u})/\bar {u}_{\infty }$.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Values of $A_{{int}}(\bar {u})$ for the total disturbance field and for the $\lambda _{{f1}}-\lambda _{{f6}}$ FFT harmonics for forcing cases $Re_{{k}}=192$ and (a) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{3/2}$, (b) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{2/3}$. Element location (grey shaded region); PTV uncertainty (blue shaded region).

Figure 11

Figure 12. The $A_{int}$ and $N_{eff}$ estimations for the experimental FFT $\lambda _{{f1}}$ mode (symbols) for cases $\lambda _{f1}=\lambda _{3/2}$ and $\lambda _{2/3}$ at $Re_{k}=192$ and for the LST solution $\lambda _1$ mode (solid lines). Here, $A_0$ shown by filled coloured markers.

Figure 12

Figure 13. The $E_{\lambda _{f1}}(\bar {{\boldsymbol {u}}})$ trends (symbols, 1 out of 5 shown) and minimum values (red circle), and transient growth modelling functions (full lines, White et al.2005) at various $Re_{{k}}$ for (a) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{3/2}$ and (b) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{2/3}$. Energy modelling function for $Re_{{k}}=192$, $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _1$ (black dotted line).

Figure 13

Figure 14. Variation $E(\bar {\boldsymbol {u}})$ for (a) total disturbance field, (b) FFT $\lambda _{f1}$, (c) $\lambda _{f2}$ and (d) $\lambda _{f3}$ modes at varying $Re_{{k}}$ and $\lambda _{f1}$. Energy is scaled by $Re_{{k}}^2$; element location (grey shaded region).

Figure 14

Figure 15. (ac) Values of $\bar {u}_d$ and (df) $u^{\prime }$ for forcing case $\lambda _{f1}$, $Re_{{k}}=330$ in (a,d) the $xz$ plane at $y/\bar {\delta }^*=0.55$; (b,e) in the $yz$ plane at $x_1=0.154c$ (vertical dashed line in a), and (c,f) at $x_2=0.174c$ (vertical dash-dot line). Vertical full line in (a) at $x/c=0.158$.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Value of $A_{And}$ and amplitude limit for laminar streak breakdown (-. line) for forcing (a) at $\lambda _{f1}=\lambda _1$ varying $Re_{{k}}$; (b) at $Re_{{k}}=330$ and varying $\lambda _{f1}$. Element location (grey shaded region).

Figure 16

Figure 17. (a) The $Q$-criterion iso-surfaces $Q=0.01$ (red) and $Q=-0.08$ (blue) for $Re_{{k}}=330$ case. Streamwise vorticity contours and $Q$-criterion iso-lines in (b) $y_Rz_R$ plane at $x/c=0.157$ and (c) $x_Rz_R$ plane at $y/\delta ^*=0.55$. Full blue lines $Q>0$ levels (5 between 0.01, 0.1), full black line $Q=0.01$ level, grey dash-dot lines $Q<0$ levels (5 between $-0.008$, $-0.01$).

Figure 17

Figure 18. (ac) Spanwise FFT spectra in the $x$$\lambda$ plane (vertical dashed line at $x_1$, vertical dash-dot line at $x_2$) and (df) $\langle \bar {u} \rangle _z$ profiles and $\lambda _{f1}$ FFT shape function at $x_1$ and $x_2$ for forcing at $Re_{{k}}=330$ and (a,d) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{3/2}$; (b,e) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{1}$; (c,f) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{2/3}$; element height (horizontal full line).

Figure 18

Figure 19. Value of $A_{int}(\bar {u})$ for the total disturbance field and for the $\lambda _{{f1}}-\lambda _{{f}6}$ FFT harmonics for forcing at $Re_{{k}}=330$ and (a) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{3/2}$, (b) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{1}$, (c) $\lambda _{{f1}}=\lambda _{2/3}$. Element location (grey shaded region); PTV uncertainty (blue shaded region).

Figure 19

Figure 20. Variation of $E(\bar {\boldsymbol {u}})$ for (a) total disturbance fields, (b) FFT $\lambda _{{f}1}$, (c) $\lambda _{{f}2}$ and (d) $\lambda _{{f}3}$ modes for varying $Re_{{k}}$ and $\lambda _{{f1}}$. Energy is scaled by $Re_k^2$; Element location (grey shaded region).

Figure 20

Figure 21. Conceptual sketch of 3-D BL receptivity to external DRE forcing, depending on the external forcing amplitude (i.e. $Re_{k}$). Primary stationary disturbance indicated as $\lambda _{f1}$, higher harmonics indicated as $\lambda _i=\lambda _{f1}/i$. Main receptivity mechanism for each forcing amplitude range in bold characters.