Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-htx7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-07T13:12:03.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do eco-geospatial differences induce otolith morphological variations? Assessment in Chelon auratus (Mugiliformes, Mugilidae) populations collected from Tunisian and Mauritanian waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2024

Toumene Deida
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Mehrez Gammoudi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Tahani El Ayari
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Environment Biomonitoring, Group of Fundamental and Applied Malacology (LEB/GFAM), Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia
Abderraouf Ben Faleh
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Lassana Djimera
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology and Biology of Aquatic Organisms (LEBAO), Mauritanian Institute of Oceanographic Research and Fisheries (IMROP), BP: 22 Nouadhibou, Mauritania
Adel A. Basyouny Shahin*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El Minia, Egypt
Nawzet Bouriga
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia Higher Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia
*
Corresponding author: Adel A. Basyouny Shahin; Email: adel.shahin@mu.edu.eg

Abstract

Saccular otoliths (sagittae) have long been shown to be species-specific and exhibit inland geospatial intra- and interpopulation morphological differences with variations in environmental conditions. Here, we analysed inland and outland geospatial variations in sagittae shape, length (Lo), width (Wo), perimeter (Po), and area (Ao), and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in Chelon auratus males and females collected from Ghar El Melh (Tunisia) and Etoile Bay (Mauritania) stations to assess whether sagittae shape and morphometry differ between these two niches having different environmental conditions. At the intrapopulation level, a significant otolith shape asymmetry was observed between left and right and left–left and right–right otoliths among males and females of the Ghar El Melh (Tunisia) population and a significant symmetry among those of the Etoile Bay (Mauritania) population. At the interpopulation level, a significant asymmetry was found between left and right otoliths' shape among males and females of the two populations. Besides, a discriminant function analysis of otoliths' contour shape separated left and right otoliths among males and females at the intra- and interpopulation levels and also separated those of the two populations. Moreover, differential significant asymmetry in Lo, Wo, Po, and Ao between left and right otoliths was observed among males and females at the intra- and interpopulation levels. Therefore, the geospatial variations in environmental conditions between the two ecological niches effectively induced differences in otolith morphology. These significant asymmetries were discussed in terms of FA caused by environmental stress conditions resulting from variations in abiotic factors between the two ecological niches.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Deida et al. supplementary material

Deida et al. supplementary material
Download Deida et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.5 KB