Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T02:26:25.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcriptional response of HT-29 intestinal epithelial cells to human and bovine milk oligosaccharides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2013

Jonathan A. Lane
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Republic of Ireland Veterinary Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
John O'Callaghan
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Republic of Ireland
Stephen D. Carrington
Affiliation:
Veterinary Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
Rita M. Hickey*
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Republic of Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: R. M. Hickey, fax +353 25 42340, email rita.hickey@teagasc.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) have been shown to interact directly with immune cells. However, large quantities of HMO are required for intervention or clinical studies, but these are unavailable in most cases. In this respect, bovine milk is potentially an excellent source of commercially viable analogues of these unique molecules. In the present study, we compared the transcriptional response of colonic epithelial cells (HT-29) to the entire pool of HMO and bovine colostrum oligosaccharides (BCO) to determine whether the oligosaccharides from bovine milk had effects on gene expression that were similar to those of their human counterparts. Gene set enrichment analysis of the transcriptional data revealed that there were a number of similar biological processes that may be influenced by both treatments including a response to stimulus, signalling, locomotion, and multicellular, developmental and immune system processes. For a more detailed insight into the effects of milk oligosaccharides, the effect on the expression of immune system-associated glycogenes was chosen as a case study when performing validation studies. Glycogenes in the current context are genes that are directly or indirectly regulated in the presence of glycans and/or glycoconjugates. RT-PCR analysis revealed that HMO and BCO influenced the expression of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-8, colony-stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte–macrophage) (GM-CSF2), IL-17C and platelet factor 4 (PF4)), chemokines (chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20), chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 2 (CXCL2), chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 6 (CXCL6), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5), chemokine (C–X3–C motif) ligand 1 (CX3CL1) and CXCL2) and cell surface receptors (interferon γ receptor 1 (IFNGR1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-2 (ICAM-2) and IL-10 receptor α (IL10RA)). The present study suggests that milk oligosaccharides contribute to the development and maturation of the intestinal immune response and that bovine milk may be an attractive commercially viable source of oligosaccharides for such applications.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Venn diagram showing the number of differentially expressed transcripts shared by human milk oligosaccharide treatment (HMO), bovine colostrum oligosaccharide treatment (BCO) and 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL) treatment of HT-29 cells.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Gene set enrichment analysis illustrating the biological processes regulated in HT-29 cells after treatment with (a) human milk oligosaccharide (HMO), (b) bovine colostrum oligosaccharide (BCO) and (c) 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL). Each node represents the number of genes that map to that gene ontology category, while the edges represent connections between the nodes. The size of each node represents the number of genes that map to the category represented by each node, and the colour saturation of the node represents the significance (P value) of the category represented by each node.

Figure 2

Table 1 Gene set enrichment analysis of the transcriptional response of HT-29 cells to milk oligosaccharides

Figure 3

Table 2 Differential expression of the immune system-associated glycogenes

Figure 4

Fig. 3 RT-PCR analysis demonstrating the changes in mRNA expression levels of immune-associated glycogenes after the human milk oligosaccharide (HMO, ) and bovine colostrum oligosaccharides (BCO, ) treatments of HT-29 cells. Error bars represent the range of possible relative expression values defined by the standard error of the delta threshold cycle (Ct). CXCL1, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 1; CXCL2, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 2; CXCL5, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5; CXCL20, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 20; CXCL6, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 6; CX3CL1, chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1; CSF2, colony-stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte–macrophage); IFNGR1, interferon gamma receptor-1; IL10RA, IL10 receptor, alpha; IL2RG, IL2 receptor, gamma; IL4R, IL4 receptor; CD74, molecule, major histocompatibility complex, class II invariant chain; ICAM-2, intercellular adhesion molecule-2; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; PF4, platelet factor 4.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Heatmap and cluster analysis of transcriptional changes induced in a group of immune system-related genes in HT-29 epithelial cells following treatment with bovine colostrum oligosaccharides (BCO), human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) and 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL). Gene transcription in untreated cells (C) is included for reference. CXCL6, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 6; CXCL2, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 2; CXCL1, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 1; ZC3H12A, Zn finger CCCH-type containing 12A; TNFAIP3, TNFα-induced protein 3; IL2RG, IL2 receptor, gamma; CCL20, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 20; BIRC3, baculoviral IAP repeat containing 3; NFKBIA, NFκ light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, α; NFKBIK, NFκ light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, ɛ.