Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-6jg5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T17:53:21.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Culture of Indulgence as Predictor of Prosocial Behavior: Governmental Effectiveness as Boundary Condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Gil Luria ,
Ram A. Cnaan  and
Amnon Boehm
Gil Luria*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, Department of Human Services, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
Ram A. Cnaan*
Affiliation:
Program for Religion and Social Policy Research, School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania and Kyung Hee University, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Amnon Boehm*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
*
gluria@univ.haifa.ac.il
cnaan@sp2.upenn.edu
aboehm@research.haifa.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies of national culture and prosocial behaviors have been limited to Hofstede’s five traditional culture dimensions. We introduce the fairly new and less studied cultural dimension of indulgence versus restraint (IVR) as a predictor of prosocial behaviors. We tested the effect of IVR on prosocial behavior over Hofstede’s previously studied dimensions. We also tested the moderating effect of government effectiveness on the relationship between indulgence and prosocial behavior. We crossed data for cultural dimensions from Hofstede with data from the world-giving index for prosocial behavior and data for government effectiveness from the World Bank. In total, eighty-seven countries entered our model. Indulgence predicted volunteering above the other researched cultural dimensions. It did not predict helping a stranger or donating. Among the cultural dimensions, only uncertainty avoidance was also significant in the prediction of volunteering. Uncertainty avoidance was the only cultural dimension that predicted donating. Individualism was not significant in the prediction of prosocial behaviors. Long-term orientation was the only cultural dimension that predicted helping a stranger (but not volunteering and donating) over other researched cultural dimensions. We found that government effectiveness is a boundary condition to the link between indulgent cultures and two prosocial behaviors (donating and helping a stranger but not for volunteering). Our results indicate that only in countries with high government effectiveness does indulgence predict prosocial behaviors, and not in cultures with low government effectiveness.

Keywords

Indulgence versus restraintLong-term orientation versus short-term normative orientationGenerosityGovernment effectivenessVolunteeringDonatingHelping a stranger

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 1164 - 1175
Copyright
Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alam, M. R., Kitenge, E., & Bedane, B. (2017). Government effectiveness and economic growth. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 222–227.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 217–260. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6525-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464–477. doi: 10.2307/2234133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011a). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924–973. doi: 10.1177/0899764010380927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011b). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. I: Religion, education, age, and socialization. Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 337–365. doi: 10.1332/204080511X6087712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, A. (2005). The participation of businesses in community decision making. Business and Society, 44(2), 144–177. doi: 10.1177/0007650305275770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charities Aid Foundation. (2015). CAF World Giving Index 2015: A global view of giving trends. West Malling, UK: Author. Retrieved February 21, 2017 from https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/caf_worldgivingindex2015_report.pdf?sfvrsn=2.Google Scholar
Cnaan, R. A., & Park, S. (2015). Civic participation is multifaceted: Towards a pluralization of involvement. Voluntaristics Review, 1(1), 1–72. doi: 10.1163/24054933-12340001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J. E., Baer, D. E., & Grabb, E. G. (2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 783–805. doi: 10.2307/3088873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M. (2008). Fundraising in the new philanthropy environment: The benefits and challenges of working with giving circles. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 19(2), 141–152. doi: 10.1002/nml.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einolf, C. J. (2017). Cross-national differences in charitable giving in the west and the world. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 472–491. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9758-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116. doi: 10.1162/003355399555954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, F., Hustinx, L., Kang, C., Cnaan, R. A., & Brudney, J. L., et al. (2010). A Cross-cultural examination of student volunteering: Is it all about resume building?. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(3), 498–523. doi: 10.1177/0899764009344353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, V. A. (2003). Volunteering in global perspective. In Dekker, P. & Halman, L. (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 35–53). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0145-9_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316. doi: 10.2307/2393392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., & Peterson, M. F. (2000). National values and organizational practices. In Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 401–405). London: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51. doi: 10.2307/2657288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. doi: 10.1017/S1876404511200046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999). Aggregating governance indicators (Vol. 2195). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Kemmelmeier, M., Jambor, E. E., & Letner, J. (2006). Individualism and good works cultural variation in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 327–344. doi: 10.1177/0022022106286927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L., Piliavin, J. A., & Call, V. R. A. (1999). Giving time, money, and blood: Similarities and differences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 276–290. doi: 10.2307/2695864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, G., Boehm, A., & Cnaan, R. A. (2015). National culture and prosocial behaviors: Results from 66 countries. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 1041–1065. doi: 10.1177/0899764014554456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, G., Cnaan, R. A., & Boehm, A. (2017). Religious attendance and volunteering: Testing national culture as a boundary condition. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 577–599. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, G., Levanon, A., Yagil, D., & Gal, I. (2016). Status, national culture and customers’ propensity to complain. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 309–330. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0884-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 401–413. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkov, M. (2011). Cultural differences in a globalizing world. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Musick, M., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B. Jr (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78, 1539–1570. doi: 10.2307/3006184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, G. (2013). The psychological contract of volunteers: A new research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 986–1005. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9294-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367. doi: 10.1177/0951692890002004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donohue, W. O., & Nelson, L. (2009). The psychological contracts of Australian hospital volunteer workers. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 14, 1–11.Google Scholar
Ott, J. C. (2010). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 353–368. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9144-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prouteau, L., & Sardinha, B. (2015). Volunteering and country-level religiosity: Evidence from the European Union. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 242–266. doi: 10.1007/s11266-013-9431-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71, 191–210. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2003). Institutional roots of volunteering: Toward a macro-structural theory of individual voluntary action. In Dekker, P. & Halman, L. (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 71–90). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0145-9_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargeant, A., & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Individual giving behaviour: A multi-disciplinary review. In Sargeant, A. & Wymer, W. (Eds.), The nonprofit marketing companion (pp. 111–144). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203936023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66, 806–828. doi: 10.2307/3088874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985). Well-being agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
Shah, S. A. M., & Amjad, S. (2011). Cultural diversity in Pakistan: National vs. provincial. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 331–344.Google Scholar
Shier, M., & Handy, F. (2015). GiveIndia: Web donations in an emerging philanthropic market. In Cnaan, R. A. & Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (Eds.), Cases in innovative nonprofits: Organizations that make a difference (pp. 95–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483398082.n9.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243–264. doi: 10.1177/089976409402300305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 363–386. doi: 10.1002/casp.906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International. (2013). Corruption perceptions index, 2013. Retrieved February 21, 2017 from https://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results.Google Scholar
United Nations (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goal. New York, NY: Millennium Project report to the UN Secretary General.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Development Program. Human Development Report 2015 (pp. 208–211). Retrieved February 21, 2017 from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values? A civicness test. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 152–174. doi: 10.1177/0022022109354378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepking, P., & Handy, F. (2015). The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan doi: 10.1057/9781137341532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 176–212. doi: 10.1177/0899764011434558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. A. (1999). The effects of volunteering on the volunteer. Law & Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 141–168. doi: 10.2307/1192270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2013). Governance indicators. Retrieved February 21, 2017 from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#reports.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar