2 Maximum beam size for the TC and the LC

We will first consider a general case of an out-of-plane compressor when the angles of incidence on the first grating in two planes $\gamma$ and $\alpha$ are arbitrary. The TC (Figure 1(a)) and LC (Figure 1(b)) are its particular cases at $\gamma =0$ and $\alpha ={\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ , respectively. Note that, both in the TC and LC, the gratings of the first and second pairs are antiparallel (mirror) to each other in the planes orthogonal to the incident beam. The case of non-parallel gratings is considered, for example, in Ref. [Reference Chanteloup, Salmon, Sauteret, Migus, Zeitoun, Klisnick, Carillon, Hubert, Ros, Nickles and Kalachnikov26]. The maximum beam size will be determined using the following procedure. We choose the coordinate system $\left(x,y,z\right)$ as shown in Figure 1: the $y$ -axis is parallel to the direction of the grooves, and the $x$ -axis in the $\left(x,z\right)$ diffraction plane is directed at an angle $\alpha$ to the surface of the grating. The coordinate origin coincides with the point of incidence of the beam on the first grating. Let us find the spectral phase $\Psi \left(\omega, {k}_x,{k}_{{y}}\right)$ accumulated in the beam on reflection from the first grating, propagation to the second grating, reflection from the second grating and propagation to the $z=0$ plane. The first derivatives of $\Psi$ with respect to ${k}_x,{k}_{{y}}$ up to the sign are equal to the beam coordinates $X\left(\omega \right)$ and $Y\left(\omega \right)$ in the $z=0$ plane. These coordinates will allow, for geometric reasons, one to determine the maximum beam size $d$ depending on the parameters of the compressor and the input pulse. The expression for $\Psi$ is available in Refs. [Reference Treacy18, Reference Huang, Zhang and Yang27]; in the chosen coordinate system it has the following form:

(2) $$\begin{align}\Psi \left(\omega, {k}_x,{k}_y\right)=L{k}_{zx}\left( \cos\theta +\cos\left(\alpha + \mathrm{atan}\frac{k_x}{k_z}\right)\right),\end{align}$$

where ${k}_{zx}^2=\frac{\omega^2}{{{c}}^2}-{k}_y^2$ , ${k}_z^2=\frac{\omega^2}{{{c}}^2}-{k}_x^2-{k}_y^2$ and $\theta$ is the angle of reflection from the grating:

(3) $$\begin{align}\sin\theta \left(\omega, {k}_x,{k}_{{y}}\right)=-\frac{2\pi }{k_{zx}}N+\mathit{\sin}\left(\alpha + \mathrm{atan}\frac{k_x}{k_z}\right).\end{align}$$

Hereinafter, we assume the minus first diffraction order. In the chosen reference frame, the transverse wave vectors are related to the incidence angles $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ as ${k}_x=0$ , ${k}_y=\frac{\omega }{c} \sin\gamma$ . Taking into account the large beam size we neglect diffraction, that is, the second derivatives of $\Psi$ with respect to ${k}_x,{k}_{{y}}$ . Then, upon differentiation of Equation (2) with allowance for Equation (3) we find the derivatives of interest to us:

(4) $$\begin{align}{\Psi}_{k_x}^{\prime}\left(\omega, {k}_x=0,{k}_{y}=\frac{\omega }{c} \sin\gamma \right)=-X\left(\omega \right)=-L\frac{\sin\left(\beta +\alpha \right)}{\cos\beta},\end{align}$$

(5) $$\begin{align}{\Psi}_{k_y}^{\prime}\left(\omega, {k}_x=0,{k}_{y}=\frac{\omega }{c} \sin\gamma \right)=-Y\left(\omega \right)=- L\tan\gamma \frac{1+\cos \left(\beta +\alpha \right)}{\cos\beta},\end{align}$$

(6) $$\begin{align}&\frac{1}{2}{\Psi}_{\omega \omega}^{\prime \prime}\left(\omega ={\omega}_0,{k}_x=0,{k}_{y}=\frac{\omega }{c} \sin\gamma \right)= \mathrm{GVD}\nonumber\\ & \quad =-\frac{L}{\omega_0c} \cos\gamma \frac{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}{2{\cos}^3{\beta}_0},\end{align}$$

where the angle of reflection $\beta =\beta \left(\omega \right)$ is found from the following:

(7) $$\begin{align}\sin\beta =-\frac{2\pi c}{\omega}\frac{N}{\cos\gamma}+ \sin\alpha,\end{align}$$

and ${\beta}_0=\beta \left({\omega}_0\right)$ . The expression for GVD (Equation (6)) is derived in Ref. [Reference Osvay and Ross21], and Equation (7) can be found in Refs. [Reference Wei and Li22, Reference Kalinchenko, Vyhlidka, Kramer, Lererc and Rus28]. The expression for $\mathrm{GVD}$  (Equation (6)) with allowance for Equation (7) is the same as for $\mathrm{GVD}$ for the TC but with the substitution $L\to L\cos\gamma; N\to N/ \cos\gamma$ . From Equations (2) and (3) it can be readily shown that this remark is true for all frequency derivatives, that is, for all dispersion orders. This circumstance can be used for high-order dispersion management of the entire laser system, including the stretcher, acousto-optics spectral phase control and compressor.

We will consider only the case when the beam is not clipped on the second grating (the case of clipping has been considered in detail in a number of works, e.g., Refs. [Reference Li, Liu, Xu, Leng and Li3, Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li5, Reference Shen, Du, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li12, Reference Li, Theobald, Welsch and Sauerbrey29, Reference Trentelman, Ross and Danson30], and will be briefly discussed in Section 4), so we will assume straight away that the beam size on the second grating coincides with its length ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}$ and height ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}$ . Taking this into account, from Figure 1 the following can be found:

(8) $$\begin{align}{L}_{\mathrm{g}}=\frac{d+\mid {X}_{\mathrm{b}}-{X}_{\mathrm{r}}\mid \cos\gamma}{\cos\alpha},\end{align}$$

(9) $$\begin{align}{H}_{\mathrm{g}}=\frac{d+\left|{Y}_{\mathrm{b}}-{Y}_{\mathrm{r}}\right| \cos\gamma}{\cos\gamma}+\left(d-\left|{X}_{\mathrm{b}}-{X}_{\mathrm{r}}\right|\right) \tan\gamma \tan\alpha,\end{align}$$

where ${X}_{\mathrm{b}}=X\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{b}}\right),$ ${X}_{\mathrm{r}}=X\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{r}}\right)$ , ${Y}_{\mathrm{b}}=Y\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{b}}\right)$ , ${Y}_{\mathrm{r}}=Y\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{r}}\right)$ and ${\omega}_\mathrm{b,r}$ are the high-frequency and low-frequency boundaries of the pulse spectrum. When deriving Equations (8) and (9), we took into account that ${X}_\mathrm{b,r}$ and ${Y}_\mathrm{b,r}$ are the beam coordinates in the plane perpendicular to the z-axis, but not in the plane normal to the beam, and also that the gratings are tilted in two planes (the second term in Equation (9)). From Equations (8) and (9) with allowance for Equations (4)–(6) we obtain the following:

(10) $$\begin{align}{L}_{\mathrm{g}}=\frac{d}{\cos\alpha}+{L}_{\mathrm{disp}}\frac{1}{\cos\gamma}\frac{2{\cos}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}\left| \mathrm{atan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}- \mathrm{atan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}\right|,\end{align}$$

(11) $$\begin{align}{H}_{\mathrm{g}}&=d\left(\frac{1+ \tan\alpha \sin\gamma}{\cos\gamma}\right)+{L}_{\mathrm{disp}}\frac{2{\cos}^3{\beta}_0\left| \tan\gamma \right|}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}\nonumber\\& \quad \times \left(\frac{1}{\cos\gamma}\left|\frac{1+\cos \left({\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}+\alpha \right)}{\mathit{\cos}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}}-\frac{1+\cos \left({\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}+\alpha \right)}{\mathit{\cos}{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}}\right|\right.\nonumber\\& \qquad\ \ \left.- \sin\alpha \left|\mathrm{atan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}- \mathrm{atan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}\right| \vphantom{\frac{1}{\cos\gamma}}\right),\end{align}$$

where ${L}_{\mathrm{disp}}=\mid \mathrm{GVD}\mid\!{\omega}_0c$ and ${\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}=\beta \left({\omega}_{\mathrm{b}}\right),{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}=\beta \left({\omega}_{\mathrm{r}}\right)$ . The absence of beam clipping along the $x$ -coordinate leads to limitations on the beam size $d$ , which follows from Equation (10):

(12) $$\begin{align}d<{d}_{\mathrm{g}}=\left({L}_{\mathrm{g}}-{L}_{\mathrm{disp}}\frac{1}{\cos\gamma}\frac{2{\mathit{\cos}}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}\left|\mathit{\tan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}-\mathit{\tan}{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}\right|\right) \cos\alpha .\end{align}$$

This expression is identical for the TC and LC. In the ${\omega}_0\gg \Omega$ approximation, Equation (12) transforms to the expression obtained in Ref. [Reference Romanov and Yushkov20] under this approximation. The second limitation on $d$ is the need to ensure decoupling of the beams, that is, non-overlapping of the second grating with the incident beam. For the TC, decoupling is attained in the direction of the $x$ -axis (Figure 1(a)). Obviously, for this the minimum beam displacement $\mid {X}_{\mathrm{min}}\mid$ should be larger than the beam size $d$ plus the minimum required technological gap $g$ :

(13) $$\begin{align}\mid {X}_{\mathrm{min}}\mid >d+g.\end{align}$$

For $\alpha >{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ (the case in Figure 1(a)), ${X}_{\mathrm{min}}={X}_{\mathrm{r}}$ , and for $\alpha <{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ , vice versa, ${X}_{\mathrm{min}}={X}_{\mathrm{b}}$ . Taking this into account, from Equations (4) and (13) we obtain for the TC the following expression:

(14) $$\begin{align}d<{d}_\mathrm{i}=J{L}_{\mathrm{disp}}-g\kern0.72em \mathrm{for}\kern0.17em \mathrm{the}\;\mathrm{TC},\end{align}$$

where

(15) $$\begin{align}J=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}cc}\frac{\mathrm{sin}\left({\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}+\alpha \right)}{\mathit{\cos}{\beta}_{\mathrm{r}}}\frac{2{\mathit{\cos}}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}& \mathrm{for}\;\alpha >{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}\\ {}\frac{\mid \mathrm{sin}\left({\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}+\alpha \right)\mid }{\mathit{\cos}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{2{\mathit{\cos}}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}& \mathrm{for}\;\alpha <{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}\end{array}.\right.\end{align}$$

The expression analogous to Equation (14) was presented in Ref. [Reference Romanov and Yushkov20] in different notation. For the LC, decoupling occurs in the direction of the $y$ -axis and requires that the minimum beam displacement $\mid {Y}_{\mathrm{min}}\mid \cos\gamma$ should be larger than $d+g$ . Since the gratings are tilted in two planes, then strictly speaking, $g$ is a function of the angles $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ , but further for simplicity we will assume $g= \mathrm{const}$ . The most stringent condition for decoupling is for frequency ${\omega}_{\mathrm{b}}$ : $\mid {Y}_{\mathrm{b}}\mid \cos\gamma >d+g$ . With this taken into account, from Equation (5) we obtain the following:

(16) $$\begin{align}d<{d}_\mathrm{i}=I{L}_{\mathrm{disp}}-g\kern0.36em \mathrm{for}\kern0.17em \mathrm{the}\;\mathrm{LC},\end{align}$$

where

(17) $$\begin{align}I=\left| \tan\gamma \right|\frac{1+\cos \left({\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}+\alpha \right)}{\mathit{\cos}{\beta}_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{2{\mathit{\cos}}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2}.\end{align}$$

In addition to meeting the conditions in Equations (12), (14) and (16), it is essential that there are no diffraction orders other than the minus first one. This condition is always more stringent for radiation with frequency ${\omega}_{\mathrm{b}}$ . Let us introduce the function $\varPi \left(\alpha \right)$ , which is equal to zero if at least one of these diffraction orders is as follows:

(18) $$\begin{align}\Pi \left(\alpha \right)=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ccc}0& \mathrm{if}& \sin\alpha <1-\frac{2\pi c}{\omega_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{N}{\cos\gamma}\kern0.24em \mathrm{or}\; \sin\alpha >\frac{4\pi c}{\omega_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{N}{\cos\gamma}-1\;\\ {}1& \mathrm{if}& \kern1.92em \mathrm{otherwise}\end{array}.\right.\end{align}$$

The two conditions on the top line correspond to the first and minus second order of diffraction, respectively. Thus, the maximum beam size $D$ , determined by simultaneous fulfillment of the three above conditions, has the following form:

(19) $$\begin{align}D=\mathit{\min}\left\{{d}_{\mathrm{g}};{d}_\mathrm{i}\right\} \Pi \left(\alpha \right),\end{align}$$

where ${d}_{\mathrm{g}}$ and $\varPi \left(\alpha \right)\kern0.24em$ are found from Equations (12) and (18) for both compressors, and ${d}_i$ from Equation (14) for the TC and from Equation (16) for the LC. Note that the above expressions for the LC are valid for any out-of-plane compressor, that is, for any angle $\alpha$ , as we have not used the condition $\alpha ={\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ when deriving these expressions.

It is convenient to conduct further discussion on the example of specific parameters of a compressed pulse, which will be addressed in the next two sections. Here, for reference we provide useful formulas for $L$ and ${\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ that follow from Equations (6) and (7):

(20) $$\begin{align}L=\left| \mathrm{GVD}\right|{\omega}_0c\frac{1}{\cos\gamma}\frac{2{\mathit{\cos}}^3{\beta}_0}{{\left( \sin\alpha -\mathit{\sin}{\beta}_0\right)}^2},\end{align}$$

(21) $$\begin{align} \sin{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}=\frac{\pi c}{\omega_0}\frac{N}{\cos\gamma}.\end{align}$$

3 Optimization of the TC and the LC for the XCELS project

Let us consider the parameters for the XCELS project^[ Reference Khazanov, Shaykin, Kostyukov, Ginzburg, Mukhin, Yakovlev, Soloviev, Kuznetsov, Mironov, Korzhimanov, Bulanov, Shaikin, Kochetkov, Kuzmin, Martyanov, Lozhkarev, Starodubtsev, Litvak and Sergeev ^{4 ]}: ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{cm}$ , ${\lambda}_0=910\;\mathrm{nm}$ , $\Delta \lambda =150\;\mathrm{nm}$ , $g=2\;\mathrm{cm}$ and 2GVD = –4.4 ps². Here, 2GVD is the dispersion of two grating pairs, that is, like above, GVD is the dispersion of one grating pair. As an example, the dependence of a number of parameters on $\alpha$ for $N=1050/\mathrm{mm}$ is plotted in Figure 2. The yellow line shows the Littrow angle for clarity. The green curve ${d}_{\mathrm{g}}$ in Equation (12) corresponds to the restrictions on the beam size imposed by the condition of the absence of beam clipping. The blue curve ${d}_\mathrm{i}$ corresponds to the restrictions on the beam size imposed by the need for decoupling in the diffraction plane for the TC (Equation (14); Figure 1(a)) and in the orthogonal plane for the out-of-plane compressor (Equation (16); Figure 1(b)). The black square wave shows the range of angles in which there are no other diffraction orders (Equation (18)): the first order is possible to the left of the square wave, and the minus second order to the right. Finally, the red dashed curve combines the three above restrictions for the $D\left(\alpha \right)$ relation (Equation (19)). The maximum value of this curve corresponds to the maximum beam size (at N = 1050/mm) and, therefore, the maximum output energy and pulse power after the compressor. The behavior of the curve $D\left(\alpha \right)$ greatly depends on $N$ for both the TC and LC (Figure 3). The curves in Figure 3(a) (for the TC) have two local maxima. At large $N$ the global maximum is at $\alpha >{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ , and at small $N$ is at $\alpha <{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}.$

Figure 2

Restrictions on maximum beam size at ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$ , N = 1050/mm for the TC (a) and for the out-of-plane compressor at $\gamma =13{}^{\circ}$ (b). Green curve for ${d}_{\mathrm{g}}$ (Equation (12)) – no beam clipping on the grating; blue curve for ${d}_\mathrm{i}$ (Equations (14) and (16)) – decoupling needed; black square wave $\Pi \left(\alpha \right)$ (Equation (18)) – range of angles without other diffraction orders (Equation (18)), the first order is possible to the left of the square wave and the minus second order to the right; the red dashed curve combines all restrictions and shows $D\left(\alpha \right)$ (Equation (19)); the yellow line shows the Littrow angle for clarity.

Figure 3

Maximum beam size $D\left(\alpha \right)$ for the TC (a) and for the out-of-plane compressor (b) for ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}\;\mathrm{and}$  N = 950/mm (blue), N = 1200/mm (green) and N = 1400/mm (red).

The parameters of an out-of-plane compressor can be optimized in a wide range of angles $\alpha$ , including $\alpha$ < ${\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ . All of the above expressions are valid for any $\alpha.$ In what will follow we will restrict consideration to the case of the LC ( $\alpha ={\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ , Figure 1(b)), which is interesting from the practical point of view. Recently, the possibility of developing gratings having length ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ and the parameters of a compressor with such gratings have been discussed in the literature^[ Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{5 ,} Reference Han, Li, Zhang, Kong, Cao, Jin, Leng, Li and Shao ^{16 ]}. Here, we will find parameters of the optimal compressor for XCELS for two options: ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{cm}$ and ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ .

The maximum size of the beam $D$ , both in the LC and TC, depends on two parameters: $N$ and $\alpha$ for the TC and $N$ and $\gamma$ for the LC. For each $N$ there exists an optimal value of the angle ${\alpha}_{\mathrm{opt}}$ or ${\gamma}_{\mathrm{opt}}$ at which $D$ is the maximum. The relations ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)=D(N,{\alpha}_{\mathrm{opt}})$ for the TC and ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)=D(N,{\gamma}_{\mathrm{opt}})$ for the LC are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b) by triangles for ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{cm}$ and by squares for ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ . For ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{cm}$ , the maximum value of the beam size ${D}_m$ is the same for the LC and TC. For the TC, ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)$ has a well-pronounced maximum at $N=950/\mathrm{mm}$ , whereas for the LC, conversely, it has a plateau in the $N$ range of 1000/mm to 1250/mm. This is an advantage of the LC, since it gives freedom to choose N. The choice of a specific value of N may be made, for example, for reasons of a higher efficiency, a higher laser-induced damage threshold of the grating, etc. Note that ${D}_m$ = 78 cm is much larger than the beam diameter in the initial XCELS design (see Table 1). An analogous plateau in the $N$ range of 950/mm to 1150/mm is observed in the ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)$ function for the LC at ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ . In this case, the LC is obviously more preferable, since it enables a larger value of ${D}_m$ : 96 cm versus 86 cm for the TC.

Table 1

Compressor parameters.

^a Given that ${R\eta w}_{\mathrm{th}}=0.231\;\mathrm{J}/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ in the plane normal to the beam.

Figure 4

Curves for compressor parameters for XCELS for the TC (a) and the LC (b) with grating length ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=138\;\mathrm{cm}$ (blue) and ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ (red). Squares and triangles – beam size ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}$ at optimal angles $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ ; circles and diamonds – difference between the incidence angle in the diffraction plane and the Littrow angle $\left(\alpha -{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}\right)$ (a) and the incidence angle in the plane orthogonal to the diffraction plane $\gamma$ (b); plus signs and asterisks in (b) – grating height  ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}$ .

The circles and diamonds in Figure 4(a) correspond to the dependence of $\alpha -{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ on $N$ . It is clearly seen that for large $N$ , $\alpha >{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ , which corresponds to a standard compressor design for high-power lasers. At the same time, for small $N,$ the maximum beam size ${D}_m$ is attained at $\alpha <{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ . This is also well seen in Figure 3(a) (left-hand maximum in the blue curve above the right-hand maximum). We are not aware of the usage of the TC with $\alpha <{\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ in high-power lasers. The circles and diamonds in Figure 4(b) show $\gamma (N)$ at which $\alpha ={\alpha}_{\mathrm{L}}$ . In the region of the ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)$ plateau, that is, at $N=950/$ mm to 1200/mm, $\gamma =10{}^{\circ}- 20{}^{\circ}$ , which falls within the range where the efficiency of the gratings almost does not decrease^[ Reference Han, Li, Zhang, Kong, Cao, Jin, Leng, Li and Shao ^{16 ,} Reference Smith, Erdogan and Erdogan ^{24 ]}.

It is worth noting the LC drawback: the grating height ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}$ is larger than the beam size. The dashed curves in Figure 4(b) show ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}(N)$ plotted by Equation (11). At the same time, the increase in ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}$ required for the LC is not so great – compare the curves for ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}(N)$ and ${D}_{\mathrm{opt}}(N)$ – and may well be implemented in practice. In any case, 160-cm-long gratings have a height of about 100 cm, which is just a little bit smaller than the requirements for the LC for XCELS and SEL-100 PW (see Table 1). Still another LC drawback is that in a general case the choice of input beam polarization is nontrivial. This issue was studied in detail in Ref. [Reference Smith, Erdogan and Erdogan24]. From the analysis made in Ref. [Reference Smith, Erdogan and Erdogan24] it follows that vertical incident polarization, when the field is normal to the direction of the grooves, is optimal (Figure 1(b)). The experiment^[ Reference Smith, Erdogan and Erdogan ^{24 ]} carried out at $\gamma =15{}^{\circ}$ showed that in this case the reflection coefficient of one grating R and the efficiency of the entire compressor differ negligibly from the corresponding parameters at $\gamma =0$ . These results were obtained for a wavelength of 800 nm and N = 1480/mm; they need clarification for other wavelengths and groove densities.

The main parameters of the TC and LC for the XCELS project are presented in Table 1. For comparison of different designs, it also contains values of maximum beam energy $W$ calculated by Equation (1), given that ${R\eta w}_{\mathrm{th}}=0.231\;\mathrm{J}/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ , which corresponds to $R=0.92$ , and the value of safe fluence ${\eta w}_{\mathrm{th}}=$ 0.251 J/cm² in the plane normal to the beam, that is, 0.174 J/cm² on the grating surface at $\alpha =46{}^{\circ}$ ^[ Reference Khazanov, Shaykin, Kostyukov, Ginzburg, Mukhin, Yakovlev, Soloviev, Kuznetsov, Mironov, Korzhimanov, Bulanov, Shaikin, Kochetkov, Kuzmin, Martyanov, Lozhkarev, Starodubtsev, Litvak and Sergeev ^{4 ]}. Note that this is a rather conservative estimate, since gratings with ${w}_{\mathrm{th}}=0.4\;\mathrm{J}/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ and ${w}_{\mathrm{th}}=0.57\;\mathrm{J}/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ in the plane normal to the beam are reported in Refs. [Reference Han, Li, Zhang, Kong, Cao, Jin, Leng, Li and Shao16] and [Reference Han, Jin, Kong, Wang, Zhang, Cao, Cui and Shao31], and $\eta =1.31$ ^[ Reference Khazanov, Shaykin, Kostyukov, Ginzburg, Mukhin, Yakovlev, Soloviev, Kuznetsov, Mironov, Korzhimanov, Bulanov, Shaikin, Kochetkov, Kuzmin, Martyanov, Lozhkarev, Starodubtsev, Litvak and Sergeev ^{4 ,} Reference Liu, Shen, Du and Li ^{10 ]} or $\eta =1.41$ ^[ Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{5 ]} are considered in the literature for $\eta$ . The Fourier-transform-limited pulse in XCELS has a duration of 17 fs, whereas the values of maximum power in Table 1 are given for a 20 fs pulse, which is more realistic in practice. It is clear from the table that the new TC and LC designs with a grating length of 138 cm allow for increasing the output power by a factor of 1.42, that is, up to 71 PW. With the use of 160 cm × 112 cm gratings in the LC, over 100 PW may be achieved.

4 The TC and the LC for SEL-100 PW

Let us consider the parameters for the SEL-100 PW project^[ Reference Peng, Xu and Yu ^{1 ,} Reference Li, Liu, Xu, Leng and Li ^{3 ,} Reference Liu, Shen, Du and Li ^{10 ,} Reference Wang, Wang, Xu and Leng ^{32 ]}: ${L}_{\mathrm{g}}=160\;\mathrm{cm}$ , 2GVD = –4.2 ps², ${\lambda}_0=925\;\mathrm{nm}$ , $\Delta \lambda =200\;\mathrm{nm}$ and $g=2\;\mathrm{cm}$ . For these values, the optimal parameters for the TC and LC are listed in Table 1. Since the pulse spectrum width in the SEL-100 PW is 1.33 times larger than that in XCELS, for a correct comparison we assume the 15-fs pulse duration to be 1.33 times shorter than in XCELS. It is seen from the table that, for a grating size of 160 cm × 75 cm, the optimal design of the TC provides an output power of 86 PW. In this case, the angle of incidence $\alpha$ differs from the Littrow angle only by 11.5°. The LC allows for achieving a significantly higher power of 111 PW with 160 cm × 110 cm gratings. The angle γ, in this case, despite being larger than in the other designs presented in Table 1, still falls within the range in which the grating efficiency almost does not reduce^[ Reference Han, Li, Zhang, Kong, Cao, Jin, Leng, Li and Shao ^{16 ,} Reference Smith, Erdogan and Erdogan ^{24 ]}.

It is important to note that the analysis made in this work completely excludes beam clipping by gratings. The design of the two-grating compressor for the SEL-100 PW presented in Ref. [Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li5] implies strong clipping. This leads to three effects that reduce the focal intensity: pulse stretching due to narrowing of the spectrum; loss of radiation energy; and deterioration of focusability. In the example numerically calculated in Ref. [Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li5], the losses were approximately 11%, 7.8% and 15%, that is, more than 35% in total. It is worthy to note that these losses cannot be compensated by increasing the pulse energy at the compressor input, as clipping does not reduce fluence on the last grating. Therefore, according to Equation (1) the compressor^[ Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{5 ]} enables 35% lower focal intensity than a compressor without clipping for the same values of ${w}_{\mathrm{th}}$ , $R,$ $\eta$ and $d$ .

Comparison of the compressor parameters for XCELS and SEL-100 PW with 160-cm long gratings shows that for the TC the maximum achievable power is the same – 86 PW; whereas for the LC the SEL-100 PW power is 4% higher – 111 PW versus 107 PW. However, from a practical point of view, the XCELS option is preferable, since for a narrower pulse spectrum, the requirements for both the compressor gratings and the rest of the optics are lower. At the same time, XCELS requires 1.33 times higher pulse energy; hence, deuterated potassium dihydrogen phosphate (DKDP) crystals with $\sqrt{1.33}=1.15$ times larger size are required.

All spatio-temporal phenomena in the out-of-plane compressor are the same as in the TC if the compressors are symmetric: ${L}_2={L}_1;{N}_2={N}_1$ ; ${\alpha}_2={\alpha}_1;{\gamma}_2={\gamma}_1$ , where the indices ‘1’ and ‘2’ correspond to the first and second grating pairs, respectively. All the compressor variants discussed above are symmetric. At the same time, they can be easily modified into asymmetric compressors that ensure reduction of fluence fluctuations due to the time delay of high-frequency spatial harmonics^[ Reference Khazanov ^{13 ,} Reference Khazanov ^{15 ]} or spatial dispersion of the output beam^[ Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{5 ,} Reference Shen, Du, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{12 ,} Reference Yang, Tang, Liu, Bin and Leng ^{14 ]}. In asymmetric compressors, grating pairs differ from each other: ${L}_2\ne {L}_1$ ^[ Reference Du, Shen, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{5 ,} Reference Shen, Du, Liang, Wang, Liu and Li ^{12 ,} Reference Yang, Tang, Liu, Bin and Leng ^{14 ]}; ${N}_2\ne {N}_1$ , ${\alpha}_2\ne {\alpha}_1$ ^[ Reference Khazanov ^{13 ]}; ${\gamma}_2\ne {\gamma}_1$ ^[ Reference Khazanov ^{15 ]}. Note that ${\gamma}_2\;\mathrm{and}\;{\gamma}_1$ can have not only different absolute values, but also signs. For example, for an LC with ${\gamma}_2=-{\gamma}_1$ , in which gratings of the first and second pairs are parallel in the y-plane and antiparallel (mirror) in the x-plane, they are two times shorter and two times wider than for the case ${\gamma}_2={\gamma}_1$ . For ${\gamma}_1\approx 10{}^{\circ}$ , fluence fluctuations are radically suppressed. The drawback of such a compressor is an additional increase in the grating height ${H}_{\mathrm{g}}$ .