Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T17:24:08.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regimes of Bondage: The Encounter between Early Modern European and Asian Slaveries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2023

Stuart M McManus Open the ORCID record for Stuart M McManus [Opens in a new window]  and
Rômulo Ehalt Open the ORCID record for Rômulo Ehalt [Opens in a new window]
Stuart M McManus*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Rômulo Ehalt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: smcmanus@cuhk.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This special issue focuses on the broader context and interconnectedness of different slave regimes in early modern Asia. Various transnational commercial and imperial projects influenced the waxing and waning of individual slave regimes, while internal and interpersonal conditions within polities also played important roles. The well-known European seaborne empires of Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, and England were major drivers of this early modern slavery, but they coexisted and competed with other groups of trader-raiders. These included merchants from the Islamicate world and Chinese coastal regions, which connected Southeast Asia, Japan, Korea, and other regions. These extensive markets linked different regions together, such as the Malabar Coast with East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Red Sea. While the focus is on the Iberian expansion and its impact on the slave trade, this special issue acknowledges that slavery in Asia should be understood as a result of multiple overlapping and interacting regimes. Each article examines a particular regime while emphasizing its interactions with neighboring regions during the early modern period. The main focus is on the encounters between different slave regimes facilitated by early modern commercial networks. The history of slavery in early modern Asia involved clashes and cross-pollination between disparate slave systems. A further contribution relates to the terminology used to define and understand slavery in non-European contexts, which is still a subject of debate. The concept of “regimes of bondage” is adopted as an umbrella term to encompass the various forms of coerced, subaltern, and dependent labor in Asia during this period. Finally, by using local categories and sources, including European and non-European language materials, the special issue aims to recover marginalized perspectives and highlight the complexity and challenges of studying slavery in Asia.

Keywords

slaveryslave regimesEast AsiaSoutheast Asia

Information

Type
Introduction
Information
Itinerario , Volume 47 , Special Issue 3: Regimes of Bondage: The Encounter between Early Modern European and Asian Slaveries , December 2023 , pp. 289 - 296
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Research Institute for History, Leiden University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Article last updated 19 December 2023

References

1 University of Indiana, Bloomington, Lilly Library, Boxer mss III, Research and Notes, Box 10. On Boxer, see Alden, Dauril et al., Charles R. Boxer: An Uncommon Life: Soldier, Historian, Teacher, Collector, Traveller (Lisbon: Fundação Oriente, 2001)Google Scholar.

2 Davis, David Brion, “Looking at Slavery from Broader Perspectives,” American Historical Review 105:2 (2000), 452–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the interrelated nature of Iberian and English slavery, see Guasco, Michael, “Agents of Empire: Africans and the Origins of English Colonialism in the Americas,” in Entangled Empires: The Anglo-Iberian Atlantic, 1500–1830, ed. Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018), 43–5Google Scholar.

3 On the concept of a Mediterratlantic world, see Hamann, Byron Ellsworth, Bad Christians, New Spains: Muslims, Catholics and Native Americans in a Mediterratlantic World (London: Routledge, 2021)Google Scholar.

4 Klein, Martin A., ed., Breaking the Chains: Slavery, Bondage, and Emancipation in Modern Africa and Asia (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Campbell, Gwyn, ed., The Structure of Slavery in Indian Ocean Africa and Asia (London: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chatterjee, Indrani and Eaton, Richard M., eds., Slavery & South Asian History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Alpers, Edward A. et al., eds., Resisting Bondage in Indian Ocean Africa and Asia (London: Routledge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, Gwyn, ed., Abolition and Its Aftermath in Indian Ocean Africa and Asia (London: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stanziani, Alessandro, ed., Labour, Coercion, and Economic Growth in Eurasia, 17th–20th Centuries (Leiden: Brill, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stanziani, Alessandro, ed., Bondage: Labor and Rights in Eurasia from the Sixteenth to the Early Twentieth Centuries (New York: Berghahn, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, Gwyn, ed., Bondage and the Environment in the Indian Ocean World (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schrikker, Alicia and Wickramasinghe, Nira, eds., Being a Slave: Histories and Legacies of European Slavery in the Indian Ocean (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allen, Richard B., ed., Slavery and Bonded Labor in Asia, 1250–1900 (Leiden: Brill, 2021)Google Scholar; Ekama, Kate et al., eds., Slavery and Bondage in Asia, 1550-1850: Towards a Global History of Coerced Labour (Berlin: DeGruyter, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Seijas, Tatiana, “The Portuguese Slave Trade to Spanish Manila: 1580–1640,” Itinerario 32:1 (2008), 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Kiyoshi, Shimojū, Miuri no Nihonshi: Jinshin baibai kara nenki hōkō he (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2012), 83Google Scholar.

7 Seijas, Tatiana, Asian Slaves in Colonial Mexico: From Chinos to Indians (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Ferreira, Roquinaldo, Cross-Cultural Exchange in the Atlantic World: Angola and Brazil during the Era of the Slave Trade (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barker, Hannah, That Most Precious Merchandise: The Mediterranean Trade in Black Sea Slaves, 1260–1500 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019)Google Scholar.

9 Miller, Joseph Calder, The Problem of Slavery as History: A Global Approach (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2012)Google Scholar; Zeuske, Michael, “Historiography and Research Problems of Slavery and the Slave Trade in a Global-Historical Perspective,” IRSH 57 (2012), 87–111Google Scholar. One cannot overstate the significance of Nieboer's work in popularising of the idea of slavery as a universally useful concept. Herman J. Nieboer, Slavery as an Industrial System: Ethnological Researches (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1900). In Japan, for instance, Nieboer was read as early as the 1930s, where it inspired Takigawa Seijirō to use the idea of slavery to describe various categories of coerced labour found in ancient Japan. See Takigawa Seijirō, Nihon keizai doreishi (Tokyo: Tōkōshoin, 1930). Takigawa's pioneering book was one of the cornerstones upon which an intense debate developed during the twentieth century in Japan concerning the use of the idea of slavery to classify a number of social institutions in medieval and feudal Japan. Takahashi Masaaki, “Nihon chūsei nōdosei ronsō,” in Rekishigaku jiten 6, rekishigaku no hōhō / Encyclopedia of Historiography 6: Methods in Historiography, ed. Kabayama Kōichi (Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1998), 490–1.

10 Miers, Suzanne, “Slavery: A Question of Definition,” S&A 24:2 (2003), 1Google Scholar.

11 Clarence-Smith, William Gervase, Islam and the Abolition of Slavery (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 1Google Scholar.

12 Igor Kopytoff and Suzanne Miers, “African ‘Slavery’ as an Institution of Marginality,” in Slavery in Africa: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives, ed. Igor Kopytoff and Suzanne Miers (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1977), 3–81.

13 Alessandro Stanziani, Labour, Coercion, and Economic Growth in Eurasia, Seventeenth–Early Twentieth Centuries (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 2; Kevin Bales, “Slavery in Its Contemporary Manifestations,” in The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary, ed. Jean Allain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 281–303. For more on the definitional question of slavery in Asia, see Miers, “Slavery: A Question of Definition”; and Christine Molfenter, “Beyond Slavery: Historical Studies on Bonded Labour in the South Asian and Indian Ocean Regions,” Südasien-Chronik / South Asia Chronicle 10 (2020), 413–39; Magaly Rodríguez García, “On the Legal Boundaries of Coerced Labor,” in On Coerced Labor: Work and Compulsion after Chattel Slavery, ed. Marcel van der Linden and Magaly Rodríguez García (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 11–29.

14 Hespanha, António Manuel, “Depois do Leviathan,” Almanack Braziliense 5 (2007), 64Google Scholar; Tamar Herzog, “Schiavitù: Una Prospettiva Globale,” in Schiavitù del Corpo e Schiavitù dell'Anima, ed. Emmanuele Colombo et al. (Milan: Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Centro Ambrosiano, 2018), 13.

15 Juliane Schiel and Stefan Hanß, “Semantics, Practices and Transcultural Perspectives on Mediterranean Slavery,” in Mediterranean Slavery Revisited (500–1800) / Neue Perspektiven auf mediterrane Sklaverei (500–1800), ed. Stefan Hanß and Juliane Schiel (Zürich: Chronos, 2014), 11–23.

16 Sweet, James H., “The Iberian Roots of American Racist Thought,” William and Mary Quarterly 54:1 (1997), 143–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Ijeoma Umebinyuo, “Diaspora Blues,” in Questions for Ada, ed. Ijeoma Umebinyuo and Sonia Taaffe (Scotts Valley, Calif.: CreateSpace, 2015), 78.

18 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

19 Gwyn Campbell, “Slavery in the Indian Ocean World,” in The Routledge History of Slavery, ed. Gad Heuman and Trevor Burnard (London: Routledge, 2010), 60–1; Michelle A. McKinley, Fractional Freedoms: Slavery, Intimacy, and Legal Mobilization in Colonial Lima, 1600–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).

20 On the idea of silenced categories and a discussion on the place of these discourses in Malay studies, see Alatas, Syed Farid, “Silencing as Method: The Case of Malay Studies,” in Fieldwork and the Self: Changing Research Styles in Southeast Asia, ed. Jammes, Jérémy and T., Victor King (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Sure enough, such a proposition bears the Spivakian question on whether we are effectively ready or prepared to implement and debate such categories considering the disparaging difference in past scholarship dedicated to these in comparison to similar European categories.

21 Wyatt, Don J., The Blacks of Premodern China (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.