Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-665pl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-13T13:33:55.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A population census approach to conserving the threatened tree Xylopia decorticans (Annonaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2026

Maria Ineida Aguiar Horst*
Affiliation:
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
Rodrigo Theófilo Valadares
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
Luana Silva Braucks Calazans
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
Márcio Lucas Bazante
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
Valquíria Ferreira Dutra
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author, ineida.maria7@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The tree Xylopia decorticans is a rare endemic in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, a global biodiversity hotspot. Described in 2007 from two protected areas, it was originally categorized as Least Concern but as a result of progressive forest conversion and degradation it is now categorized as Endangered in the Brazilian Red List and IUCN Red List. Ecologically, the search for new populations is important because the species provides resources to a range of wildlife in different forest layers, but there have been no demographic studies on which to base conservation action. To address this lack of information, we surveyed a private protected area in south-eastern Brazil where there was a new record of X. decorticans. We located 121 individuals within a minimum convex polygon area of 4.08 ha (density 29.65 individuals/ha), c. 30% of which were juveniles. Mean tree height was 9 m and diameter at breast height ≤ 10 cm. The species is ombrophilous and sensitive to edge effects, as evidenced by desiccation observed in the field. The findings of this study improve our understanding of the ecological characteristics of species within regions afflicted by ongoing forest degradation, and underscores the pivotal role of Reservas Particular do Patrimônio Natural (private natural heritage reserves) in Brazil in the conservation of threatened species such as X. decorticans.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

Introduction

The Atlantic Forest is the most biodiverse phytogeographic domain in Brazil, supporting > 17,000 catalogued species (Mittermeier et al., Reference Mittermeier, Hoffmann, Pilgrim, Brooks, Lamoreux, Mittermeier, Gil and da Fonseca2004; Brazil Flora Group, 2022). Annonaceae is a diverse family of flowering plants including Xylopia, one of the genera that occur in Brazil (Lobão et al., Reference Lobão, Lopes, Erkens, Mendes-Silva, Pontes Pires and Silva2020). Xylopia comprises several tree or shrub species, many of which are known as pindáiwa by the Indigenous peoples, meaning plants used as fishing nets (Dias, Reference Dias1988; Lopes & Mello-Silva, Reference Lopes and Mello-Silva2014).

Xylopia decorticans D.M. Johnson & Lobão (Plate 1), described in 2007, has a restricted distribution and is endemic to the highlands in central Espírito Santo State (Lobão & Johnson, Reference Lobão and Johnson2007). It is recognized by the reddish-brown bark on its branches (Plate 1a–b), its fleshy flowers that develop from the base of the stem to the branches (Plate 1d–f), and its pink or reddish fruits with arillate seeds (Lobão & Johnson, Reference Lobão and Johnson2007; Plate 1g–h). In addition, this zoochorous species provides resources for wildlife in different forest strata because of its characteristic cauliflory. The species was originally categorized as Least Concern because it occurs in at least two protected areas of the Atlantic Forest in Espírito Santo State, the Reserva Biológica Augusto Ruschi and the Estação Biológica Santa Lúcia (Lobão & Johnson, Reference Lobão and Johnson2007). The description was based on specimens from eight localities, six of which were in private areas. Since 2007, the species has been found in four new localities, also in private areas. Despite this increase in the number of recorded localities, as a result of the progressive conversion of the forest for other land use and the damage caused by logging and wood harvesting in the region (Mendes & Padovan, Reference Mendes and Padovan2000; Thomaz, Reference Thomaz2010; CNCFlora, 2018), it is now categorized as Endangered on the Brazilian Red List of Threatened Species (Brazil, 2022) and on the IUCN Red List (Fernandez et al., Reference Fernandez, Verdi, León, Martinelli and Lopes2021). Recently, advances in our knowledge of the flora of Espírito Santo State have led to the identification of a new subpopulation in a small private protected area. This study built on that discovery by carrying out an assessment of the abundance of X. decorticans locally, with a view to enhancing our understanding of its biology and distribution.

Plate 1 Identifying features of Xylopia decorticans in the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado, Santa Maria do Jetibá, Espírito Santo, Brazil: (a) branch and leaves; (b) details of a branch emphasizing the reddish-brown bark; (c) cauliflory tubers; (d–e) flower buds; (f) flower at anthesis; (g) immature fruit; (h) mature and open fruit. Photos: (a–c, e) M.I.A. Horst; (d) L.S.B. Calazans; (f, h) L.O. Bezerra; (g) D.O. Sabbagh.

Ecologically, studies on rare and threatened species are important because population data are often scarce, resulting in significant knowledge gaps that hinder effective conservation actions and predictions of future population change (Hortal et al., Reference Hortal, De Bello, Diniz-Filho, Lewinsohn, Lobo and Ladle2015; Collen et al., Reference Collen, Dulvy, Gaston, Gardenfors, Keith and Punt2016; CNCFlora, 2018). Recognizing the critical need for such information (as highlighted by the Brazilian Red List; CNCFlora, 2018; Brazil, 2022), this study investigated the population structure of X. decorticans to contribute to its long-term conservation in the face of ongoing declines in habitat quality and extent, whilst providing crucial data for future management and restoration efforts for threatened flora in the region.

Study area

We conducted our study within the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado, a private protected area located in the state of Espírito Santo, south-eastern Brazil (Fig. 1). The reserve encompasses < 50 ha of well-preserved dense ombrophilous forest, lies within the Centro Norte Serrano Ecological Corridor (Espírito Santo, 2010) close to several other protected areas (see Silva et al., Reference Silva, Calazans, Valadares and Dutra2020), and is designated as an Outpost of the Atlantic Forest Biosphere Reserve (IA-RBMA, 2023). Situated in the municipality of Santa Maria de Jetibá, the Reserve spans elevations of 750–900 m. According to Köppen’s climate classification, the region exhibits a warm temperate climate, fully humid with no dry season and a warm summer (Cfb: Alvares et al., Reference Alvares, Stape, Sentelhas, Gonçalves and Sparovek2014). The mean daily temperature is typically below 22 °C in the warmest month and below 18 °C in the coldest month, and mean annual precipitation is 1,259 mm (Incaper, 2023).

Fig. 1 The study site in Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado, Santa Maria do Jetibá, Espírito Santo, Brazil, showing the distribution and size (DBH, diameter at breast height) of the Xylopia decorticans trees recorded.

We collected some data outside the original boundaries of the Reserve in recently procured forest areas bordering the protected area. Access to the remainder of the forest fragment was limited as we did not have permission to enter other private areas contiguous with the Reserve.

Methods

We identified a subpopulation based on its degree of isolation in an extremely fragmented landscape subject to continuous anthropogenic disturbance (IUCN, 2019). We searched for X. decorticans in the Reserve during October 2023–August 2024, following the census protocol defined by Bullock (Reference Bullock and Sutherland)1996) and the guidelines for threatened tree conservation surveys outlined by the Global Trees Campaign (Brewer, Reference Brewer2013). We utilized existing trails as well as making incursions into the forest interior to carry out our search. The species occurs in well-preserved primary forest (Saiter et al., Reference Saiter, Oza and Freitas2024), so we did not survey forest areas undergoing regeneration.

We recorded all individuals ≥ 1.30 m tall, a sufficient height to measure other parameters (Moro & Martins, Reference Moro, Martins, Felfili, Eisenlohr, Melo, Andrade and Meira-Neto2011), and georeferenced coordinates in the Universal Transverse Mercator system using a GPS (Fig. 1). We also recorded life stage, diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height (estimated by eye). We calculated height and diameter at breast height using the Spiegel formula (Felfili & Rezende, Reference Felfili and Rezende2003). We classified any individuals with cauliflory tubers present (Plate 1c) as adults, others as juveniles.

For our population census analysis, we plotted occurrence points in QGIS 3.32.0 (QGIS Development Team, 2016) to delineate minimum convex polygons for X. decorticans in the area. The sum of the area of the polygons represents the total area occupied by the subpopulation. We calculated population density by dividing the total number of individuals found by the total area occupied by the subpopulation.

We analysed qualitative indicators provided by the Brazilian Law for the Protection of Native Vegetation (Brazil, 2012) to assess the degree of habitat preservation in the survey area. We assessed the occurrence and condition of individual X. decorticans found near the edge of the forest fragment in a 10 m strip extending from the edge to the interior. We defined this limit based on qualitative indicators typically associated with edge effects, such as fallen trees, herbaceous strata dominated by heliophylous bamboos, discontinuous leaf litter, and high light intensity or luminosity (e.g. Murcia, Reference Murcia1995; Rodrigues & Nascimento, Reference Rodrigues and Nascimento2006; Laurance et al., Reference Laurance, Nascimento and Laurance2007). We assessed the vitality of individuals based on the condition of the crown and leaves, and the presence of any disease or damage indicators such as cavities in the trunk or fungal growths (Gill & Daltry, Reference Gill and Daltry2013).

Results

Our habitat assessment showed that X. decorticans thrives in minimally disturbed forest remnants or areas of advanced regeneration/successional stages. We identified the following indicators of suitable habitat: thick, continuous leaf litter; the presence of woody vines; a high density of epiphytes; palm indicator species such as Euterpe edulis Mart., Attalea dubia (Mart.) Burret, Syagrus insignis (Devansaye) Becc., Bactris timbuiensis H.Q.B.Fern. and Geonoma schottiana Mart.; an average canopy height of 25 m, including emergent specimens; and a high floristic richness with diverse life forms.

We located and measured 121 specimens of X. decorticans within the study area, occupying 4.08 ha, and comprising 38 juveniles and 83 adults with diameter at breast height ≥ 0.9 cm (Supplementary Table 1). We grouped our sample into two height classes (0–9.25 m and 9.26–18.50 m) and two DBH classes (0.95–12.95 cm and 12.96–25.9 cm). The majority of individuals (91.7%) were 2–9 m tall, and nearly all had a DBH of 0.95–10.5 cm. We calculated X. decorticans density as 29.65 individuals/ha.

We identified five dead or desiccated individuals in the edge strip of the study area. They were located in sections exposed to the prevailing north-east winds following conversion of adjoining areas to monoculture plantations of eucalyptus trees Eucalyptus spp. Although our sample is small, our observations are supported by the increase in luminosity, strong development of a heliophyte Chusquea spp. (Poaceae) community, discontinuity in the accumulation of leaf litter and the presence of large fallen trees. It is of note that we also recorded up to three fallen trees of X. decorticans with large stems (DBH ≥ 10 cm) in the edge strip. Overall, the species exhibited a strong preference for forest patches not exposed to edge effects.

Discussion

This study provides the first ecological data on X. decorticans, building on information gathered in earlier studies of the tree community in the highlands of Espírito Santo (e.g. Saiter et al., Reference Saiter, Oza and Freitas2024) and establishing initial parameters for more targeted conservation efforts. One of the targets set by the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (BGCI, 2024) is that at least 20% of threatened species should be included in restoration and recovery programmes. However, the ecological characteristics of X. decorticans suggest that it should be recognized as a climax species and planted in the more advanced stages of regeneration, known in Brazil as forest enrichment. In Brazil, it is common to plant ombrophilous species such as X. decorticans in regenerating areas where forest strata are diagnosable but low in richness. We recommend that reintroduction efforts in areas undergoing regeneration within the study area should be limited to enrichment in forest patches at advanced successional stages.

In addition to our data providing the location of future collection matrices for ex situ propagation, they also contribute to our knowledge of the ecology, distribution and abundance of X. decorticans (Cardoso et al., Reference Cardoso, Erwin, Borges and New2011; Hortal et al., Reference Hortal, De Bello, Diniz-Filho, Lewinsohn, Lobo and Ladle2015). However, there is a continuing need for dispersion and ex situ conservation studies that can provide insights into germination and development, and protocols for in situ planting.

The predominance of individuals with a DBH of < 10 cm suggests that the legal inclusion criterion currently employed to assess forest vegetation within the Centro-Norte Serrano Corridor (Brazil, 2012) does not accurately reflect the population size of X. decorticans. For example, in the case of environmental permits for major infrastructure works, only trees with a DBH above this threshold are included in the species list presented to the inspection agency, which means that smaller X. decorticans would be omitted. The species list is directly related to future environmental mitigation actions, which could include germplasm rescue of declining species (Brazil, 2012).

Monitoring programmes are included as one of the mitigating actions specified in Brazilian legislation (Brazil, 2012). Based on our findings, population monitoring programmes for X. decorticans should use a DBH threshold of 5 cm, so that both young and adult individuals are included. Although we recorded some individuals high up in the canopy (c. 18 m at average canopy height), this species demonstrates a reproductive strategy closely linked to the understory. The prevalence of small trees in our study area aligns with patterns observed in understory species in tropical forests generally (Bohlman, Reference Bohlman2015), including other Annonaceae (Gomes-Westphalen et al., Reference Gomes-Westphalen, Lins-e-Silva and Araújo2012). Thus, our findings suggest that X. decorticans is a specialist species adapted to specific ecological conditions with a variety of trophic niches and more intricate ecological networks (Losapio et al., Reference Losapio, Montesinos-Navarro and Saiz2019). Collectively, our results indicate that the species is an understory component of more advanced successional forest stages, where community structure is more complex and thus conducive to species that are sensitive to desiccation in more exposed habitats.

Cauliflory increases the supply of flowers and fruits to seed dispersers and can occur from the base of the stem to the thinnest branches of the crown (Onstein et al., Reference Onstein, Kissling, Chatrou, Couvreur, Morlon and Sauquet2019). Plants in the genus Xylopia are associated with diplochory, in which vertebrates (mainly birds) and invertebrates are involved in seed dispersal (Christianini & Oliveira, Reference Christianini and Oliveira2010; Cabral et al., Reference Cabral, Bender, Couvreur, Faurby, Hagen and Hensen2025). Xylopia decorticans exhibits cauliflory and is important for threatened seed-eating birds throughout its range. We believe it may support both terrestrial birds (Galliformes) and species that feed in the tree canopy, including the following Endangered (EN) and Critically Endangered (CR) species (status according to Espírito Santo, 2022): Odontophorus capueira (EN), Asthenes moreirae (CR), Grallaria varia imperator (EN), Turdus fumigatus fumigatus (EN), Crypturellus noctivagus (CR) and Tinamus solitarius (EN). Therefore, conservation of X. decorticans will be of benefit to a wide variety of other wildlife.

We categorized the individuals present in the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado as a distinct subpopulation of X. decorticans because of the low genetic flow between the forest fragments that characterize the highlands in the central region of Espírito Santo, particularly within the Centro-Norte Serrano Ecological Corridor. More diverse populations would exhibit greater genetic variation, enhancing their resilience to inbreeding and other genetic bottlenecks (Ridley, Reference Ridley2009; DeWood et al., Reference DeWoody, Harder, Mathur and Willoughby2021). An understanding of the population structure of endemic species such as X. decorticans is crucial for guiding conservation efforts aimed at reconnecting fragmented forest patches and maintaining ecological function in the landscape.

Population studies are essential for robust analyses of threatened species because there are large gaps in our knowledge of the distribution, evolution, ecology and physiology of even well-studied taxa such as Annonaceae (Hortal et al., Reference Hortal, De Bello, Diniz-Filho, Lewinsohn, Lobo and Ladle2015; Erkens et al., Reference Erkens, Blanpain, Jara, Runge, Verspagen, Cosiaux and Couvreur2023). Based on our findings, we recommend that X. decorticans is used in forest enrichment programmes, aligning with initiatives such as Forest Landscape Restoration (FAO et al., 2021), which are gaining traction regionally (Espírito Santo, 2023). This would also be a positive recommendation within the framework of actions aimed at the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UNEP & FAO, 2020). This approach would enable stakeholders to accelerate the implementation and monitoring of forest enrichment programmes, advancing global restoration goals and local conservation efforts.

In summary, our population census has provided quantitative data on the abundance and distribution of X. decorticans within a small Atlantic Forest fragment. Our findings improve our understanding of the ecological characteristics of species within regions afflicted by ongoing forest degradation, point the way to effective conservation action and underscore the pivotal role of private natural heritage reserves (Reservas Particular do Patrimônio Natural) in Brazil in the conservation of Endangered species such as X. decorticans.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article is available at doi.org/10.1017/S0030605325102524

Author contributions

Study design: MIAH, RTV; fieldwork: MIAH, RTV, LSBC; data analysis: MIAH, RTV; writing: all authors.

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo scholarship to MIHA (process UFES 202422108DPQ). We thank Ecovila Bom Destino for providing fieldwork permission and assisting with logistics; Leo Gasparini, Emanoel Ferreira, Ana Luíza Batista, Lucas Bezerra, Cleberson Loureiro, Alexandre Magno, Germano Feijó, Gustavo Pezzani, Walder José Marianno, Fabiula Arantes and Humberto Passos Coelho for fieldwork support; and Hilton Monteiro Cristóvão for valuable data on the threatened birds occurring in the area.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards. Research in Espírito Santo State was carried out under IEMA permit NUBIO no. 028-R4A4/2015 - process no. 71911308.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.

References

Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.A., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.L.M. & Sparovek, G. (2014) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22, 711728.10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International) (2024) Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK. bgci.org/our-work/inspiring-and-leading-people/policy-and-advocacy/the-global-strategy-for-plant-conservation [accessed January 2026].Google Scholar
Bohlman, S.A. (2015) Species diversity of canopy versus understory trees in a Neotropical Forest: implications for forest structure, function and monitoring. Ecosystems, 18, 658670.10.1007/s10021-015-9854-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil (2012) Lei Nº 12.651. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa. Diário Oficial da União, 25 de maio de 2012.Google Scholar
Brazil (2022) Portaria MMA Nº 148. Atualiza a Lista Nacional de Espécies Ameaçadas de Extinção. Diário Oficial da União, 07 de junho de 2022.Google Scholar
Brazil Flora Group (Gomes-da-Silva, J., Filardi, F.L.R., Barbosa, M.R.V., Baumgratz, J.F.A., Bicudo, C.E.M., Cavalcanti, T.B. et al.) (2022) Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, 71, 178198.Google Scholar
Brewer, S. (2013) Brief 1. How to Survey an Area for Threatened Tree Species. Global Trees Campaign. Fauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK. bgci.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Brief-1-English.pdf [accessed 01 January 2025].Google Scholar
Bullock, J. (1996) Plants. In Ecological Census Techniques. A Handbook (ed. Sutherland), W.J., pp. 111138. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Cabral, A., Bender, I.M., Couvreur, T.L., Faurby, S., Hagen, O., Hensen, I. et al. (2025) Seed-dispersing vertebrates and the abiotic environment shape functional diversity of the pantropical Annonaceae. New Phytologist, 246, 22632279.10.1111/nph.70113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, P., Erwin, T.L., Borges, P.A. & New, T.R. (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation 144, 26472655.10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centro Nacional de Conservação da Flora (2018) Annonaceae - Xylopia decorticans D.M. Johnson & Lobão. proflora.jbrj.gov.br/html/Xylopia%20decorticans_2018.html [accessed 02 January 2025].Google Scholar
Christianini, A.V. & Oliveira, P.S. (2010) Birds and ants provide complementary seed dispersal in a neotropical savanna. Journal of Ecology, 98, 573582.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01653.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collen, B., Dulvy, N.K., Gaston, K.J., Gardenfors, U., Keith, D.A., Punt, A.E. et al. (2016) Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List. Biology Letters, 12, 20150843.10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWoody, J.A., Harder, A.M., Mathur, S. & Willoughby, J.R. (2021) The long-standing significance of genetic diversity in conservation. Molecular Ecology, 30, 41474154.10.1111/mec.16051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, M.C. (1988) Estudos taxonômicos do gênero Xylopia L. (Annonaceae) no Brasil extra-amazônico. PhD thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Erkens, R.H.J., Blanpain, L.M.P., Jara, I.C., Runge, K., Verspagen, N., Cosiaux, A. & Couvreur, T.L.P. (2023) Spatial distribution of Annonaceae across biomes and anthromes: knowledge gaps in spatial and ecological data. Plants, People, Planet, 5, 520535.10.1002/ppp3.10321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espírito Santo (2010) Decreto Estadual Nº 2.529-R/2010. Institui os Corredores Ecológicos Prioritários do Espírito Santo no âmbito do Corredor Central da Mata Atlântica. Diário Oficial dos Poderes do Estado, 07 de junho de 2010.Google Scholar
Espírito Santo (2022) Decreto Estadual Nº 5.237-R/2022. Atualiza a lista de espécies da fauna silvestre ameaçadas de extinção no estado. Diário Oficial dos Poderes do Estado, 25 de novembro de 2022.Google Scholar
Espírito Santo (2023) COP de Dubai: Plano de Descarbonização e Programa Capixaba de Carbono. Caderno Noticioso, Diário Oficial dos Poderes do Estado, 26.118, 05.Google Scholar
Felfili, R.W. & Rezende, R.P. (2003) Conceitos e Métodos em fitossociologia. UNB, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Fernandez, E., Verdi, M., León, M.L.V., Martinelli, G. & Lopes, J. (2021) Xylopia decorticans. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T189635574A189635576.pt.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Commission on Ecosystem Management (CEM) & Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) (2021) Principles for ecosystem restoration to guide the United Nations Decade 2021–2030. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Gill, D. & Daltry, J. (2013) Brief 3. How to Make a Monitoring Plan for Threatened Tree Species. Global Trees Campaign. Fauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK. bgci.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Brief-3-English.pdf [accessed 01 July 2025].Google Scholar
Gomes-Westphalen, J.S., Lins-e-Silva, A.C.B. & Araújo, F.S. (2012) Who is who in the understory: the contribution of resident and transitory groups of species to plant richness in forest assemblages. Revista de Biología Tropical, 60, 10251040.Google ScholarPubMed
Hortal, J., De Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Lewinsohn, T.M., Lobo, J.M. & Ladle, R.J. (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46, 523549.10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IA-RBMA. Posto avançado da Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica (2023) Conselho Nacional da Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica aprova três novos postos avançados. rbma.org.br/n/conselho-nacional-da-reserva-da-biosfera-da-mata-atlantica-aprova-tres-novos-postos-avancados [accessed 3 January 2025].Google Scholar
Incaper (2023) Programa de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural, Santa Maria de Jetibá. 2020-2023. Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (Incaper), Vitória, Bazil. incaper.es.gov.br/media/incaper/proater/municipios/Santa_Maria.pdf [accessed 03 January 2025].Google Scholar
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2019) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 24 August 2025].Google Scholar
Laurance, W.F., Nascimento, H.E., Laurance, S.G. et al. (2007) Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis. PLOS One, 2, e1017.10.1371/journal.pone.0001017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobão, A.Q. & Johnson, D.M. (2007) Xylopia decorticans (Annonaceae), a new cauliflorous species from Brazil. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium, 25, 207211.Google Scholar
Lobão, A.Q., Lopes, F.C., Erkens, R.H.J., Mendes-Silva, I., Pontes Pires, A.F., Silva, L.V. et al. (2020) Annonaceae. In: Flora e Funga do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. floradobrasil2020.jbrj.gov.br/FB110219 [accessed 03 January 2025].Google Scholar
Lopes, J.D.C. & Mello-Silva, R. (2014) Diversidade e caracterização das Annonaceae do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 36, 125131.10.1590/S0100-29452014000500015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losapio, G., Montesinos-Navarro, A. & Saiz, H. (2019) Perspectives for ecological networks in plant ecology. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 12, 87102.10.1080/17550874.2019.1626509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, S.L. & Padovan, P. (2000) A Estação Biológica de Santa Lúcia, Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão 11/12, 734.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Lamoreux, J., Mittermeier, C.G., Gil, P.R. & da Fonseca, G.A.B. (2004) Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Moro, M.F. & Martins, F.R. (2011) Métodos de levantamento do componente arbóreo-arbustivo. In Fitossociologia no Brasil: métodos e estudos de caso. Vol. 1 (eds Felfili, J.M., Eisenlohr, P.V., Melo, M.M.R.F., Andrade, L.A. & Meira-Neto, J.A.A.), pp. 174212. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar
Murcia, C. (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 5862.10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onstein, R.E., Kissling, W.D., Chatrou, L.W., Couvreur, T.L., Morlon, H. & Sauquet, H. (2019) Which frugivory-related traits facilitated historical long-distance dispersal in the custard apple family (Annonaceae)? Journal of Biogeography, 46, 18741888.10.1111/jbi.13552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2016) QGIS: Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 02 January 2025].Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (2009) Evolução. Artmed Editora. Porto Alegre, Brasil.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, P.J.F.P & Nascimento, M.T. (2006) Fragmentação florestal: breves considerações teóricas sobre efeitos de borda. Rodriguésia, 57, 6774.10.1590/2175-7860200657105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiter, F.Z., Oza, E.F., Freitas, J. et al. (2024) Updated list of long-term monitored tree species in a forest with high diversity and endemism in the highlands of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 24, e20241708.10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2024-1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, H.L., Calazans, L.S.B., Valadares, R.T. & Dutra, V.F. (2020) First natural report of Pabstiella teschiana Chiron & Xim. Bols. (Orchidaceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest: notes on morphology, ecology and conservation. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 43, 551554.10.1007/s40415-020-00617-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomaz, L. (2010) A Mata Atlântica no estado do Espírito Santo, Brasil: de Vasco Fernandes Coutinho ao século 21. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão, 27, 520.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020) Strategy for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. wedocs.unep.org/items/689e0129-9fd4-41fd-bf52-4df151b6969f [accessed 04 January 2025].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Plate 1 Identifying features of Xylopia decorticans in the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado, Santa Maria do Jetibá, Espírito Santo, Brazil: (a) branch and leaves; (b) details of a branch emphasizing the reddish-brown bark; (c) cauliflory tubers; (d–e) flower buds; (f) flower at anthesis; (g) immature fruit; (h) mature and open fruit. Photos: (a–c, e) M.I.A. Horst; (d) L.S.B. Calazans; (f, h) L.O. Bezerra; (g) D.O. Sabbagh.

Figure 1

Fig. 1 The study site in Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Macaco Barbado, Santa Maria do Jetibá, Espírito Santo, Brazil, showing the distribution and size (DBH, diameter at breast height) of the Xylopia decorticans trees recorded.

Supplementary material: File

Horst et al. supplementary material

Horst et al. supplementary material
Download Horst et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.6 KB