Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T11:08:12.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macrobenthic biodiversity in intertidal habitats of the Iroise Biosphere Reserve (Brittany, France)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2009

C. Hily  and
F. Jean
C. Hily
Affiliation:
URA CNRS D 1513, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue le Gorgeu, 29275 Brest Cedex, France
F. Jean
Affiliation:
URA CNRS D 1513, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue le Gorgeu, 29275 Brest Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patterns of the distribution of intertidal fauna in relation to the diversity of habitats were studied in the UNESCO Man and Biosphere (MAB) reserve of the archipelago of Molene and Ouessant (west Brittany, France). A classification of environmental features was developed in order to determine species richness, abundance, biomass and trophic structure of the macrobenthic fauna in this intertidal area which covers 1120 ha. The four descriptors of the environment were: (1) substratum (rock, boulders, sediment, pebbles); (2) height on the shore, based on the macrophytic zones: Pelvetia canaliculata/Fucus spiralis; Fucus vesiculosus / Ascophyllum nodosum; Fucus serratus; and Himanthalia elongata/Zostera marina; (3) wave exposure (sheltered, semi-sheltered, exposed); (4) percentage of algal cover (<50%, >50%). Each type was defined by a four-figure number and matched to a map codification. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a posteriori Newman-Keuls test (P=0.05) were applied to the series of species richness and biomass. Among the 308 species sampled, 40 represented 90% of the total biomass. Maximal number of species was reached in boulder fields in the Himanthalia zone, under exposed conditions and high algal cover. The lowest number of species was observed in pebble fields of the Pelvetia zone and in the sedimentary areas. Trophic structures were dominated by suspension feeders and herbivores at high levels on the shore and by carnivores at the lowest levels. High vegetation cover and wave-exposed conditions were shown to increase with increasing faunal diversity. Links between patterns of habitat distribution and faunal diversity and biomass in different spatial scales are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 311 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bourget, E., DeGuise, J. & Daigle, G., 1994. Scales of substratum heterogeneity, structural complexity, and the early establishment of a marine epibenthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 181, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H., 1976. Competitive interactions and the species diversity of corals. In Coelenterate ecology and behaviour (ed. Mackie, G.O.), pp. 51–59. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A.N. & Wilde, R.T., 1987. Algal diversity in relation to physical disturbance: a mosaic of successionnal stages in a subtidal cobble habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 37, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., 1971. Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs, 41, 351–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., 1975. Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecological Monographs, 45, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, M.N., 1984. Disturbance and recovery in intertidal pools: maintenance of mosaic patterns. Ecological Monographs, 54, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floc'h, J.Y., 1967. Cartographie de la végétation marine et observations écologiques dans l'archipel de Moline (Finistère). PhD thesis, University of Rennes, France.Google Scholar
Fuji, A. & Nomura, H., 1990. Community structure of the rocky shore macrobenthos in southern Hokkaido, Japan. Marine Biology, 107, 471–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hily, C. & Cuillandre, J.P., 1991. Activités humaines en milieu marin - Réserve de la biosphère d'Iroise. Report MAB Unesco/Conseil Général Finistère (France), 87 pp.Google Scholar
Huston, M., 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist, 113, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.R., 1964. Ecology of rocky shores. London: The English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M., John, D. & Lieberman, D., 1984. Factors influencing algal species assemblages on reef and cobble substrata off Ghana. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 75, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loya, Y., 1976. Recolonization of the Red Sea corals affected by natural catastrophes and man-made perturbations. Ecology, 57, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meesters, E., Knijn, R., Willemsen, P., Pennartz, R., Roebers, G. & Soest, R.W.M., van, 1991. Sub-rubble communities of Curacao and Bonaire coral reefs. Coral Reefs, 10, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R.T., 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist, 100, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S.T.A., Kolasa, J., Armesto, J.J., & Collins S.L., 1989. The ecological concept of disturbance and its expression at various hierarchical levels. Oikos, 54, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridoux, V., Guinet, C., Carcaillet, C. & Creton, P., 1994. Utilisation de l'espace par les mammifères marins - Réserve de la biosphère d'Iroise. Report MAB Unesco/Conseil Général Finistère (France), 61 pp.Google Scholar
Sousa, W.P., 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology, 60, 1225–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. & Stephenson, A., 1972. Life between tidemarks on rocky shores (ed. Freeman, W.H.). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y., Mori, K., Nojima, S., Kikuchi, T., Shibata, T., Nishino, T. & Omori, K., 1985. Community structure of a rocky shore in Tsuji-sima Island, Amakusa. I. Horizontal and vertical distribution pattern of common animals. Publications from the Amakusa Marine Biological Laboratory, Kyushu University, 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J., 1981. Structure of a rocky intertidal community in New South Wales: patterns of vertical distribution and seasonal changes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 51, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar