Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T17:25:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triaxial tests to determine a microstructure-based snow viscosity law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Perry Bartelt
Affiliation:
SWISS Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Markus Von Moos
Affiliation:
Institute for Geotechnical Engineering (IGT), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a new triaxial testing apparatus designed to determine the creep (viscoelastic) behavior of snow. The device is deformation-controlled and can apply strain rates between 10–7 s–1 and 10–2s–1 in tension and compression. The sample volume change is determined by measuring the displaced pore-air volume. During winters 1997/98 and 1998/99, >100 compression and tension tests were carried out. It is shown that snow is a highly non-linear but ideal viscoelastic material with a strong strain-rate dependency. A selection of test results is provided. We show how snow viscosity varies with density and strain rate. In a final analysis we interpret our results with respect to snow microstructure in order to develop microstructure-based constitutive relations which can be implemented in finite-element programs. Our results clearly show that for snow densities and strain rates tested, straining of the grain bonds is the primary mechanism of deformation within the snow ice lattice.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2000
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The triaxial apparatus with snow sample.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The mechanical system.

Figure 2

Table 1. Specifications of triaxial apparatus

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Triaxial control system.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Measured axial stress σa of a compressive creep test. A snow sample with density p = 255 kg m–3 , side pressure oT = 2.5kPa is loaded with a strain rate (b) Comparison between measurements and simulation. A simple density-dependent Maxwell law matches the measurements well. The simulation results are denoted with a cross. The temperature of the tests was T = –12.5˚C.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) The influence of snow density on viscoelastic behavior. The larger the density, the larger the viscosity. Top curve: p = 255 kg m–3 . Bottom curve: p =214 kg m–3 . (b) The influence of applied strain rate on snow stress-strain behavior. Top curve: Middle curve: Bottom curve: . In both cases the temperature of the tests was T=-12.5˚C.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Comparison between experimentally determined viscosity and constitutive model. Note the good agreement for all strain rates. Experimentally applied strain rates: diamonds ∊ = 2.2 × l0–5s–1 , triangles ∊ = 1.1 × l0–5s–11 , circles ∊ = 4.2× 10–6s–1, crosses ∊ = 1.7 × l0–6s–1 , squares ∊ = 7.4× 10–7s–1

Figure 7

Fig. 7. The parameter σv indicates the percentage of the ice lattice that is resisting deformation. The thick curved line is an exponential fit to the test results: a, = 0.0028 6 00080f>. The experimental results indicate a, lies in the range 2–20%.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. A comparison between αη and A 6 The straight lines are the theoretical predictions of Mahajan and Brown for constant r b / r g ratios. The lower line r b / r g = 0.2; upper line r b / r g = 0.5. Note the good agreement between theory and experiment for low-density snow.