Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T06:07:10.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alterations in gut microbial metabolic pathways following bariatric surgery assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2026

Nisreen Rashad Tashkandy*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University , Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Researchers have studied gut microbiota changes following bariatric surgery (BS), but not gut diversity and function in patients who fail to reduce weight. Stool samples were collected from three groups of women: 15 women who did not lose weight after BS (“Yes” group), 9 overweight women without surgery, and 8 slim women (“No” group). 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and PICRUSt2 were used for the analysis. The surgery and control groups had equal alpha and beta diversity, perhaps due to the high proportion of overweight participants (n = 24). All groupings were dominated by Bacteroidota and Bacillota. Barnesiellaceae decreased with BS, although Streptococcaceae remained frequent in overweight people. The iron supplementation group had High abundance of Atopobiaceae and Prevotellaceae. Barnesiellaceae abundance was considerably lower in both surgical groups (with and without iron supplementation) than in the no-iron and no-surgery groups. The ornithine degradation and haem biosynthesis routes use different metabolites than the glycine super system. Finally, the “Yes” group significantly upregulated PWY0–1241, PWY-5177, and PWY-5855 signaling pathways. In conclusion, gut bacteria and metabolic functions may predict weight loss after surgery better than diversity markers. The requirement for orthogonal validation assays is suggested by pathway analysis outperforming diversity metrics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the women based on their weight and history of bariatric surgery

Figure 1

Figure 1. Beta diversity-based Aitchison distance clustering reveals potentially interesting groups among samples. The heatmap shows the pairwise Aitchison distances (centred log-ratio transformed) between samples. These differences indicate that the microbial composition of the cohort differed. Darker colours indicate closely related samples. On the left, hierarchical clustering with complete linkage groups the samples based on their beta diversity profiles. The arrangement of the clusters suggests no important connection between the microbial profiles and clinical factors, such as surgery, weight, and iron levels.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The relative abundance of the most common bacterial phyla in samples from bariatric surgery patients (P) and control subjects (C). The stacked bar plots illustrate the number of each type of microbe present in all the samples, with each bar representing a single sample. The samples are sorted by ID, with the letters “P” and “C” at the beginning of the ID numbers indicating that the person had undergone bariatric surgery and the other person did not, respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Relative abundance of important bacterial families in different clinical subgroups. (A) Abundance of bacteria in individuals who had undergone bariatric surgery or not. (B) Comparison of the abundance of bacteria between individuals grouped by both surgery and body mass index. (C) Comparison of the abundance of bacteria between individuals grouped by surgery and those treated with iron supplements. Statistical significance was examined using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for two conditions and the Kruskal–Wallis H test, followed by the Dunn post hoc test for multiple conditions (*adjusted p < 0.05).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Bar plot of MetaCyc abundance data and pathways. Differentially abundant metabolic pathways between groups (Yes vs. No). Bars show relative pathway abundance with error bars indicating variability across samples. The panel on the right displays log2 fold changes for significantly enriched pathways, highlighting shifts in ubiquinone biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism, aromatic compound degradation, and select central carbon–energy pathways.

Figure 5

Figure 5. PCA plot of MetaCyc abundance data. PCA of MetaCyc pathway profiles comparing the “Yes” and “No” groups. Points represent individual samples, with 95% confidence ellipses illustrating group dispersion and overlap. Marginal density plots show how each group is distributed along the two principal components.

Figure 6

Table 2. Differential abundance of MetaCyc pathways between individuals who underwent surgery and those who did not undergo surgery

Supplementary material: File

Tashkandy supplementary material

Tashkandy supplementary material
Download Tashkandy supplementary material(File)
File 13.2 KB