Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T03:24:54.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of cover crop residue and residual herbicide on emergence dynamics of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in grain sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

Sachin Dhanda
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Kansas State University, Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS, USA
Vipan Kumar*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, Soil and Crop Sciences Section, Ithaca, NY, USA
J. Anita Dille
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Augustine Obour
Affiliation:
Professor, Kansas State University, Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS, USA
Elizabeth A. Yeager
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Johnathan Holman
Affiliation:
Professor, Kansas State University, Southwest Research and Extension Center, Garden City, KS, USA
*
Corresponding author: Vipan Kumar; Email: vk364@cornell.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 2020 to 2023 at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS, to understand the emergence dynamics and periodicity of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) as influenced by cover crop (CC) residue and residual herbicide in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. The study site was under a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–sorghum–fallow rotation with a natural seedbank of GR A. palmeri. Treatments included (1) fall-planted CC mixture [winter triticale (×Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus [Secale × Triticum])/winter peas (Pisum sativum L.)/rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)/radish (Raphanus sativus L.)] after wheat harvest and terminated at triticale heading stage (next spring before sorghum planting) with glyphosate alone or (2) glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine, (3) chemical fallow (no CC but treated with acetochlor/atrazine and dicamba before sorghum planting), and (4) nontreated control (no CC and no herbicide). Results indicated that CC terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine had a delayed and reduced cumulative emergence of GR A. palmeri as compared with chemical fallow and CC terminated with glyphosate alone across all 3 yr. Compared with chemical fallow, the CC terminated with glyphosate alone and glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine required 66 to 643 and 105 to 1,257 more cumulative growing degree days, respectively, to achieve 90% cumulative emergence of GR A. palmeri across all 3 yr. The combined effect of CC residue with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine reduced the total emergence counts of GR A. palmeri by 42% to 56% and 82% to 94% as compared with chemical fallow and nontreated control, respectively. These results suggest that fall-planted CC combined with a residual herbicide at termination can be utilized for GR A. palmeri suppression in grain sorghum.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Planting and termination dates for cover crops and planting and harvesting dates for grain sorghum over three growing seasons at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS

Figure 1

Figure 1. Daily minimum and maximum air temperature (C) and precipitation (mm) during the growing seasons of 2021 (A), 2022 (B), and 2023 (C).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Weekly emergence counts of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Amaranthus palmeri under different treatments in 2021. Chemical fallow had no cover crop (CC) and was treated with glyphosate + acetochlor/atrazine + dicamba at the same time as CC termination. CC+Gly indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate; CC+Gly+(ACR+ATZ) indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine. The same letter above columns within each timing are not significantly different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test at P < 0.05. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Weekly emergence counts of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Amaranthus palmeri under different treatments in 2022. Chemical fallow had no cover crop (CC) and was treated with glyphosate + acetochlor/atrazine + dicamba at the same time as CC termination. CC+Gly indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate; CC+Gly+(ACR+ATZ) indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine. The same letter above columns within each timing are not significantly different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test at P < 0.05. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Weekly emergence counts of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Amaranthus palmeri under different treatments in 2023. Chemical fallow had no cover crop (CC) and was treated with glyphosate + acetochlor/atrazine + dicamba at the same time as CC termination. CC+Gly indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate; CC+Gly+(ACR+ATZ) indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine. The same letter above columns within each timing are not significantly different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test at P < 0.05. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 5

Table 2. Regression parameters estimated from the log-logistic model (Equation 3) for percent cumulative emergence of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Amaranthus palmeri, duration of A. palmeri emergence, and coefficient of determination (R2) during the 2021 to 2023 growing seasons at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS

Figure 6

Figure 5. Cumulative emergence of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Amaranthus palmeri under different treatments during 2021 (A), 2022 (B), and 2023 (C) growing seasons in relation to cumulative growing degree days (cGDD). Chemical fallow had no cover crop (CC) and was treated with glyphosate + acetochlor/atrazine + dicamba at the same time as CC termination. CC+Gly indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate; CC+Gly+(ACR+ATZ) indicates cover crop terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine. Vertical bars indicate ± standard error of the mean at each observation date. Model is based on Equation 3 with parameter estimates in Table 2.