Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T00:28:30.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Closure of deep boreholes in ice sheets: a discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

P.G. Talalay
Affiliation:
St Petersburg Mining Institute, 199026 St Petersburg, Russia E-mail: talalay@PT15797.spb.edu
Roger LeB. Hooke
Affiliation:
Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, 303 Bryand Global Sciences Center, Orono, ME 04469-5790, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most frequently used relation between ice deformation rate, έ, and stress, , is the power law, commonly called Glen’s flow law, έ = Aፐn , in which A is an ice stiffness parameter and n is an empirical constant. A can be estimated from the simple exponential relation where A 0 is a constant independent of temperature; E, commonly called the enhancement factor, depends on ice crystal orientation, impurity content and other factors; Q is the activation energy for creep; R is the universal gas constant; and T is the absolute temperature. Laboratory experiments yield values of A 0 = 9.514MPa–3a–1 for secondary creep. Typical borehole closure experiments then give E ≈ 0.16. This low value probably results from the fact that, when deforming into a borehole, ice is subject to stresses that are inconsistent with the preferred orientation of c axes that has developed over many years under a stress configuration with no borehole present. Closure data from Vostok hole 3G yield E ≈ 0.7. This higher value may reflect a unique stress environment yielding fabrics that are somewhat better oriented for borehole closure.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Rheological models of ice deformation: (a) Newtonian material with viscosity coefficient of 1013 Pa s; (b) plastic material with yield stress of 100 kPa; (c) Newtonian-plastic material using Glen’s law with n = 3 and A = 50MPa–3a–1 (for ice at t = –5˚C; Paterson, 1994).

Figure 1

Table 1. Values A–20, E, and E derived from measurements of borehole closure during secondary creep

Figure 2

Table 2. Values of Q based on literature reviews and on experiments using polycrystalline ice at temperatures below –10˚C

Figure 3

Table 3. Paterson’s (1994) recommended values of A for secondary creep* and n = 3

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Variation of A with 1/T. ‘Other points’ include three from Duval (1977), four from Glen (1955), two from Mellor and Smith (1967) and two from Steinemann (1958). F&K: Fisher and Koerner (1986); N: Naruse and others (1988); B&D: Blinov and Dmitriev (1987); 3G: this study. It is assumed that several of the experiments at very low temperatures did not reach έmin.

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Enhancement factor based on measurements of borehole tilting: Dye 3 borehole, Greenland (Dahl-Jensen and Gundestrup, 1987); and GISP2 borehole, Greenland (N. Clow and K. Gundestrup, unpublished data). The smooth variation with depth in the GISP2 data is a consequence of calculating shear strain rates from a seventh-order polynomial fit to the raw velocity profile. We used values of E from an interpretation of the likely error distribution that Clow and Gundestrup feel is more ‘realistic’ rather than one that yielded values that were ~25% higher. Ordinates have been scaled so the Wisconsin/Holocene transition occurs at a common level in the graph. Calculations use A0 = 9.514 ×1012MPa–3 a–1.

Figure 6

Table 4. Temperature, pressure difference, age of ice, and measured diameter of hole 3G, at various depths

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Differential pressure on walls of hole 3G at Vostok Station (January 1992). The upper 135 m of the hole is filled with air.

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Changes in diameter with depth over 3.47 years in borehole 3G: curve a shows experimental data; curves b, c and d are based on Equations (1) and (5) with A0 = 9.514 ×1012MPa–3 a–1, n = 3 and E = 0.74 (hole 3G), E =1.0 (Paterson) and E = 0.16 (Table 1, rows 1–5), respectively.