Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T21:50:29.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of the metabolic responses to ingestion of hydrothermally processed high-amylopectin content maize, uncooked maize starch or dextrose in healthy individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2013

Richard M. Bracken*
Affiliation:
Applied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK Diabetes Research Group, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK
Benjamin J. Gray
Affiliation:
Applied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK Diabetes Research Group, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK
Daniel Turner
Affiliation:
Applied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK Diabetes Research Group, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK
*
* Corresponding author: , fax+44 1792 513171, email r.m.bracken@swansea.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Optimal carbohydrate ingestion strategies as nutritional therapy for glycogen storage diseases have not been fully realised, in part, due to difficulties in accessing patient cohorts, alongside limited details on metabolic effects and insight into working mechanisms. The present pilot study compared glycaemic and fuel oxidation responses following the ingestion of a hydrothermally processed maize starch (HPMS), an uncooked maize starch (UCMS) and maize-derived dextrose (DEX) at rest and during and after exercise in healthy individuals. A total of eight participants (seven males and one female; body mass (BM) 76·9 (sem 5·2) kg) visited the laboratory on three occasions. During each visit, the participants ingested 1 g/kg BM of HPMS (Glycosade™), UCMS (Argo™) or DEX as a 10 % solution. Blood samples were collected over a 2 h rest period and for 2 h after a 60 min treadmill run at 65 (sem 1) % VO2max. Mean values with their standard errors were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Blood glucose concentrations under the HPMS condition were significantly elevated from resting values at 90 min (P= 0·02) after ingestion compared with those under the UCMS (60 min; P= 0·02) and DEX (30 min; P= 0·001) conditions. The rate of carbohydrate use during exercise after the ingestion of HPMS was 7–9 % lower compared with that after the ingestion of either DEX or UCMS (P< 0·05). The total amount of lipids oxidised during exercise was greater under the HPMS condition (26·2 (sem 2·8) g) compared with that oxidised under the UCMS (19·6 (sem 2·7) g; P= 0·04) or DEX (20·6 (sem 3·6) g; P= 0·07) condition. The results demonstrated a glycaemic advantage to the ingestion of HPMS over that of UCMS or DEX. Carbohydrate oxidation was reduced after the ingestion of HPMS compared with that after the ingestion of UCMS or DEX, with a corresponding higher rate of endogenous lipid use during exercise.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a) Blood glucose, (b) plasma insulin and (c) plasma NEFA responses to the ingestion of dextrose (DEX, ), hydrothermally processed maize starch (HPMS, ) and uncooked maize starch (UCMS, ) at rest and 2 h following a submaximal run (Ex). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Hollow sample points indicate significant changes from rest within each condition (P≤ 0·05). * Mean value was significantly different between the HPMS and UCMS conditions (P≤ 0·05). † Mean values were significantly different between the HPMS and DEX conditions (P≤ 0·05). ‡ Mean values were significantly different between the UCMS and DEX conditions (P≤ 0·05).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 (a) Blood pH and (b) lactate responses to the ingestion of dextrose (DEX, ), hydrothermally processed maize starch (HPMS, ) and uncooked maize starch (UCMS, ) at rest and 2 h following a submaximal run (Ex). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Hollow sample points indicate significant changes from rest within each condition (P≤ 0·05). * Mean values were significantly different between the HPMS and DEX conditions (P≤ 0·05). † Mean values were significantly different between the UCMS and DEX conditions (P≤ 0·05).

Figure 2

Table 1 Physiological responses and perception of intensity during run exercise (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Fig. 3 (a) Carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation, (b) lipid oxidation and (c) percentage of energy expenditure derived from carbohydrates (grey) and lipids (black) during the submaximal run protocol. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. ■, Dextrose (DEX); □, hydrothermally processed maize starch (HPMS); , uncooked maize starch (UCMS). * Mean values were significantly different between the HPMS and DEX conditions (P= 0·07). † Mean values were significantly different between the HPMS and DEX conditions (P≤ 0·05). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).