2.1 Mass production of the spherical foam shells

The foam shell is an integral component of the IFE target design. The materials under consideration are divinyl benzene (DVB), poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) and resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) foams as well as polyvinyl phenol (PVP), glow-discharged polymer (GDP) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gas barriers. Significant advances have been made toward demonstrating production of mass capsules in leading IFE laboratories. The IFE capsules are complicated, precision assemblies, often requiring novel material structures.

The General Atomics and Schafer Corporation are the prime target fabricators in the US ICF program since 1992^{[Reference Steinman64–66]}. They supply ICF/IFE experiments with many thousands of targets and components each year, including the shells from beryllium, glass, bulk polymers, polymer and metal foams, barrier layer coatings, and so forth^[65]. The technology to form reactor-scaled foam shells from DVB is discussed in detail in Ref. [Reference Streit and Schroen67]. The main approach to the production of the polymer foam capsules is the microencapsulation technology. Using a multiple orifice droplet generator this technology can produce the capsules at high rates. The current production rate of the reactor-scale foam capsules from DVB is about 3 Hz (4 mm diameter and 200–300  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ -thick, the cell dimensions is 1–4  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , the density is in the range of 15–200  $\text{mg}/\text{cm}^{3}$ )^{[Reference Goodin, Aleksander, Brown, Frey, Gallix, Gibson, Maxwell, Nobile, Olson, Petzoldt, Raffray, Rochau, Schroen, Tillack, Rickman and Vermillion34, Reference Goodin44]} (Figure 2). Thin gold and/or palladium coating can then be added on to the outer surface of the foam shell through a vapor deposition process (sputter coating)^{[Reference Goodin, Aleksander, Brown, Frey, Gallix, Gibson, Maxwell, Nobile, Olson, Petzoldt, Raffray, Rochau, Schroen, Tillack, Rickman and Vermillion34]}. This Au/Pd coating is about 30–100 nm thick. Note that application of Pd as an outer coating greatly increases the shell wall permeability thus allowing rapid filling with $\text{D}_{2}$ and D–T fuel^{[Reference Goodin, Aleksander, Brown, Frey, Gallix, Gibson, Maxwell, Nobile, Olson, Petzoldt, Raffray, Rochau, Schroen, Tillack, Rickman and Vermillion34, Reference Koresheva68]}.

Figure 2. Foam shells made in General Atomics (taken from Refs. [Reference Goodin44, 65]). (a) A batch of foam DVB shells; (b) polished DVB shell of a 4 mm diameter with a 300 $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ wall, it is a prototype for the NRL IFE target design; (c) the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image shows the foam structure of a DVB foam; (d) SEM image of a section of the foam DVB shell with double outer coating from PVP and GDP.

An approach to mass production of the foam shells using the microfluidics devices in combination with an electric field is considering in the United States^{[Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69–Reference Bei, Jones and Tucker-Schwartz.72]} and Japan^{[Reference Nagai, Iyoda and Zhao73]}. The process of the shell fabrication uses programmable electronic circuity to manipulate the fluid droplet and transport targets. The following layout is considering for the shell fabrication^{[Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69]}:

1. – Step 1: dispense fluids and combine them to make an oil–water emulsion.

2. – Step 2: center the emulsion using an electric field and polymerize the shell.

3. – Step 3: remove fluid from the polymerized shell.

The experiments^{[Reference Bei, Jones and Tucker-Schwartz.72]} have demonstrated that application of the electric field at Step 2 has certain prospects to produce a spherically symmetric liquid shell (Figure 3). Further experiments are in the progress.

Figure 3. Sequence of video frames showing accelerated centering of inner silicone oil droplet by intentionally inducing elongation of the outer shell. (a) Before application of voltage; (b) a strong electric field $Eo=23~\text{kV}/\text{m}$ at 100 kHz is applied for ${\sim}15$ s; (c) field strength is reduced to 13  $\text{kV}/\text{m}$ . The time required for the inner droplet to achieve centering is reduced from ${\sim}80$ to ${\sim}45$  s and this lower field strength sustains the concentric condition indefinitely (taken from Ref. [Reference Bei, Jones and Tucker-Schwartz.72]).

An active research IFE program has been started in Japan^{[Reference Norimatsu38]} with respect to developing the mass technology of the FI targets. The current shell technologies allow fabricating thin polymer shells in a wide range of diameters (0.5–5.0 mm) as well as making thin plastic shells with a thick inner foam layer [Figures 4(a) and 4(b)]^{[Reference Nakai and Mima37, Reference Norimatsu38]}. Figure 4(b) demonstrates a section of the foam PMMA shell with the outer PVA coating. The shell is made by the emulsion method with further deposition of the outer gas barrier by the interfacial poly condensation method.

Figure 4. Fuel pellets for laser fusion (taken from Refs. [Reference Nakai and Mima37, Reference Norimatsu38]). (a) Plastic shells (CH, CD, CD–T) with diameter range of 0.5–5 mm; (b) plastic foam shell coated by plastic gas barrier.

The FI target includes two components: the guiding cone and the shell with a special hole for the cone entrance. The mass manufacturing technique of the re-entrant cone fabrication has been demonstrated in the United Kingdom and Japan^{[Reference Norimatsu38–Reference Tolley, ben Saïd, Koresheva, Perin, Perlado, Schaumann, Schurtz and Spindloe40]}. In Ref. [Reference Norimatsu38], it was proposed to make cones from Li17Pb83 (which is the same material as the first wall of the reactor chamber) because of lower erosion and higher mechanical strength of this material compare to the pure lead. The original method of drilling of frozen foam shells to make a hole for the re-entrant cone followed by the cone-and-shell assembly has been demonstrated in Japan for an individual target^{[Reference Norimatsu38]}. Mass fabrication of the re-entrant cones using the mechanical micro-machining system is also developing in the United Kingdom^{[Reference Spindloe39, Reference Tolley, ben Saïd, Koresheva, Perin, Perlado, Schaumann, Schurtz and Spindloe40]} (see Figure 5 taken from Ref. [Reference Spindloe39]).

Figure 5. A batch of the re-entrant cones (taken from Ref. [Reference Spindloe39]).

One of the topical problems of the target fueling is a rapid loading of the shell batch with a fuel. Study on cryogenic injection filling (liquid fuel) versus diffusion filling (gaseous fuel) is required.

So the current technologies are mainly of two types: liquid fuel filling and gaseous fuel filling.

Liquid fuel filling:

1. – The first approach is based on the fuel loading through a thin tube mounted onto a shell. A small hole of about 5–15  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ diameter is drilled in a shell wall, and the tube is mounted to the shell. The shell is then cooled and the liquid fuel is filled through the tube. This approach is used in many ICF Laboratories; for example, in the present-day cryogenic experiments on the NIF for fueling the ignition individual targets^[66] as well as in the cryogenic experiments on the freezing of hydrogen isotopes, performed in Russia^{[Reference Izgorodin, Solomatina, Pepelyaev, Rogozhina and Osetrov30]}.

2. – The second approach is based on the fuel loading to a foam shell by the thermal cavitation technique^{[Reference Norimatsu47]}. The steps of this technique for a batch of the FI targets are as follows:

   1. (1) A batch of foam targets with re-entrant cones are placed into a bath with liquid D–T fuel.

   2. (2) The liquid fuel fills each target through the pores of the target wall.

   3. (3) Laser light is introduced into the inner volume of each target through a re-entrant cone.

   4. (4) Inner volume of the targets is evacuated by laser heating.

   This approach has been demonstrated with a foam hemi sphere filled with the liquid $\text{D}_{2}$ ^{[Reference Norimatsu47]}.

Gaseous fuel filling by diffusion through a shell wall. The fuel gas is permeated through the wall in a controlled manner to prevent the wall buckling:

1. – The first approach is based on filling an individual shell mounted in the permeation cell. This approach is applied for the target preparation for ICF experiments on the OMEGA laser^{[Reference Stoeckl, Chiritescu, Delletres, Epstein, Glebov, Harding, Keck, Loucks, Lund, McCrory, McKenty, Marshall, Meyerhofer, Morse, Regan, Radha, Roberts, Sangster, Seka, Skupsky, Smalyuk, Sorce, Soures, Town, Li, Petrasso, Séguin, Fletcher, Paladino, Freeman, Izumi, Lerche and Phillips74]}. The fuel gas is permeated through the wall in a controlled manner to prevent the shell wall buckling. The cell is then cooled to ${\sim}20$  K or below to condense/freeze the gas.

2. – The second approach is based on filling a batch of free-standing shells at one time^{[Reference Aleksandrova and Belolipetskiy31, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75]} (see Section 3.2), which allows to shorten the fill time per target. The shells are placed in the shell container (SC). The diffusion technique can work in molecular or atomic (more rapid process) modes. Comparative characteristics of the both processes were studied in Refs. [Reference Koresheva68, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75]. After filling at 300 K, the SC with the filled shells is transported at the same temperature from the fill system to the layering module (LM) for carrying out the experiments on FST layering.

Before starting the experiments, the SC is cooled down to a temperature $T_{\text{d}}$ , which is significantly lower than 300 K. This is required for the SC depressurization, i.e., for the gas removal from the dead volume of the SC. The possibility of performing the procedure of SC depressurization under conditions excluding both the shell breakdown by internal pressure and the fuel leakage from the shells due to the reverse diffusion appears only under the temperature decrease: when the gas pressure drops down, the gas permeability decreases, and the strength of shell material rises. As the gas pressure in the shell does not depend on the shell material, the possibility of performing one variant or another is determined only by the shell strength and the value of its aspect ratio. In principle, two situations are possible: at a certain temperature, the tensile strength of the shell is sufficient to depressurize the SC when the fuel is still gaseous, or a necessary diminishing in pressure can be achieved only at $T_{\text{d}}<T_{\text{cp}}$ ( $T_{\text{cp}}$ is the critical point temperature), when the fuel in the SC becomes liquid. This determines the initial fuel state before FST layering: (1) gaseous state corresponds to $T_{\text{d}}>T_{\text{cp}}$ , (2) critical state corresponds to the critical point region $T\sim T_{\text{cp}}$ , (3) liquid state corresponds to the compressed liquid region at $T_{\text{s}}<T<T_{\text{cp}}$ , (4) two-phase state corresponds to the ‘liquid $+$ vapor’ state at $T$ ${<}$ $T_{\text{s}}$ , where $T_{\text{s}}$ is the temperature of the fuel separation into the liquid and gaseous phases.

The diffusion technique to ramp fill a batch of free-standing shells at one time with a highly pressurized fuel gas (up to 1000 atm at 300 K) was developed and practically realized at the Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (LPI/RAS)^{[Reference Aleksandrova and Belolipetskiy31, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75]}.

2.2 Mass production of the cryogenic targets

To solve the problem of mass production of the cryogenic targets, two approaches are considering: fluidized bed layering (USA, General Atomics^{[Reference Goodin, Aleksander, Brown, Frey, Gallix, Gibson, Maxwell, Nobile, Olson, Petzoldt, Raffray, Rochau, Schroen, Tillack, Rickman and Vermillion34, Reference Goodin44, Reference Petzoldt54, Reference Boehm76–Reference Boehm, Raffray, Alexander and Goodin78]}) and foam layering (USA^{[Reference Goodin44, Reference Ho, Salmonson, Clark, Lindl, Haan, Amendt and Wu79, Reference Skupski, Betti, Collins, Goncharov, McKenty, Radha and Epstein80]} and Japan^{[Reference Norimatsu81, Reference Iwamoto, Nagai, Nakai, Ito, Fujimura, Maekawa, Mito, Norimatsu, Okamoto, Motojima, Azechi and Mima82]}).

Fluidized bed layering technique is an attempt to form the cryogenic D–T layer of an acceptable quality inside a batch of unmounted shells using the beta-layering process. The following sequence of operational steps is applied^{[Reference Petzoldt54, Reference Boehm76–Reference Boehm, Raffray, Alexander and Goodin78]}:

1. – A batch of unmounted shells is placed inside a pressure vessel and it is filled there with gaseous D–T fuel by a diffusion process.

2. – While still in the pressure vessel, the targets are cooled below the triple point of D–T (19.79 K), which is followed by D–T fuel condensing and freezing on the bottom of the shells.

3. – Then the shells are transported into a fluidized bed, where the batch of unmounted shells begins to levitate in a rising flow of gaseous helium. It should be noted that gas pressure in the bed has to be low enough not to crash the thin-walled targets.

4. – During this process, nonuniformly frozen D–T form a uniform solid layer inside the shells according to the beta-layering process^{[Reference Koziozemski, Mapoles, Sater, Chernov, Moody, Lugten and Johnson21]}. Note that for smooth and uniform fuel layer formation using the beta-layering it is required that the isothermal environment around a target be better than ${<}1$  mK. A near-isothermal environment has to be maintained around each target in the fluidized bed through the random movement and spin of individual targets within a precisely controlled gas stream.

Operation of the fluidized bed with a massive of Au/Pd-coated PAMS at $T<10$  K was demonstrated in Ref. [Reference Petzoldt54] (Figure 6). Unfortunately, the experiments have shown that some of the shells are crushed as they bump each other during their levitation in the fluidized bed. This is a problem that must be solved. In addition, all the problems inherent to the beta-layering process will be inherent to the fluidized bed layering as well. Difficult and expensive technologies such as precision control of temperature, pressure and thermal uniformity of the environment are necessary during seed formation and D–T layer growth to create a really groove-free single crystal layer. Nevertheless, this method is being studied in the United States as a promise for mass production of IFE targets ^{[Reference Boehm76–Reference Boehm, Raffray, Alexander and Goodin78]}.

Figure 6. Fluidized bed with a massive of Au/Pd-coated PAMS shells of a 4 mm diameter. (a) Bed is out of the cryostat; (b) bed is inside the cryostat. Bed fluidized at 9 K (taken from Ref. [Reference Petzoldt54]).

Foam layering technique is another approach, which is under consideration in the research laboratories of the United States and Japan^{[Reference Goodin44, Reference Ho, Salmonson, Clark, Lindl, Haan, Amendt and Wu79–Reference Iwamoto, Nagai, Nakai, Ito, Fujimura, Maekawa, Mito, Norimatsu, Okamoto, Motojima, Azechi and Mima82]}. In this approach liquid fuel layer is distributed inside the foam capsule into a spherically symmetric layer due to an action of surface tension of the foam. Unfortunately, the application of foam capsule allows retaining liquid fuel in uniform configuration until the pores are not supersaturated. Note that according the calculation results given in Ref. [Reference Skupski, Betti, Collins, Goncharov, McKenty, Radha and Epstein80] it is necessary for the efficiency of the DD scheme that foam layer be supersaturated with 280  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ thick pure D–T layer disposed over the inner surface of the foam capsule. The spherical uniformity of pure liquid D–T layer is disrupted under an action of the gravity. Probably, this problem can be solved by the magnetic levitation technique^{[Reference Chatain and Nikolaev83]}. On the other hand, the calculations^{[Reference Ho, Salmonson, Clark, Lindl, Haan, Amendt and Wu79]} have shown that it is possible to optimize target parameters so that it would be possible to use, rather effectively, targets in which a porous layer is not supersaturated.

One of the critical issues of the foam layering is the following. During the process of liquid-to-solid fuel transition, the fuel density becomes higher; thus small voids arise in each pore. This results in the emergence of a fuel inhomogeneity in the layer volume.

A new concept for reactor targets mass production has been proposed in the United States^{[Reference Jones, Gram, Kentch and Harding41, Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69]}. It is based on programmable microfluidic electromechanical circuity to govern the processes of the foam shell fabrication, the shells filling with liquid fuel and targets transport. The feasibility of this concept to form the cryogenic D–T targets is being investigated in Refs. [Reference Jones, Gram, Kentch and Harding41, Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69] according to the following layout: (1) form liquid D–T into discrete droplets; (2) wick liquid into the foam shell (foam layering); (3) condense inert gas (Ne, Ar, Kr or Xe) onto an outer surface of foam target. An overcoat from solid inert gas serves as a barrier coating onto a foam; (4) form solid fuel layer when the target moves through a thermal gradient (from 20 to 19.5 K) at a rate of 0.001 K per 5 min; (5) inject target: an overcoat from solid inert gas ablates during target flight, and thus protect the target from overheating.

The experiments^{[Reference Jones, Gram, Kentch and Harding41, Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69]} showed the liquid $\text{D}_{2}$ -column levitation in the capillary under the action of electrostatic field followed by forming a droplet of the desired volume (Figure 7), and the liquid $\text{D}_{2}$ wicks completely and rapidly into the foam shell. It was found that developing a viable condensed-gas overcoat of the foam shell is critical to simplifying the D–T filling and target injection operation. The advantage of the microfluidics approach is that it ensures a faster fuel filling and thus reduces the tritium amount during target preparation. On the other hand, the layering time is still large: the process requires D–T layer cooling from 20 to 19.5 K with a rate of 0.001 K per 5 min^{[Reference Harding, Jones and Meyerhoffer69]}. Besides, there exist some open questions concerning a protective layer (overcoat), namely:

1. – Which is the required thickness and composition of the overcoat?

2. – Is the overcoat sublimation uniform enough during target injection?

The above questions require additional study.

Figure 7. First demonstration of dielectrophoretic behavior in a cryogenic liquid: electrostatic field has been used to levitate a column of liquid $\text{D}_{2}$ and form a droplet of the desired volume (taken from Ref. [Reference Boehm, Raffray, Alexander and Goodin77]).

As regards the application of the overcoat from a solid inert gas, it should be noted that the issue has a certain history. Such protective layers were first proposed by Hendrics and Johnson in 1979^{[Reference Hendricks and Johnson42]} via condensation of the inert gas on the outer surface of free-falling spherical shells from the solid fuel. A schematic of the facility, so-called a multilayer cryogenic reactor, is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Schematics of target production via a multilayer cryogenic reactor (taken from Ref. [Reference Hendricks and Johnson42]).

Another approach to form the outer protective cryogenic layer from a solidified gas has been proposed and demonstrated in Refs. [Reference Koresheva, Aleksandrova, Baranov, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Koshelev, Kuteev, Nikitenko, Tolokonnikov, Osipov, Timofeev, Timasheva and Yaguzinskiy43, Reference Aleksandrova, Chtcherbakov, Koresheva, Koshelev and Osipov84]. In these experiments a special rotating-and-bouncing cell (R&B cell) was used. Deposition of the outer protective cryogenic layer onto the target is presented in Figure 9, in which Figure 9(a) shows two polymer shells inside the R&B cell prior to the experiment. Exceptionally for the purposes of illustration, we set the experiment in the following way. Each shell encloses liquid $\text{H}_{2}$ at 14.6 K, which is readily seen at the bottom of each shell. In the top part of the shells (from the outside) there is a solid deposit of oxygen. After the R&B cell operation in the mixing mode the solid deposit becomes redistributed sufficiently uniform onto the outer surface of both shells [Figure 9(b)]. Note that under experiment conditions the shell #1 has a Pd coating of 15 nm thick, which is important for additional target protection. Allowing for the obtained results (opaque protective layer), we propose the following physical layout of the target formation with a protective cryogenic layer from the outside: filling the shell with gas, formation of the inner fuel layer, target characterization, and if the target is within the specifications, deposition of the outer protective cryogenic layer.

Figure 9. Deposition of a protective cryogenic layer onto the outside of the shells placed in the R&B cell. (a) Shells with a crystalline powder of solid $\text{O}_{2}$ on their tops: (a1) shell #1 with an outer Pd coating of 15 nm thick and (a2) shell #2; (b) the same shells with uniformly distributed solid $\text{O}_{2}$ : (b1) shell #1 and (b2) shell #2.

There are also other researches^{[Reference Norimatsu, Nagai, Takeda and Yamanaka85]} in which it has been theoretically proven that an outer ‘insulating’ foam layer provides an increased thermal robustness during the target injection into the target chamber. Inclusion of an empty plastic foam layer on the outside of the target provides thermal insulation that would delay the heat transfer to the D–T fuel and helps extend the target lifetime during injection.

Closing this section, note that the fluidized bed layering and the microfluidic concept are currently at the beginning stage of their development. The next step is to demonstrate these approaches with spherical targets filled with $\text{D}_{2}$ and D–T fuel. This means that all of the basic processes for target fabrication must be demonstrated though for individual targets (fuel filling, D–T layering and characterization of the D–T layer, cryogenic transfer, etc.). Changing to a mass target production (with accounting the interface problems) will be extraordinarily challenging for both techniques.

Note also that new approaches offer a great advantage of working with an array of FSTs. Their disadvantage at the layering stage is that they form an equilibrium anisotropic single crystal layer that, as a result, leads to the following problems:

1. – Long layering time (under the cooling rate of 0.001 K per 5 min).

2. – It becomes impossible to deliver the targets with anisotropic fuel into the reaction chamber without roughening of the layers^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Safronov, Timasheva, Timofeev and Tolokonnikov32, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva and Tolokonnikov86]}.

3. – Anisotropic fuel can lead to a distortion of the front of a shock wave (growth instabilities caused by grain-affected shock velocity variations). As shown in Ref. [Reference Bringa, Caro, Victoria and Park33], nanocrystalline NIF targets would be the best for their application for achieving efficient ignition.

3.1 Fuel layering in free-standing and line-moving targets

Because the fusion reactor operates at significant rates, it will need to be refueled during its burn period, and an FST transmission line becomes an integral part of any IFE reactor^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Nikitenko and Osipov49, Reference Koresheva87]}. It must supply about one million targets each day and transport them to the reaction chamber.

A key aspect of the target transmission line is elaboration of the efficient methods of cryogenic target fabrication. The targets must be free standing and the fusion fuel inside the targets must have such a structure (the grain size should be scaled back into the nanometer range), which supports the fuel layer survivability under target injection and transport through the reaction chamber. The ultra-fine fuel layers refer to as advance materials for application to fusion target fabrication in the form that meets the requirements of implosion physics^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}.

To meet the above requirements, at the LPI/RAS significant progress has been made in the technology development based on rapid fuel layering inside moving FSTs, which refers to as FST-layering method^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46, Reference Koresheva, Aleksandrova, Osipov, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Koshelev, Nikitenko, Tolokonnikov, Yaguzinskiy, Baranov, Safronov, Timofeev, Kuteev and Kapralov52, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva and Tolokonnikov86–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}. The aim of these targets is to demonstrate large benefits of a ‘layering – plus – delivery’ scheme for a rep-rated target fabrication and delivery (Figure 10). Thus, a fundamental difference of the FST-layering method from generally accepted approaches is that it works with the free-standing and line-moving targets (see Figure 10), which allows one to economically fabricate large target quantities and to continuously (or at a required rate) inject them at the laser focus.

Figure 10. High repetition rate and mass production of inexpensive fuel targets can be developed on the bases of the FST-transmission line as an integral part of any IFE reactor.

During FST layering, a batch mode is applied, and high cooling rates ( $q_{\text{FST}}=1{-}50~\text{K}/\text{s}$ ) are maintained to form isotropic ultra-fine solid layers inside free-rolling targets. High cooling combined with fuel doping (neon, argon and tritium) results in creation of stable ultimate-disordered structures with a high defect density or isotropic medium. The effect of additives is as follows^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}:

1. – They initiate a mass dislocation growth that prevents the formation of a coarse-grained crystalline phase and enhances the mechanical strength of the layers.

2. – They decelerate the diffusion transport processes and raise the diffusion activation energy.

3. – They work as stabilizing agents keeping the grain size stable and, as a consequence, keeping the thermal and mechanical stability of the ultra-fine cryogenic layers.

The results obtained for solid hydrogen samples^{[Reference Alekseeva, Natsik, Romashkin, Vachtchenko, Garbuz and Lyahno101]} have shown that even a slight granularity growth (grain size decrease by a factor of 1.4) significantly increases the deformation strengthening coefficient along the entire deformation curve. The strength limit also increases by ${\sim}1.3$ times.

In addition, the important parameter is the following value: target lifetime on a temperature scale $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}T$ , which is the temperature interval in which a stable ultra-fine layer structure can exist. Our experiments showed that for FST technology this interval has the largest possible range, from 4.2 K right up to the temperature of solid fuel melting at the triple point^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov90, Reference Koresheva, Osipov, Timasheva and Yaguzinskiy93]}.

Therefore, the ultra-fine layers obtained by FST can be referred to as layers with inherent survival features because they have enhanced mechanical strength and thermal stability^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Safronov, Timasheva, Timofeev and Tolokonnikov32, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva and Tolokonnikov86, Reference Koresheva94]}. This is a significant factor for layer quality survival during the target delivery.

The term ‘ultra-fine’ layer relates to a fuel state, which is characterized by an ultra-fine microstructural length or a grain size. It can be classified into the following structural categories: near-nano (submicron) crystalline state (grain size in the range of 0.1–0.3  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}$ m), nanocrystalline state (typically, grain size ${\leqslant}100$  nm), amorphous state (characteristic spatial scale or the order parameter ${\sim}1$  nm). Very often, near-nanocrystalline state is called ‘fine-grained’ crystalline. The properties of nanostructured materials deviate from those of single crystals (or coarse-grained crystalline) and glasses with the same average chemical composition. Nanocrystalline materials and coatings are a challenging research topic at the LPI/RAS in the area of target science and technology^{[Reference Koresheva87]}.

The FST-layering method is promising for the formation of a stable ultra-fine layer from D–T mixture having the molecular composition: 25% of $\text{D}_{2}$ , 50% of deuterium tritide molecules, and 25% of $\text{T}_{2}$ ( $\text{T}_{2}$ in D–T is considered as a high-melting additive with respect to $\text{D}_{2}$ and deuterium tritide).

Figure 11. FST-layering method provides a rapid symmetrization and formation of solid ultra-fine layers. (a) Schematic of the FST-LM (100-projection micro-tomograph is used for cryo target control^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Ospov, Panina, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Tonshin and Yaguzinskiy97–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}); (b) target before layering (‘liquid $+$ vapor’ state of fuel); (c) target after FST layering (symmetrical solid layer); (d) single-spiral LC (1); (e) single-spiral LC (1) mounted with a TC (2); (f) fill chamber for filling the shells with highly pressurized gas fuel (1000 atm at 300 K); (g) elements of the SC.

3.2 FST-layering experiments according to the scheme of ‘layering $+$ delivery’

With contributions from leading works, this section reviews the most up-to-date progress in the development of the FST-layering method. During FST layering, two processes are mostly responsible for maintaining a uniform solid layer formation:

1. – Firstly, the target rotation when it rolls along the layering channel (LC, single- or double-spiral) results in $a$ liquid layer symmetrization.

2. – Secondly, the heat transport outside the target via conduction through a small contact area between the shell wall and the wall of the LC (metal hollow tube helium cooled outside) results in a liquid layer freezing.

The total layering time is typically less than 15 s, which has a side benefit in the view of tritium inventory minimization^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov and Chtcherbakov91, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov and Chtcherbakov92, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Kalabuhov, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe95, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov98, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}. The LC is a major element, which ensures the target technology development according to the ‘layering $+$ delivery’ scheme. Figure 11 schematically shows the operational scenario of the FST-layering method which includes:

1. – FST- LM works with a target batch at one time.

2. – The transport process is the target injection between the basic units of the LM: SC, LC and test chamber (TC).

3. – During moving, the target surface is not isothermal.

4. – Targets move top-down in the LC (Figures 11–13) in a rapid succession of one after another.

5. – All these allow a high-repetition-rate injection of the cryogenic target to the TC.

6. – TC is used for cryogenic target quality control: precise tomographic characterization^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Golov, Chtcherbakov, Makeeva, Koresheva and Osipov102–Reference Koresheva, Osipov, Aleksandrova, Nikitenko, Tolokonnikov, Listratov, Timofeev, Kupriyashin, Leonov, Koshelev, Baranov, Usachev, Timasheva and Gromov104]} and threshold characterization^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy and Pisarnitskaya105]}.

7. – TC is a prototypical interface unit between the LM and target injector (TI).

Figure 12. Spiral LCs in a (a) and (b) single- or (c) double-coiling geometry. The spiral material is copper in (b) and (c) and stainless steel in (a).

Figure 13. Combined layering channel (CLC) which consists of two spirals: acceleration spiral (spiral 1, red coiling) and deceleration spiral (spiral 2, blue coiling). (a) CLC schematics; (b) mock-up of the acceleration spiral channel; (c) mock-up of the deceleration spiral channel.

The LC is a special insert into the LM cryostat (Figure 14), a certain part of which must be at cryogenic temperatures. For successful experiments, the medium immediately surrounding the target inside the LC is vacuum, which is promising for creation of the interface units. Several interchangeable LC – cylindrical (wide and narrow under vertical and inclined geometry) and spiral – were manufactured and tested. Note that FST layering does not require that the target surface be near to isothermal.

Figure 14. Illustrates of the operation principle of the FST-LM and shows the mutual alignment of the basic units. (a) An SC with a shell batch for repetition-rate injection of the filled shells to the LC [material for work with D–T fuel are low-carbon austenitic stainless steels, GOST 5632-72: 03Kh18N12 (304L), 03Kh18N10T, 03Kh17N14M3 (316L)]; (b) assembly procedure (1, cryogenic transport mechanism; 2, SC; 3, LC; 4, TC mounted in position 5); (c) cryostat (overall dimensions: $0.21~\text{m}\times 1.3$  m).

Table 1. Design specifications calculated for CLC with two spirals (for the time $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}}\sim 15$  s).

The LC must have a well-defined geometry in order to satisfy the condition:

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{form}}\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{form}}$ is the layering time and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}}$ is the time of target residence in the LC. A key problem for this condition realization is the determination of the LC parameters: the spiral angle ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ is inclination angle), the total spiral length $(L)$ , the number of spiral turns ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$ ) and one-turn diameter ( $\varnothing$ ). A set of the single-spiral and double-spiral LCs is shown in Figure 12. The double-spiral LC are our latest developments in the area of optimization of the FST-layering process for the fabrication of cryogenic targets with a diameter over 2 mm^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Kalabuhov, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe95, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe96, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]} because they maintain the gain in the target residence time and fuel layer symmetrization. The mock-up testing revealed a considerable increase in the value of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}}$ inside a double-spiral LC with respect to that of a single-spiral one. For example, for the single- and double-spiral LC with the same parameters ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=23$ turns, $\varnothing =38$  mm, $L=400$  mm, material: cuprum tube $\varnothing 6.3~\text{mm}\times 0.75$  mm) the values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}}$ were 9.8 and 23.5 s in Figures 12(b) and 12(c) (LC No.1). The LC No.2 in Figure 12(c) has practically the same parameters: $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=22$ turns, $\varnothing =39$  mm, $L=440$  mm, material: cuprum tube $\varnothing 6~\text{mm}\times 1$  mm, but the spiral angle slightly varies along the spiral length. In doing so, we can scale up or scale down the target speed during its rolling in the LC. One of the most interesting cases is a CLC, which consists of two spirals (Figure 13): acceleration spiral (spiral 1, red coiling) and deceleration spiral (spiral 2, blue coiling) in order to zero the target speed at the combined LC (CLC) output^{[Reference Koresheva87]}. The problem formulation is as follows: determine the CLC parameters for the target residence time $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{\text{res}}\sim 15~\text{s}$ , for the inclination angle of spiral 1 $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{1}<13^{\circ }$ (to realize just the rolling motion without any sliding), for the inclination angle of spiral 2 $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}\sim 0^{\circ }$ and for the total height of the CLC ${\sim}1$  m. The computation results are presented in Table 1.

Table 2. Isotropic ultra-fine fuel for application to IFE targets fabrication^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}.

Table 3. FST-layering time for different targets^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}.

a Note: During FST layering the parameter $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}$ depends on material & design of the shell and affects the layering time.

Note that the CLC can be of any configuration (two or more spirals or including a conical one) as long as it provides the required layering time and fuel layer symmetrization. We also plan experiments on the FST layering within the LC like a three-leaved figure (trefoil) in the cross-section. All these allow the formation of cryogenic targets of different designs by the FST-layering method (Tables 2 and 3)^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99, Reference Nakai and Miley106]}.

The physical layout of the FST-formation cycle (fuel filling – fuel layering – target injection) is as follows:

1. – Fuel filling of a shell batch placed in the SC (CH shells used at LPI/RAS are shown in Figure 15).

2. – SC transport from the fill system to the LM (Figure 14).

3. – SC cooling and depressurization without shell destruction.

4. – Shell injection one by one from the SC to the LC.

5. – FST layering within moving FSTs inside the LC (layering $+$ delivery).

6. – Repetition-rate injection of the finished cryogenic targets to the TC from the LC, the bottom part of which is a gravitational injector^{[Reference Koresheva94]}.

Figure 15. In our research we have used the CH shells made at different laboratories. (a) The Thermonuclear Target Lab (diameter ${\leqslant}1.8$  mm LPI, Russia); (b) large CH shells (diameter ${\geqslant}1.8$  mm) have been delivered by the Science and Technology Facility Council (STFC, UK); (c) CH shells covered with a thin Pb layer have been delivered by the Institute for Laser Engineering (ILE, Osaka Univ., Japan).

Figure 16. Repetition-rate target injection under gravity from the LC to the TC. (a) Target during injection, $T=4.2$ K; (b) target injection rate is 0.1 Hz (free target location in the TC, $T=4.2$  K); (c) target injection in to a cylindrical cavity (1, cavity before injection; 2, injected target inside the cavity).

Scientific reasons for the concept of cryogenic target transport by injection in the course of its fabrication and delivery at the laser focus were given in Refs. [Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva and Osipov107–Reference Koresheva, Osipov and Aleksandrova109]. The target injection can be carry out directly to the TC with a free target positioning onto the chamber bottom [Figures 16(a) and 16(b)] or to a special cylindrical cavity [Figure 16(c)]. Some other options for the target injection and positioning are demonstrated in Figures 17–20. The target injection and positioning using a tripod [Figure 17(a)] was proposed and examined at the LPI/RAS^{[Reference Koresheva94]} (Figure 20) for the 300 kJ laser facility (ISKRA-6^{[Reference Belkov and Garanin110]}).

Figure 17. Other options for target injection and location in space. (a) Using tripod at room temperature; (b) using HTSC for noncontact manipulation, positioning and transport of the free-standing cryogenic targets to develop maglev systems (b).

Figure 18. The FST facility for levitation experiments below 20 K: (1) closed-cycle optical helium cryostat (CryoTrade & CryoMech); (2) vacuum-pumping system (Pfeiffer); (3) optical control system; (4) sample holder with CH shell inside it; (5) CH shell.

A promising way is the possibility of using magnetic levitation (maglev) transport systems for noncontact manipulation, positioning and delivery of the cryogenic targets (Figures 17(b)–19). We focus on the transport system development based on movement of high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) over a permanent magnet guideway (PMG) systems^{[Reference Koresheva, Aleksandrova, Ivanenko, Kalabukhov, Koshelev, Kupriashin, Mitsen, Klenov, Osipov and Panina56, Reference Aleksandrova, Akunets, Bezotosnyi, Blokhin, Gavrilkin, Ivanenko, Koresheva, Koshelev, Mitsen and Panina57, Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Akunets, Bezotosnyi, Blokhin, Gavrilkin, Ivanenko, Koresheva, Koshelev, Mitsen and Panina111–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov113]}. An active guidance was achieved by using the HTSC ceramics ( $\text{YBa}_{2}\text{Cu}_{\text{3}}\text{O}_{7-X}$ , often abbreviated as Y123) and different PMGs. The HTSC materials allow working in two research lines: indirect delivery when the target is placed into a sabot (special capsule for target carrier) and direct delivery when target moves in a solo flight without any target carrier. The study is designed to generate different regimes of the HTSC sample levitation for testing the conditions that can be applied to development of Maglev transport systems. A prototypical HTSC-sabot (superconducting substrates) were used as a carrier for polymer (CH) shells in the presence of a magnetic field of different configurations [Figures 17(b1) and 17(b2)]. A special interest here will be to also see how the CH shell levitates in a solo flight without any support [Figure 17(b3)]. To do this we deposited an outer covering (Y123-layer) onto the outside of a 2 mm diameter CH shell. The Y123-layer is a composite from a viscous polymer having micro-particles (superconducting powder) from Y123-ceramics. The check, using which experiments have been executed, shows the FST facility (Figure 18) based on the optical helium cryostat of a closed cycle for levitation experiments below 20 K. Figure 19 shows the levitation of the system ‘CH shell $+$ Y123-layer’ at $T=80$  K and at $T=18$  K in the TC of the cryostat. It is notable that at all temperatures varying in the experiments from 6.0 to 80 K we obtain similar results on the HTSC sample levitation. It allows us to run the experiments on the development of the maglev transport systems at 80 K [Figure 19(b)], as such experiments are not available in the TC of the cryostat because of its small sizes (5  $\text{mm}^{3}$ ) [Figure 19(c)].

Figure 19. Levitation of CH shell with an outer Y123-layer. (a) Photo of ‘CH shell $+$ Y123-layer’ at room temperature (300 K); (b) ‘CH shell $+$ Y123-layer’ levitation at $T=80$  K over linear PMG; (c) ‘CH shell $+$ Y123-layer’ levitation at $T=18$  K in the TC of the cryostat.

Figure 20. FST supply system (SS) for 300 kJ laser facility (ISKRA-6). (a) Geometrical arrangement of the FST-SS in the target chamber of the laser facility; (b) cryogenic target fabrication and gravitational delivery at the center of the target chamber.

In the IFE research, these results attract a significant interest due to their potentials for almost frictionless motion, i.e., the HTSC–maglev suspension technologies can be used for enhancement of the operating efficiency of an injection process. Thus, the HTSC–maglev transport systems, because of their contactless nature, can be an excellent springboard for the development of a hybrid TI^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Golov, Chtcherbakov, Makeeva, Koresheva and Osipov102]}.

3.3 Hydrogen fuel with an isotropic ultra-fine structure

Ultra-fine materials (near-nano and nanocrystalline) with new functionalities show great promise for application to IFE^[114]. Substantial progress has been made in the past decade in developing target fabrication capabilities to form an ultra-fine hydrogen fuel^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Nikitenko and Osipov49, Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}. Further discussion is required to review the structure–property relationships in order to understand the fundamental concepts underlying the observed physical and mechanical characteristics.

Over the last 20 years, the LPI/RAS has been devising the structure-sensitive methods of forming high-quality hydrogen fuel layers with an isotropic structure to meet the requirements of implosion physics (see original papers^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva and Osipov89, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov90]} and further developments^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Safronov, Timasheva, Timofeev and Tolokonnikov32, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Nikitenko and Osipov49, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva and Tolokonnikov86–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88, Reference Koresheva, Osipov, Timasheva and Yaguzinskiy93–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}). As shown, a considerable anisotropy of HCP phases of $\text{H}_{2}$ and $\text{D}_{2}$ ^{[Reference Wanner and Meyer.100]} results in the layer degrading due to roughening of the layer surface before the target reaches the chamber center, or can result in the shock velocity dependence on the grain orientation^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Safronov, Timasheva, Timofeev and Tolokonnikov32, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva and Tolokonnikov86–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}.

Taking into account that the extent of anisotropy is 20% for longitudinal sound and 33% for transverse sound^{[Reference Wanner and Meyer.100]}, the formation of isotropic solid fuel is of vital importance. In this context, the FST-layering method is a valuable tool to form isotropic ultra-fine cryogenic layers under the following conditions: high cooling rates ( $q_{\text{FST}}=1{-}50~\text{K}/\text{s}$ ) combined with high-melting additives to fuel content in the range of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}=0.5\%$ –20%. Figures 21–23 illustrate the influence of these conditions on the cryogenic layer structure and quality.

Figure 21. Different cooling rates give rise to the cryogenic $\text{H}_{2}$ -layer formation with a different granularity. No additives are used in these experiments.

Figure 22. High-melting additives to fuel (frames 2 and 4) are critically important as stabilizing agents to prevent the grain size growth.

Figure 23. Success of FST-layering method is conditioned by synchronous use of high cooling rates and high-melting additives to hydrogen isotopes. (a) 550 $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ diameter glass shell; (b) 1.23 mm diameter CH shell. The amount of additives was 20% of Ne in order to modeling the role of tritium in D–T fuel; (c) a Fourier spectrum of the bright band of the cryogenic layer given in (b).

No additives are used in the experiments presented in Figure 21. Different cooling rates give rise to the cryogenic $\text{H}_{2}$ -layer formation with a different granularity. Transparent cryogenic layers are formed only at extremely high cooling rates. They are more than $100~\text{K}/\text{s}$ (see on the right of Figure 21). In the next set of experiments conditions have been changed (Figure 22). Moderate cooling rates (only 2–10  $\text{K}/\text{s}$ ) were combined with using different additives to the hydrogen fuel. In addition, the metal outer coatings were deposited on the CH shells to balance the cooling conditions. The coatings were made from Pd [15 nm on the first two, Figure 22(a)] and Pt/Pd [20 nm on the last two Figure 22(b)]. Then these shells were filled with pure gaseous fuel and gaseous fuel having the doping agents: Figure 22(a): frame 1, pure $\text{H}_{2}$ ; frame 2, $\text{H}_{2}+5\%\text{HD}$ ; Figure 22(b): frame 3, pure $\text{D}_{2}$ ; frame 4, $\text{D}_{2}+3\%\text{Ne}$ . Even frames (2 and 4) in Figure 22 show a significant influence of the applied additives on the hydrogen layering.

In Figures 23(a) and 23(b), the amount of additives was 20% (Ne) in order to model the D–T fuel. The cooling rates are 8  $\text{K}/\text{s}$ for glass shell and 2  $\text{K}/\text{s}$ for CH shell. The tomographic characterization (100-projection micro-tomograph^{[Reference Koresheva, Osipov, Aleksandrova, Nikitenko, Tolokonnikov, Listratov, Timofeev, Kupriyashin, Leonov, Koshelev, Baranov, Usachev, Timasheva and Gromov104]}) showed that the $\text{D}_{2}$ layers are spherical and smooth, meeting the specification requirements $\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}_{2}=0.15~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}<1~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ [Figure 23(c)]. We already note that the FST-layering method is much promising for the formation of a stable ultra-fine layer from D–T (25% of $\text{T}_{2}$ ) because $\text{T}_{2}$ is considered as a high-melting additive with respect to $\text{D}_{2}$ and deuterium tritide.

Thus, fuel doping (high-melting additives with regard to the hydrogen isotopes and their mixtures) is the condition which answers to the practical realization of the FST-layering method for application to IFE. It is connected with the fact that, without additives the cryogenic layer formation of the required quality is possible only at very high cooling rates ( ${\geqslant}100~\text{K}/\text{s}$ , Figure 21). For the creation of a reliable and inexpensive FST technology it is necessary to reduce the cooling rates by one and a half or even two orders of magnitude. Using the additives allows one to reach the goal.

Further we try to formulate some basic aspects that illustrate the difference between the beta-layering method and the FST-layering method.

The former requires slow cooling rates ( ${\sim}10^{-5}~\text{K}/\text{s}$ ) and high-temperature control ( ${<}1$  mK) for avoiding the formation of multiple crystals of different orientations, and for obtaining a single crystal layer (more exactly, a real single crystal and not ideal one) from anisotropic hydrogen isotopes. The layer growth usually starts with a single crystal seed. The process to grow up all the layer from this seed takes many hours, and the grain boundaries which roughen the layer surface can occur. In this case the layers become unstable relevant to the growth of local defects under thermal and mechanical loads, and can decrease the odds for achieving ignition at NIF.

The latter requires the high cooling rates ( ${\sim}10^{2}~\text{K}/\text{s}$ ) and nonisothermal target to stimulate the occurrence of a tremendous amount of crystals of different orientations. This allows to reduce the grain size and suppress the fuel anisotropy. Moreover, near-nano and nanostructured materials exhibit some peculiar mechanical and physical properties, e.g., an increased mechanical strength^{[Reference Suzdalev115]}. These layers are assembled from the ultra-fine crystallites or building blocks. Since the grain sizes are sufficiently small, the grain boundaries make up a major portion of the materials, and strongly affect their properties. As shown in Ref. [Reference Gudilin116], it is possible to program the properties of such materials through the control of their structural features, more specifically the grain size, taking into account that their structure is mainly formed from the grain boundaries, and a large portion of the atoms resides in these grain boundaries.

Thus, for the beta-layering method, changing the conditions under which the real single crystal layers are grown up stimulates the dynamic grain boundaries and results in local defect growths, so-called grooves (e.g., under thermal and mechanical loads in time between the moment just after target preparation and the laser shot).

For the FST-layering method, the grain boundaries in the ultra-fine fuel layers allow to obtain many useful and unique thermal, mechanical, magnetic, electrical and optical properties^{[Reference Suzdalev115, Reference Gudilin116]} which can be applied to enhance the target performance during implosion.

At present stage, the R&D program at the LPI/RAS proposes to undertake a research effort, in which contemporary advances in physical and chemical engineering science on material structurization will be applied to accomplish specific technological tasks for further optimization of the FST-layering method. One more option to fuel material structurization is cryogenic layer fabrication in the conditions of periodic mechanical influence^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Akunetc, Timasheva and Panina117]}. As is well known from literature^{[Reference Danilov118–Reference Ovsienko120]}, existence of external periodic impacts on a liquid phase in the course of its crystallization allows to regulate a granularity of the solid phase. External periodic mechanical influence leads to the fact that, since some time point determined by the amplitude and frequency of a wave, the growth of ice-forming nuclei has stopped. Their further evolution happens in two ways: either a part of nuclei is completely dissolved, or the survived nuclei gets to the dynamic equilibrium mode at which the nuclei sizes oscillate around a constant value, and their concentration in time does not change any more.

Below, we present the investigation into the process of cryogenic layer formation under conditions of the periodic mechanical influence on the fuel^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Akunetc, Timasheva and Panina117]}. The investigation is carried out to reduce the cooling rates in the presence of vibrations for making the FST technology not only more efficient for reactor-scale targets, but also more reliable and inexpensive for a laser IFE power plant.

To meet the goal, the LPI/RAS has developed a piezo-vibration LM – the R&B cell, which is constructively placed into the cryostat [Figure 24(a)]^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Chtcherbakov, Koresheva, Koshelev and Osipov84, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Akunetc, Timasheva and Panina117]}. In the R&B cell, the shells with fuel [Figure 24(b)] are cooled via the heat conductivity during impact, and the solid cryogenic layers are formed within vibrating shells. Note that a vibrating membrane (piezo-substrate) is an integral part of the R&B cell. The couple ‘membrane-&-target’ is driven by an input signal generated due to the inverse piezoelectric effect. Modulation of the input signal impresses information on the carrier frequency and amplitude [Figure 24(a)]. While the bouncing mode is applied, the value of the relative amplitude $A=H/2R$ ( $H$ is the height of the maximum shell raising, $R$ is the shell radius) can vary within the wide bounds from 1.5 to 10 shell diameters depending on the input signal frequency. It allows one to modify the key experimental parameters (mechanical and thermal) for influencing the fuel microstructure and intensifying the creation of isotropic ultra-fine fuel layers.

Figure 24. Assembly of the R&B cell with the FST-LM. (a) Schematic of the experiment; (b) a general view of the optical TC with targets placed onto the cryogenic piezo-substrate (frames 1 and 2).

The obtained results are shown in Figure 25. The spherical polymer shells made by the LPI/RAS were used in these experiments. Their parameters are as follows: diameters are $\varnothing =1$ –2 mm, the hydrogen fuel is $\text{H}_{2}$ , $\text{D}_{2}$ or their mixtures filled at 300 K to pressures in the range of $P_{\text{f}}=100$ –450 atm. The shells with fuel were placed onto a piezo-substrate – a thin piezoelectric crystal with fastened edges. Then the shells were cooled to a temperature slightly above the triple point one ( $T_{\text{tp}}=13.9$  K for $\text{H}_{2}$ and $T_{\text{tp}}=18.7$  K for $\text{D}_{2}$ ). The piezo-substrate temperature is 4.2 K. The heat exchange during impact goes between a warm target and a cold piezo-substrate, which results in the fuel freezing in the presence of vibrations. The input signal amplitude was 75 V, and the vibration frequency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}$ was in the wide range of 0.3 kHz–3.0 MHz. The values of the cooling rates $q$ were from $10^{-5}~\text{K}/\text{s}$ (beta-layering method) to 1  $\text{K}/\text{s}$ (a lower value for the FST-layering method).

Figure 25. Solid layers formation with a different microstructure using the cryogenic piezo-vibrator placed in the R&B cell. (a) $\text{D}_{2}$ (diameter ${\sim}1.35$  mm,  $P_{\text{f}}=350$  atm); (b)  $\text{H}_{2}$ (diameter ${\sim}1.5$  mm,  $P_{\text{f }}=445$ atm).

Figure 25(a) shows the shells cooling down to $T_{\text{tp}}=18.7$  K through a small contact area between the shell and the piezo-substrate. The CH shells ( $\varnothing \,\sim \,1.35$  mm) are filled with $\text{D}_{2}$ up to 350 atm at 300 K. The cooling rate is $q=0.1~\text{K}/\text{s}<q_{\text{FST}}=1{-}50~\text{K}/\text{s}$ , and the initial $\text{D}_{2}$ state in the shell is ‘liquid $+$ vapor’ [Figure 25(a1)]. The experiments showed that under vibration loading the $\text{D}_{2}$ -ice structures are very different:

1. – No vibrations ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0$ ) – formation of a coarse-grained crystalline layer [Figure 25(a2)];

2. – Weak vibrations ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=2.25$ –3.5 kHz, $A=H/R<4$ ) – typical crystalline structures become more smoothed due to arising of fine-grained clusters [Figure 25(a3)];

3. – Strong vibrations ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=3.75$  kHz, $A=H/R\sim 10$ ) – formation of an ultra-fine deuterium ice, which quite uniformly covers the inner surface of the target shell [Figure 25(a4)].

Figure 25(b) shows the shells cooling down to $T_{\text{tp}}=13.9$  K through a small contact area between the shell and piezo-substrate. The CH shells ( $\varnothing \sim 1.5$  mm) are filled with $\text{H}_{2}$ up to 445 atm at 300 K. The cooling rates are $q\sim 0.1~\text{K}/\text{s}$ [Figures 25(b2) and 25(b3)] and $q\sim 0.5~\text{K}/\text{s}$ [Figure 25(b4)] that is less than $q_{\text{FST}}$ . The initial $\text{H}_{2}$ state inside the shell is ‘liquid $+$ vapor’ [Figure 25(b1)].

We have obtained the following results:

1. – No vibrations ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0$ ), $q=0.1~\text{K}/\text{s}$ coarse-grained crystalline layer [Figure 25(b2)].

2. – At the same $q=0.1~\text{K}/\text{s}$ , but at the vibration presence (2.4 kHz) the layer structure becomes more smoothed [Figure 25(b3)].

3. – Under synchronous rise in the level of vibrations ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\sim 10$  kHz) and the cooling rate up to $q=0.5~\text{K}/\text{s}$ (but ${<}q_{\text{FST}}$ ), there is formation of an ultra-fine hydrogen structure [Figure 25(b4)].

The obtained results on the target layering in the R&B cell are of primary importance because they demonstrate a possibility to reduce the cooling rates typical for ultra-fine layers with the help of the vibration influence on the liquid fuel during its freezing, and, what is more important, without any high-melting additives to a fuel content.

Therefore, we plan to make experiments using a classical FST-LM combined with a special vibrator for launching the high-frequency waves in the top part of the LC, which work as a wave guide, maintaining a vibration loading on the targets during their layering.

Closing this section, it should be noted that depending on the formation method (more specifically, on the cooling rate) and the experimental conditions (influence of additives or vibrations), the solid fuel layer can be in the state with different microstructural scaling or grain size: isotropic ultra-fine layers or anisotropic molecular macro crystals (like real single crystals, e.g., as a result of the beta-layering). Determination of an optimal fuel microstructure (permissible grain size and anisotropy level of the solid fuel) is of critical importance (see Table 2) because it allows making provision for the operating efficiency of IFE power plant. It concerns both the possibility of forming the high-quality, high-strength and heat-resistant fuel layers, and the possibility of regular propagation of the shock wave, the front of which has to be extremely smooth.

For all these reasons, the FST-layering method is a promising candidate for the development of the FST-transmission line at a high-repetition-rate capability intended for mass manufacturing of IFE cryogenic targets.

3.4 Current status and planes of the research program of the LPI/RAS

A broad R&D program for large target fabrication and their delivery at the center of the target chamber of an MJ-laser facility were set up at the LPI/RAS in 1993. As a result of long-term research effort, the LPI/RAS gained a unique experience in the development of the FST supply system (FST-SS) for target production with an ultra-fine fuel layer within polymer shells of 1–2 mm diameter. The LPI–RAS has demonstrated the efficiency of the FST technologies in building a facility operating in a batch mode for mass production of cryogenic targets and meeting all the manufacturing requirements.

A first prototypical FST-SS has been operational since May 1999^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Osipov, Tolokonnikov, Baranov, Listratov, Soloviev, Timofeev, Usachev, Belolipetskiy, Rivkis and Yaquzhinskiy46]}. The system maintained the fuel filling up to 1000 atm at 300 K, fuel layering inside moving free-standing polymer shells, and injecting the finished cryogenic targets into the TC. The FST-SS has the following operational characteristics:

1. (1) Allows to form fuel layers ( $W=20$ –100  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ ) within the free-standing-&-line-moving polymer shells of 0.8–1.8 mm in diameter.

2. (2) Allows to create cryogenic targets in a batch-&-repetition rate mode with a rate of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0.1$ Hz.

3. (3) Allows to create isotropic fuel layers in a stable ultra-fine state that reduces the risks of target degradation:

   1. – isotropic ultra-fine fuel allows targets to survive mechanical and thermal loads during their injection and transport through the reaction (target) chamber;

   2. – isotropic ultra-fine fuel allows to mitigate the perturbations during confinement and to prevent the implosion degradation caused by ablation-front-driven instabilities.

4. (4) Allows to minimize tritium inventories in the FST-SS due to the following features:

   1. – minimum spatial scale of FST-SS due to a close packaging of FSTs;

   2. – minimum layering time: less than 15 s at the expense of high cooling rates;

   3. – target transport by injection between the basic FST-SS elements: SC–LC–TC.

5. (5) At the moment, the most inexpensive technology in the world in comparison with any other target system based on traditional technologies^{[Reference Nakai and Miley106, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev and Ospov121]}.

The next step is the FST-SS development^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Kalabuhov, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe95, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe96, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]} for High Power laser Energy Research (HiPER) project: $E_{L}\sim 200$  kJ, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}>1$  Hz, targets $\varnothing >2$  mm. A conceptual baseline target (BT-2) is of two types. Their dimensions are as follows^{[Reference Tolley, ben Saïd, Koresheva, Perin, Perlado, Schaumann, Schurtz and Spindloe40]}: BT-2 is a 2.094 mm diameter compact polymer shell with a 3 $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ thick wall. The solid layer thickness is $W=211~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ ; BT-2a consists of a 2.046 mm diameter compact polymer shell (3 $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ thick also) having a D–T filled CH foam ( $W_{\text{foam}}=70~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ ) onto its inner surface. Onto the inner foam surface there is a solid layer ( $W=$ 120 $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ ) of pure D–T.

The theoretical efforts of the LPI/RAS have focused on the development of computational models of the HiPER targets response during FST-formation cycle: fuel filling – fuel layering – target injection. Using the target production scheme (TPS) codes^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov and Chtcherbakov91, Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov and Chtcherbakov92, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Kalabuhov, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe95–Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]} allows planning the FST-layering experiments and studying the behavior of the targets in the FST-SS for HiPER (FST-SS–HiPER). Within modeling we take into account the LM prototype operation not only as an off-line unit but also as an integrated part of the FST-SS–HiPER working in the high-repetition-rate regime. Operational-&-risks-reduction analysis of an LM-HiPER adaptation to using the radioactive D–T fuel was completed as well^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Kalabuhov, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe95, Reference Aleksandrova, Belolipetskiy, Koresheva, Koshelev, Malinina, Mitina, Panina, Chtcherbakov, Tolley, Edwards and Spindloe96, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}. The input parameters for FST-SS–HiPER computation are as follows:

1. – Initial target configuration of HiPER-scale targets.

2. – Properties database at room and cryogenic temperatures.

3. – Thermal environment during the FST-formation cycle.

4. – Stress environment during the FST-formation cycle (transport process is target injection between fundamental system elements: SC–LC–TC).

The computations of the FST-layering time for the HiPER-scale targets are given in Table 3 for $T_{\text{in}}=37$  K and $T_{\text{in}}=27$  K ( $T_{\text{in}}$ is the temperature just before the FST layering) in comparison with other targets of different designs. The results obtained for $T_{\text{in}}=31$  K are presented in Table 4 for the single-spiral LC, and in Table 1 for the CLC.

Table 4. Optimized FST-parameters for HiPER targets^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov99]}.

Based on these results the LPI/RAS developed the FST-SS–HiPER for targets with a diameter more than 2 mm. The FST-SS–HiPER works in a batch mode at an injection rate of 100 targets per 1–10 s. In doing so, it is supposed to use multiple target protection methods such as metal reflecting coatings^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Gromov, Koresheva, Koshelev, Osipov and Yaguzinskiy75, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}, outer protective cryogenic layers^{[Reference Koresheva, Aleksandrova, Baranov, Bazdenkov, Chtcherbakov, Koshelev, Kuteev, Nikitenko, Tolokonnikov, Osipov, Timofeev, Timasheva and Yaguzinskiy43, Reference Aleksandrova, Chtcherbakov, Koresheva, Koshelev and Osipov84]}, sabot as target carrier^{[Reference Osipov, Koresheva, Baranov, Timofeev, Kapralov and Kuteev51]} with a protective cover^{[Reference Osipov, Koresheva, Baranov, Timofeev, Kapralov and Kuteev51]}.

The physical layout includes the following stages^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]} (Figures 26 and 27):

1. – Pusher No.1 drives one sabot toward a nest of the revolver.

2. – Revolver rotates and drives the sabot to the exit of the target collector.

3. – Shuttle transfers one cryogenic target from the collector to the sabot.

4. – Next rotation ensures a protective cover delivery onto the top of the sabot.

5. – One more rotation drives the assembly unit (target-&-sabot-&-cover) to the entrance of the coil.

6. – Assembly unit is pulled out of the revolver by the electromagnetic field of the coil.

7. – Pre-acceleration of the assembly unit up to 3–8  $\text{m}/\text{s}$ ^{[Reference Osipov, Koresheva, Baranov, Timofeev, Kapralov and Kuteev51]} and its delivery along the guide tube to a start position of the injector (coil or gas gun, or hybrid).

The completing steps are as follows: target-&-sabot-&-cover acceleration, sabot-&-target splitting, sabot removal, target-&-cover co-injection into a reaction chamber^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Nikitenko and Osipov49, Reference Osipov, Koresheva, Baranov, Timofeev, Kapralov and Kuteev51, Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev and Ospov121, Reference Koresheva122]}.

Figure 26. Design of the target SS based on the FST technologies: FST layering, protective cover generation (solid Xe, Ne or $\text{D}_{2}$ ), ‘target $+$ sabot $+$ cover’ repetition-rate assembly and positioning at starting point of the injector (coil or gas gun, or hybrid).

Figure 27. Sabot used for test experiments on electromagnetic acceleration at cryogenic temperatures. (a) Target-&-sabot assembly; (b) general view of a set of sabots made from soft-magnetic iron of the ARMKO type; (c) cryogenic electromagnetic injector with one coil [c1, insert into the cryostat with the coil mounted on its top (c2)], (d) experimental results on the sabot velocity $v$ ( $\text{m}/\text{s}$ ) at the coil output versus the parameter $J\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$ (here $J$ is the current amplitude, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$ is the amount of turns of the coil) – maximal overloads achieved is $a=320$  g at $v=8~\text{m}/\text{s}$ .

Thus, the FST-SS–HiPER is a system capable of filling, layering, characterizing and delivering the cryogenic targets to the HiPER target chamber.

In doing so, methodologies of the fabrication and injection processes are applicable to mass manufacturing and scaled up to the required amount of inexpensive targets.

3.5 FST-transmission line for mass manufacturing of IFE targets at high repetition rate

Technologies based on using the FSTs in each step of cryogenic target fabrication and delivery is the research area that has been intensively explored at the LPI/RAS. The aim of these targets is to demonstrate large benefits of a ‘layering – plus – delivery’ scheme for a rep-rated cryogenic target fabrication (Figure 10) in a cost-effective manner.

Moving targets co-operate all stages of the fabrication and injection processes in the FST-transmission line that is considered as a potential solution of the problem of mass target manufacturing^{[Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Ospov, Timasheva, Tolokonnikov, Panina, Belolipetskiy and Yaguzinskiy88]}. Various options for target injection are also under consideration, including gravitational injectors and electromagnetic accelerators^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev, Nikitenko and Osipov49, Reference Osipov, Koresheva, Baranov, Timofeev, Kapralov and Kuteev51, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov112, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov113, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev and Ospov121, Reference Koresheva122]}. A promising way for noncontact manipulation, positioning and transport of the free-standing cryogenic targets is using quantum levitation effect of the HTSC to develop maglev transport systems (Figures 19 and 28). Therefore, we also analyze the possibilities to develop a hybrid TI using HTSC levitation in magnetic field^{[Reference Koresheva87]}:

1. – Gravitational injector $+$ HTSC–maglev suspension technologies.

2. – Electromagnetic injector $+$ HTSC–maglev suspension technologies.

Our new developments in this area are based on using the second- generation HTSC (2G HTSC) tapes for cryogenic transport of IFE targets^{[Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Akunets, Bezotosnyi, Blokhin, Gavrilkin, Ivanenko, Koresheva, Koshelev, Mitsen and Panina111]}. The 2G HTSC tapes were obtained by a combination of advanced chemical and physical deposition techniques, together with implementing original tape architectures (SuperOx, Moscow)^{[Reference Aleksandrova, Akunets, Bezotosnyi, Blokhin, Gavrilkin, Ivanenko, Koresheva, Koshelev, Mitsen and Panina111]}. The HTSC-sabots of different designs are presented in Figure 28.

Figure 28. Levitation of different HTSC-sabots. Linear PMG-system is three permanent magnets (NdFeB) and several soft ferromagnetic inserts; circular PMG-system is an NdFeB disk commercial permanent magnet (outer diameter $=$  100 mm, inner diameter  $=$  50 mm), which is placed inside the soft ferromagnetic holder.

In the area of on-line characterization and tracking of a flying target in the target chamber it is proposed to use the Fourier holography^{[Reference Koresheva, Nikitenko, Aleksandrova, Bazdenkov, Belolipetskiy, Chtcherbakov and Osipov58, Reference Koresheva87]}, and the computer experiments have proved the efficiency of this approach.

A unique science, engineering and technological base developed at the LPI–RAS are currently used under execution of the IAEA Contract/Agreement No. 20344 entitled ‘FST-transmission line for mass manufacturing of IFE targets’^{[Reference Koresheva87]}. The project targets are the shells of ${\sim}4$  mm in diameter with a shell wall of different designs from compact and porous polymers. The layer thickness is ${\sim}200~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ for pure solid fuel and ${\sim}300~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ for in-porous solid fuel. The project goal is the development of the FST-LM of next generation (cryogenic target factory) for creation of a prototype of the FST-transmission line for IFE power plant.

Thus, the FST technique (work with free-standing and line-moving targets) as well as the equipment for its realization developed at the LPI/RAS is unique and has no analogs in the world. Subsequent advancements based on the FST technique are being made under the LPI/RAS program for developing a modular version of the target factory for reactor-scaled targets and commercialization of the obtained results^{[Reference Koresheva87, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov112, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Krokhin and Osipov113, Reference Aleksandrova, Koresheva, Koshelev and Ospov121, Reference Koresheva122]}.

The use of line-moving targets creates new possibilities for developing an efficient technology for production of environment- friendly fuel to generate electric and thermal power based on IFE. It should be emphasized that high efficiency of a nuclear power plant can be ensured by organizing simultaneous operations according to a scheme^{[Reference Sharkov123]} (see Figure 29):

$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \text{ONE DRIVER }{-}\text{ONE TARGET FACTORY }N\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \quad \text{REACTORS }(N>5).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$

For this purpose, it is necessary that the target factory supplying the cryogenic hydrogen fuel to the reactor would be based on a line production of the cryogenic targets, which can be ensured, at present, only with the help of the FST technology.

Figure 29. Creation of the IFE power plant with number of reactors $N>5$ requires creation of the target factory of line production capable to work effectively with the $N$ -number of reactors according to the following scheme: one driver – one target factory – $N$ reactors.