Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T07:55:04.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-profile tunable radiator for small satellite application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Nevena Šaponjić*
Affiliation:
ViaSat Antenna Systems SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Tomislav Debogović
Affiliation:
SWISSto12, Lausanne, Switzerland
Frédéric Bongard
Affiliation:
ViaSat Antenna Systems SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Pedro Robustillo-Bayon
Affiliation:
Airbus DS, Friedrichshafen, Germany
Maria Carolina Vigano
Affiliation:
ViaSat Antenna Systems SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Mikael Krummen
Affiliation:
ViaSat Antenna Systems SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Jean-Daniel Landis
Affiliation:
Almatech, Lausanne, Switzerland
Marco Sabbadini
Affiliation:
European Space Agency, ESTEC, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: N. Saponjic Email: nevena.saponjic@viasat.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A tunable radiator for space application has been developed to meet stringent requirements in terms of electrical and environmental specifications but also low mass, simple manufacturing and low cost. The element is based on the folded planar inverted F-antenna, with size of one quarter of wavelength. It is mechanically tunable to adjust input impedance for any various positions on the satellite body and possible obstacles and protrusions. Results in terms of radiation pattern, S parameters, shock and vibration tests are presented. The antenna operates in ultra-high frequency band (400 MHz) in linear polarization. It has been designed to act as the basic element for miniaturized multi-function antenna systems on board of small satellites that can operate in three different radiating modes and in both left and right hand circular polarizations.

Information

Type
Industrial and Engineering Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Shock environmental requirements for antenna element.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Radiating element geometry.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Current distribution on the radiating element isolated (up) and fastened to the satellite body (down).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Simulation results for radiating element return loss for different values of tuning parameters. The antenna can be mechanically tuned for any frequency in the designed range.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mechanical design of the radiating element.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. The quasi-static stress verification analysis for the radiating element.

Figure 6

Table 2. The quasi-static stress verification analysis summary of the radiating element.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Flux diagram of the complete optimization software for tuning (left) and radiation (right).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Minaturized Multi-function Antenna System consisting of eight radiating elements distributed on two opposite faces of the satellite body.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Excitation distribution and illustration of the tracking beam directions in Mode D.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Radiating element manufactured and fastened to vibration test support.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Simplified radiating elements manufactured and fastened to the cube representing the satellite body.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Radiation patterns measurement of radiating element mounted on the mechanical test fixture and the coordinate system: (a) E-plane; (b) H-plane.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Radiation patterns of radiating element: E-plane (up); H-plane (down). Legend: ··/—/-- 395/400/405 MHz; Co-pol measurement; Co-pol simulation; Cross-pol measurement; Cross-pol simulation.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Total gain of radiating element. Legend: ♦ Measurement; Simulation.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Simulated (up) and (measured) return loss of radiating element tuned to the central frequency of 400 MHz.

Figure 16

Table 3. Random and sine vibration levels.

Figure 17

Fig. 15. Shock Response Spectrum for x and z axes. The shock levels were far above the target.

Figure 18

Fig. 16. Comparison of return loss measurements for radiating element before and after mechanical tests.

Figure 19

Fig. 17. Size of the element versus frequency chart.