Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:02:29.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EQUILIBRIUM STRATEGIES IN QUEUES BASED ON TIME OR INDEX OF ARRIVAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Moshe Haviv
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel E-mail: haviv@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskella@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskerner@mscc.huji.ac.il
Offer Kella
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel E-mail: haviv@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskella@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskerner@mscc.huji.ac.il
Yoav Kerner
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel E-mail: haviv@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskella@mscc.huji.ac.il; mskerner@mscc.huji.ac.il

Abstract

In most decision models dealing with unobservable stochastic congested environments, one looks for a (Nash) equilibrium behavior among customers. This is a strategy that, if adopted by all, then under the resulting steady-state conditions; the best response for an individual is to adopt this strategy too. The purpose of this article is to look for a simple decision problem but where the assumption of steady-state conditions is removed. Specifically, we consider an M/M/N/N loss model in which one pays for trying to get service but is rewarded only if one finds an available server. The initial conditions at time 0 are common knowledge and each customer possesses his arrival time as his private information. The equilibrium profile tells each arrival whether to try (randomization allowed) given his time of arrival. We show that all join up to some point of time. At this point, there is a quantum drop in the joining probability from one to some fraction. From then on, their joining probability continuously converges to the equilibrium joining probability under the model that assumes steady state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hassin, R. & Haviv, M. (2003). To Queue or not to queue: Equilibrium behavior in queueing system. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lin, K.Y. & Ross, S.M. (2003). Admission control with incomplete information of a queueing system. Operations Research 51: 645654.Google Scholar
3.Lin, K.L. & Ross, S.M. (2004). Optimal admission control for a single-server loss queue. Journal of Applied Probability 41: 535546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ross, S.M. (1996). Stochastic processes, 2nd ed.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar