Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T22:24:53.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare Politics in Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

Lawrence M. Mead
Lawrence M. Mead
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stakes of political conflict involve contending values and issue definitions as well as policy. Welfare reform was the most important change in American domestic policy since civil rights. Its significance hinges crucially on how participants understood the issue, but existing research fails to resolve what their perceptions were. Most accounts suggest that welfare reform was an ideological contest concerning the proper scope of government, but there are other views. This study gauges the welfare agenda rigorously by coding speakers in congressional hearings on the basis of how they framed the issue and the position they took on it during the six chief episodes of welfare reform that occurred between 1962 and 1996. The reform efforts aroused four distinct divisions. Over time, positions moved rightward, but more important, the dominant issue changed: The ideological debate about government was overtaken by a more practical debate about how to manage welfare. This is the first study to track the substantive meaning of any issue in Congress over an extended period of time using hearing witnesses and a preset analytic scheme.

Information

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 345 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Martin. 1978. Welfare: The Political Economy of Welfare Reform in the United States. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bero, Lisa A., Montini, Theresa, Bryan-Jones, Katherine, and Mangurian, Christina. 2001. “Science in Regulatory Policy Making: Case Studies in the Development of Workplace Smoking Restrictions.” Tobacco Control 10: 329–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besharov, Douglas J., Samari, with Nazarin. 2001. “Child Care after Welfare Reform.” In The New World of Welfare: An Agenda for Reauthorization and Beyond, ed. Blank, Rebecca M. and Haskins, Ron, 461–81. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blank, Rebecca M., and Haskins, Ron. 2001. The New World of Welfare: An Agenda for Reauthorization and Beyond. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Smith, Ryan A.. 1994. “Antipoverty Policy, Affirmative Action, and Racial Attitudes.” In Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, ed. Danziger, Sheldon H., Sandefur, Gary D., and Weinberg, Daniel H., 365–95. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Kenneth M. 1974. The Nixon Guaranteed Income Proposal: Substance and Process in Policy Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Bryner, Gary. 1998. Politics and Public Morality: The Great American Welfare Reform Debate. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Burke, Vincent J., and Burke, Vee. 1974. Nixon's Good Deed: Welfare Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Bricher, Marie. 1997. “Problem Definition and Public Policy: Congressional Committees Confront Work, Family, and Gender, 1945–1990.” Social Forces 76: 135–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, Bricher, R. Marie, and Einwohner, Rachel L.. 1995. “Policy Alternatives and Political Change: Work, Family, and Gender on the Congressional Agenda, 1945–1990.” American Sociological Review 60: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Hirsh, C. Elizabeth. 2007. “Interest Organization, Information, and Policy Innovation in the U.S. Congress.” Sociological Forum 22: 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Sheldon H., and Weinberg, Daniel H., eds. 1986. Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn't. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth. 1996. From Opportunity to Entitlement: The Transformation and Decline of Great Society Liberalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Del Sesto, Steven L. 1980a. “Conflicting Ideologies of Nuclear Power: Congressional Testimony on Nuclear Reactor Safety.” Public Policy 28: 39–70.Google Scholar
Del Sesto, Steven L. 1980b. “Nuclear Reactor Safety and the Role of the Congressman: A Content Analysis of Congressional Hearings.” Journal of Politics 42: 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeParle, Jason. 2004. American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and the Nation's Drive to End Welfare. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The ‘Issue-Attention Cycle.’” Public Interest 28: 38–50.Google Scholar
Duncan, Greg J., and Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay. 2001a. “Welfare Reform and Children's Well-Being. In The New World of Welfare, ed. Blank, Rebecca M. and Haskins, Ron, 391–417. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Greg J., and Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay. 2001b. For Better and for Worse: Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Children and Families. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 1995. The War against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilder, George. 1981. Wealth and Poverty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goehlert, Robert U., and Sayre, John R.. 1982. The United States Congress: A Bibliography. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Grogger, Jeffrey, and Karoly, Lynn A.. 2005. Welfare Reform: Effects of a Decade of Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskins, Ron. 2001. “Liberal and Conservative Influences on the Welfare Reform Legislation of 1996.” In For Better and for Worse: Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Children and Families, ed. Duncan, Greg J. and Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay, 9–34. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Haskins, Ron. 2006. Work Over Welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel, and King, Gary. 2008. “Extracting Systematic Social Science Meaning from Text.” Working paper, Yale University, Center for the Study of American Politics.Google Scholar
Hunter, Marjorie. 1972. “Curb Is Planned in Welfare Bill.” New York Times, January 21.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1989. “How Citizens Think about Issues: A Matter of Responsibility.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 878–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1990. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues: The Case of Poverty.” Political Behavior 12: 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael B. 1986. In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael B. 1989. The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Leman, Christopher, 1980. The Collapse of Welfare Reform: Political Institutions, Policy, and the Poor in Canada and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lenkowsky, Leslie. 1986. Politics, Economics, and Welfare Reform: The Failure of the Negative Income Tax in Britain and the United States. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lødemel, Ivar, and Trickey, Heather. 2001. “An Offer You Can't Refuse”: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr., and Whitman, David Deft. 1981. The President as Policymaker: Jimmy Carter and Welfare Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Michael C. 2002. “The Logic of Positive Feedback: Telecommunications Policy through the Creation, Maintenance, and Destruction of a Regulated Monopoly.” In Policy Dynamics, ed. Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., 51–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marmor, Theodore R., Mashaw, Jerry L., and Harvey, Philip L.. 1990. America's Misunderstood Welfare State: Persistent Myths, Enduring Realities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 1986. Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 1992. The New Politics of Poverty: The Nonworking Poor in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1965. “The Professionalization of Reform.” Public Interest 1: 6–16.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1973. The Politics of a Guaranteed Income: The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Noble, Charles. 1997. Welfare as We Knew It: A Political History of the American Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. Rev. ed. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Michael. 2003. “The Force of Ideas, Problem Definition, Disjoint Policy Change and the Politics of Welfare.” Working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Fiona. 2000. “Framing Welfare Reform in Affluent Societies: Rendering Restructuring More Palatable?” Journal of Public Policy 20: 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87: 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2000. The Missing Middle: Working Families and the Future of American Social Policy. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Steensland, Brian. 2008. The Failed Welfare Revolution: America's Struggle over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Sandra J. 2004. The Culture of Education Policy. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 1996. Whose Welfare? AFDC and Elite Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, House Committee on Ways and Means. 2004. 2004 Green Book: Background Material, and Data on the Programs within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 2000. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Winston, Pamela. 2002. Welfare Policymaking in the States: The Devil in Devolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar