Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T09:25:22.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geographic contingency, not species sorting, dominates macroevolutionary dynamics in an extinct clade of neogastropods (Volutospina; Volutidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2021

Dana S. Friend*
Affiliation:
Paleontological Research Institution, 1259 Trumansburg Road, Ithaca, New York 14850 U.S.A. E-mail: dsf88@cornell.edu, wda1@cornell.edu
Brendan M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, 101 Bagby Avenue, Waco, Texas 76706 U.S.A. E-mail: Brendan_Anderson@baylor.edu
Warren D. Allmon
Affiliation:
Paleontological Research Institution, 1259 Trumansburg Road, Ithaca, New York 14850 U.S.A. E-mail: dsf88@cornell.edu, wda1@cornell.edu
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Rates of speciation and extinction are often linked to many ecological factors, traits (emergent and nonemergent) such as environmental tolerance, body size, feeding type, and geographic range. Marine gastropods in particular have been used to examine the role of larval dispersal in speciation. However, relatively few studies have been conducted placing larval modes in species-level phylogenetic context. Those that have, have not incorporated fossil data, while landmark macroevolutionary studies on fossil clades have not considered both phylogenetic context and net speciation (speciation–extinction) rates. This study utilizes Eocene volutid Volutospina species from the U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain and the Hampshire Basin, U.K., to explore the relationships among larval mode, geographic range, and duration. Based on the phylogeny of these Volutospina, we calculated speciation and extinction rates in order to compare the macroevolutionary effects of larval mode. Species with planktotrophic larvae had a median duration of 9.7 Myr, which compared significantly to 4.7 Myr for those with non-planktotrophic larvae. Larval mode did not significantly factor into geographic-range size, but U.S. and U.K. species do differ, indicating a locality-specific component to maximum geographic-range size. Non-planktotrophs (NPTs)were absent among the Volutospina species during the Paleocene–early Eocene. The relative proportions of NPTs increased in the early middle Eocene, and the late Eocene was characterized by disappearance of planktotrophs (PTs). The pattern of observed lineage diversity shows an increasing preponderance of NPTs; however, this is clearly driven by a dramatic extinction of PTs, rather than higher NPT speciation rates during the late Eocene. This study adds nuance to paleontology's understanding of the macroevolutionary consequences of larval mode.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Proposed effects of non-planktotrophy on the proportion of planktotrophic (PT) taxa (white) to non-planktotrophic (NPT) taxa (filled) based on speciation and extinction rates in four theoretical models of macroevolution. A, Rare origins of new non-planktotrophic lineages from planktotrophic taxa coupled with low speciation rates lead to persistence at low relative diversity. B, Non-planktotrophic lineages of equal or higher net speciation than planktotrophic lineages accumulate passively due to the one-way nature of the transitions. C, Non-planktotrophic lineages with higher rates of both speciation and extinction due to their low population sizes and low connectivity would result in strong fluctuations of relative diversity, with frequent extinction of non-planktotrophic lineages. D, For non-planktotrophic lineages with extremely low speciation rates, the total diversity is dictated by the frequency of new non-planktotrophic lineages from planktotrophic taxa relative to extinction rate.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Phylogeny of Paleocene–Eocene Volutospina. PT, planktotrophic; NPT, non-planktotrophic; gray circle labels, U.S. species; white circle labels, U.K. species; white circles on phylogeny, larval mode change from planktotrophic to non-planktotrophic. Black arrows, west to east Atlantic larval dispersal; white arrows, east to west Atlantic larval dispersal.

Figure 2

Table 1. Nanoplankton (NP) boundary ages and duration. Number of planktotrophs (PTs) and non-planktotrophs (NPTs) present in each zone.

Figure 3

Table 2. Larval mode (PT, planktotroph; NPT, non-planktotroph), species duration, provenance (GCP, U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain; APB, Anglo-Parisian Basin), and maximum geographic-range size (in units of 75 km, as in Hansen [1980]) of Volutospina species.

Figure 4

Table 3. Results of Mann-Whitney U-tests. **significant p-value. PT, planktotrophs; NPT, non-planktotrophs; GCP, U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain; APB, Anglo-Parisian Basin.

Figure 5

Table 4. Results of the multiple logistic regression analysis.

Figure 6

Figure 3. A, Number of planktotrophic and non-planktotrophic Volutospina. B, Relative abundance of planktotrophic and non-planktotrophic Volutospina. See zones noted in Table 1.

Figure 7

Table 5. Speciation and extinction rates (per species per million years) of planktotroph and non-planktotroph Volutospina.

Figure 8

Table 6. Calculations of speciation and extinction rates. *Time-bin length based on Papazonni et al. (2017) until NP21. NP 21–23 based on Less and Ozcan (2012). PT, planktotroph; NPT, non-planktotroph; NP, nanoplankton.

Figure 9

Table 6. Continued.