Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-54lbx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T21:23:08.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susceptibility of phaseolin (Phaseolus vulgaris) subunits to trypsinolysis and influence of dietary level of raw phaseolin on protein digestion in the small intestine of rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Carlos A. Montoya
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35590 St-Gilles, France Prairie Swine Centre, 2105 8th Street East, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7H 5N9
Jean-Paul Lallès
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35590 St-Gilles, France
Stephen Beebe
Affiliation:
Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, AA 6713 Cali, Colombia
Wolfgang B. Souffrant
Affiliation:
FBN, Dept. of Nutritional Physiology “Oskar Kellner”, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
Daniel Mollé
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1253 STLO, 65 rue St-Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
Pascal Leterme*
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre, 2105 8th Street East, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7H 5N9
*
*Corresponding author: Pascal Leterme, fax +1 306 955 2510, email pascal.leterme@usask.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present work was (a) to investigate trypsinolysis of denatured purified T phaseolin (Phaseolus vulgaris) subunits by MS and (b) to test the effect of raw T phaseolin inclusion level in diets fed chronically to rats on digestion in the small intestine. The diets contained casein as the sole protein source, or casein substituted with 33, 67 and 100 % of purified T phaseolin. Rats were fed for 10 d and then euthanised. Digesta and tissues from the first and second halves of the small intestine were prepared for electrophoresis, immunoblotting and densitometry. α-Phaseolin subunit for the T phaseolin was more resistant to trypsinolysis than β-phaseolin subunit. Nearly intact phaseolin subunits (molecular weight, MW 44–54 kDa) and partially digested phaseolin fragments (MW 17–19 and 20–24 kDa) were identified in small intestinal digesta. The concentration of intact phaseolin and of most undigested phaseolin fragments in digesta increased in the second half of the small intestine with increasing phaseolin intake (P < 0·05–0·01). The concentration of phaseolin fragments of a MW of 21–22·5 and 23–24·5 kDa in the mucosa increased linearly (P = 0·016–0·084) when the level of the T phaseolin was increased in the diet. In conclusion, the present work provides evidence that denatured T phaseolin subunits display different trypsinolysis patterns in vitro. Moreover, a high intake of raw T phaseolin impacts digestion in the small intestine of rats.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredient and analytical composition of the experimental diets*

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Predicted cleavage sites (arrow) and identified peptides of denatured α- (band b) and β (bands c and d)-phaseolin subunits (Fig. 2) by MS after trypsinolysis using the sequences proposed by Slightom et al.(9). The peptides identified by MS are shown in bold. The differences in identified peptides between β-phaseolin subunits are underlined.

Figure 2

Table 2 Densitometry analysis of protein bands obtained by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of digesta of the proximal and distal small intestine (SI) of rats fed with different levels of unheated T phaseolin

Figure 3

Table 3 Densitometry analysis of protein bands obtained by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting in the mucosa of the proximal and distal small intestine (SI) of rats fed with different levels of unheated T phaseolin

Figure 4

Fig. 2 (a) SDS-PAGE and (b) Western blotting analysis of casein (lane 2), T phaseolin (lane 3) and samples of digesta of the proximal and distal small intestine (SI1, SI2) of rats fed diets containing casein (C) or phaseolin (P) incorporated at 33, 67 or 100 % of the protein in the diet to CSI1 (4), CSI2 (5), P33SI1 (6), P33SI2 (7), P67SI1 (8), P67SI2 (9), P100SI1 (10) and P100SI2 (11). Molecular-weight markers (MW, lanes 1 and 12) are indicated on the left. (a′, b′) Densitometry profiles for the same samples, lines are means for five rats (, CSI1;, P33SI1;, P67SI1;, P100SI1;, CSI2;, P33SI2;, P67SI2; , P100SI2). Letters with (a, b) arrowheads and (a′, b′) arrows for stained bands and densitometry peaks are described in the text.

Figure 5

Fig. 3 (a) SDS-PAGE and (b) Western blotting analysis of casein (lane 2), T phaseolin (lane 3) and samples of mucosa of the proximal and distal small intestine (SI1 and SI2) of rats fed diets containing casein (C) or phaseolin (P) incorporated at 33, 67 or 100 % of the protein in the diet to CSI1 (4), CSI2 (5), P33SI1 (6), P33SI2 (7), P67SI1 (8), P67SI2 (9), P100SI1 (10) and P100SI2 (11). Molecular-weight markers (MW, lanes 1 and 12) are indicated on the left. (a′, b′) Densitometry profiles for the same samples, lines are means for five rats (, CSI1;, P33SI1;, P67SI1;, P100SI1;, CSI2;, P33SI2;, P67SI2; , P100SI2). Letters with (a, b) arrowheads and (a′, b′) arrows for stained bands and densitometry peaks are described in the text.