In the original publication of this article, a phrase was mistakenly omitted from a sentence in section IV, “Analysis of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions.” In the last full paragraph of the thirteenth page of the article (the last paragraph of subsection “Analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions,” prior to the beginning of subsection “Robustness checks”), the second-to-last sentence should read (added words bolded for emphasis):
The intermediate solution shows that the presence of long distance and legal risk and social mobilization and a major regulatory barrier and a commercial support condition is sufficient to produce the absence of the outcome: pipelines that are not (yet) built (Table 5).
The author apologizes for this error.
