Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T01:03:40.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technology-enhanced approximation to Standard English stress shift

The case of educated Yoruba (Nigerian) teenagers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Abisola Aiyeola*
Affiliation:
Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin, Nigeria
*
Corresponding author: Abisola Aiyeola; Email: abisolafelicia@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

International intelligibility among World Englishes is indisputably pertinent. Second language contexts, such as Nigeria, often adopt the Received Pronunciation (RP) to achieve intelligibility and serve as the pedagogical and descriptive basis of the language (Carr & Honeybone, 2007). However, studies on spoken Nigerian English (NE) have established that RP is unattainable by Nigerians, English language teachers inclusive (Akinjobi & Aina, 2014; Aina, 2014; Adesanya, 2020a; Agboyinu, 2018; Aiyeola, 2021). Search for an ancillary model of Standard English pronunciation in Nigeria, therefore, becomes a necessity.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Suffixation-induced stress shift in the speeches of UIYTUs

Figure 1

Figure 1. Percentage of appropriate stress shift resulting from suffixation realised in the production of UIYTUs

Figure 2

Table 2. Analysis of variance for UIYTUs’ stress shift in words with stress-shifting suffixes

Figure 3

Table 3. Frequencies and percentages of UIYTUs’ stress shift in variable words

Figure 4

Figure 2. Percentage of stress shift realised in UIYTUs’ production of variable words

Figure 5

Table 4. Analysis of variance for UIYTUs’ stress shift in variable words

Figure 6

Table 5. Multiple (between-group) comparison for UIYTUs’ stress shift

Figure 7

Figure 3. Native baseline spectrograms of perfect and perfection compared with sample HTC spectrograms of perfect and perfection as produced by UIYTU 245

Figure 8

Figure 4. Native baseline spectrograms of perfect and perfection compared with sample MTC spectrograms of perfect and perfection as produced by UIYTU 282

Figure 9

Figure 5. Native baseline spectrograms of perfect and perfection compared with sample LTC spectrograms of perfect and perfection as produced by UIYTU 258

Figure 10

Figure 6. Native baseline spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) compared with sample HTC spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) as produced by UIYTU 250

Figure 11

Figure 7. Native baseline spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) compared with sample MTC spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) as produced by UIYTU 200

Figure 12

Figure 8. Native baseline spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) compared with sample LTC spectrograms of ˈconduct (noun) and conˈduct (verb) as produced by UIYTU 211