Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-7rbh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T10:59:04.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘This is not who we are’: Gendered bordering practices, ontological insecurity, and lines of continuity under the Trump presidency

Part of: RIS Trump collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

Christine Agius Open the ORCID record for Christine Agius [Opens in a new window]
Christine Agius*
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cagius@swin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Trump presidency ushered in a heightened sense of ontological insecurity in the US, based on a national self-narrative that portrayed an emasculated America. Trump promised to return the US to primacy by pursuing policies and practices that focused on border protection, militarisation, and the vilification of external others, while amplifying racial tensions within the country. From caging immigrant children at the border, to an enabling of white supremacy and the Capitol riots, Trump's presidency was broadly seen as aberration in the self-narrative of America as a tolerant, democratic nation. In this article, I am interested in how gendered bordering practices inform ontological (in)security in Trump's narrative of the nation, domestic and external policy, and discourses. While Trump's electoral loss to Biden in 2020 has been described as a ‘return to normal’, this article instead considers how Trump's presidency exhibited lines of continuity when examined through a gender lens. Understanding how masculinism informs ideas of ontological security reveals how notions of gendered bordering, hierarchy, and ordering have been persistent threads in US politics, rather than simply an anomaly under Trump. This suggests greater potential to read ontological security in more complex terms through gendered bordering practices.

Keywords

Ontological SecurityGenderBorderingTrumpGenderSecurity/War Studies

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 385 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

The online version of this article has been updated since original publication. A notice detailing the change has been published at https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052100067X.

References

1 Alexi McCammond, ‘Biden condemns Proud Boys: “Cease and desist”’, Axios (2020), available at: {https://www.axios.com/biden-denounces-proud-boys-cease-and-desist-4738e584-53f7-43ab-a6ef-0563f985a612.html} accessed 30 May 2021; Jacob Greber, ‘Is this who we are, asks Joe Biden, as he lashes out at Trump’, Financial Review (2020), available at: {https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/is-this-who-we-are-asks-joe-biden-as-he-lashes-out-at-trump-20200603-p54yxi} accessed 30 May 2021; Molly Nagel, ‘“Dreamers” should immediately be made citizens in immigration plan: Biden’, ABC News (2019), available at: {https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-dreamers-made-citizens-immigration-plan/story?id=63908038} accessed 31 May 2021.

2 ‘Transcript of President-elect Joe Biden's victory speech’, Associated Press (2020), available at: {https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-religion-technology-race-and-ethnicity-2b961c70bc72c2516046bffd378e95de} accessed 4 June 2021.

3 John Sides, Michael Tesler, and Lynn Vavreck, Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).

4 Emily Zogbi, ‘Therapists coin new term: Trump Anxiety Disorder’, Newsweek (2018), available at: {https://www.newsweek.com/therapists-report-rise-anxiety-trump-was-elected-1046687} accessed 11 October 2018; John C. Markowitz, ‘Anxiety in the age of Trump’, Comprehensive Psychiatry, 74:A3 (2017), available at: {https//doi:10.1016/S0010-440X(17)30125-6}.

5 American Psychological Association, ‘Many Americans Stressed about Future of our Nation, New APA Stress in America Survey Reveals’ (2017), available at: {http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/02/stressed-nation.aspx} accessed 12 October 2018.

6 Mitzen, Jennifer, ‘Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 341–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kinnvall, Catarina, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security’, Political Psychology, 25:5 (2004), pp. 741–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brent J. Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State (London, UK: Routledge, 2008).

7 Jacob Pramuk, ‘Trump inauguration speech: “Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength”’, CNBC (2017), available at: {https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/donald-trump-were-transferring-power-from-washington-back-to-the-people.html} accessed 17 April 2020.

8 Vollmer, Bastian A., ‘Categories, practices and the self-reflections on bordering, ordering and othering’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 112:1 (2021), pp. 4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 8).

9 Bilgic, Ali, ‘“We are not barbarians”: Gender politics and Turkey's quest for the West’, International Relations, 29:2 (2015), pp. 198–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Delehanty, Will K. and Steele, Brent J., ‘Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory: Insights from feminist IR’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:3 (2009), pp. 523–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kinnvall, Catarina, ‘Borders and fear: Insecurity, gender and the far right in Europe’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23:4 (2015), pp. 514–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kinnvall, Catarina, ‘Feeling ontologically (in)secure: States, traumas and the governing of gendered space’, Cooperation and Conflict, 52:1 (2017), pp. 90–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kinnvall, Catarina, ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the masculinization of Indian politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3 (2019), pp. 283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Alexandra Homolar and Ronnie Scholz, ‘The power of Trump-speak: Populist crisis narratives and ontological security’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3 (2019), pp. 344–64; Christine Agius, Annika Bergman Rosamond, and Catarina Kinnvall, ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism: Masculinity, climate denial and Covid-19’, Politics, Religion and Ideology, 21:4 (2020), pp. 432–50.

11 Delehanty and Steele, ‘Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory’.

12 Christine Agius and Emil Edenborg, ‘Gendered bordering practices in Swedish and Russian foreign and security policy’, Political Geography, 71 (2019), pp. 56–66.

13 Elizabeth Frazer and Kimberly Hutchings, ‘Revisiting Ruddick: Feminism, pacifism and non-violence’, Journal of International Political Theory, 10:1 (2013), pp. 109–24.

14 V. Spike Peterson and Anne Sisson Runyan, Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2010), p. 63; Lucy Nicholas and Christine Agius, The Persistence of Global Masculinism: Discourse, Gender and Neo-Colonial Re-Articulations of Violence (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave, 2018), p. 8.

15 Nicholas and Agius, ‘The persistence of global masculinism’, p. 5.

16 Judith Butler, ‘Sexual difference as a question of ethics: Alterities of the flesh in Irigaray and Merleau-Ponty’, in Dorothea Olkowski and Gail Weiss (eds), Feminist Interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010), p. 111.

17 Peterson and Runyan, Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium, p. 63.

18 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’.

19 Andrew Hom and Brent J. Steele, ‘Anxiety, time, and ontological security's third-image potential’, International Theory, 12:2 (2020), pp. 322–36.

20 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’, p. 342.

21 Anthony Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1991), pp. 243, 54; Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’; Mitzen, Jennifer, ‘Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity: Habits, capabilities and ontological security’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2 (2006), pp. 270–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Subotić, Jelena, ‘Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 12:4 (2016), pp. 610–27Google Scholar.

22 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’, pp. 342–3.

23 Kinnvall, ‘Feeling ontologically (in)secure’, p. 91.

24 Mitzen, ‘Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity’, p. 274.

25 American Psychological Association, ‘Many Americans Stressed about Future of Our Nation’.

26 Abramson, Yoni, ‘Securing the diasporic “self” by travelling abroad: Taglit-Birthright and ontological security’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45:4 (2019), pp. 656–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zeynep Gülsah Çapan and Ayşe Zarakol, ‘Turkey's ambivalent self: Ontological insecurity in “Kemalism” versus “Erdoğanism”’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3 (2019), pp. 263–82; Special Issue ‘Postcolonial Bordering and Ontological Insecurities’, Postcolonial Studies, 20:3 (2017); Kinnvall, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism’; Kinnvall, ‘Borders and fear’; Catarina Kinnvall, ‘Ontological insecurities and postcolonial imaginaries: The emotional appeal of populism’, Humanity & Society, 42:4 (2018), pp. 523–43; Catarina Kinnvall and Paul Nesbitt-Larking, ‘Security, subjectivity and space in postcolonial Europe: Muslims in the diaspora’, European Security, 18:3 (2009), pp. 305–25; Michael Skey, ‘“A sense of where you belong in the world”: National belonging, ontological security and the status of the ethnic majority in England’, Nations and Nationalism, 16:4 (2010), pp. 715–33; Carmina Yu Untalan, ‘Decentering the self, seeing like the other: Toward a postcolonial approach to ontological security’, International Political Sociology, 14:1 (2020), pp. 40–56; Marco Vieira, ‘Understanding resilience in International Relations: The non-aligned movement and ontological security’, International Studies Review, 18:2 (2016), pp. 290–311; Marco Vieira, ‘(Re-)imagining the “self” of ontological security: The case of Brazil's ambivalent postcolonial subjectivity’, Millennium, 46:2 (2018), pp. 142–64.

27 Agius, Bergman Rosamond, and Kinnvall, ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism’; Bilgic, ‘“We are not barbarians”’; Delehanty and Steele, ‘Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory’; Kinnvall, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism’; Kinnvall, ‘Borders and fear’; Kinnvall, ‘Feeling ontologically (in)secure’; Kinnvall, ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and Hindutva’.

28 Catarina Kinnvall, Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India: The Search for Ontological Security (London, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 73.

29 Kinnvall, ‘Feeling ontologically (in)secure’.

30 Delehanty and Steele, ‘Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory’, p. 528; see also Nira Yuval-Davis, Gender & Nation (London, UK: SAGE, 1997); Joane Nagel, ‘Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21:2 (1998), pp. 242–69.

31 Bilgic, ‘“We are not barbarians”’, p. 202; V. Spike Peterson, ‘Gendered identities, ideologies, and practices in the context of war and militarism’, in Laura Sjoberg and Sandra Via (eds), Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2010), pp. 17–29.

32 V. Spike Peterson, ‘Gendered nationalism’, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 6:1 (1994), pp. 77–83; Agius, Bergman Rosamond, and Kinnvall, ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism’; Siri Hustvedt, ‘Not just economics: White populism and its emotional demons’, NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 25:1 (2017), pp. 62–5.

33 Koen Slootmaeckers, ‘Nationalism as competing masculinities: Homophobia as a technology of othering for hetero- and homonationalism’, Theory and Society, 48 (2019), pp. 239–65; Agius and Edenborg, ‘Gendered bordering practices’; Emil Edenborg, ‘Homophobia as geopolitics: “Traditional values” and the negotiation of Russia's place in the world’, in Jon Mulholland, Nicola Montagna, and Erin Sanders-McDonagh (eds), Gendering Nationalism: Intersections of Nation, Gender and Sexuality (London, UK: Palgrave, 2018), pp. 67–87.

34 Melissa Deckman and Erin Cassese, ‘Gendered nationalism and the 2016 US Presidential Election: How party, class, and beliefs about masculinity shaped voting behavior’, Politics & Gender, 17:2 (2019), pp. 277–300 (p. 295).

35 Charlotte Hooper, Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2012); Claire Duncanson, ‘Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11:1 (2009), pp. 63–80; R. W. Connell, ‘Masculinities and globalization’, Men and Masculinities, 1:1 (1998), pp. 3–23; R. W. Connell and James W. Messerschmidt, ‘Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept’, Gender & Society, 19:6 (2005), pp. 829–59; Bilgic, ‘“We are not barbarians”’.

36 Nicholas and Agius, ‘The persistence of global masculinism’, p. 5.

37 Iris Marion Young, ‘The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29:1 (2003), pp. 1–25 (p. 4).

38 Young, ‘The logic of masculinist protection’, p. 2; see also Judith Stiehm, ‘The protected, the protector, the defender’, Women's Studies International Forum, 5:3–4 (1982), pp. 367–76.

39 Wendy Brown, Walled States, Waning Sovereignty (New York, NY: Zone Books, 2010), p. 41.

40 Young, ‘The logic of masculinist protection’.

41 Brent J. Steele and Alexandra Homolar, ‘Ontological insecurities and the politics of contemporary populism: Introduction to the Special Issue’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3 (2019), pp. 214–21 (p. 214).

42 Peterson, ‘Gendered nationalism’, p. 18.

43 Agius and Edenborg, ‘Gendered bordering practices’, p. 58.

44 Noel Parker and Nick Vaughan-Williams, ‘Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the “lines in the sand” agenda’, Geopolitics, 17:4 (2012), pp. 727–33; Karine Côté-Boucher, Federica Infantino, and Mark B. Salter, ‘Border security as practice: An agenda for research’, Security Dialogue, 45:3 (2014), pp. 195–208; Corey Johnson, Reece Jones, Anssi Paasi, Louise Amoore, Alison Mountz, Mark Salter, and Chris Rumford, ‘Interventions on rethinking “the border” in border studies’, Political Geography, 30 (2011), pp. 61–9; Victoria M. Basham and Nick Vaughan-Williams, ‘Gender, race and border security practices: A profane reading of “Muscular Liberalism”’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15:4 (2013), pp. 509–27.

45 Henk van Houtum, ‘The geopolitics of borders and boundaries’, Geopolitics, 10:4 (2005), pp. 672–9; Vollmer, ‘Reflections on bordering, ordering and othering’.

46 Agius and Edenborg, ‘Gendered bordering practices’, p. 57.

47 ‘Kate Steinle: Trump outrage over murder case acquittal’, BBC News (2017), available at: {https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42190455} accessed 24 June 2021; Jamie R. Abrams, ‘The myth of enforcing border security versus the reality of enforcing dominant masculinities’, California Western Law Review, 56:1 (2020), pp. 69–102 (p. 82).

48 While walls, fences, and other barriers mark the border with Mexico, the border remains somewhat ‘leaky’, with some six hundred miles unfenced in the middle of Texas due to private property rights, treaty provisions, floodplains, and litigation issues. By the end of his presidency, only 15 miles of new primary barriers had been built where none had existed previously, and 350 miles of replacement or secondary barrier constructed. Lucy Rodgers and Dominic Bailey, ‘Trump wall: How much has he actually built?’, BBC News (2020), available at: {https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46824649} accessed 23 June 2021.

49 United States Government Publishing Office, ‘Executive Order 13768 of January 25, 2017: Enhancing public safety in the interior of the United States’, Federal Register, 82:8 (2017), pp. 8799–803, available at: {https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-30/pdf/2017-02102.pdf}.

50 Donald J. Trump, ‘NY MAG: Trump apologized to Hope Hicks when she resigned; Trump pushes death penalty for some drug dealers’, Transcript CNN Newsroom (2018), available at: {http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1803/19/cnr.06.html} accessed 14 June 2021.

51 Sarah Pierce, Jessica Bolter, and Andrew Selee, ‘US Immigration Policy under Trump: Deep Changes and Lasting Impacts’, Migration Policy Institute (2018), pp. 1–3, available at: {https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/us-immigration-policy-trump-deep-changes-impacts}.

52 Sabrina Siddiqui, ‘Trump signs “extreme vetting” executive order for people entering the US’, The Guardian (2017), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/donald-trump-muslim-refugee-ban-executive-action} accessed 28 June 2020.

53 Donald J. Trump, ‘Remarks by President Trump on the Illegal Immigration Crisis and Border Security’, Washington, DC (1 November 2018), available at: {https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-illegal-immigration-crisis-border-security/}.

54 Ibid.

55 John Wagner, ‘Trump: Immigration is “changing the culture” of Europe and its leaders “better watch themselves”’, Washington Post (2018), available at: {https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-immigration-is-changing-the-culture-of-europe-and-its-leaders-better-watch-themselves/2018/07/13/afb5d9a6-868b-11e8-8f6c-46cb43e3f306_story.html?utm_term=.67547f63816a} accessed 10 May 2020.

56 Blair Guild, ‘Trump: “If you don't have borders, then you don't have a country”’, CBS News (2018), available at: {https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-rally-south-carolina-today-governor-henry-mcmaster-today-live-stream-updates/} accessed 12 April 2020.

57 Homolar and Scholz, ‘The power of Trump-speak’, p. 346.

58 Claudio J. Perez, ‘How U.S. policy has failed immigrant children: Family separation in the Obama and Trump eras’, Family Law Quarterly, 54:1 (2020), pp. 37–66.

59 Abrams, ‘Enforcing border security versus enforcing dominant masculinities’, p. 72.

60 Kalifa J. Wright, Lydia E Pace, C. Nicholas Cueno, and Deborah Bartz, ‘Reproductive injustice at the southern border and beyond: An analysis of current events and hope for the future’, Women's Health Issues, 31:4 (2021), pp. 306–09.

61 Abrams, ‘Enforcing border security versus enforcing dominant masculinities’, pp. 94–9.

62 Pete Williams, ‘Sessions: Parents, children entering U.S. illegally will be separated’, NBC News (2018), available at: {https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/sessions-parents-children-entering-us-illegally-will-be-separated-n872081} accessed 13 June 2021.

63 Philip Bump, ‘How to mislead with statistics, DHS Secretary Nielsen edition’, Washington Post (2018), available at: {https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/06/18/how-to-mislead-with-statistics-dhs-secretary-nielsen-edition/} accessed 13 June 2021.

64 Megan Garber, ‘How to look away’, The Atlantic (2018), available at: {https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/06/how-to-look-away/563234/}.

65 Martin Savidge, Tristan Smith, and Emanuella Grinberg, ‘What Trump supporters think of family separations at the border’, CNN (2018), available at: {https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/19/us/trump-voters-family-separation/index.html} accessed 21 June 2021.

66 Leandra Hinojosa Hernández, ‘Feminist approaches to border studies and gender violence: Family separation as reproductive injustice’, Women's Studies in Communication, 42:2 (2019), pp. 130–4.

67 Vanessa Romo, ‘U.S. Army is discharging immigrant recruits who were promised citizenship’, NPR (2018), available at: {https://www.npr.org/2018/07/09/626773440/u-s-army-is-discharging-immigrant-recruits-who-were-promised-citizenship} accessed 14 August 2020.

68 Stephanie deGooyer, ‘Why Trump's denaturalization task force matters’, The Nation (2018), available at: {https://www.thenation.com/article/trumps-denaturalization-task-force-matters/}.

69 ‘Trump accuses China of “raping” US with unfair trade policy’, BBC News (2016), available at: {https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36185012} accessed 19 August 2020.

70 Sarah N. Lynch, ‘U.S. sailors captured by Iran were held at gunpoint: U.S. military’, Reuters (2016), available at: {https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-iran-boats-idUSKCN0UW1Q7} accessed 18 September 2020.

71 Paul Elliott Johnson, ‘The art of masculine victimhood: Donald Trump's demagoguery’, Women's Studies in Communication, 40:3 (2017), pp. 229–50 (pp. 240, 234).

72 Alexandra Homolar and Georg Löfflmann, ‘Populism and the affective politics of humiliation narratives’, Global Studies Quarterly, 1:1 (2021), pp. 1–11 (p. 2).

73 Alexander Smith, ‘Eric Trump says Syria strike was swayed by “heartbroken” Ivanka’, NBC News (2017), available at: {https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/eric-trump-says-syria-strike-was-swayed-heartbroken-ivanka-n745021} accessed 4 July 2019.

74 Young, ‘The logic of masculinist protection’.

75 Maximillian Alvarez, ‘Stupid, brutal world’, The Baffler (2017), available at: {https://thebaffler.com/the-poverty-of-theory/stupid-brutal-world-alvarez}.

76 Jessica Chasmar, ‘Fareed Zakaria: “Donald Trump became president” last night’, The Washington Times (2017), available at: {https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/7/fareed-zakaria-donald-trump-became-president-last-/} accessed 8 October 2021.

77 Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus, Kabir Khanna, and Anthony Salvanto, ‘What Americans think about U.S. strike on Syria’, CBS (2017), available at: {https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-poll-shows-divergence-in-americans-opinion-of-us-strike-vs-syria/}; Nicholas and Agius, ‘The persistence of global masculinism’, pp. 104–05.

78 Johnson, ‘The art of masculine victimhood’, p. 241.

79 Jeffrey Lewis, ‘The “Mother of All Bombs” isn't that big: Why did it unsettle us so much?’, The Washington Post (2017), available at: {https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/04/14/the-mother-of-all-bombs-isnt-that-big-why-did-it-unsettle-us-so-much/?utm_term=.4a9ab5a927ff} accessed 30 May 2020.

80 Clara Eroukhmanoff, ‘A feminist reading of foreign policy under Trump: Mother of all bombs, wall, and the “locker room banter”’, Critical Studies on Security, 5:3 (2017), pp. 177–81.

81 James W. Messerschmidt and Tristan Bridges, ‘Trump and the politics of fluid masculinities’, Gender & Society blog (2017), available at: {https://gendersociety.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/trump-and-the-politics-of-fluid-masculinities/}.

82 Banu Gökarıksel and Sara H. Smith, ‘“Making America great again”? The fascist body politics of Donald Trump’, Political Geography, 54 (2016), pp. 79–81 (p. 80).

83 Nina C. Krickel-Choi, ‘The embodied state: Why and how physical security matters for ontological security’, Journal of International Relations and Development (2021), available at: {https//doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00219-x}; Krahmann, Elke, ‘The market for ontological security’, European Security, 27:3 (2018), pp. 356–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Diane Negra and Julia Leyda, ‘Querying “Karen”: The rise of the angry white woman’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24:1 (2021), pp. 350–7 (p. 352).

85 Lauren Fedor, ‘Trump seeks to woo “suburban housewives of America”’, Financial Times (2020), available at: {https://www.ft.com/content/ee9271b6-4930-465f-b697-0879ea1a38a1} accessed 12 November 2020.

86 Apryl Williams, ‘Black memes matter: #LivingWhileBlack with Becky and Karen’, Social Media + Society, October to December (2020), pp. 1–14 (p. 8).

87 Stephen R. Vina, Blas Nunez-Neto, and Alyssa Bartlett Weir, Civilian Patrols Along the Border: Legal and Policy Issues, CRS Report for Congress (2006), available at: {https://sgp.fas.org/crs/homesec/RL33353.pdf}.

88 Greg Grandin, ‘How violent American vigilantes at the border led to Trump's wall’, The Guardian (2019), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/28/how-violent-american-vigilantes-at-the-border-led-to-trumps-wall}; Cynthia Weber, ‘Design, translation, citizenship: Reflections on the virtual (de)territorialization of the US–Mexico border’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30:3 (2012), pp. 482–96 (pp. 485–6); Parsons, John R., ‘Border militias: Experience, narrative, and the moral imperative to act’, Journal of Extreme Anthropology, 4:1 (2020), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Timothy B. Grevette, ‘Politics, time, space, and attitudes toward US–Mexico border security’, Political Geography, 65 (2018), pp. 107–16 (pp. 109–10).

90 FBI Uniform Crime Reporting, ‘2017 Hate Crime Statistics’ (2018), available at: {https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2017/topic-pages/incidents-and-offenses} accessed 19 August 2021.

91 Katayoun Kishi, ‘Assaults Against Muslims in U.S. Surpass 2001 Level’, Pew Research Centre (2017), available at: {http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/15/assaults-against-muslims-in-u-s-surpass-2001-level/}.

92 FBI Uniform Crime Reporting, Hate Crime Statistics, available at: {https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/ucr/publications#Hate-Crime%20Statistics} accessed 19 August 2021.

93 Nick Niedzwiadek, ‘Trump goes after Black Lives Matter, “toxic propaganda” in schools’, Politico (2020), available at: {https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/17/trump-black-lives-matter-1619-project-417162} accessed 5 July 2021.

94 ‘Full text: Trump's comments on white supremacists, “alt-left” in Charlottesville’, Politico (2017), available at: {https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/15/full-text-trump-comments-white-supremacists-alt-left-transcript-241662} accessed 28 March 2020.

95 Homolar and Löfflmann, ‘Populism and affective politics of humiliation narratives’, p. 5.

96 ‘Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?’, BBC News (2021), available at: {https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55640437} accessed 11 April 2021.

97 Johnson, ‘The art of masculine victimhood’, p. 239.

98 Levinger, Matthew, ‘Love, fear, anger: The emotional arc of populist rhetoric’, Narrative and Conflict: Explorations in Theory and Practice, 6:1 (2017), p. 12Google Scholar.

99 ‘The Capitol siege: The arrested and their stories’, NPR (2021), available at: {https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories#database} accessed 21 June 2021.

100 Andrew McCormick, ‘Madness on Capitol Hill’, The Nation (2021), available at: {https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/capitol-trump-insurrection-explosions/} accessed 8 February 2021.

101 Cannen, Emma, ‘Avant-garde militarism and a post-hip-hop president’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16:2 (2014), pp. 255–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 259–60).

102 Agius, Christine, ‘Ordering without bordering: Drones, the unbordering of late modern warfare and ontological insecurity’, Postcolonial Studies, 20:3 (2017), pp. 370–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

103 Rachel Weiner, ‘Obama drone joke: Was it offensive?’, Washington Post (2010), available at: {http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/05/obama-drone-joke-was-it-offens.html}.

104 Lloyd Cox and Steve Wood, ‘“Got him”: Revenge, emotions, and the killing of Osama bin Laden’, Review of International Studies, 43:1 (2017), p. 112–29.

105 Grevette, ‘Politics, time, space, and attitudes toward US–Mexico border security’, pp. 107–09.

106 It was this agreement that Trump argued he was continuing from the Obama administration when he was criticised for his ‘zero tolerance’ policy. But his claim that Obama deported more immigrants and detained children is somewhat untrue. Under Obama, voluntary as well as involuntary removals were counted together. While detentions existed under the Obama administration, Trump's ‘zero tolerance’ policy saw anyone crossing the border without inspection charged with a criminal offence and taken to criminal detention facilities where children were not permitted. While detentions continued under Obama with the Secure Communities programme (2008–14), criminality was reserved for serious crimes that threatened national security. See Perez, ‘How U.S. policy has failed immigrant children’.

107 deGooyer, ‘Why Trump's denaturalization task force matters’.

108 Alison Rourke, ‘“Putin's poodle”: Newspapers declare Trump a traitor after Helsinki summit’, The Guardian (2018), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jul/17/putins-poodle-newspapers-declare-trump-a-traitor-after-helsinki-summit}.

109 ‘Captain America: Donald Trump is “Putin's puppet”’, BBC (2018), available at: {https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-44856717}; Anushay Hossain, ‘Hillary Clinton was exactly right about Trump being Putin's puppet’, CNN (2018), available at: {https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/16/opinions/clinton-trump-puppet-opinion-hossain/index.html}; Dartunorro Clark, ‘“Shameful”, “treasonous”, “disgraceful”: Trump slammed from all sides for news conference with Putin’, NBC News (2018), available at: {https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/shameful-treasonous-disgrace-lawmakers-pundits-react-trump-s-joint-news-n891736}.

110 Ruth Ben-Ghiat, ‘Trump and Putin: The pictures tell the story’, CNN (2018), available at: {https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/18/opinions/these-pictures-tell-story-of-trump-and-putin-ben-ghiat/index.html}.

111 Wiedlack, Katharina, ‘Enemy number one or gay clown? The Russian president, masculinity and populism in US media’, NORMA, 15:1 (2020), pp. 59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 Steve Holland, ‘Obama, Clinton in new flap, over nuclear weapons’, Reuters (2016), available at: {https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-obama-idUSN0238110020070803}.

113 Delehanty and Steele, ‘Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory’; Cynthia Enloe, The Big Push: Exposing and Challenging the Persistence of Patriarchy (Oxford, UK: Myriad, 2017).

114 Cited in Gökarıksel and Smith, ‘“Making America great again”?’, p. 80.

115 Eklundh, Emmy, ‘Excluding emotions: The performative function of populism’, Partecipazione e conflitto, 13:1 (2020), pp. 107–31Google Scholar.

116 Amanda Gorman, ‘The Hill We Climb: The Amanda Gorman poem that stole the inauguration show’, The Guardian (2021), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/20/amanda-gorman-poem-biden-inauguration-transcript}.

117 Carol Cohn, ‘The perils of mixing masculinity and missiles’, New York Times (2018), available at: {https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/security-masculinity-nuclear-weapons.html}.

118 Jon Herbert, Trevor McCrisken, and Andrew Wroe, The Ordinary Presidency of Donald J. Trump (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).

119 Gorkariksel and Smith in Philip E. Steinberg, Sam Page, Jason Dittmer, Banu Gökariksel, Sara B. Smith, Alan Ingram, and Natalie Koch, ‘Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on’, Political Geography, 62 (2018), pp. 207–15 (p. 210).